Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions

R. F. Casten

Front. Phys. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 132104

PDF (1576KB)
Front. Phys. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 132104 DOI: 10.1007/s11467-018-0834-7
PERSPECTIVE

Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions

Author information +
History +
PDF (1576KB)

Abstract

Nuclei are complex objects yet display remarkable simplicities and regular patterns. The study of these and their origins has long been one of the twin pillars of nuclear structure research. We will discuss the behavior of atomic nuclei from this point of view. A key element will be the advantages of looking at the same data from different perspectives and of inter-relating these perspectives.

Keywords

nuclear structure / simple patterns and symmetries / diverse perspectives and models / emergence of collectivity / residual interactions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
R. F. Casten. Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions. Front. Phys., 2018, 13(6): 132104 DOI:10.1007/s11467-018-0834-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

A. Arima and F. Iachello, New symmetry in the sdboson model of nuclei: The group O(6), Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 385 (1978)

[2]

A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective states (I): The vibrational limit, Ann. Phys. 99, 253 (1976)

[3]

A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (II): The rotational limit, Ann. Phys. 111, 201 (1978)

[4]

A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting Boson model of collective nuclear states (IV): The O(6) limit, Ann. Phys. 123, 468 (1979)

[5]

A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Collective nuclear states as symmetric couplings of proton and neutron excitations, Phys. Lett. B 66, 205 (1977)

[6]

D. R. Janssen, R. V. Jolos, and F. Donau, An algebraic treatment of the nuclear quadrupole degree of freedom, Nucl. Phys. A 224, 93 (1974)

[7]

R. F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspective, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, 2000

[8]

R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Empirical signature for shape transitions mediated by sub-shell changes, Phys. Rev. C 78, 041301(R) (2008)

[9]

R. F. Casten and N. V. Zamfir, Empirical realization of a critical point description in atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052503 (2001)

[10]

F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052502 (2001)

[11]

A. Couture, R. F. Casten, and R. B. Cakirli, Simple, empirical approach to predict neutron capture cross sections from nuclear masses, Phys. Rev. C 96, 061601(R) (2017)

[12]

J. A. Cizewski, R. F. Casten, G. J. Smith, M. L. Stelts, W. R. Kane, H. G. Borner, and W. F. Davidson, Evidence for a new symmetry in nuclei: The structure of 196Pt and the O(6) limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 167 (1978)

[13]

R. F. Casten, Interacting Bosons in Nuclear Physics, Ed. F. Iachello, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, p. 37

[14]

A. S. Davydov and G. F. Filippov, Rotational states in even atomic nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 8, 237 (1958)

[15]

J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, An intrinsic state for the interacting boson model and its relationship to the Bohr–Mottelson model, Nucl. Phys. A 350(1–2), 31 (1980)

[16]

R. F. Casten, NpNn systematics in heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 443(1), 1 (1985)

[17]

R. F. Casten, D. S. Brenner, and P. E. Haustein, Valence p-ninteractions and the development of collectivity in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(7), 658 (1987)

[18]

A. de-Shalit and M. Goldhaber, Mixed configurations in nuclei, Phys. Rev. 92(5), 1211 (1953)

[19]

I. Talmi, Effective interactions and coupling schemes in nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34(4), 704 (1962)

[20]

P. Federman and S. Pittel, Towards a unified microscopic description of nuclear deformation, Phys. Lett. B 69(4), 385 (1977)

[21]

R. F. Casten, D. D. Warner, D. S. Brenner, and R. L. Gill, Relation between the Z= 64 shell closure and the onset of deformation at N= 88–90, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47(20), 1433 (1981)

[22]

J. D. Garrett and Z.Y. Zhang, Abstract, International Conference on Contemporary Topics in Nuclear Structure Physics, Cocoyoc, Mexico, June 9–14, 1988

[23]

J. Y. Zhang, R. F. Casten, and D. S. Brenner, Empirical proton-neutron interaction energies: Linearity and saturation phenomena, Phys. Lett. B 227(1), 1 (1989)

[24]

R. B. Cakirli, D. S. Brenner, R. F. Casten, and E. A. Millman, Proton-neutron interactions and the new atomic masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(9), 092501 (2005) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(11), 119903 (2005)]

[25]

D. S. Brenner, R. B. Cakirli, and R. F. Casten, Valence proton-neutron interactions throughout the mass surface, Phys. Rev. C 73(3), 034315 (2006)

[26]

R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Direct empirical correlation between proton-neutron interaction strengths and the growth of collectivity in nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(13), 132501 (2006)

[27]

R. B. Cakirli, K. Blaum, and R. F. Casten, Indication of a mini-valenceWigner-like energy in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 82, 061304(R) (2010)

[28]

G. Alaga, K. Alder, A. Bohr, and B. R. Mottelson, Intensity rules for beta and gamma transitions to nuclear rotational states, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 29, 9 (1955)

[29]

P. O. Lipas, Perturbation corrections to energies of collective states in deformed even nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 39, 468 (1962)

[30]

L. L. Riedinger, N. R. Johnson, and J. H. Hamilton, β- and γ-Vibrational Bands of 152Sm and 154Gd, Phys. Rev. 179(4), 1214 (1969)

[31]

D. D. Warner and R. F. Casten, Revised formulation of the phenomenological interacting boson approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(20), 1385 (1982)

[32]

A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(5), 818 (1996)

[33]

D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Proxy-SU(3) symmetry in heavy deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017)

[34]

D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Analytic predictions for nuclear shapes, prolate dominance, and the prolate-oblate shape transition in the proxy-SU(3) model, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017)

[35]

Talks by R. F. Casten and R. B. Cakirli to be given at SSNET18, Nov. 5–9, 2018, Paris, France

[36]

R. D. Ratna Raju, J. P. Draayer, and K. T. Hecht, Search for a coupling scheme in heavy deformed nuclei: The pseudo SU(3) model, Nucl. Phys. A 202(3), 433 (1973)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1576KB)

940

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/