1 Introduction
Because natural solar-blind ultraviolet (SB-UV) light with a wavelength of 200−300 nm is totally absorbed by the ozone layer, propagation of SB-UV signals loaded on artificial sources would not be disturbed on the earth’s surface. Therefore, the detection of SB-UV light facilitates applications including short-distance confidential communication, flame detection, missile warning systems, and so on [
1-
6]. Nevertheless, due to a severe attenuation during propagation, ultrasensitive SB-UV detectors with a high responsivity, a low noise-equivalent power (NEP), a high detectivity and a low dark current are lacking and highly demanded [
7-
12]. Different types of ultrasensitive detectors have been explored, but there still are non-negligible drawbacks. Commercial photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are very sensitive but often severely constrained by their complicated structure, large size, and high energy consumption [
13,
14]. Detectors based on normal p−n junctions, heterojunctions or Schottky diodes show huge potential in self-powered detection but often have poor figures of merit [
5,
15-
20]. Even though avalanche photodiodes (APDs) have an ultrahigh sensitivity even down to a single photon [
21], the large voltage required for triggering an avalanche effect induces a high dark count rate and low energy efficiency.
Photoconductors based on some emerging semiconducting materials and their heterostructures have been demonstrated with high photoconductive gains and sensitivities, mainly due to the combination of a prolonged lifetime of majority and a short transit time [
22-
28]. With a simple device structure, these new-type photoconductors have a high potential for advanced SB-UV detectors. But this signal amplification mechanism usually leads to a slow response, a small bandwidth, and a high uncertainty. To address these problems, detectors based on ferroelectric semiconductor α-In
2Se
3 were explored very recently, where an ultrahigh gain induced by the light-induced polarization switching was found to endow the devices with ultrasensitive detection of even down to tens of photons [
29]. Owing to the two-dimensional (2D) layered crystalline structure nature, an appropriate bandgap (1.38 eV) and a ferroelectric nature, α-In
2Se
3 also shows possibilities to construct new electronic and optoelectronic devices, including ultrasensitive SB-UV detectors.
In the meanwhile, neuromorphic analog computing based on synaptic devices has been studied for its high energy efficiency and parallel computation ability. Most synaptic devices are usually used in artificial neural networks (ANNs), connecting neurons with electrically programmable weights [
30-
35] and showing long-term plasticity, i.e., long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Among these, memristors [
36,
37], phase change memories [
38], and 2D heterostructures [
30,
34,
39] have been widely implemented for their extraordinary programmability. On the other hand, a series of optoelectronic memories have been also implemented whose conductance can be programmed by both optical and electrical pulses, which are often called optoelectronic synapses [
32]. Even with good plasticity, most optoelectronic synapses still have low energy efficiency because of the strong light (radiant intensity over 0.1 mW/cm
2) required for the weight modulations [
30,
40-
43]. Therefore, a more sensitive optoelectronic synapse is also demanded.
In this work, we demonstrate an α-In2Se3 phototransistor for ultrasensitive UV detection and neuromorphic computing. Benefiting from the inherent light-induced polarization switching mechanism in α-In2Se3, the phototransistor shows an ultrahigh sensitivity of 17.85 fW to SB-UV light. Moreover, this phototransistor has a fast response time of 400 μs, an ultrahigh responsivity of 2.6 × 105 A/W, a high detectivity of 1.3 × 1016 Jones and an ultralow NEP of 4.2 × 10−20 W/Hz1/2. Implemented as optoelectronic synapses in a 784 × 300 × 10 ANN, the phototransistor shows stable LTP and LTD behavior after being applied ultraweak optical pulses (0.003 mW/cm2) and identical gate electrical pulses respectively. When testing on a classification task, this ANN shows a high accuracy of 68.2% and a small degradation of 12% at a 50% noise level. These properties make this phototransistor a potential candidate for constructing advanced SB-UV photodetectors and optoelectronic synapses.
2 Methods
2.1 Device fabrications
Si wafers covered with 300 nm thick SiO2 were used as the substrates. The bottom gate of Cr/Au (8/30 nm) was patterned using electron beam lithography (EBL) and deposited using thermal vapor deposition. Then, HfO2 with a thickness of 25 nm was deposited as the gate insulator using atomic layer deposition (ALD). Then, mechanically exfoliated α-In2Se3 was transferred onto the stack using a standard wet-transfer method. Then, source and drain electrodes of Cr/Au (8/80 nm) were patterned and deposited. Lastly, a capping layer of 5 nm thick Al2O3 was deposited for encapsulation.
