Characteristics investigation of Yb3+:YAG crystals for optical refrigeration

Yongqing Lei, Biao Zhong, Xuelu Duan, Chaoyu Wang, Jiajin Xu, Ziheng Zhang, Jinxin Ding, Jianping Yin

Front. Phys. ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 42300.

PDF(4812 KB)
Front. Phys. All Journals
PDF(4812 KB)
Front. Phys. ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4) : 42300. DOI: 10.1007/s11467-023-1266-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characteristics investigation of Yb3+:YAG crystals for optical refrigeration

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Yb3+:YAG crystal is one excellent material for developing high-power radiation-balanced lasers (RBLs). An experimental study of the laser cooling performances of YAG crystals with various doping Yb3+ concentrations, especially for application of RBLs, is reported here. With improved Yb3+ doping concentration in YAG crystal, though the resonance absorption coefficient increases, the corresponding external quantum efficiency has been found to decrease with the average fluorescence wavelength being red shifted, which is detrimental to anti-Stokes fluorescence (ASF) cooling. The decrease of the external quantum efficiency can cause the first zero crossing wavelength to red shift, which is not conducive to RBLs. Based on the comprehensive study of the cooling characteristics of the series of Yb3+-doped YAG crystals, the optimal Yb3+ doping concentration for ASF cooling has been suggested.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

anti-Stokes fluorescence cooling / Yb3+:YAG crystal / radiation-balanced lasers

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yongqing Lei, Biao Zhong, Xuelu Duan, Chaoyu Wang, Jiajin Xu, Ziheng Zhang, Jinxin Ding, Jianping Yin. Characteristics investigation of Yb3+:YAG crystals for optical refrigeration. Front. Phys., 2023, 18(4): 42300 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-023-1266-6

1 Introduction

Laser cooling is the physical processes in which materials interact with laser and lose kinetic or thermal energy, where the materials can be gases [1-4], liquids [5], and solids [6-8]. Compared with laser cooling in gases, the reduced thermal energy of which is mainly from translational degrees of freedom, the reduced thermal energy in laser-cooled solids is from lattice vibrations [9]. Laser cooling of gases involves the cooling and trapping of atoms and molecules, which is now a workhorse in many fields, including quantum computer, quantum information, time/frequency standards and tests of fundamental physics [10-19]. Laser cooling of solids recently has received great attention benefit from important applications in airborne and space-based sensor systems, optical tweezers and precision metrology [20-24].
The net laser cooling of Yb3+:ZBLANP glasses by Epstein et al. in 1995 [6] confirmed the earlier idea of ASF cooling of bulk matter proposed by Pringsheim [25] and thermodynamic analysis of ASF cooling given by Landau [26]. Since then, ASF cooling has been confirmed in of sorts glasses and crystals doped with trivalent rare-earth ions, such as Yb3+, Tm3+, and Ho3+[6, 7, 27-29]. In particular, Yb3+:YLF [7, 8, 30, 31] and Yb3+:LLF [32-34] have achieved remarkable cooling temperature records which are below the cryogenic temperature 123 K. ASF cooling of semiconductors has also attracted great attention of researchers. Big advances have made in both theory and experiment [35-37]. In theory, the Fermi-Dirac distribution governed charge carriers enable semiconductors to be laser cooled even colder than the rare-earth-doped materials, however experimental studies are still at an early stage [9, 35, 36, 38-40].
Shortly after demonstration the idea of ASF cooling in experiment, the concept of RBLs was introduced by Bowman in 1999 [41]. The ASF cooling is used to remove the heat load coming from both the quantum defect and the parasitic absorption of the impurities in laser operation [42-44]. Laser operation with no net heat generation in the gain medium is desirable not only for high power laser output, but also for applications in low-noise sensing and high precision metrology [45-47].
One of the big challenges in stable operation of the RBLs and radiation-balance amplifiers (RBAs) is to keep a very subtle balance condition between different cooling and lasing parameters [47-49]. Following the advancement in theory of RBLs and RBAs, experimental progress has been greatly achieved in recent years [23, 47, 50-57]. Recently, RBLs based on fibers of silica and ZBLAN with extremely low OH and suppressed Yb3+ ion clustering have also been experimentally demonstrated [23, 49]. Yb3+:YAG as one of the excellent laser gain media, featuring high thermal conductivity, low electron-phonon coupling rates and well-developed annealing technology, has also good laser cooling performance. In 2001, Epstein et al. [58] pumped 2.3% Yb3+:YAG crystal at 1030 nm in a vacuum and obtained a temperature drop of 8.9 K from room temperature. In 2013, de Lima Filho et al. [59] pumped 3% Yb3+:YAG crystal at 1030 nm in atmosphere and achieved a temperature drop of 8.8 K from room temperature [59]. Recently, our group obtained a temperature drop of about 80 K in the 3% Yb3+:YAG crystal by laser at 1030 nm in vacuum [60]. In addition, the Yb3+:YAG crystals of both rod and disk geometry have also been experimentally demonstrated as the gain medium for RBLs [42, 53].
Yb3+:YAG crystal is generally considered as a promising gain medium for RBLs, whose performance depends on the cooling behavior of the crystal [42, 53]. The Yb3+ doping concentration strongly affects the crystal in its cooling behavior [55]. In theory, higher dopant concentration will benefit the laser output power since more Yb3+ ions are involved in the lasing and cooling cycles, however other factors like concentration quenching will also get serious and thus affect the laser performance. Therefore, a comprehensive research about the relationship between the ASF cooling characteristics of the crystal and the dopant concentration is necessary. In this paper, we experimentally investigate the laser cooling performance of YAG crystals with various doping Yb3+ concentrations. The Yb3+ doping concentration dependent laser cooling characteristics of the samples are analyzed in detail. And the optimum doping Yb3+ concentration for ASF cooling is suggested.
The principle of laser cooling of rare-earth doped solids is based on ASF processes [25]. Rare-earth ions are excited by photons of energy p from the top of the ground state to the bottom of the excited state. The excited ions reach quasi-equilibrium with the lattices of the host by absorbing phonons. Then the excited ions spontaneously radiatively decay to the ground state emitting the anti-Stokes fluorescence photons of mean photon energy f, which are higher than the absorbed photons in energy. The energy difference between f and p is supplied by the host and taken away by ASF. The four-level theoretical model is conventionally used to characterize the cooling efficiency and expressed as [61]
ηc=ηextηabsλpλf1,
where λp and λf are the pump and mean fluorescence wavelength, respectively. ηext = ηeWr/(ηeWr + Wnr) and ηabs = αr/(αr + αb) represent the external quantum efficiency and absorption efficiency, respectively. ηe is the fluorescence extraction efficiency related to the reabsorption and the total internal reflection (TIR) in the host. Wr and Wnr are the radiation and non-radiation decay rate, respectively. The αr and αb are the resonant and background absorption coefficient, respectively.
The mean fluorescence wavelength λf of the Yb3+:YAG crystal can be calculated according to the following expression [62]:
λftheo=cνf=c(j3i4f1jβ0i1j)j3i4f1jβ0i1jν0i1j,
where the superscript theo in λftheo is short for theoretical. f0i (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) and f1j (j = 1, 2, 3) are the Boltzmann occupation factors of the Stark sublevels of the ground and excited states of Yb3+ ion, respectively. The expressions of f0i and f1j are described as follows:
f0i=exp(E0ikBT)i4exp(E0ikBT),
f1j=exp(E1jkBT)j3exp(E1jkBT),
where, kB is the Boltzmann constant, E0i and E1j represent the energy of the sublevels in the ground state (2F7/2) and excited state (2F5/2), respectively. β0i1j is the branching ratio of the Yb3+:YAG crystal. ν0i1j is the transition frequency between the energy levels from the excited state sublevel (1, j) to the ground state sublevel (0, i).

2 Experimental setup

Fig.1 shows the schematic of the experimental setup including the LITMoS (Laser Induced Temperature Modulation Spectrum) test system and laser cooling system. A fiber laser (YFL-1020-50, Precilasers Co. Ltd.) with a tunable wavelength range of 1010−1080 nm is used for both the LITMoS test and laser cooling experiments. An optical isolator prevents unwanted light feedback into the laser system. The combination of a half-wave plate (HWP) and a polarization beam splitter (PBS) divides the linearly polarized laser into two branch beams with adjustable power for LITMoS test and laser cooling experiments.
Fig.1 The schematic diagram of the LITMoS test and laser cooling experimental setup. HWP: half-wave plate; OI: optical isolator; PBS: polarizing beam splitter.

Full size|PPT slide

The laser cooling characteristics of the sample, ηext and αb are obtained by fitting the cooling efficiency ηcexp(λ)=KΔT/ΔTPabsPabs measured by the LITMoS test using Eq. (1) [63, 64]. The laser irradiates the sample with its wavelength varying from 1010 nm to 1080 nm at an interval of 10 nm to produce the small temperature change ΔT (heating or cooling). The spectrometer and the calibrated thermal camera are used to measure the absorption power Pabs and ΔT, respectively. K is a constant related to the thermal load on the sample. It is essential that the ambient temperature is kept stable and thermal equilibrium is achieved in the sample for each measurement. A pair of mode-matching lenses is used to adjust the waist radius of the laser beam incident onto the Yb3+:YAG crystal of dimension 2×2×5 mm3 at Brewster angle cut. A multimode fiber with diameter 600 μm collects the fluorescence light emitted by the crystal and transfers it to the spectrometer. The sample is placed in a vacuum chamber (10−5 Pa) and supported by two optical fibers (diameter 100 μm), blackbody radiation of the vacuum chamber is the primary source of heat load.
The optical probe system is calibrated by a standard blackbody radiation source (Ocean Optics HL-3P-INT-CAL-EXT). A calibrated thermal camera is adopted to measure the laser-induced temperature changes of the sample during the LITMoS test, while differential luminescence thermometry [7] is adopted to measure the temperature of the sample in the laser cooling experiment. The temperatures of the crystal and the environment are monitored in real-time.

3 Cooling efficiency parameters

3.1 Absorption efficiency and the mean fluorescence wavelength with different Yb3+ doping concentration

Fig.2(a) shows the Stark sublevel energies of Yb3+:YAG crystal at room temperature [65] and the cooling cycle of optical refrigeration. The red upward arrow indicates the pump laser with wavelength λp, and the blue downward arrow indicates the fluorescence with a mean wavelength of λf. The blue and red solid lines in figure 2(b) represent the absorption and the fluorescence spectra of the 5% Yb3+:YAG crystal, respectively. The blue dash-dot line represents λf of the 5% Yb3+:YAG crystal at 300 K, appearing at about 1012.7 nm. The blue shaded region to the right of λf under the absorption spectrum is called the “optical cooling tail.” The pump wavelength for laser cooling should be chosen inside the optical cooling tail. Since the resonance absorption coefficient is small in the blue shaded region, the utilization of the pump power is low in efficiency.
Fig.2 (a) The energy diagram of the Yb3+ in YAG crystal. (b) Absorption (blue) and fluorescence (red) spectra for the 5% Yb3+:YAG crystal at 300 K. The blue dotted line indicates the mean fluorescence wavelength λf at 300 K.

Full size|PPT slide

Temperature-dependent fluorescence spectra of the sample, placed in the cold finger in a high vacuum liquid nitrogen cryostat (JANIS VPF-100) for adjusting the temperature, were excited by the laser at 914 nm with the power less than 3 mW, and were measured by a calibrated spectrometer (Ocean Optics Maya2000 Pro-NIR) through a multimode fiber with the diameter of 600 μm. Fig.3(a) shows the temperature-dependent fluorescence spectra of the 5% Yb3+:YAG crystal from 150 K to 300 K at an interval of 50 K. The resonant absorption coefficient αr(λ, T) is obtained from the fluorescence spectrum S(λ, T) utilizing the McCumber relation αr(λ,T)λ5S(λ,T)exp(hcλkBT) [66] combined with the normalization at the wavelength of 1030 nm, and corresponding results are shown in Fig.3(b). As one can see, in the optical cooling tail there are two peaks located at 1030 nm and 1048 nm, respectively. The absorption coefficient in the optical cooling tail rapidly decreases as the sample temperature is reduced.
Fig.3 The temperature-dependent fluorescence (a) and absorption (b) spectra for the 5% Yb3+:YAG crystal, respectively. (c) The mean fluorescence wavelength λf for 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG versus the temperature of the sample. The solid line indicates a linear fitting. (d) The normalized fluorescence spectrum for 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG at 300 K.

Full size|PPT slide

The λf of the Yb3+:YAG crystal can be obtained from the measured fluorescence spectrum by utilizing the following formula [63]:
λfexp(T)=S(λ,T)λdλS(λ,T)dλ,
where the superscript exp in λfexp is short for experimental. S(λ, T) is the temperature-dependent fluorescence spectra of the sample. Fig.3(c) shows the dependence of λf on the sample temperature. The solid black squares, red circles, and blue triangles represent results for selected Yb3+ doping concentrations of 1%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. All measurements are fitted by linear functions and given as follows: λf1% = −0.065 (nm/K) × T (K) + 1029.14 (nm), λf5% = −0.063 (nm/K) × T (K) + 1031.56 (nm), and λf10% = −0.056 (nm/K) × T (K) + 1031.87 (nm). The value of λf gets red shifted with the decrease of the sample temperature, which causes more populations on the lower sublevels of the excited state governed by Boltzmann statistics.
Eq. (2) is used to calculate the dependence of the mean wavelength λf on the sample temperature. For instance, the theoretically calculated values are λf (300 K, 1%) = 1009.2 nm and λf (80 K, 1%) = 1011.6 nm, respectively. The experimentally measured values are λf (300 K, 1%) = 1009.6 nm and λf (80 K, 1%) = 1024.2 nm, respectively. As one can see, the difference at high temperature between theoretical calculation and experimental measurement is rather small, while that at low temperature is quite large. The large discrepancy at low temperature mainly comes from that the temperature dependence of the branching ratio is not considered in Eq. (2). Besides, the cooperative effect and reabsorption related to Yb3+ ion concentration and crystal shape also affect the value of λf. For example, at a fixed temperature of 300 K, the value of λf from experimental measurement is redshifted by about 5.3 nm when the Yb3+ doping concentration increases from 1% to 10%, as can be seen in Fig.3(c). This red shift is ascribed to the effect of fluorescence reabsorption. Fluorescence reabsorption and trapping tend to be more effective as the Yb3+ doping concentration increases, resulting in more depleted emissions at higher energies [67]. Fig.3(d) shows the fluorescence spectra of 1%, 5%, and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals at 300 K. All the curves are normalized at wavelength 1030 nm for better comparison. As one can see, with increasing Yb3+ doping concentration, the intensity of the fluorescence at wavelength shorter than 980 nm gets weaker, while that at wavelength longer than 980 nm gets stronger.

3.2 External quantum efficacy and with different Yb3+ doping concentration

The external quantum efficiency ηext and the background absorption coefficient αb of the 1%, 5%, and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystal samples are measured by the LITMoS test. Fig.4 shows the corresponding results with the solid circles representing the experimental data of cooling efficiency at 300 K. The values of ηext, αb and the cooling range (300 K) between two zero-crossing wavelengths (λc1λc2) are obtained by the model fit utilizing Eq. (1) and were listed in Tab.1. The variation of the background absorption αb among different samples is small. With increasing Yb3+ doping concentration, the second zero-crossing wavelength λc2 is red shifted, which is attributed to the increasing absorption efficiency ηabs = 1/(1 + αb/αr).
Tab.1 The results of the LITMoS test.
Sample Parameters
ηext αb Cooling range (λc1λc2)
1% Yb3+:YAG 99.20% 1.6×10−4 cm−1 1020−1055 nm
5% Yb3+:YAG 99.15% 1.0×10−4 cm−1 1022−1082 nm
10% Yb3+:YAG 97.80% 2.0×10−4 cm−1 1038−1080 nm
Fig.4 Experimental results (blue solid circles) and model fitting (red lines) to cooling efficiency for the 1% (a), 5% (b) and 10% (c) Yb3+:YAG crystals at 300 K.

Full size|PPT slide

As shown in Tab.1, the value of ηext decreases with increasing the Yb3+ doping concentrations, which is consistent with the theoretical prediction in Ref. [68]. Besides, a higher Yb3+ doping concentration will lead to a relatively larger refractive index of the sample [69], resulting in more fluorescence confinement and reabsorption, migration of excited electrons, and cooperative luminescence [68]. A well-known formula generalizes the influence of cooperative effects on the fluorescence lifetimeτf of excited energy levels, and given as [70]
τf=τw(1+σNYbl)1+92π(NYbN0)2,
where τw = 0.95 ms is the measured lifetime at low concentration [71], σ is the absorption cross-section, l is the average absorption length, NYb is the number density of doped Yb3+ ions, and N0 = 2.3 × 1021 cm−3 is a critical Yb3+ ion density (corresponding to doping concentration of ~17%) for concentration quenching [71]. It is necessary to control the Yb3+ doping concentration in YAG crystals so that the corresponding number density is much lower than N0 to avoid concentration quenching. The fluorescence lifetime τf can also be described as τf = ηe/(ηeWr + Wnr), Wnr = Wmp + ΣiWi [50]. Here, Wmp ~2.12 × 10−6 s−1 is the multiphonon non-radiative decay rate at 300 K [72] and ΣiWi is the sum of non-radiative decay rates of other channels from the sublevel related. The condition of Wnr Wr is necessary in order to obtain a high external quantum efficiency ηext. When NYb is increased from 1% to 10%, τf is reduced by 18% due to increasing non-radiative decay rates according to Eq. (5), and this will result in significant decrease of ηext. The decreasing ηext can result in red shift of the first zero-crossing wavelength λc1.
On the basis of the laser cooling parameters of the Yb3+:YAG crystal samples, the cooling efficiency contour diagram, named as “cooling window”, of each sample are drawn utilizing the theoretical model expressed by Eq. (1). The cooling window can comprehensively describe the laser cooling feature of the sample. Fig.5(a−c) show the cooling windows of 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals, respectively. The Yb3+:YAG crystal has resonance absorption peaks at 1030 nm and 1048 nm in the optical cooling tail, corresponding to the E03E11 and E04E11 Stark sublevel transitions. When the Yb3+ doping concentration increases from 1% to 10%, the cooling range generally moves toward the longer wavelength and the optimal pump wavelength for cooling changes from 1030 nm to 1048 nm. The above comparative study indicates that the 5% Yb3+:YAG crystal exhibits excellent cooling performance, with a cooling window predicted global minimum achievable temperature (g-MAT) of about 180 K.
Fig.5 The cooling windows of the 1% (a), 5% (b) and 10% (c) Yb3+:YAG crystals. The blue and red regions correspond to the cooling and heating regimes, respectively, with the dotted lines representing ηc = 0.

Full size|PPT slide

4 Laser cooling results

The cooling windows shown in Fig.5 indicate that the optimum pump wavelength for the 1% and 5% Yb3+:YAG crystals is 1030 nm, while that for the 10% Yb3+:YAG crystal is 1048 nm. For simplicity, the single-pass configuration of pump laser is adopted to characterize the optical cooling properties of the YAG crystal samples with various Yb3+ doping concentrations. The crystal temperature reaches a steady state under the combined effect of laser cooling and black body radiation heating. The laser cooling power (Pcool) and the heat load power (Pload) are described by the following equations [73]:
Pcool=Ppump[1exp(αrl)]ηc,
Pload=εsAsσ(Tc4T4)+NκLALdL(TcT),
where Ppump is the incident laser power, and l is the crystal’s length. The Stefan–Boltzmann constant σ = 5.67 × 10−8 W/(m2·K4), Tc is the temperature of the vacuum chamber. εs and As represent the emissivity and the surface area of the sample, respectively. N is the number of contacting points with area AL, length dL and conductivity κL. Fig.6(a) describes the temperature of each sample varying with the pump laser power. The solid symbols correspond to experimental measurements with the solid line being the model fitted lines from Eqs. 6(a) and (b). In our experiment, with a pump power of about 35 W the finally obtained cooling temperatures are 252 K, 226 K and 261 K for the 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals, respectively. The time-dependent temperature evolution of each sample is shown in Fig.6(b). The temperature drops are 42 K, 69 K, and 34 K for the 1%, 5%, and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals, respectively. It usually takes about 10 minutes for the sample to reach the final equilibrium state in temperature.
Fig.6 (a) Steady-state temperature of the 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals versus the power of pumping laser. Dots represent the measurement data and lines represent the model prediction. (b) Time-dependent evolution of the 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals.

Full size|PPT slide

5 Discussion and conclusions

The cooling efficiency ηc of the sample is determined by four parameters ηext, αr, λf and αb. Three of them ηext, αr and λf are affected by the Yb3+ doping concentrations. Fig.7 (a) and (b) show the corresponding experimental results. When the doping concentration increases from 1% to 10%, the mean fluorescence wavelength λf is redshifted from 1009.2 nm to 1015.1 nm, and the external quantum efficiency ηext decreases from 99.2% to 97.8%. When the Yb3+ doping concentration exceeds 5%, there is a dramatic drop in ηext. This observation is greatly different from the theoretical calculation in Ref. [68], where ηext decreases slowly and slightly with the Yb3+ doping concentration increasing up to 10%. Our explanation is as follows: as the Yb3+ doping concentration increases, more Yb3+ ions participate in the laser cooling cycle, and the resonance absorption of the pump laser increases, so do the fluorescence reabsorption and trapping effect. However, the enhanced fluorescence reabsorption and trapping effect result in a redshift of the λf and thus the decrease of ηext. For the 7.5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals under our study here, this causes the first zero-crossing wavelength λc1 to exceed 1030 nm. Therefore, for laser cooling of Yb3+:YAG crystals with doping concentrations greater than 7.5%, the pump laser wavelength should be tuned to 1048 nm for optimum cooling effect.
Fig.7 (a) Concentration dependence of the mean fluorescence wavelength λf (300 K). (b) Concentration dependence of the external quantum efficiency ηext. (c) The background absorption coefficients of each sample. The red line indicates the average value of the background absorption coefficient (2.3 × 10−4 cm−1). (d) Concentration dependence of the minimum cooling temperature of each sample obtained in the experiment with the pump laser of about 35 W and the g-MAT of each sample with the same average background absorption coefficient (2.3 × 10−4 cm−1).

Full size|PPT slide

Compared to the 2% and 7.5% Yb3+ doped samples, the 1%, 5% and 10% Yb3+ doped ones are superior and close in quality and have a smaller background absorption, and therefore their cooling performances are selectively picked out and presented in Fig.6 for better comparison. Furthermore, for a better understanding of the influence of the dopant concentration on the ASF cooling behavior the background absorption coefficients of the six samples are compiled in Fig.7(c) and their average value αb = 2.3 × 10−4 cm−1 is calculated and shown by the dotted line. The final cooling temperature obtained in our experiment of each sample under the same experimental conditions including the pump power of about 35 W is presented in Fig.7(d) in blue solid squares. Experimental results in Fig.7(d) show that the final cooling temperature of the 7.5% Yb3+:YAG crystal is slightly higher than the 10% Yb3+:YAG crystal. This is ascribed to their slight difference of various samples in their impurity absorption and scattering. Experimental measurement indicates the background absorption is 4.5 × 10−4 cm−1 and 2 × 10−4 cm−1 for the 7.5% and 10% Yb3+:YAG crystals, respectively. The g-MAT of the six samples are also calculated from their respective cooling parameters with the same average background absorption coefficient and corresponding results are shown in Fig.7(d) in red circles. As we can see, the results follow the trend of those from experiment and indicates an optimal doping concentration in the range of 3%−5%.
In conclusion, the optical cooling characteristics of the YAG crystals with the Yb3+ doping concentrations ranging from 1% to 10% are comprehensively studied in experiment. The fluorescence spectra with the sample temperature range of 150−300 K are accurately measured and the corresponding absorption spectra are carefully obtained. The external quantum efficiency ηext and the background absorption αb are precisely measured by the LITMoS test. The influences of the Yb3+ doping concentration on the cooling parameters of λf, ηext and αr are analyzed. The cooling windows are also mapped to characterize the optical cooling properties of the samples. As the sample temperature decreases, the experimentally measured red shift of the mean fluorescence wavelength λf deviates more from its corresponding theoretical calculation. For instance, the deviation of λf for the 1% Yb3+:YAG crystal at a temperature of 300 K is about 0.4 nm, while that at 80 K increases to about 12.6 nm. As the Yb3+ doping concentration increases, the experimentally measured external quantum efficiency ηext decreases more dramatically compared to its corresponding slight change from theoretical calculation, particularly for samples with doping concentration larger than ~5%. For instance, the value of ηext for the 1% Yb3+ and 10%:YAG crystal in our experiment is measured to be ~99.2% and ~97.6% respectively, corresponding to a variation of ~1.6%, while that from the theoretical calculation is less than ~0.2% [68]. This dopant concentration-dependent value of ηext has a strong influence on the optical cooling behavior of the sample and thus the finally obtained temperature. As one can see, as the Yb3+ doping concentration improves, though the resonant absorption will be increased, the decreasing external quantum efficiency ηext and the red shifting mean fluorescence wavelength λf will impair the total cooling efficiency. Our comprehensive studies suggest an optimal dopant concentration of about 3%−5% for the Yb3+:YAG crystals of similar sizes for optical cooling performance. We believe the results presented here can serve as a helpful reference for researchers involved in related studies, like optical coolers and RBLs.

References

[1]
N. Djeu, W. Whitney. Laser cooling by spontaneous anti-Stokes scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1981, 46(4): 236
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[2]
E. A. Cornell, C. E. Wieman. Bose–Einstein condensation in a dilute gas, the first 70 years and some recent experiments. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2002, 74(3): 875
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[3]
T. W. Hänsch, A. L. Schawlow. Cooling of gases by laser radiation. Opt. Commun., 1975, 13(1): 68
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[4]
D. S. Jin, J. Ye. Polar molecules in the quantum regime. Phys. Today, 2011, 64(5): 27
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[5]
C. Zander, K. H. Drexhage. Cooling of a dye solution by anti-Stokes fluorescence. Adv. Photochem., 1995, 20: 59
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[6]
R. I. Epstein, M. I. Buchwald, B. C. Edwards, T. R. Gosnell, C. E. Mungan. Observation of laser-induced fluorescent cooling of a solid. Nature, 1995, 377(6549): 500
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[7]
D. V. Seletskiy, S. D. Melgaard, S. Bigotta, A. Di Lieto, M. Tonelli, M. Sheik-Bahae. Laser cooling of solids to cryogenic temperatures. Nat. Photonics, 2010, 4(3): 161
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[8]
S. D. Melgaard, A. R. Albrecht, M. P. Hehlen, M. Sheik-Bahae. Solid-state optical refrigeration to sub-100 Kelvin regime. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6(1): 20380
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[9]
D. V. Seletskiy, R. Epstein, M. Sheik-Bahae. Laser cooling in solids: Advances and prospects. Rep. Prog. Phys., 2016, 79(9): 096401
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[10]
W. D. Phillips. Nobel Lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1998, 70(3): 721
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[11]
I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, W. Zwerger. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2008, 80(3): 885
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[12]
A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, P. O. Schmidt. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys., 2015, 87(2): 637
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[13]
R. Horchani. Laser cooling of internal degrees of freedom of molecules. Front. Phys., 2016, 11(4): 113301
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[14]
J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, J. Ye. Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quantum matter. Science, 2017, 357(6355): 1002
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[15]
S. A. Malinovskaya. Laser cooling using adiabatic rapid passage. Front. Phys., 2021, 16(5): 52601
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[16]
Q. Liang, T. Chen, W. H. Bu, Y. H. Zhang, B. Yan. Laser cooling with adiabatic passage for type-II transitions. Front. Phys., 2021, 16(3): 32501
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[17]
K. Yan, R. Gu, D. Wu, J. Wei, Y. Xia, J. Yin. Simulation of EOM-based frequency-chirped laser slowing of MgF radicals. Front. Phys., 2022, 17(4): 42502
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[18]
W. Bu, Y. Zhang, Q. Liang, T. Chen, B. Yan. Saturated absorption spectroscopy of buffer-gas-cooled Barium monofluoride molecules. Front. Phys., 2022, 17(6): 62502
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[19]
Y. Liu, L. Luo. Molecular collisions: From near-cold to ultra-cold. Front. Phys., 2021, 16(4): 42300
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[20]
R. Vicente, G. Nogues, J. M. Niot, T. Wiertz, P. Contini, A. Gardelein. Impacts of laser cooling for low earth orbit observation satellites: An analysis in terms of size, weight and power. Cryogenics, 2020, 105: 103000
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[21]
J. Li, Z. Chen, Y. Liu, P. S. Kollipara, Y. Feng, Z. Zhang, Y. Zheng. Opto-refrigerative tweezers. Sci. Adv., 2021, 7(26): eabh1101
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[22]
M. P. Hehlen, J. Meng, A. R. Albrecht, E. R. Lee, A. Gragossian, S. P. Love, C. E. Hamilton, R. I. Epstein, M. Sheik-Bahae. First demonstration of an all-solid-state optical cryocooler. Light Sci. Appl., 2018, 7(1): 15
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[23]
J. Knall, M. Engholm, T. Boilard, M. Bernier, P. B. Vigneron, N. Yu, P. D. Dragic, J. Ballato, M. J. F. Digonnet. Radiation-balanced silica fiber laser. Optica, 2021, 8(6): 830
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[24]
F. Caminati, G. Cittadino, E. Damiano, A. Di Lieto, M. Tonelli. A design for optical refrigeration: The parallel configuration. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2023, 122(2): 021102
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[25]
P. Pringsheim. Zwei bemerkungen über den unterschied von lumineszenz-und temperaturstrahlung. Eur. Phys. J. A, 1929, 57(11−12): 739
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[26]
L. Landau. On the thermodynamics of photoluminescence. J. Phys. (Moscow), 1946, 10: 503
[27]
W. Patterson, S. Bigotta, M. Sheik-Bahae, D. Parisi, M. Tonelli, R. Epstein. Anti-Stokes luminescence cooling of Tm3+ doped BaY2F8. Opt. Express, 2008, 16(3): 1704
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[28]
S. Rostami, A. R. Albrecht, A. Volpi, M. P. Hehlen, M. Tonelli, M. Sheik-Bahae. Tm-doped crystals for mid-IR optical cryocoolers and radiation balanced lasers. Opt. Lett., 2019, 44(6): 1419
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[29]
S. Rostami, A. R. Albrecht, A. Volpi, M. Sheik-Bahae. Observation of optical refrigeration in a holmium-doped crystal. Photon. Res., 2019, 7(4): 445
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[30]
A. Gragossian, M. Ghasemkhani, J. Meng, A. Albrecht, M. Tonelli, M. Sheik-Bahae. Optical refrigeration inches toward liquid-nitrogen temperatures. SPIE Newsroom, 2017,
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[31]
S. Bigotta, A. Di Lieto, A. Toncelli, M. Tonelli, D. Seletskiy, M. Hasselbeck, M. Sheik-Bahae, R. Epstein. Laser cooling of solids: New results with single fluoride crystals. Nuovo Cimento-Societa Italiana Di Fisica Sezione B, 2007, 122: 685
[32]
B. Zhong, J. Yin, Y. Jia, L. Chen, Y. Hang, J. Yin. Laser cooling of Yb3+-doped LuLiF4 crystal. Opt. Lett., 2014, 39(9): 2747
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[33]
B. Zhong, Y. Lei, H. Luo, Y. Shi, T. Yang, J. Yin. Laser cooling of the Yb3+-doped LuLiF4 single crystal for optical refrigeration. J. Lumin., 2020, 226: 117472
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[34]
Y. Lei, B. Zhong, T. Yang, X. Duan, M. Xia, C. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Zhang, J. Ding, J. Yin. Laser cooling of Yb3+:LuLiF4 crystal below cryogenic temperature to 121 K. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2022, 120(23): 231101
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[35]
J. Zhang, D. Li, R. Chen, Q. Xiong. Laser cooling of a semiconductor by 40 Kelvin. Nature, 2013, 493(7433): 504
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[36]
J. B. Khurgin. Multi-phonon-assisted absorption and emission in semiconductors and its potential for laser refrigeration. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2014, 104(22): 221115
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[37]
S. T. Ha, C. Shen, J. Zhang, Q. Xiong. Laser cooling of organic–inorganic lead halide perovskites. Nat. Photonics, 2016, 10(2): 115
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[38]
X. Xia, A. Pant, A. S. Ganas, F. Jelezko, P. J. Pauzauskie. Quantum point defects for solid‐state laser refrigeration. Adv. Mater., 2021, 33(23): 1905406
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[39]
J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, L. C. Kwek, Q. Xiong. Resolved-sideband Raman cooling of an optical phonon in semiconductor materials. Nat. Photonics, 2016, 10(9): 600
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[40]
D. Li, J. Zhang, Q. Xiong. Laser cooling of CdS nanobelts: Thickness matters. Opt. Express, 2013, 21(16): 19302
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[41]
S. R. Bowman. Lasers without internal heat generation. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 1999, 35(1): 115
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[42]
S. R. Bowman, S. P. O’Connor, S. Biswal, N. J. Condon, A. Rosenberg. Minimizing heat generation in solid-state lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 2010, 46(7): 1076
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[43]
G. Nemova, R. Kashyap. Thin-disk athermal laser system. Opt. Commun., 2014, 319: 100
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[44]
E. Mobini, M. Peysokhan, B. Abaie, A. Mafi. Thermal modeling, heat mitigation, and radiative cooling for double-clad fiber amplifiers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 2018, 35(10): 2484
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[45]
J. M. Knall, M. Engholm, T. Boilard, M. Bernier, M. Digonnet. Radiation-balanced silica fiber amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2021, 127(1): 013903
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[46]
J. M. Knall, M. J. Digonnet. Design of high-power radiation-balanced silica fiber lasers with a doped core and cladding. J. Lightwave Technol., 2021, 39(8): 2497
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[47]
M. Sheik-Bahae, Z. Yang. Optimum operation of radiation-balanced lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 2020, 56(1): 1
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[48]
G. Nemova, R. Kashyap. Athermal continuous-wave fiber amplifier. Opt. Commun., 2009, 282(13): 2571
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[49]
E. Mobini, S. Rostami, M. Peysokhan, A. Albrecht, A. Mafi. Laser cooling of ytterbium-doped silica glass. Commun. Phys.-UK, 2020, 3: 1
[50]
E. Mobini, M. Peysokhan, B. Abaie, M. P. Hehlen, A. Mafi. Spectroscopic investigation of Yb-doped silica glass for solid-state optical refrigeration. Phys. Rev. Appl., 2019, 11(1): 014066
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[51]
M. Peysokhan, E. Mobini, B. Abaie, A. Mafi. Method for measuring the resonant absorption coefficient of rare-earth-doped optical fibers. Appl. Opt., 2019, 58(7): 1841
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[52]
X. Xia, A. Pant, E. J. Davis, P. J. Pauzauskie. Design of a radiation-balanced fiber laser via optically active composite cladding materials. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 2019, 36(12): 3307
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[53]
Z. Yang, J. Meng, A. R. Albrecht, M. Sheik-Bahae. Radiation-balanced Yb:YAG disk laser. Opt. Express, 2019, 27(2): 1392
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[54]
J. B. Khurgin. Radiation-balanced tandem semiconductor/Yb3+: YLF lasers: Feasibility study. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 2020, 37(6): 1886
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[55]
J. Knall, M. Engholm, J. Ballato, P. D. Dragic, N. Yu, M. J. Digonnet. Experimental comparison of silica fibers for laser cooling. Opt. Lett., 2020, 45(14): 4020
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[56]
M. Peysokhan, E. Mobini, A. Allahverdi, B. Abaie, A. Mafi. Characterization of Yb-doped ZBLAN fiber as a platform for radiation-balanced lasers. Photon. Res., 2020, 8(2): 202
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[57]
M. Peysokhan, S. Rostami, E. Mobini, A. R. Albrecht, S. Kuhn, S. Hein, C. Hupel, J. Nold, N. Haarlammert, T. Schreiber, R. Eberhardt, A. Flores, A. Tünnermann, M. Sheik-Bahae, A. Mafi. Implementation of laser-induced anti-stokes fluorescence power cooling of ytterbium-doped silica glass. ACS Omega, 2021, 6(12): 8376
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[58]
R. I. Epstein, J. Brown, B. C. Edwards, A. Gibbs. Measurements of optical refrigeration in ytterbium-doped crystals. J. Appl. Phys., 2001, 90(9): 4815
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[59]
E. S. L. Filho, G. Nemova, S. Loranger, R. Kashyap. Laser-induced cooling of a Yb:YAG crystal in air at atmospheric pressure. Opt. Express, 2013, 21(21): 24711
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[60]
B. Zhong, Y. Lei, X. Duan, T. Yang, J. Yin. Optical refrigeration of the Yb3+-doped YAG crystal close to the thermoelectric cooling limit. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2021, 118(13): 131104
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[61]
M. Sheik-Bahae, R. I. Epstein. Optical refrigeration. Nat. Photonics, 2007, 1(12): 693
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[62]
D. C. Brown, V. A. Vitali. Yb:YAG kinetics model including saturation and power conservation. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 2011, 47(1): 3
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[63]
S.D. Melgaard, Cryogenic optical refrigeration: Laser cooling of solids below 123 K, Ph.D Thesis, The University of New Mexico, 2013
[64]
X. Duan, B. Zhong, Y. Lei, C. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Zhang, J. Ding, J. Yin. Accurate characterization of the properties of the rare-earth-doped crystal for laser cooling. Appl. Sci. (Basel), 2022, 12(9): 4447
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[65]
H. W. Bruesselbach, D. S. Sumida, R. A. Reeder, R. W. Byren. Low-heat high-power scaling using InGaAs-diode-pumped Yb:YAG lasers. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 1997, 3(1): 105
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[66]
D. McCumber. Einstein relations connecting broadband emission and absorption spectra. Phys. Rev., 1964, 136(4A): A954
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[67]
A.Volpi, Laser cooling of fluoide crystals, Ph. D Thesis, Università di Pisa, 2015
[68]
G. Nemova, R. Kashyap. Optimization of optical refrigaration in Yb3+:YAG samples. J. Lumin., 2015, 164: 99
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[69]
F. D. Patel, E. C. Honea, J. Speth, S. A. Payne, R. Hutcheson, R. Equall. Laser demonstration of Yb3Al5O12/(YbAG) and materials properties of highly doped Yb:YAG. IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 2001, 37(1): 135
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[70]
F. Auzel, F. Bonfigli, S. Gagliari, G. Baldacchini. The interplay of self-trapping and self-quenching for resonant transitions in solids, role of a cavity. J. Lumin., 2001, 94–95, 293
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[71]
C. Goutaudier, K. Lebbou, Y. Guyot, M. Ito, H. Canibano, A. El Hassouni, L. Laversenne, M. T. Cohen-Adad, G. Boulon. Advances in fibre crystals: Growth and optimization of spectroscopic properties for Yb3+ doped laser crystals. Ann. Chim., 2003, 28(6): 73
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[72]
Y. Nakayama, Y. Harada, T. Kita. An energy transfer accompanied by phonon absorption in ytterbium-doped yttrium aluminum perovskite for optical refrigeration. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2020, 117(4): 041104
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[73]
D. V. Seletskiy, M. P. Hehlen, R. I. Epstein, M. Sheik-Bahae. Cryogenic optical refrigeration. Adv. Opt. Photonics, 2012, 4(1): 78
CrossRef ADS Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11604100, 11834003, 61574056, 91536218, and 11874151), the Special Financial Grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016T90346), and 111 Project (No. B12024). B. Zhong thanks L. Z. Deng for helpful discussions.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4812 KB)

554

Accesses

2

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/