Fermion dynamical symmetry and strongly-correlated electrons: A comprehensive model of high-temperature superconductivity

Abstract

We review application of the SU(4) model of strongly-correlated electrons to cuprate and iron-based superconductors. A minimal self-consistent generalization of BCS theory to incorporate antiferromagnetism on an equal footing with pairing and strong Coulomb repulsion is found to account systematically for the major features of high-temperature superconductivity, with microscopic details of the parent compounds entering only parametrically. This provides a systematic procedure to separate essential from peripheral, suggesting that many features exhibited by the high-T_c data set are of interest in their own right but are not central to the superconducting mechanism. More generally, we propose that the surprisingly broad range of conventional and unconventional superconducting and superfluid behavior observed across many fields of physics results from the systematic appearance of similar algebraic structures for the emergent effective Hamiltonians, even though the microscopic Hamiltonians of the corresponding parent states may differ radically from each other.

Keywords

strongly-correlated electrons / SU(4) model / fermian dynamical symmetry / high-temperature superconductivity

References

[1] J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Muller, Possible high T_csuperconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system, Z. Phys. B 64(2), 189 (1986)

[2] See: D. A. Bonn, Are high-temperature superconductors exotic? Nat. Phys. 2, 159 (2006); M. R. Norman and C. Pépin, The electronic nature of high temperature cuprate superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66(10), 1547 (2003) (and Refs. therein)

[3] Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Iron-based layered superconductor LaO_1–xF_xFeAs (x= 0.05–0.12) with T_c= 26 K, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(11), 3296 (2008)

[4] Y. Sun, M. W. Guidry, and C. L. Wu, A new family of high T_ccompounds—Stepping stones toward understanding unconventional superconductivity, Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 1617 (2009)

[5] J. Guo, S. Jin, G. Wang, S. Wang, K. Zhu, T. Zhou, M. He, and X. Chen, Superconductivity in the iron selenide K_xFe₂Se₂, Phys. Rev. B 82(18), 180520 (2010)

[6] D. C. Johnston, The puzzle of high temperature superconductivity in layered iron pnictides and chalcogenides, Adv. Phys. 59(6), 803 (2010)

[7] J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, High-temperature superconductivity in iron-based materials, Nat. Phys. 6(9), 645 (2010)

[8] D. Mou, L. Zhao, and X. Zhou, Structural, magnetic and electronic properties of the iron-chalcogenide A_xFe_2–ySe₂ (A=K, Cs, Rb, and Tl, etc.) superconductors, Front. Phys. 6(4), 410 (2011)

[9] H. Oh, J. Moon, D. Shin, C. Moon, and H. J. Choi, Brief review on iron-based superconductors: Are there clues for unconventional superconductivity? Progress in Superconductivity 13, 65 (2011)

[10] J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108(5), 1175 (1957)

[11] L. N. Cooper, Bound electron pairs in a degenerate Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. 104(4), 1189 (1956)

[12] For example, see M. R. Norman, The challenge of unconventional superconductivity, Science 332(6026), 196 (2011) (and references cited there)

[13] D. Jérome, Organic superconductors: When correlations and magnetism walk in, arXiv: 1201.5796 (2012)

[14] See, for example, P. Ring, and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem, Springer–Verlag, 1980

[15] D. Page, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, and A. W. Steiner, Superfluid Neutrons in the core of the neutron star in cassiopeia A, arXiv: 1110.5116 (2011)

[16] T. Noda, M. Hashimoto, N. Yasutake, T. Maruyama, T. Tatsumi, and M. Fujimoto, Cooling of compact stars with color superconducting phase in quark hadron mixed phase, Astrophys. J. 765(1), 1 (2012)

[17] M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Schäfer, Color superconductivity in dense quark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80(4), 1455 (2008)

[18] C. L. Wu, D. H. Feng, and M. W. Guidry, The fermion dynamical symmetry model, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 21, 227 (1994)

[19] F. Iachello and A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987

[20] R. Bijker, F. Iachello, and A. Leviatan, Algebraic models of hadron structure (I): Nonstrange baryons, Ann. Phys. 236(1), 69 (1994)