2.2 Electronic and optoelectronic measurements
Electronic and optoelectronic performances of the as-fabricated phototransistors were tested on a semiconductor analyzer system (Keysight B1500A). Temporal responses were collected with an LED source of 275 nm and a laser source of 360 nm. All tests were conducted under the condition of a high vacuum (<10−6 Torr) and a low temperature (~80 K). Illumination light powers were calibrated by a commercial photodiode power meter (Thorlabs, Inc.) and a commercial PMT photon-counter (Excelitas Technologies Corp.) (Supplementary Fig. S1).
2.3 Simulations
The ANN model was constructed and simulated on the CrossSim platform (webpage: cross-sim.sandia.gov). During the training process, synaptic weights of the ANN were updated following a backpropagation logarithm according to the LTP/LTD behavior experimentally tested. A standard image dataset (namely F-MNIST) containing 60000 images of 10 classes was used to train and test the constructed ANN.
3 Results
3.1 Basic characterizations
The schematic structure of the α-In
2Se
3 phototransistor is shown in Fig.1(a). High-k HfO
2 was selected as the gate dielectric hence only a small gate voltage is needed for the electrical operations [
44]. And apart from preventing contaminants from the environment, the top Al
2O
3 layer can induce an electron doping effect and strengthen the n-type semiconducting characteristic of the channel α-In
2Se
3 (Supplementary Fig. S2). After the fabrication process, the Raman spectrum of the channel was tested. As shown in Fig.1(b), peaks observed at 104, 181 and 193 cm
−1 are corresponding to the
,
and
modes of α-In
2Se
3 respectively, which is consistent with previous results [
45,
46]. This demonstrates the high crystalline quality of the channel material after device fabrication.
As the channel of the phototransistor, α-In
2Se
3 is a kind of 2D layered ferroelectric semiconductor whose ferroelectricity originates from the broken symmetry of the in-layer quintuple Se−In−Se−In−Se where the displacement of middle Se atoms induces the polarization switching. And the ferroelectric polarization of α-In
2Se
3 can be decomposed into two strongly coupled components, in-plane and out-of-plane components. Even though both components can contribute to tuning the conductance of α-In
2Se
3-based transistors [
47], the out-of-plane polarization component is mainly in our consideration because it contributes to the most channel conductance under a small drain voltage [
48-
51], which can be proved by the no-hysteresis double-sweep output curve compared to a double-sweep transfer curve with a large hysteresis window (Supplementary Fig. S3). To confirm the ferroelectricity of the exfoliated α-In
2Se
3, a local voltage sweeping using a piezoelectric force microscope (PFM) tip was conducted and the amplitude and phase signals were collected. As shown in Fig.1(c), an obvious hysteresis in phase with a 180° reversal and a butterfly-like curve of amplitude can be observed, which validates the ferroelectric nature of α-In
2Se
3 [
52].
As a ferroelectric semiconductor, α-In
2Se
3 shows two unusual features. The first is that its conductance states are strongly correlated with the ferroelectric polarization directions. Due to the accumulation/depletion of electrons at the α-In
2Se
3/gate dielectric interface, transistors based on α-In
2Se
3 have a nonvolatile low-resistance/high-resistance state (LRS/HRS) for ferroelectric polarization down/up state [
53]. The second is that, because of the suitable bandgap and the existence of an imprint effect, light can flip the ferroelectricity of α-In
2Se
3 into a polarization down state, hence a nonvolatile LRS [
29,
54,
55]. A brief band diagram analysis can be seen in Supplementary Fig. S4. In total, the conductance of the α-In
2Se
3 phototransistor can be repeatedly switched by electricity and light. This can be seen from the temporal response of an α-In
2Se
3 phototransistor to electrical and optical pulses as shown in Fig.1(d). The phototransistor was initially at an LRS with a large drain current of 0.11 μA. Then, an 8 V gate pulse (
VGS) was applied at 1−2 s, setting the phototransistor into a polarization-up state and HRS. And a following −9 V gate pulse at 3−4 s can set it back to a polarization down state and LRS. Similar conductance switching can be also observed using electrical and UV light pulses, where an LRS can be achieved after being applied a 275 nm UV light pulse at 7−8 s. A retention time of over 10000 s can be achieved both at LRS and HRS (see Supplementary Fig. S5).
