1 Introduction
2 Defect types
2.1 Point defect
Fig.2 (a) Top view and side view of point defects: Schottky vacancy, Frenkel defect, adatoms, interstitial atom and substitutional atom. (b) The diagram of edge defects. (c) The diagram of grain boundary: low-angle grain boundary and high-angle grain boundary. (d) The occupation of energy levels caused by different defects. |
2.2 Grain boundary
3 Improve the quality during the growth
3.1 Vacancy
Fig.3 (a) Schematic illustration of the CVD setup for the NaX-assisted (X = Cl, Br, and I) MoS2 growth, and Raman intensity mappings in two types of MoS2 samples with NaBr and without salt [66]. (b) Large area HAADF-STEM images of MoSe2, Mo0.98W0.02Se, and Mo0.82W0.18Se2 monolayers from left to right, respectively (above). Enlarged HAADF-STEM images from the regions contained by dashed squares in corresponding images above after Lucy–Richardson deconvolution (below). The Se vacancies with one missing Se atoms are labeled by V, and those with two missing Se atoms are labeled by H [70]. (c) Optical images of MoS2 grown on sapphire for 30 min with O2 flow rate ranging from 0 to 5 sccm. The insets are AFM height images of MoS2 grown on sapphire under different O2 flow rates (0−2 sccm) [71]. (d, e) Typical Raman (d) and photoluminescence (e) spectra of as-grown MoS2 with (red) and without (black) O2 carrier gas, respectively [71]. |
3.2 Grain boundary
Fig.4 (a) Schematics of the improved CVD synthesis for the high-throughput growth of submillimeter monolayer TMDC single crystals [72]. (b) SEM images of WS2 crystals: on the substrate without self-stacking, on the self-stacked substrate for forming micro-reactors, and on the self-stacked substrate placed in the circumfluence CVD chamber, respectively. The insets show the typical WS2 flakes correspondingly [72]. (c) Corresponding OM images and Raman spectra of MoS2 synthesized using MoO3 powder (above) and Mo foil (below) as precursors [79]. (d) Optical images of the monolayer WS2 crystals that were grown from FWO3, PTWO3, AWO3, and PTAWO3 powders, respectively [80]. (e) Optical microscopy images and domain size distribution histogram of MoS2 grown on c-plane sapphire and molten glass, respectively [81]. (f) Typical optical images of monolayer MoS2 assisted grown by three different seeding promoters corresponding to PTAS, CuPc and CV, respectively [95]. (g) OM and AFM images of MoS2 grown on SiO2 without −OH (left) and with −OH (right), respectively [98]. |
4 Improve the quality by post-treatment
4.1 Sulfur vacancy
4.1.1 Post-treatment by dry method
Fig.5 (a) A 3D schematic plot of layered WS2, with the sulfur atoms shown in yellow, tungsten atoms in gray and the N atoms in blue [100]. (b) Atomic structures of WS2 without nitrogen plasma treatment (left) and with nitrogen plasma treatment (right) that were obtained via STEM. The insets are schematic diagram of sulfur atom (yellow round) and tungsten atom (brown round), as well as the corresponding SAED pattern [100]. (c) Schematic illustration of for hydrogen-doped MoS2 [102]. (d) Band diagram showing the evolution of MoS2 Fermi level: before hydrogenation, upon the first exposure to hydrogen, and after the complete hydrogenation, respectively [102]. (e) STM images of MoS2/G/Au after annealing at different temperature [105]. |
4.1.2 Post-treatment by wet method
Fig.6 (a) PL images of a MoS2 monolayer before (above) and after treatment (below). Insets show optical micrographs [114]. (b) ADF-STEM images of five pristine 1L-MoS2 samples (top panels) and the distribution maps (bottom panels) of the V S (yellow dot) and VS2 (red dot) defects measured from the corresponding ADF-STEM images. Note that a noticeable antisite defect, MoS2, is observed and is denoted by an arrow on the ADF-STEM images [111]. (c) The HAADF images and Z-contrast mapping in the areas marked with yellow rectangles before (left) and after (right) PSS-induced SVSH, reveal that the sulfur vacancies (1S) are healed spontaneously by the sulfur adatom clusters on MoS2 surface through a PSS-induced hydrogenation process [118]. (d) Kinetics and transient states of the reaction between a single SV and MPS. There are two energy barriers, the first one (0.51 eV) is due to the S−H bond breaking, and the second one (0.22 eV) is due to S−C bond breaking. The inset shows the chemical structure of MPS [120]. (e) High-resolution aberration-corrected TEM images of as-exfoliated (left) and TS-treated (right) monolayer MoS2 sample, showing the significant reduction of SV by MPS treatment. The SVs are highlighted by red arrows. The overlaid blue and yellow symbols mark the position of Mo and S atoms, respectively [120]. (f) Series of STM images of MoS2 (0001) surface before and after adsorption of dodecanethiol molecules [123]. (g) Schematic of probable repairing processes [123]. |
4.2 Selenium vacancy repair
4.2.1 Post-treatment by dry method
Fig.7 (a) AFM characterization of partially laser modified WSe2 flakes. For each of these flakes, the portion on the right corresponds to laser modified region. (b) Proposed photo-induced chemical changes to the MoSe2 sample. (c) PL intensity mappings of an individual MoSe2 flake before and after HBr treatment. (d) Optical microscopic images of MoSe2 flakes on SiO2/Si (upper panel) and those of the same flakes after the deposition of ZnPc by SDC methods (lower panel). The second column shows the thickness of the as-grown and functionalized MoSe2 using the SDC method, analyzed by AFM. (e) PL intensity as a function of the excitation power for as-grown MoSe2 and MoSe2 + ZnPc. |
4.2.2 Post-treatment by wet method
Tab.1 Summary of important defect repairing methods in TMDCs. |
Defect type | Repair stage | Properties | Repairing method | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sulfur vacancies | Growth process | N-type doping | Introducing NaX | [66] |
Lower mobility | Oxygen-assisted CVD | [71] | ||
Post-treatment | Lower on/off current ratio | N2, O2, H2 plasma treatment | [100-102] | |
Annealing | [105] | |||
Weaker PL intensity | TFSI treatment | [110] | ||
PSS treatment | [119] | |||
MPS treatment | [120] | |||
Selenium vacancies | Growth process | N-type doping | Introducing other metallic oxide powder | [70] |
Post-treatment | Weaker PL intensity | Oxygen passivizationAnnealing | [138][139] | |
HBr treatment | [140] | |||
Lower mobility | MPc treatment | [135] | ||
Grain boundaries | Growth process | Higher domain density Small size | Space confinement effect | [72] |
Double-tube system with one-side sealed inner tube | [73] | |||
Lower mobility Lower on/off current | Two-stage (induction and growth stage) CVD method | [74] | ||
Selection and pretreatment of the substrate and source | [79-81] | |||
Introducing catalysts and additives | [88-99] | |||
Post-treatment | − |