[21] F. Iachello and R. D. Levine, Algebraic Theory of Molecules, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995

[22] F. Iachello and P. Truini, Algebraic model of anharmonic polymer chains, Ann. Phys. 276(1), 120 (1999)

[23] P. W. Anderson, Random-phase approximation in the theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 112(6), 1900 (1958)

[24] R. J. Glauber, Photon correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10(3), 277 (1963)

[25] For a review, see, Ref. [6] and P. J. Hirschfeld, M. M. Korshunov, and I. I. Mazin, Gap symmetry and structure of Fe-based superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124508 (2011)

[26] T. Timusk and B. Statt, The pseudogap in hightemperature superconductors: An experimental survey, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62(1), 61 (1999)

[27] M. Norman, D. Pines, and C. Kollin, The pseudogap: Friend or foe of high T_c? Adv. Phys. 54(8), 715 (2005)

[28] G. Sheet, M. Mehta, D. A. Dikin, S. Lee, C. W. Bark, J. Jiang, J. D. Weiss, E. E. Hellstrom, M. S. Rzchowski, C. B. Eom, and V. Chandrasekhar, Phaseincoherent superconducting pairs in the normal state of Ba(Fe_1–xCo_x)₂As₂, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(16), 167003 (2010)

[29] T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, C. Gadermaier, N. D. Zhigadlo, S. Katrych, J. Karpinski, and D. Mihailovic, Distinct pseudogap and quasiparticle relaxation dynamics in the superconducting state of nearly optimally doped Sm- FeAsO_0.8F_0.2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(11), 117002 (2009)

[30] K. Ahilan, F. L. Ning, T. Imai, A. S. Sefat, R. Jin, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales, and D. Mandrus, ¹⁹F NMR investigation of the iron pnictide superconductor LaFeAsO_0.89F_0.11, Phys. Rev. B 78, 100501(R) (2008)

[31] T. Sato, K. Nakayama, Y. Sekiba, T. Arakane, K. Terashima, S. Souma, T. Takahashi, Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Doping dependence of pseudogap in LaFeAsO_1–xF_x, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. C 77(Suppl.), 65 (2008)

[32] F. Ning, K. Ahilan, T. Imai, A. S. Sefat, R. Jin, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales, and D. Mandrus, ⁵⁹Co and ⁷⁵As NMR investigation of electron-doped high Tc superconductor BaFe_1.8Co_0.2As₂ (T_c= 22 K), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77(10), 103705 (2008)

[33] S. M. Hayden, H. A. Mook, P. Dai, T. G. Perring, and F. Doğan, The structure of the high-energy spin excitations in a high-transition-temperature superconductor, Nature 429(6991), 531 (2004)

[34] J. M. Tranquada, H. Woo, T. G. Perring, H. Goka, G. D. Gu, G. Xu, M. Fujita, and K. Yamada, Quantum magnetic excitations from stripes in copper oxide superconductors, Nature 429(6991), 534 (2004)

[35] J. E. Hoffman, E. W. Hudson, K. M. Lang, V. Madhavan, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, A four unit cell periodic pattern of quasi-particle states surrounding vortex cores in Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_8+δ, Science 295(5554), 466 (2002)

[36] M. Vershinin, S. Misra, S. Ono, Y. Abe, Y. Ando, and A. Yazdani, Local ordering in the pseudogap state of the high-T_csuperconductor Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_8+δ, Science 303(5666), 1995 (2004)

[37] T. Hanaguri, C. Lupien, Y. Kohsaka, D. H. Lee, M. Azuma, M. Takano, H. Takagi, and J. C. Davis, A “checkerboard” electronic crystal state in lightly holedoped Ca_2–xNa_xCuO₂Cl₂, Nature 430(7003), 1001 (2004)

[38] K. McElroy, J. Lee, J. A. Slezak, D. -H. Lee, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, and J. C. Davis, Atomic-scale sources and mechanism of nanoscale electronic disorder in Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_8+δ, Science 309(5737), 1048 (2005)

[39] V. J. Emery and S. A. Kivelson, Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density, Nature 374(6521), 434(1995)

