Bohm’s approach to quantum mechanics: Alternative theory or practical picture?

Abstract

Since its inception Bohmian mechanics has been generally regarded as a hidden-variable theory aimed at providing an objective description of quantum phenomena. To date, this rather narrow conception of Bohm’s proposal has caused it more rejection than acceptance. Now, after 65 years of Bohmian mechanics, should still be such an interpretational aspect the prevailing appraisal? Why not favoring a more pragmatic view, as a legitimate picture of quantum mechanics, on equal footing in all respects with any other more conventional quantum picture? These questions are used here to introduce a discussion on an alternative way to deal with Bohmian mechanics at present, enhancing its aspect as an efficient and useful picture or formulation to tackle, explore, describe and explain quantum phenomena where phase and correlation (entanglement) are key elements. This discussion is presented through two complementary blocks. The first block is aimed at briefly revisiting the historical context that gave rise to the appearance of Bohmian mechanics, and how this approach or analogous ones have been used in different physical contexts. This discussion is used to emphasize a more pragmatic view to the detriment of the more conventional hidden-variable (ontological) approach that has been a leitmotif within the quantum foundations. The second block focuses on some particular formal aspects of Bohmian mechanics supporting the view presented here, with special emphasis on the physical meaning of the local phase field and the associated velocity field encoded within the wave function. As an illustration, a simple model of Young’s two-slit experiment is considered. The simplicity of this model allows to understand in an easy manner how the information conveyed by the Bohmian formulation relates to other more conventional concepts in quantum mechanics. This sort of pedagogical application is also aimed at showing the potential interest to introduce Bohmian mechanics in undergraduate quantum mechanics courses as a working tool rather than merely an alternative interpretation.

Keywords

Bohmian mechanics / quantum phase / velocity field / interference / Young’s two-slit experiment

References

[1] A. Einstein, Kinetic equilibrium of absorption and emission of blackbody radiation by an atom, Phys. Z. 18, 121 (1917)

[2] D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables (I), Phys. Rev. 85(2), 166 (1952)

[3] D. Bohm, A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables (II), Phys. Rev. 85(2), 180 (1952)

[4] D. Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge, New York, 1980

[5] P. Pylkkänen, B. J. Hiley, and I. Pättiniemi, Individuals across the Sciences, Oxford University Press, New York, 2015

[6] R. E. Wyatt, Quantum Dynamics with Trajectories, Springer, New York, 2005

[7] P. K. Chattaraj, Ed., Quantum Trajectories, CRC Taylor and Francis, New York, 2010

[8] K. H. Hughes and G. Parlant, eds., Quantum Trajectories, CCP6, Daresbury, UK, 2011

[9] A. S. Sanz and S. Miret-Artés, A Trajectory Description of Quantum Processes (II): Applications, vol. 831 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, 2014

[10] X. Oriols and J. Mompart, Eds., Applied Bohmian Mechanics: From Nanoscale Systems to Cosmology, Pan Standford Publishing, Singapore, 2012

[11] A. Benseny, G. Albareda, A. S. Sanz, J. Mompart, and X. Oriols, Applied Bohmian mechanics, Eur. Phys. J. D 68(10), 286 (2014)

[12] Following Schiff [82] (see p. 171), here the term “picture” will also be used instead of “representation”, leaving the latter “for designation of the choice of axes in Hilbert space or, equivalently, the choice of the complete orthonormal set of functions, with respect to which the states and dynamical variables are specified.”

[13] D. F. Styer, M. S. Balkin, K. M. Becker, M. R. Burns, C. E. Dudley, S. T. Forth, J. S. Gaumer, M. A. Kramer, D. C. Oertel, L. H. Park, M. T. Rinkoski, C. T. Smith, and T. D. Wotherspoon, Nine formulations of quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys. 70(3), 288 (2002)

[14] For a more detailed account on David Bohm’s life and work the interested reader is encouraged to consult the bibliographical work published in 1997 by his colleague Hiley [Biogr. Mems. Fell. R. Soc. 43, 107 (1997)].

[15] P. R. Holland, The Quantum Theory of Motion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993

[16] C. L. Lopreore and R. E. Wyatt, Quantum wave packet dynamics with trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(26), 5190 (1999)

[17] E. Madelung, Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer form, Z. Phys. 40(3–4), 322 (1927)

[18] J. Mehra, The Beat of a Different Drum: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994

[19] Throughout this work, the concept of quantum particle or system is used to denote the degrees of freedom of interest necessary to characterize and study a real physical system. If such degrees of freedom are translational, they can be associated without loss of generality with the particle itself, since they account for its center of mass, as in classical mechanics. However, this is a particular case, since they may also describe vibrations, rotations, etc., and although Schrodinger’s equation and its Bohmian reformulation are still valid in these cases, they no longer refer to particles in the usual sense.

