Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions

R. F. Casten

PDF(1576 KB)
PDF(1576 KB)
Front. Phys. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 132104. DOI: 10.1007/s11467-018-0834-7
PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE

Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Nuclei are complex objects yet display remarkable simplicities and regular patterns. The study of these and their origins has long been one of the twin pillars of nuclear structure research. We will discuss the behavior of atomic nuclei from this point of view. A key element will be the advantages of looking at the same data from different perspectives and of inter-relating these perspectives.

Keywords

nuclear structure / simple patterns and symmetries / diverse perspectives and models / emergence of collectivity / residual interactions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
R. F. Casten. Approaching nuclei through multiple perspectives and diverse models: Patterns, symmetries, interactions. Front. Phys., 2018, 13(6): 132104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-018-0834-7

References

[1]
A. Arima and F. Iachello, New symmetry in the sdboson model of nuclei: The group O(6), Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 385 (1978)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[2]
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective states (I): The vibrational limit, Ann. Phys. 99, 253 (1976)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[3]
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (II): The rotational limit, Ann. Phys. 111, 201 (1978)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[4]
A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting Boson model of collective nuclear states (IV): The O(6) limit, Ann. Phys. 123, 468 (1979)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[5]
A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Collective nuclear states as symmetric couplings of proton and neutron excitations, Phys. Lett. B 66, 205 (1977)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[6]
D. R. Janssen, R. V. Jolos, and F. Donau, An algebraic treatment of the nuclear quadrupole degree of freedom, Nucl. Phys. A 224, 93 (1974)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[7]
R. F. Casten, Nuclear Structure from a Simple Perspective, 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, 2000
[8]
R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Empirical signature for shape transitions mediated by sub-shell changes, Phys. Rev. C 78, 041301(R) (2008)
[9]
R. F. Casten and N. V. Zamfir, Empirical realization of a critical point description in atomic nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052503 (2001)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[10]
F. Iachello, Analytic description of critical point nuclei in a spherical-axially deformed shape phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 052502 (2001)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[11]
A. Couture, R. F. Casten, and R. B. Cakirli, Simple, empirical approach to predict neutron capture cross sections from nuclear masses, Phys. Rev. C 96, 061601(R) (2017)
[12]
J. A. Cizewski, R. F. Casten, G. J. Smith, M. L. Stelts, W. R. Kane, H. G. Borner, and W. F. Davidson, Evidence for a new symmetry in nuclei: The structure of 196Pt and the O(6) limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 167 (1978)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[13]
R. F. Casten, Interacting Bosons in Nuclear Physics, Ed. F. Iachello, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, p. 37
[14]
A. S. Davydov and G. F. Filippov, Rotational states in even atomic nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 8, 237 (1958)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[15]
J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, An intrinsic state for the interacting boson model and its relationship to the Bohr–Mottelson model, Nucl. Phys. A 350(1–2), 31 (1980)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[16]
R. F. Casten, NpNn systematics in heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 443(1), 1 (1985)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[17]
R. F. Casten, D. S. Brenner, and P. E. Haustein, Valence p-ninteractions and the development of collectivity in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(7), 658 (1987)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[18]
A. de-Shalit and M. Goldhaber, Mixed configurations in nuclei, Phys. Rev. 92(5), 1211 (1953)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[19]
I. Talmi, Effective interactions and coupling schemes in nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34(4), 704 (1962)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[20]
P. Federman and S. Pittel, Towards a unified microscopic description of nuclear deformation, Phys. Lett. B 69(4), 385 (1977)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[21]
R. F. Casten, D. D. Warner, D. S. Brenner, and R. L. Gill, Relation between the Z= 64 shell closure and the onset of deformation at N= 88–90, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47(20), 1433 (1981)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[22]
J. D. Garrett and Z.Y. Zhang, Abstract, International Conference on Contemporary Topics in Nuclear Structure Physics, Cocoyoc, Mexico, June 9–14, 1988
[23]
J. Y. Zhang, R. F. Casten, and D. S. Brenner, Empirical proton-neutron interaction energies: Linearity and saturation phenomena, Phys. Lett. B 227(1), 1 (1989)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[24]
R. B. Cakirli, D. S. Brenner, R. F. Casten, and E. A. Millman, Proton-neutron interactions and the new atomic masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(9), 092501 (2005) [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(11), 119903 (2005)]
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[25]
D. S. Brenner, R. B. Cakirli, and R. F. Casten, Valence proton-neutron interactions throughout the mass surface, Phys. Rev. C 73(3), 034315 (2006)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[26]
R. B. Cakirli and R. F. Casten, Direct empirical correlation between proton-neutron interaction strengths and the growth of collectivity in nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(13), 132501 (2006)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[27]
R. B. Cakirli, K. Blaum, and R. F. Casten, Indication of a mini-valenceWigner-like energy in heavy nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 82, 061304(R) (2010)
[28]
G. Alaga, K. Alder, A. Bohr, and B. R. Mottelson, Intensity rules for beta and gamma transitions to nuclear rotational states, Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. 29, 9 (1955)
[29]
P. O. Lipas, Perturbation corrections to energies of collective states in deformed even nuclei, Nucl. Phys. 39, 468 (1962)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[30]
L. L. Riedinger, N. R. Johnson, and J. H. Hamilton, β- and γ-Vibrational Bands of 152Sm and 154Gd, Phys. Rev. 179(4), 1214 (1969)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[31]
D. D. Warner and R. F. Casten, Revised formulation of the phenomenological interacting boson approximation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(20), 1385 (1982)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[32]
A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(5), 818 (1996)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[33]
D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Proxy-SU(3) symmetry in heavy deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[34]
D. Bonatsos, I. E. Assimakis, N. Minkov, A. Martinou, S. Sarantopoulou, R. B. Cakirli, R. F. Casten, and K. Blaum, Analytic predictions for nuclear shapes, prolate dominance, and the prolate-oblate shape transition in the proxy-SU(3) model, Phys. Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[35]
Talks by R. F. Casten and R. B. Cakirli to be given at SSNET18, Nov. 5–9, 2018, Paris, France
[36]
R. D. Ratna Raju, J. P. Draayer, and K. T. Hecht, Search for a coupling scheme in heavy deformed nuclei: The pseudo SU(3) model, Nucl. Phys. A 202(3), 433 (1973)
CrossRef ADS Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1576 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/