3.2 Photodetection performance
UV detection performance of the phototransistor was investigated by testing its temporal responses to lights with various intensities and wavelengths. Before light illumination, the phototransistor was set into an HRS with a very low dark current of below 0.3 pA using a positive gate pulse and this low dark current can be very stable with a long retention time of over 10000 s (Supplementary Fig. S6). As shown in Fig.2(a), temporal response under 5 cycles of alternating optical and electrical pulses were collected. In each period, 275 nm SB-UV lights with different power intensities were applied for 5 seconds. Note that the active powers are the multiplications of the incident power densities and the device channel area (30 μm
2). The weakest power used is 17.85 fW, much weaker than most exiting SB-UV photodetectors (as will be discussed later). A cycle test of a 360 nm light was also conducted with the weakest power of 0.57 fW (Supplementary Fig. S7), showing the sub-fW level sensitivity of the detector at a longer wavelength. In response to UV light, the rise time can be as fast as 400 μs, and a 50 ns gate pulse can be applied to reset the detector to the initial HRS (Supplementary Figs. S8 and S9). One possible reason for the difference between these two values is that the gate voltage can induce a global electric field in the α-In
2Se
3 channel which facilitates fast reversed-domain nucleation and growth [
56], while a light-induced switching process is constrained by the carrier generation and migration process.
Responsivity (
Rph) is a basic figure of merit for a photodetector, which is defined by
Rph =
Iph/
Pin, where
Iph is photocurrent and
Pin is the power of incident light received by the detector. Owing to the ultra-low dark current at the HRS and the large current gain during light illumination,
Iph is approximately equal to the current after illumination. As shown in Fig.2(b), responsivity achieves a maximum value at a threshold power
Pth. And
Pth is equal to 0.23 pW for 275 nm and 1.96 fW for 360 nm. The maximum responsivity is 2.6 × 10
5 A/W and 4.5 × 10
6 A/W for 275 nm and 360 nm, respectively. The ultrahigh responsivity originates from the high gain (
G), which is defined as
G =
hcRph/(
eλ), where
h is Planck’s constant,
c is the velocity of light,
e is the electron charge and
λ is the wavelength. The calculated gain of the phototransistor reaches 1.6×10
7 at most [Supplementary Fig. S10(a)], which is comparable to commercial photon-number-resolved detectors like avalanche photodiodes (APDs) and photomultipliers (PMTs) (between 10
4 to 10
10) [
57]. The high gain results from the high efficiency of the light-induced polarization switching process, which induces a giant current change under weak light illumination due to the ferroelectric polarization-related conducting effect.
A low noise current (in) is important for sensitive photodetectors. Here, by fitting the noise spectrum [Supplementary Fig. S10(b)], an overall noise current of below 0.1 pA/Hz1/2 can be obtained, which is very low compared to other detectors. Combining noise current and responsivity, noise-equivalent power (NEP) can be calculated by
where is the root-mean-squared noise current over all frequencies. NEP tells the minimum incident light power that can be recognized out. Because of the low noise current and ultrahigh responsivity, the overall NEP of the device is below 2 × 10−17 W/Hz1/2, achieves 4.2 × 10−20 W/Hz1/2 at 275 nm and the lowest value of 2.4 × 10−21 W/Hz1/2 at 360 nm [Fig.2(c)]. Detectivity is usually a comprehensive figure of merit for photodetectors and is defined as
where A is the device active area and Δf is the bandwidth. Detectivity of the phototransistor can reach 1.3 × 1016 Jones at 275 nm and 2.3 × 1017 Jones at 360 nm (Supplementary Fig. S10(c)). The repeatability of the above figures of merit was validated on another device (Supplementary Fig. S11).
The sensitivity of this detector can achieve a higher level when it is set to a photon-counting mode, similar to the Geiger mode of APDs. Fig.2(d) shows the dependence of photocurrent on photon number. We see the photocurrent is exponentially related to the number of incident photons within a tolerable error range. And the device can distinguish photon numbers as low as 5000. In addition, the extrapolated photocurrent at the single photon (1.4 pA) exceeds the dark current (~0.3 pA), indicating that it is possible to achieve a photon-number resolution by using more accurate readout circuits and single-photon sources. Commercial PMTs and APDs are very sensitive as well but are usually limited by the large size and high operating voltage. While our phototransistor may address these problems due to its low operating voltage (<5 V) and the ability to be freely integrated with Si or other 2D materials by van der Waals integration, and the dielectric layer HfO2 can also be replaced by other oxides like SiO2 or Al2O3 (see Supplementary Fig. S12), which endows the device with a wider application range.