[20] S. Goldstein, Quantum theory without observers (I), Phys. Today 51(3), 42 (1998)

[21] S. Goldstein, Quantum theory without observers (II), Phys. Today 51(4), 38 (1998)

[22] A. S. Sanz and S. Miret-Artés, Quantum phase analysis with quantum trajectories: A step towards the creation of a Bohmian thinking, Am. J. Phys. 80, 525 (2012)

[23] M. Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966

[24] W. H. Zurek and J. A. Wheeler, Quantum Theory of Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983

[25] S. J. Hawking, The Dreams that Stuff is Made of, Running Press, Philadephia, PA, 2011

[26] P. Marage and G. Wallenborn, Eds., The Solvay Councils and the Birth of Modern Physics, Vol. 22 of Science Networks. Historical Studies, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1999

[27] J. T. Cushing, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994

[28] B. L.van der Waerden, Sources of Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1966

[29] G. Bacciagaluppi and A. Valentini, Eds., Quantum Theory at the Crossroads. Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference, Science Networks. Historical Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

[30] J. von Neumann and R. T. B. (transl.), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955

[31] L. de Broglie, Non-Linear Wave Mechanics: A Causal Interpretation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1960

[32] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantummechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47(10), 777 (1935)

[33] E. Schrödinger and M. Born, Discussion of probability relations between separated systems, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 31(04), 555 (1935)

[34] E. Schrödinger and P. A. M. Dirac, Probability relations between separated systems, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 32(03), 446 (1936)

[35] J. S. Bell, On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, Physics 1(3), 195 (1964)

[36] J. S. Bell, On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38(3), 447 (1966)

[37] L. Gilder, The Age of Entanglement. When Quantum Physics was Reborn, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2008

[38] J. P. Dowling and G. J. Milburn, Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 361(1809), 1655 (2003)

[39] C. B. Parker, McGraw Hill Encyclopaedia of Physics, 2nd Ed., McGraw Hill, Princeton, 1994

[40] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47(7), 460 (1981)

[41] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedanken experiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49(2), 91 (1982)

[42] A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49(25), 1804 (1982)

[43] The three experiments performed of Aspects and coworkers in these years set precedent for future experimental tests of Bell inequalities. However, it is worth noticing that they were not the first empirical tests. For an account on entanglement, from its appearance on stage to the theoretical and experimental works around Bell-type tests, the interested reader may find a fresh historical overview in Ref. [37] [see also: A. D. Aczel, Entanglement. The Greatest Mystery in Physics (Four Walls Eight Windows, New York, 2001)].

[44] It is worth highlighting the special role of Chris Dewdney in this story, specifically in the rekindling of Bohm’s formulation, which arose as a direct consequence when he was looking for research problems for his PhD at Birkbeck. While doing such a search, he came across Bohm’s formulation and thought about the possibility to compute the trajectories and quantum potential for the twoslit experiment. His calculations of the trajectories plus Chris Philippidis’ calculations of the quantum potential gave rise to the 1979 paper “Quantum interference and the quantum potential” [45], after having “pressurized” Basil Hiley to take an interest on the issue. Then, after completing his PhD, other papers followed, extending the model neutron interferometry, spin measurement and superposition, EPR, etc. [15].

[45] C. Philippidis, C. Dewdney, and B. J. Hiley, Quantum interference and the quantum potential, Nuovo Cim. B 52(1), 15 (1979)

[46] C. Dewdney and B. J. Hiley, A quantum potential description of one-dimensional time-dependent scattering from square barriers and square wells, Found. Phys. 12(1), 27 (1982)

[47] B. J. Hiley, Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony by James T. Cushing, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 28(2), 299 (1997)

[48] D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe, Routledge, New York, 1993

[49] D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty, J. Stat. Phys. 67(5–6), 843 (1992)

[50] D. Dürr and S. Teufel, Bohmian Mechanics: The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory, Springer, Berlin, 2009

[51] D. Dürr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghì, Quantum Physics without Quantum Philosophy, Springer, Berlin, 2013

[52] L. Landau, J. Phys. U.S.S.R. 5, 71 (1941)

[53] F. London, Planck’s constant and low temperature transfer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17(2–3), 310 (1945)

[54] J. M. Ziman, Quantum hydrodynamics and the theory of liquid helium, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219(1137), 257 (1953)

[55] W. Bierter and H. L. Morrison, Derivation of the Landau quantum hydrodynamics for interacting Bose systems, J. Low Temp. Phys. 1(2), 65 (1969)

[56] E. A. Jr McCullough and R. E. Wyatt, Quantum dynamics of the collinear (H, H₂) reaction, J. Chem. Phys. 51(3), 1253 (1969)