[40] J. L. Tallon and J. W. Loram, The doping dependence of T* What is the real high-T_c phase diagram? Physica C 349(1-2), 53(2001)

[41] P. W. Anderson, Spin-charge separation is the key to the high T_ccuprates, Physica C 341–348, 9(2000)

[42] D. Pines, Quantum protectorates in the cuprate superconductors, Physica C 341–348, 59(2000)

[43] R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines, The theory of everything, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97(1), 28(2000)

[44] A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Vols. I and II, W. A. Benjamin, 1969 and 1975

[45] However the standard methodologies in the elementary particle physics case differ from the ones used here, partially because a relativistic quantum field theory is required there but non-relativistic fields are adequate for the present discussion. An accessible introduction to non- Abelian gauge fields may be found in Gauge Field Theories, An Introduction with Applications, Mike Guidry, Wiley, 1992.

[46] M. W. Guidry, L. A. Wu, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, SU(4) model of high-temperature superconductivity and antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 63(13), 134516(2001)

[47] M. W. Guidry, A fermion dynamical symmetry model of high-temperature superconductivity and antiferromagnetic order, Rev. Mex. Fís. 45(S2), 132 (1999)

[48] L. A. Wu, M. W. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, SO(5) as a critical dynamical symmetry in the SU(4) model of high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 67(1), 014515 (2003)

[49] M. W. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, Mott insulators, no-double-occupancy, and non-Abelian superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 70(18), 184501 (2004)

[50] Y. Sun, M. W. Guidry, and C. L. Wu, Temperaturedependent gap equations and their solutions in the SU(4) model of high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 73(13), 134519 (2006)

[51] Y. Sun, M. W. Guidry, and C. L. Wu, Pairing Gaps, Pseudogaps, and Phase Diagrams for Cuprate Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 75(13), 134511 (2007)

[52] Y. Sun, M. W. Guidry, and C. L. Wu, k-dependent SU(4) model of high-temperature superconductivity and its coherent state solutions, Phys. Rev. B 78(17), 174524 (2008)

[53] M. W. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, Instabilities of doped Mott insulators and the properties of hightemperature superconductors, published in Nuclei and Mesoscopic Physics, p. 160, P. Danielewicz, P. Piecuch, and V. Zelevinsky (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings, 2008.

[54] M. W. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, A unified description of cuprate and iron arsenide superconductors, Front. Phys. China 4(4), 433 (2009)

[55] M. W. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, Strong anisotropy of cupratepseudogap correlations: Implications for Fermi arcs and Fermi pockets, New J. Phys. 11(12), 123023 (2009)

[56] M. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, Generalizing the Cooper pair instability to doped Mott insulators, Front. Phys. China 5(2), 171 (2010)

[57] M. W. Guidry, Y. Sun, and C. L. Wu, Inhomogeneity, dynamical symmetry, and complexity in high-temperature superconductors: Reconciling a universal phase diagram with rich local disorder, Chin. Sci. Bull. 56(4–5), 367 (2011)

[58] The particle–hole symmetry intrinsic to these models does not mean that hole-doped and electron-doped compounds are expected to behave in the same manner. Although the operators and basis states of the model are particle–hole symmetric, the interactions entering the effective Hamiltonian would not be expected to be the same for holedoped and particle-doped compounds. Thus, the physical properties of hole-doped and electron-doped compounds could differ substantially.

[59] We employ an isomorphism between the groups SU(4) and SO(6) to label irreducible representations using SO(6) quantum numbers. The representation structure and relationship of SU(4) and SO(6) is discussed in: J. N. Ginocchio, Ann. Phys. 126, 234 (1980)

[60] Groups generally may have more than one Casimir invariant. We shall use the term “Casimir”to refer loosely to the lowest-order such invariants (which are generally quadratic in the group generators). In the context of the present discussion, quadratic Casimirs are associated with 2-body interactions at the microscopic level. Higher-order Casimirs are then generally associated with 3-body and higher interactions. The restriction of our Hamiltonians to polynomials of order 2 in the Casimirs is then a physical restriction to consideration of only 1-body and 2-body interactions.

[61] W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Coherent states: Theory and some applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62(4), 867(1990)

[62] W. M. Zhang, C. L. Wu, D. H. Feng, J. N. Ginocchio, and M. W. Guidry, Geometrical structure and critical phenomena in the fermion dynamical symmetry model: Sp(6), Phys. Rev. C 38(3), 1475 (1988)

[63] W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, C. L. Wu, H. Wu, and J. N. Ginocchio, Symmetry constrained Hartree–Fock– Bogoliubov theory with applications to the fermion dynamical symmetry model, Nucl. Phys. A 505(1), 7 (1989)

[64] W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and J. N. Ginocchio, Geometrical interpretation of SO(7): A critical dynamical symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59(18), 2032(1987)

[65] W. M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and J. N. Ginocchio, Geometrical structure and critical phenomena in the fermion dynamical symmetry model: SO(8), Phys. Rev. C 37(3), 1281 (1988)

[66] R. Gilmore, Geometry of symmetrized states, Ann. Phys. 74(2), 391 (1972)

[67] R. Gilmore, On the properties of coherent states, Rev. Mex. Fis. 23(1–2), 143 (1974)

[68] A. M. Perelomov, Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group, Commun. Math. Phys. 26(3), 222 (1972)

[69] J. R. Klauder, Continuous-representation theory: Postulates of continuous-representation theory, J. Math. Phys. 4, 1055 (1963); Continuous‐representation theory (II): Postulates of continuous‐representation theory, J. Math. Phys. 4, 1058 (1963)

[70] Thus the most general SU(4) coherent state depends on eight real variables. The reduction of the coherent state parameters to only two in Eq. (28) follows from requiring time reversal symmetry and assuming conservation of spin projection S_zfor the wave function.

[71] B. R. Judd, Operator Techniques in Atomic Spectroscopy, McGraw-Hill, 1963

[72] The competition between dynamical symmetries governing the transition between spherical and deformed nuclei is discussed in §4.5 (in particular, §4.5.4) of Ref. [18].

[73] M. W. Guidry and Y. Sun, Superconductivity and superfluidity as universal emergent phenomena in diverse fermionic systems, Front. Phys. 10(4), 1 (2015)

[74] M. W. Guidry, Universality of emergent states in diverse physical systems, AIP Conf. Proc. 1912, 020005 (2017)

[75] L. A. Wu and M. W. Guidry, The ground state of monolayer graphene in a strong magnetic field, Sci. Rep. 6(1), 22423 (2016)

[76] L. A. Wu, M. Murphy, and M. W. Guidry, SO(8) fermion dynamical symmetry and strongly correlated quantum Hall states in monolayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 95(11), 115117 (2017)

[77] M. W. Guidry, SO(8) fermion dynamical symmetry and quantum hall states for graphene in a strong magnetic field, Fortschr. Phys. 65(6–8), 1600057 (2017)

[78] J. L. Tallon, J. W. Loram, J. R. Cooper, C. Panagopoulos, and C. Bernhard, Superfluid density in cuprate high-T_csuperconductors: A new paradigm, Phys. Rev. B 68(18), 180501 (2003)

[79] P. Dai, H. A. Mook, S. M. Hayden, G. Aeppli, T. G. Perring, R. D. Hunt, and F. Doğan, The magnetic excitation spectrum and thermodynamics of high-T_csuperconductors, Science 284(5418), 1344 (1999)

[80] J. C. Campuzano, H. Ding, M. R. Norman, H. M. Fretwell, M. Randeria, A. Kaminski, J. Mesot, T. Takeuchi, T. Sato, T. Yokoya, T. Takahashi, T. Mochiku, K. Kadowaki, P. Guptasarma, D. G. Hinks, Z. Konstantinovic, Z. Z. Li, and H. Raffy, Electronic spectra and their relation to the (π, π) collective mode in high-T_csuperconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(18), 3709 (1999)

[81] Z. A. Xu, N. P. Ong, Y. Wang, T. Kakeshita, and S. Uchida, Vortex-like excitations and the onset of superconducting phase fluctuation in underdoped La_2–xSr_xCuO₄, Nature 406(6795), 486 (2000)

[82] N. P. Ong, Y. Wang, S. Ono, Y. Ando, and S. Uchida, Vorticity and the Nernst effect in cuprate superconductors, Ann. Phys. 13(12), 9 (2004)

[83] P. W. Anderson, The resonating valence bond state in La₂CuO₄ and superconductivity, Science 235(4793), 1196 (1987)

[84] D. Vaknin, S. K. Sinha, D. E. Moncton, D. C. Johnston, J. M. Newsam, C. R. Safinya, and H. E. King, Antiferromagnetism in La₂CuO_4–y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(26), 2802 (1987)

[85] T. S. Nunner, B. M. Anderson, A. Melikyan, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Dopant-modulated pair interaction in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(17), 177003 (2005)

[86] A. C. Fang, L. Capriotti, D. J. Scalapino, S. A. Kivelson, N. Kaneko, M. Greven, and A. Kapitulnik, Gapinhomogeneity-induced electronic states in superconducting Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_8+δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(1), 017007 (2006)

[87] Y. He, T. S. Nunner, P. J. Hirschfeld, and H. P. Cheng, Local electronic structure of Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O₈ near oxygen dopants: A window on the high-T_cpairing mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(19), 197002 (2006)

[88] M. M. Maśka, Z. Sledz, K. Czajka, and M. Mierzejewski, Inhomogeneity-induced enhancement of the pairing interaction in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(14), 147006 (2007)

[89] S. Petit and M. B. Lepetit, Real-space fluctuations of effective exchange integrals in high-T_ccuprates, Europhys. Lett. 87(6), 67005 (2009)

[90] K. Foyevtsova, R. Valentı, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Effect of dopant atoms on local superexchange in cuprate superconductors: A perturbative treatment, Phys. Rev. B 79(14), 144424 (2009)

[91] S. Johnston, F. Vernay, and T. P. Devereaux, Impact of an oxygen dopant in Bi₂Sr₂CaCu₂O_8+δ, Europhys. Lett. 86(3), 37007 (2009)

[92] S. Okamoto and T. A. Maier, Microscopic inhomogeneity and superconducting properties of a two-dimensional Hubbard model for high-T_ccuprates, Phys. Rev. B 81(21), 214525 (2010)

[93] G. Khaliullin, M. Mori, T. Tohyama, and S. Maekawa, Enhanced pairing correlations near oxygen dopants in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(25), 257005 (2010)

[94] J. W. Loram, J. L. Tallon, and W. Y. Liang, Absence of gross static inhomogeneity in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 69, 060502(R) (2004)

[95] J. Bobroff, H. Alloul, S. Ouazi, P. Mendels, A. Mahajan, N. Blanchard, G. Collin, V. Guillen, and J. F. Marucco, Absence of static phase separation in the high T_ccuprate YBa₂Cu₃O_6+y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(15), 157002 (2002)

[96] I. Bozovic, G. Logvenov, M. A. J. Verhoeven, P. Caputo, E. Goldobin, and M. R. Beasley, Giant proximity effect in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(15), 157002 (2004)

[97] G. Alvarez, M. Mayr, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Areas of superconductivity and giant proximity effects in underdoped cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 71(1), 014514 (2005)

[98] I. Bozovic, G. Logvenov, M. A. J. Verhoeven, P. Caputo, E. Goldobin, and T. H. Geballe, No mixing of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in a high-temperature superconductor, Nature 422(6934), 873 (2003)

[99] E. Demler, A. J. Berlinsky, C. Kallin, G. B. Arnold, and M. R. Beasley, Proximity effect and Josephson coupling in the SO(5) theory of high-T_csuperconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(13), 2917 (1998)

[100] E. Dagotto, Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems, Science 309(5732), 257 (2005)

[101] M. R. Norman and C. Pépin, The electronic nature of high temperature cuprate superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66(10), 1547 (2003)

[102] A. Damascelli, A. Hussain, and Z. X. Shen, Angleresolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(2), 473 (2003)

[103] E. Dagotto, Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66(3), 763 (1994)