To sum up the overall performance of the phototransistor as a UV detector, comparisons among this phototransistor and other previously reported UV detectors are shown in Fig.2(e) and (f). In contrast to other types of prevailing UV detectors, especially SB-UV detectors (GaN, h-BN), narrow-bandgap detectors (Te, BP), and commercial products (PMTs and APDs), the α-In2Se3 phototransistor has the highest responsivity and the lowest NEP. It is also worth noting that our device has the weakest detectable power, which further proves its huge potential for ultrasensitive UV detection.
3.3 Neuromorphic computing
In brains of human beings, neurons are interconnected by numerous synapses, through which active signals are transported from one neuron to other neurons. During signal transportation, connection strengths, i.e., weights of synapses, can be tuned flexibly to realize a learning process. This behavior of synapses is called long-term plasticity, including long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Inspired by this, our phototransistor can be implemented as an optoelectronic “synapse” in artificial neural networks (ANNs), because its conductance state can be tuned as the weight with electrical or optical signals.
As shown in Fig.3(a), we demonstrate LTP and LTD serially for 19 cycles. In each LTP-LTD weight modulation process, we adopted an identical pulse scheme, where 100 1 ms-width optical pulses and subsequent 100 1 ms-width gate electrical pulses were applied on the synapse with a fixed pulse interval of 50 ms. After each optical/electrical pulse, the synapse is changed to a new conductance state and kept stable until the next pulse comes. Note that the optical pulses have an amplitude of about 1 pW, corresponding to a radiant intensity of 0.003 mW/cm
2, which is very weaker compared to that of most other optoelectronic synapses [
30,
40-
43]. After successfully demonstrating LTP and LTD on a single device, we conducted an α-In
2Se
3 phototransistor-based ANN via simulation. We constructed an ANN containing 784 × 300 × 10 full-connected three-layer neurons [as illustrated in Fig.3(b)] on the CrossSim platform (the details can be seen in Section 2). The experimentally collected LTP and LTD were used as guidance for weight updating during the training process. The input neurons receive grayscale values of pixels in one input image at one time and they are transferred through weighted artificial synapses to the hidden layer and ultimately to the output layer. The ultimate scores in 10 output neurons decide the recognized class of the input images.
Finally, its performance on the Fashion-MNIST (F-MNIST) dataset with different noise levels was calculated and evaluated [
58]. Recognition accuracy evolving during the training process at different noise levels was computed and the results are shown in Fig.3(c). After 15 training epochs, recognition accuracy reaches 68.2% without noise and can still achieve 56.6% even with a 50% noise level, as shown in Fig.3(d). These results validate the feasibility of implementing the phototransistor as an optoelectronic synapse. And it also can be implemented as a pure-electric synapse with pure-electric LTP/LTD behaviors, which further endows it with a wider application range in neuromorphic computing (Supplementary Fig. S13).
4 Conclusion
In summary, we fabricate an α-In2Se3 phototransistor and demonstrate its extraordinary UV detection performance and potential as an optoelectronic synapse for constructing neuromorphic computing hardware. As an SB-UV (275 nm) detector, the phototransistor has an ultraweak detectable power of 17.85 fW, a response time of 400 μs, an ultrahigh gain of 1.2 × 106, a responsivity of 2.6 × 105 A/W, a detectivity of 1.3 × 1016 Jones and an ultralow NEP of 4.2 × 10−20 W/Hz1/2. At a longer wavelength (360 nm), its minimum detectable power and NEP can be decreased to 0.57 fW and 2.4 × 10−21 W/Hz1/2 respectively, responsivity and detectivity can be promoted to 4.5 × 106 A/W and 2.3 × 1017 Jones respectively. These figures of merits are the best among various UV detectors. Moreover, working in a photon-counting mode, as low as 5000 photons can be distinguished and a photon-number resolution might be realized. We further implement the device as an artificial optoelectronic synapse for neuromorphic computing. The device shows LTP and LTD behavior when being applied identical optical pulses and gate electrical pulses. With optically/electrically alterable conductance, the phototransistor is used to construct a 784 × 300 × 10 artificial neural network for image recognition. After being trained for 15 epochs, the accuracy can achieve 68.2% when recognizing F-MNIST images without noise, and just decreased by 12% even with a 50% noise, showing a good noise-tolerance.