[57] E. A. Jr McCullough and R. E. Wyatt, Dynamics of the collinear H+H2 reaction (I): Probability density and flux, J. Chem. Phys. 54(8), 3578 (1971)

[58] E. A. Jr McCullough and R. E. Wyatt, Dynamics of the collinear H+H2 reaction (II): Energy analysis, J. Chem. Phys. 54(8), 3592 (1971)

[59] J. O. Hirschfelder, A. C. Christoph, and W. E. Palke, Quantum mechanical streamlines (I): Square potential barrier, J. Chem. Phys. 61(12), 5435 (1974)

[60] J. O. Hirschfelder, C. J. Goebel, and L. W. Bruch, Quantized vortices around wavefunction nodes (II), J. Chem. Phys. 61(12), 5456 (1974)

[61] J. O. Hirschfelder and K. T. Tang, Quantum mechanical streamlines (III): Idealized reactive atom–diatomic molecule collision, J. Chem. Phys. 64(2), 760 (1976)

[62] J. O. Hirschfelder and K. T. Tang, Quantum mechanical streamlines (IV): Collision of two spheres with square potential wells or barriers, J. Chem. Phys. 65(1), 470 (1976)

[63] J. O. Hirschfelder, The angular momentum, creation, and significance of quantized vortices, J. Chem. Phys. 67(12), 5477 (1977)

[64] P. Lazzeretti and R. Zanasi, Inconsistency of the ringcurrent model for the cyclopropenyl cation, Chem. Phys. Lett. 80(3), 533 (1981)

[65] P. Lazzeretti, E. Rossi, and R. Zanasi, Singularities of magnetic-field induced electron current density: A study of the ethylene molecule, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 25(6), 929 (1984)

[66] P. Lazzeretti, Ring currents, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 36(1), 1 (2000)

[67] S. Pelloni and P. Lazzeretti, Stagnation graphs and topological models of magnetic-field induced electron current density for some small molecules in connection with their magnetic symmetry, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 111(2), 356 (2011)

[68] J. A. N. F. Gomes, Delocalized magnetic currents in benzene, J. Chem. Phys. 78(6), 3133 (1983)

[69] J. A. N. F. Gomes, Topological elements of the magnetically induced orbital current densities, J. Chem. Phys. 78(7), 4585 (1983)

[70] R. J. F. Berger, H. S. Rzepa, and D. Scheschkewitz, Ring Currents in the Dismutational Aromatic Si6R6, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49(51), 10006 (2010)

[71] Y. Couder, S. Protière, E. Fort, and A. Boudaoud, Walking and orbiting droplets, Nature 437(7056), 208 (2005)

[72] Y. Couder and E. Fort, Single-particle diffraction and interference at a macroscopic scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97(15), 154101 (2006)

[73] S. Protière, A. Boudaoud, and Y. Couder, Particle–wave association on a fluid interface, J. Fluid Mech. 554(–1), 85 (2006)

[74] E. Fort, A. Eddi, A. Boudaoud, J. Moukhtar, and Y. Couder, Path-memory induced quantization of classical orbits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(41), 17515 (2010)

[75] J. W. M. Bush, Quantum mechanics writ large, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(41), 17455 (2010)

[76] D. M. Harris, J. Moukhtar, E. Fort, Y. Couder, and J. W. M. Bush, Wavelike statistics from pilot-wave dynamics in a circular corral, Phys. Rev. E 88, 011001(R) (2013)

[77] J. W. M. Bush, Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47(1), 269 (2015)

[78] For an illustration of this type of motion, the interested readers can find animations of these experiments at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9yWv5dqSKk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmC0ygr08tE

[79] T. Durt, Generalized guidance equation for peaked quantum solitons and effective gravity, EPL 114(1), 10004 (2016)

[80] The traditional definition for quantum observable in terms of expectation values is not appealed here, because the purpose is to offer a physical, real-lab view, where one deals with detectors that register individual signals (regardless of the inherent complexity involved in the technicalities of the detection process, and not with abstract algebraic objects.

[81] I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood

[82] L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1968

[83] W. Braunbek and G. Laukien, Optik (Stuttg.) 9, 174 (1952)

[84] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics. Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999

[85] R. D. Prosser, The interpretation of diffraction and interference in terms of energy flow, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 15(3), 169 (1976)

[86] R. D. Prosser, Quantum theory and the nature of interference, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 15(3), 181 (1976)

[87] H. D. Dahmen, E. Gjonaj, and T. Stroh, Quantile motion of electromagnetic waves in wave guides of varying cross section and dispersive media, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 7(7–8), 645 (1998)

[88] W. Żakowicz, Light rays and imaging in wave optics, Phys. Rev. E 64(6), 066610 (2001)

[89] T. Wünscher, H. Hauptmann, and F. Herrmann, Which way does the light go? Am. J. Phys. 70(6), 599 (2002)

[90] E. Hesse, Modelling diffraction during ray tracing using the concept of energy flow lines, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 109(8), 1374 (2008)

[91] A. S. Sanz, M. Davidović, M. Božić, and S. Miret-Artés, Understanding interference experiments with polarized light through photon trajectories, Ann. Phys. 325(4), 763 (2010)

[92] K. Y. Bliokh, A. Y. Bekshaev, A. G. Kofman, and F. Nori, Photon trajectories, anomalous velocities and weak measurements: A classical interpretation, New J. Phys. 15(7), 073022 (2013)

[93] R. V. Waterhouse, T. W. Yates, D. Feit, and Y. N. Liu, Energy streamlines of a sound source, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78(2), 758 (1985)

[94] R. V. Waterhouse and D. Feit, Equal-energy streamlines, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80(2), 681 (1986)

[95] E. A. Skelton and R. V. Waterhouse, Energy streamlines for a spherical shell scattering plane waves, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80(5), 1473 (1986)

[96] R. V. Waterhouse, D. G. Crighton, and J. E. Ffowcs-Williams, A criterion for an energy vortex in a sound field, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81(5), 1323 (1987)

[97] R. V. Waterhouse, Vortex modes in rooms,J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82(5), 1782 (1987)

[98] M. Davidović, Á. S. Sanz, and M. Božić, Description of classical and quantum interference in view of the concept of flow line, J. Russ. Laser Res. 36(4), 329 (2015)

[99] M. D. Kostin, On the Schrödinger–Langevin equation,J. Chem. Phys. 57(9), 3589 (1972)

[100] G. H. Yuan, S. Vezzoli, C. Altuzarra, E. T. F. Rogers, C. Couteau, C. Soci, and N. I. Zheludev, Quantum superoscillation of a single photon, Light Sci. Appl. 5(8), e16127 (2016)

[101] Z. Y. Zhou, Z. H. Zhu, S. L. Liu, Y. H. Li, S. Shi, D. S. Ding, L. X. Chen, W. Gao, G. C. Guo, and B. S. Shi, Quantum twisted double-slits experiments: Confirming wavefunctions’ physical reality,Sci. Bull. 62(17), 1185 (2017)

[102] G. L. Long, W. Qin, Z. Yang, and J. L. Li, Realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics and encounter-delayedchoice experiment, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 61(3), 030311 (2018)

[103] Z. Y. Li, Weak-measurement Mach–Zehnder interferometer for testing wave-particle duality, EPL 117(5), 50005 (2017)

[104] A. S. Sanz, M. Davidović, and M. Božić, Full quantum mechanical analysis of atomic three-grating Mach– Zehnder interferometry, Ann. Phys. 353, 205 (2015)

[105] A. S. Sanz, F. Borondo, and S. Miret-Artés, Particle diffraction studied using quantum trajectories, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14(24), 6109 (2002)

[106] A. S. Sanz, Investigating Puzzling Aspects of the quantum theory by means of its hydrodynamic formulation, Found. Phys. 45(10), 1153 (2015)

[107] A. S. Sanz and S. Miret-Artés, A trajectory-based understanding of quantum interference, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 41(43), 435303 (2008)

[108] A. Luis and A. S. Sanz, What dynamics can be expected for mixed states in two-slit experiments? Ann. Phys. 357, 95 (2015)

[109] H. M. Wiseman, Grounding Bohmian mechanics in weak values and bayesianism, New J. Phys. 9(6), 165 (2007)

[110] S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M. J. Stevens, R. P. Mirin, L. K. Shalm, and A. M. Steinberg, Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer, Science 332(6034), 1170 (2011)

[111] B. Braverman and C. Simon, Proposal to observe the nonlocality of Bohmian trajectories with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(6), 060406 (2013)

[112] W. P. Schleich, M. Freyberger, and M. S. Zubairy, Reconstruction of Bohm trajectories and wave functions from interferometric measurements, Phys. Rev. A 87(1), 014102 (2013)

[113] M. H. Shamos (Ed.), Great Experiments in Physics, Dover, New York, 1987

[114] J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987

[115] Concerning this aspect, it is worth mentioning that some recent models [116] conclude that phase correlations arise when a point-like treatment is assumed for quantum particles, particularly for electrons. If such particles are understood as extended objects, then local variables are claimed to be sufficient to explain such correlations.

[116] T. Pope and W. Hofer, Spin in the extended electron model, Front. Phys. 12(3), 128503 (2017)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature