RESEARCH ARTICLE

XFEM schemes for level set based structural optimization

  • Li LI 1,2 ,
  • Michael Yu WANG , 1 ,
  • Peng WEI 3
Expand
  • 1. Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 2. School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China

Received date: 28 Sep 2012

Accepted date: 20 Oct 2012

Published date: 05 Dec 2012

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

In this paper, some elegant extended finite element method (XFEM) schemes for level set method structural optimization are proposed. Firstly, two- dimension (2D) and three-dimension (3D) XFEM schemes with partition integral method are developed and numerical examples are employed to evaluate their accuracy, which indicate that an accurate analysis result can be obtained on the structural boundary. Furthermore, the methods for improving the computational accuracy and efficiency of XFEM are studied, which include the XFEM integral scheme without quadrature sub-cells and higher order element XFEM scheme. Numerical examples show that the XFEM scheme without quadrature sub-cells can yield similar accuracy of structural analysis while prominently reducing the time cost and that higher order XFEM elements can improve the computational accuracy of structural analysis in the boundary elements, but the time cost is increasing. Therefore, the balance of time cost between FE system scale and the order of element needs to be discussed. Finally, the reliability and advantages of the proposed XFEM schemes are illustrated with several 2D and 3D mean compliance minimization examples that are widely used in the recent literature of structural topology optimization. All numerical results demonstrate that the proposed XFEM is a promising structural analysis approach for structural optimization with the level set method.

Cite this article

Li LI , Michael Yu WANG , Peng WEI . XFEM schemes for level set based structural optimization[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2012 , 7(4) : 335 -356 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-012-0351-2

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong S.A.R. (Project No. CUHK417309) is gratefully acknowledged.
1
Bendsoe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224

DOI

2
Bendsoe M P. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural Optimization, 1989, 1(4): 193–202

DOI

3
Xie Y M, Steven G P. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896

DOI

4
Xie Y M, Steven G P. Evolutionary Structural Optimization. London: Springer-Verlag, 1997

5
Sethian J A, Wiegmann A. Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 163(2): 489–528

DOI

6
Wang M Y, Wang X M, Guo D M. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 192(1-2): 227–246

DOI

7
Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2004, 194(1): 363–393

DOI

8
Liu Z, Korvink J G, Huang R. Structure topology optimization: fully coupled level set method via FEMLAB. Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005, 29(6): 407–417

DOI

9
Jang G W, Kim Y Y. Sensitivity analysis for fixed-grid shape optimization by using oblique boundary curve approximation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2005, 42(11,12): 3591–3609

DOI

10
Fish J. The S-version of finite element method. Computers & Structures, 1992, 43(3): 539–547

DOI

11
Belytschko T, Fish J, Bayliss A. The spectral overlay on finite elements for problems with high gradients. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1990, 81(1): 71–89

DOI

12
Wang S Y, Wang M Y. A moving superimposed finite element method for structural topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 65(11): 1892–1922

DOI

13
Belytschko T, Xiao S P, Parimi C. Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2003, 57(8): 1177–1196

DOI

14
Belytschko T, Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 45(5): 601–620

DOI

15
Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T. A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 46: 131–150

DOI

16
Duysinx P, Van Miegroet L, Jacobs T, Fleury C. Generalized shape optimization using XFEM and level set methods. In: Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design, Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials. Berlin: Springer, 2006, 23–32

17
Van Miegroet L, Jacobs T, Duysinx P. Recent developments in fixed mesh optimization with X-FEM and level set description. In: Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Seoul, Korea, 2007, 1947–1956

18
Van Miegroet L, Duysinx P. 3D shape optimization with X-FEM and a level set constructive geometry approach. In: Proceedings of 8th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Lisbon, Portugal, 2009, 1453–1463

19
Van Miegroet L, DuysinxP. Stress concentration minimization of 2DFilets using X-FEM and level set description. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4–5): 425–438

DOI

20
Edwards C S, Kim H A, Budd C J. Smooth boundary based optimization using fixed grid. In: Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Seoul, Korea, 2007, 1789–1798

21
Lee D K, Lipka A, Ramm E. Nodal-based topology optimization using X-FEM and level sets. In: Proceedings of 7th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Seoul, Korea, 2007, 1987–1996

22
Wei P, Wang M Y, Xing X H. A study on X-FEM in continuum structural optimization using level set model. Computer Aided Design, 2010, 42(8): 708–719

DOI

23
Ventura G. On the elimination of quadrature sub-cells for discontinuous functions in the eXtended Finite Element Method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 66(5): 761–795

DOI

24
Natarajan S, Mahapatra D R, Bordas S P. Integrating strong and weak discontinuities without integration sub-cells and example applications in an XFEM/GFEM framework. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 83: 269–294

25
Daux C, Moës N, Dolbow J, Sukumar N, Belytschko T. Arbitrary branched and intersecting cracks with the extended finite element method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2000, 48: 1741–1760

DOI

26
Sukumar N, Chopp D L, Moës N, Belytschko T. Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(46–47): 6183–6200

DOI

27
Wells G N, Sluys L J, de Borst R. Simulating the propagation of displacement discontinuities in a regularized strain-softening medium. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002, 53(5): 1235–1256

DOI

28
Stazi F L, Budyn E, Chessa J, Belytschko T. An extended finite element method with higher order elements for curved cracks. Computational Mechanics, 2003, 31(1–2): 38–48

DOI

29
Legay A, Wang H W, Belytschko T. Strong and weak arbitrary discontinuities in spectral finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2005, 64(8): 991–1008

DOI

30
Cheng K W, Fries T P. Higher order XFEM for curved strong and weak discontinuities. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 82: 564–590

31
Sethian J A. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999

32
Osher S, Fedkiw R P. Level Set, Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surface. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002

33
Fries T P, Belytschko T. The extended/generalized finite element method: An overview of the method and its applications. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 84: 253–304

34
Chessa J, Smolinski P, Belytschko T. The extended finite element method (XFEM) for solidification problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002, 53(8): 1959–1977

DOI

35
Fries T P. The intrinsic XFEM for two-fluid flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2009, 60(4): 437–471

DOI

36
Moës N, Cloirec M, Cartraud P, Remacle J F. A computational approach to handle complex microstructure geometries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 192(28–30): 3163–3177

DOI

37
Duddu R, Bordas S, Chopp D, Moran B. A combined extended finite element and level set method for biofilm growth. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 74(5): 848–870

DOI

38
Legay A, Chessa J, Belytschko T. An Eulerian-Lagrangian method for fluid-structure interaction based on level sets. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 195(17–18): 2070–2087

DOI

39
Young W C, Budynas R G. Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002

40
Peterson R E. Stress Concentration Design Factors. New York: Wiley, 1953

41
Nocedal J, Wright S J. Numerical Optimization. New York: Springer, 1999

42
Belegundu A D, Chandrupatla T R. Optimization Concepts and Applications in Engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1999

Outlines

/