[104] M. R. Norman, H. Ding, M. Randeria, J. C. Campuzano, T. Yokoya, T. Takeuchi, T. Takahashi, T. Mochiku, K. Kadowaki, P. Guptasarma, and D. G. Hinks, Destruction of the Fermi surface in underdoped high-T_csuperconductors, Nature 392(6672), 157 (1998)

[105] X. J. Zhou, T. Yoshida, D. H. Lee, W. L. Yang, V. Brouet, F. Zhou, W. X. Ti, J. W. Xiong, Z. X. Zhao, T. Sasagawa, T. Kakeshita, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, A. Fujimori, Z. Hussain, and Z. X. Shen, Dichotomy between nodal and antinodal quasiparticles in underdoped (La_2–xSr_x)CuO₄ superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(18), 187001 (2004)

[106] A. Kanigel, M. R. Norman, M. Randeria, U. Chatterjee, S. Souma, A. Kaminski, H. M. Fretwell, S. Rosenkranz, M. Shi, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, K. Kadowaki, D. Hinks, L. Ozyuzer, and J. C. Campuzano, Evolution of the pseudogap from Fermi arcs to the nodal liquid, Nat. Phys. 2(7), 447 (2006)

[107] N. Doiron-Leyraud, C. Proust, D. LeBoeuf, J. Levallois, J. B. Bonnemaison, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, and L. Taillefer, Quantum oscillations and the Fermi surface in an underdoped high-T_csuperconductor, Nature 447(7144), 565 (2007)

[108] D. LeBoeuf, N. Doiron-Leyraud, J. Levallois, R. Daou, J. B. Bonnemaison, N. E. Hussey, L. Balicas, B. J. Ramshaw, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, S. Adachi, C. Proust, and L. Taillefer, Electron pockets in the Fermi surface of hole-doped high-T_csuperconductors, Nature 450(7169), 533 (2007)

[109] E. A. Yelland, J. Singleton, C. H. Mielke, N. Harrison, F. F. Balakirev, B. Dabrowski, and J. R. Cooper, Quantum oscillations in the underdopedcuprate YBa₂Cu₄O₈, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(4), 047003 (2008)

[110] A. F. Bangura, J. D. Fletcher, A. Carrington, J. Levallois, M. Nardone, B. Vignolle, P. J. Heard, N. Doiron- Leyraud, D. LeBoeuf, L. Taillefer, S. Adachi, C. Proust, and N. E. Hussey, Small Fermi surface pockets in underdopedhigh temperature superconductors: Observation of Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in YBa₂Cu₄O₈, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(4), 047004 (2008)

[111] C. Jaudet, D. Vignolles, A. Audouard, J. Levallois, D. LeBoeuf, N. Doiron-Leyraud, B. Vignolle, M. Nardone, A. Zitouni, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, L. Taillefer, and C. Proust, de Haas–van Alphen oscillations in the underdoped high-temperature superconductor YBa₂Cu₃O_6.5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(18), 187005 (2008)

[112] S. R. Julian and M. R. Norman, Local pairs and small surfaces, Nature 447(7144), 537 (2007)

[113] G. F. Chen, Z. Li, G. Li, J. Zhou, D. Wu, J. Dong, W. Z. Hu, P. Zheng, Z. J. Chen, H. Q. Yuan, J. Singleton, J. L. Luo, and N. L. Wang, Superconducting properties of the Fe-based layered superconductor LaFeAsO_0.9F_0.1, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(5), 057007 (2008)

[114] H. H. Wen, G. Mu, L. Fang, H. Yang, and X. Zhu, Superconductivity at 25 K in hole-doped (La_1–xSr_x)OFeAs, Europhys. Lett. 82(1), 17009 (2008)

[115] X. H. Chen, T. Wu, G. Wu, R. H. Liu, H. Chen, and D. F. Fang, Superconductivity at 43 K in SmFeAsO_1–xF_x, Nature 453(7196), 761 (2008)

[116] G. F. Chen, Z. Li, D. Wu, G. Li, W. Z. Hu, J. Dong, P. Zheng, J. L. Luo, and N. L. Wang, Superconductivity at 41 K and its competition with spin-density-wave instability in layered CeO_1–xF_xFeAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(24), 247002 (2008)

