Symmetries of the interacting boson model

Abstract

This contribution reviews the symmetry properties of the interacting boson model of Arima and Iachello. While the concept of a dynamical symmetry is by now a familiar one, this is not necessarily so for the extended notions of partial dynamical symmetry and quasi dynamical symmetry, which can be beautifully illustrated in the context of the interacting boson model. The main conclusion of the analysis is that dynamical symmetries are scarce while their partial and quasi extensions are ubiquitous.

Keywords

interacting boson model

References

[1] A. Arima and F. Iachello, Collective nuclear states as representations of a SU(6) group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35(16), 1069 (1975)

[2] J. Rainwater, Nuclear energy level argument for a spheroidal nuclear model, Phys. Rev. 79(3), 432 (1950)

[3] A. Bohr, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 26, 14 (1952)

[4] D. M. Brink, A. F. R. De Toledo Piza, and A. K. Kerman, Interval rules and intensity ratios in vibrating spherical nuclei, Phys. Lett. 19(5), 413 (1965)

[5] A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 27, 16 (1953)

[6] L. Wilets and M. Jean, Surface oscillations in even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 102, 788 (1956)

[7] A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Collective nuclear states as symmetric couplings of proton and neutron excitations, Phys. Lett. B 66(3), 205 (1977)

[8] T. Otsuka, A. Arima, and F. Iachello, Nuclear shell model and interacting bosons, Nucl. Phys. A 309(1–2), 1 (1978)

[9] T. Otsuka, A. Arima, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Shell model description of interacting bosons, Phys. Lett. B 76(2), 139 (1978)

[10] J. P. Elliott and A. P. White, An isospin invariant form of the interacting boson model, Phys. Lett. B 97(2), 169 (1980)

[11] J. P. Elliott and J. A. Evans, An intrinsic spin for interacting bosons, Phys. Lett. B 101(4), 216 (1981)

[12] E. Wigner, On the consequences of the symmetry of the nuclear hamiltonian on the spectroscopy of nuclei, Phys. Rev. 51(2), 106 (1937)

[13] G. Racah, Theory of complex spectra (III), Phys. Rev. 63(9–10), 367 (1943)

[14] G. Racah, Theory of complex spectra (IV), Phys. Rev. 76(9), 1352 (1949)

[15] J. P. Elliott, Collective motion in the nuclear shell model (I): Classification schemes for states of mixed configurations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245(1240), 128 (1958)

[16] J. P. Elliott, Collective motion in the nuclear shell model (II): The introduction of intrinsic wave-functions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245(1243), 562 (1958)

[17] F. Iachello, Lie Algebras and Applications, Springer, Berlin, 2006

[18] A. Frank, J. Jolie, and P. Van Isacker, Symmetries in Atomic Nuclei, Springer, Berlin, 2009

[19] P. Van Isacker, Partial and quasi dynamical symmetries in nuclei, Nucl. Phys. News 24(3), 23 (2014)

[20] J. N. Ginocchio and M. W. Kirson, Relationship between the Bohr collective hamiltonian and the interacting-boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44(26), 1744 (1980)

[21] A. E. L. Dieperink, O. Scholten, and F. Iachello, Classical limit of the interacting-boson model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44(26), 1747 (1980)

[22] A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Features of nuclear deformations produced by the alignment of individual particles or pairs, Phys. Scr. 22(5), 468 (1980)

[23] A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (II): Nuclear Deformations, Benjamin, New York, 1975

[24] R. Gilmore, Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers, Wiley, New York, 1981

[25] E. López-Moreno and O. Castaños, Shapes and stability within the interacting boson model: Dynamical symmetries, Phys. Rev. C 54(5), 2374 (1996)

[26] J. Jolie, P. Cejnar, R. F. Casten, S. Heinze, A. Linnemann, and V. Werner, Triple point of nuclear deformations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(18), 182502 (2002)

[27] R. F. Casten, Shape phase transitions and critical-point phenomena in atomic nuclei, Nat. Phys. 2(12), 811 (2006)

[28] P. Cejnar, J. Jolie, and R. F. Casten, Quantum phase transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(3), 2155 (2010)

[29] O. Castaños, E. Chacón, A. Frank, and M. Moshinsky, Group theory of the interacting boson model of the nucleus, J. Math. Phys. 20(1), 35 (1979)

[30] A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective states (I): The vibrational limit, Ann. Phys. 99(2), 253 (1976)

[31] A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (II): The rotational limit, Ann. Phys. 111(1), 201 (1978)

[32] A. Arima and F. Iachello, Interacting boson model of collective nuclear states (IV): The O(6) limit, Ann. Phys. 123(2), 468 (1979)

[33] A. M. Shirokov, N. A. Smirnova, and Yu. F. Smirnov, Parameter symmetry of the interacting boson model, Phys. Lett. B 434(3–4), 237 (1998)

[34] F. Iachello and A. Arima, The Interacting Boson Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987

[35] D. D. Warner, and R. F. Casten, Predictions of the interacting boson approximation in a consistent Qframework, Phys. Rev. C 28(4), 1798 (1983)

[36] P. O. Lipas, P. Toivonen, and D. D. Warner, IBA consistent-Qformalism extended to the vibrational region, Phys. Lett. B 155(5–6), 295 (1985)

[37] R. F. Casten, Status of experimental tests of the IBA, in: Interacting Bose–Fermi Systems in Nuclei, edited by F. Iachello, Plenum, New York, 1981, page 3

[38] P. Cejnar and J. Jolie, Dynamical-symmetry content of transitional IBM-1 hamiltonians, Phys. Lett. B 420(3–4), 241 (1998)

[39] Y. Alhassid and A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry, J. Phys. A 25(23), L1265 (1992)

[40] A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetry in deformed nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(5), 818 (1996)

[41] A. Leviatan, A. Novoselsky, and I. Talmi, O(5) symmetry in IBA-1 — the O(6)–U(5) transition region, Phys. Lett. B 172(2), 144 (1986)

[42] P. Van Isacker, Dynamical symmetry and higher-order interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(21), 4269 (1999)

[43] A. Leviatan and P. Van Isacker, Generalized partial dynamical symmetry in nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(22), 222501 (2002)

[44] A. Leviatan, Partial dynamical symmetries, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66(1), 93 (2011)

[45] C. Kremer, J. Beller, A. Leviatan, N. Pietralla, G. Rainovski, R. Trippel, and P. Van Isacker, Linking partial and quasi dynamical symmetries in rotational nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 89, 041302(R) (2014)

[46] F. Pan and J. P. Draayer, New algebraic solutions for SO(6)↔U(5) transitional nuclei in the interacting boson model, Nucl. Phys. A 636(2), 156 (1998)

[47] D. J. Rowe, P. Rochford, and J. Repka, Dynamic structure and embedded representation in physics: The group theory of the adiabatic approximation, J. Math. Phys. 29(3), 572 (1988)

[48] D. J. Rowe, C. Bahri, and W. Wijesundera, Exactly solvable model of a superconducting to rotational phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(20), 4394 (1998)

[49] C. Bahri and D. J. Rowe, SU(3) quasi-dynamical symmetry as an organizational mechanism for generating nuclear rotational motions, Nucl. Phys. A 662(1–2), 125 (2000)

[50] M. Macek, J. Dobeš, and P. Cejnar, Transition from γ-rigid to γ-soft dynamics in the interacting boson model: Quasicriticality and quasidynamical symmetry, Phys. Rev. C 80(1), 014319 (2009)

[51] D. Bonatsos, E. A. McCutchan, and R. F. Casten, SU(3) quasidynamical symmetry underlying the Alhassid–Whelan arc of regularity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(2), 022502 (2010)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature