Robotized machining of big work pieces: Localization of supporting heads

  • Wojciech SZYNKIEWICZ 1 ,
  • Teresa ZIELIŃSKA , 2 ,
  • Włodzimierz KASPRZAK 1
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Control and Computation Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-665, Poland
  • 2. Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-665, Poland

Received date: 28 Feb 2010

Accepted date: 12 Apr 2010

Published date: 05 Dec 2010

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

A planner for a self adaptable and reconfigurable fixture system is proposed. The system is composed of mobile support agents that support thin sheet metal parts to minimize part dimensional deformation during drilling and milling operations. Compliant sheet metal parts are widely used in various manufacturing processes including automotive and aerospace industries. The main role of the planner is to generate an admissible plan of relocation of the mobile agents. It has to find the admissible locations for the supporting heads that provide continuous support in close proximity to the tool and trajectories of the mobile bases characterized by very high speeds during the relocation phases.

Key words: fixture; robot; milling; drilling

Cite this article

Wojciech SZYNKIEWICZ , Teresa ZIELIŃSKA , Włodzimierz KASPRZAK . Robotized machining of big work pieces: Localization of supporting heads[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2010 , 5(4) : 357 -369 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-010-0103-0

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Union Framework Program Theme (NMP-2007-3.2-1) within the Project SwarmItFix (No. FP7-214678).
1
Menassa R, De Vries W. Optimization methods applied to selecting support positions in fixture design. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 1991, 113(4): 412-418

2
Vallapuzha S, De Meter E C, Choudhuri S, Khetan R P. An investigation of the effectiveness of fixture layout optimization methods. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2002, 42(2): 251-263

DOI

3
Sela M N, Gaudry O, Dombre E, Benhabib B. A reconfigurable modular fixturing system for thin-walled flexible objects. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1997, 13(9): 611-617

DOI

4
Shirinzadeh B, Tie Y. Experimental investigation of the performance of a reconfigurable fixture system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1995, 10(5): 330-341

DOI

5
Youcef-Toumi K, Liu W, Asada H. Computer-aided analysis of reconfigurable fixtures and sheet metal parts for robotics drilling. International Journal of Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 1988, 4(3-4): 387393

6
Bi Z M, Zhang W J. Flexible fixture design and automation: review, issues and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 2001, 39(13): 2867-2894

DOI

7
Kang Y, Rong Y, Yang J, Ma W. Computer-aided fixture design verification. Assembly Automation, 2002, 22(4): 350-359

DOI

8
Cai W, Hu S J, Yuan J X. Deformable sheet metal fixturing: principles, algorithms, and simulations. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1996, 8(3): 318-324

DOI

9
DeMeter E C. Fast support layout optimization. International Journal Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 1998, 38(10-11):1221-1239

DOI

10
Rearick M R, Hu S J, Wu S M. Optimal fixture design for deformable sheet metal workpieces. Transactions of NAMRI/SME, 1993, 21: 407-412

11
Gilbert E, Johnson D, Keerthi S. A fast procedure for computing the distance between objects in three-dimensional space. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 1988, 4(2): 193-203

DOI

Outlines

/