[117] Z. A. Ren, J. Yang, W. Lu, W. Yi, X. L. Shen, Z. C. Li, G. C. Che, X. L. Dong, L. L. Sun, F. Zhou, and Z. X. Zhao, Superconductivity in the iron-based F-doped layered quaternary compound Nd[O_1–xF_x]FeAs, Europhys. Lett. 82(5), 57002 (2008)

[118] G. F. Chen, Z. Li, D. Wu, J. Dong, G. Li, W. Z. Hu, P. Zheng, J. L. Luo, and N. L. Wang, Element substitution effect in transition metal oxypnictide Re(O_1–xF_x)TAs (Re= rare earth, T= transition metal), Chin. Phys. Lett. 25(6), 2235 (2008)

[119] M. Daghofer, A. Moreo, J. A. Riera, E. Arrigoni, D. J. Scalapino, and E. Dagotto, Model for the magnetic order and pairing channels in Fe pnictide superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(23), 237004 (2008)

[120] A. Moreo, M. Daghofer, J. A. Riera, and E. Dagotto, Properties of a two-orbital model for oxypnictide superconductors: Magnetic order, B_2g spin-singlet pairing channel, and its nodal structure, Phys. Rev. B 79(13), 134502 (2009)

[121] K. Nakayama, T. Sato, P. Richard, Y. M. Xu, Y. Sekiba, S. Souma, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, H. Ding, and T. Takahashi, Superconducting gap symmetry of Ba_0.6K_0.4Fe₂As₂ studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Europhys. Lett. 85(6), 67002 (2009)

[122] H. Ding, P. Richard, K. Nakayama, K. Sugawara, T. Arakane, Y. Sekiba, A. Takayama, S. Souma, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, Z. Wang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, and N. L. Wang, Observation of Fermi-surface-dependent nodeless superconducting gaps in Ba_0.6K_0.4Fe₂As₂, Europhys. Lett. 83(4), 47001 (2008)

[123] L. Zhao, H. Y. Liu, W. T. Zhang, J. Q. Meng, X. W. Jia, G. D. Liu, X. L. Dong, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, W. Lu, G. L. Wang, Y. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Y. Wang, Z. Y. Xu, C. T. Chen, and X. J. Zhou, Multiple nodeless superconducting gaps in (Ba_0.6K_0.4)Fe₂As₂ superconductor from angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Chin. Phys. Lett. 25(12), 4402 (2008)

[124] K. Umezawa, Y. Li, H. Miao, K. Nakayama, Z. H. Liu, P. Richard, T. Sato, J. B. He, D. M. Wang, G. F. Chen, H. Ding, T. Takahashi, and S. C. Wang, Unconventional anisotropic s-wave superconducting gaps of LiFeAs ironpnictide superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(3), 037002 (2012)

[125] Z. H. Liu, P. Richard, K. Nakayama, G. F. Chen, S. Dong, J. B. He, D. M. Wang, T. L. Xia, K. Umezawa, T. Kawahara, S. Souma, T. Sato, T. Takahashi, T. Qian, Y. Huang, N. Xu, Y. Shi, H. Ding, and S. C. Wang, Unconventional superconducting gap in NaFe_0.95Co_0.05As observed by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 84(6), 064519 (2011)

[126] J. Hu and N. Hao, S₄ symmetric microscopic model for iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. X 2(2), 021009 (2012)

[127] P. W. Anderson, When the electron falls apart, Phys. Today 50(10), 42 (1997)

[128] S. C. Zhang, A unified theory based on SO(5) symmetry of superconductivity and antiferromagnetism, Science 275(5303), 1089 (1997)

[129] There also is the U(1) generator of charge density waves in our full U(4)⊃U(1)×SU(4) algebra that does not appear in the Zhang SO(5) algebra.

[130] S. C. Zhang, J. P. Hu, E. Arrigoni, W. Hanke, and A. Auerbach, Projected SO(5) models, Phys. Rev. B 60(18), 13070 (1999)

[131] The broken particle number symmetry can be restored by particle-number projection, but in practice this procedure may not be necessary as we are dealing with a system having a very large number of fermions.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature