The zero active mass condition in Friedmann–Robertson–Walker cosmologies

Abstract

Many cosmological measurements today suggest that the Universe is expanding at a constant rate. This is inferred from the observed age versus redshift relationship and various distance indicators, all of which point to a cosmic equation of state (EoS) p = −ρ/3, where ρ and p are, respectively, the total energy density and pressure of the cosmic fluid. It has recently been shown that this result is not a coincidence and simply confirms the fact that the symmetries in the Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) metric appear to be viable only for a medium with zero active mass, i.e., ρ+ 3p = 0. In their latest paper, however, Kim, Lasenby and Hobson (2016) have provided what they believe to be a counter argument to this conclusion. Here, we show that these authors are merely repeating the conventional mistake of incorrectly placing the observer simultaneously in a comoving frame, where the lapse function g_tt is coordinate dependent when ρ+ 3p≠0, and a supposedly different, freefalling frame, in which g_tt = 1, implying no time dilation. We demonstrate that the Hubble flow is not inertial when ρ+ 3p≠0, so the comoving frame is generally not in free fall, even though in FRW, the comoving and free-falling frames are supposed to be identical at every spacetime point. So this confusion of frames not only constitutes an inconsistency with the fundamental tenets of general relativity but, additionally, there is no possibility of using a gauge transformation to select a set of coordinates for which g_tt = 1 when ρ+ 3p≠0.

Keywords

cosmology / gravitation / spacetime metric

References

[1] C. L. Bennett, R. S. Hill, G. Hinshaw, M. R. Nolta, N. Odegard, L. Page, D. N. Spergel, J. L. Weiland, E. L. Wright, M. Halpern, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, G. S. Tucker, and E. Wollack, First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)Observations: Foreground Emission,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148(1), 97 (2003)

[2] D. N. Spergel, L. Verde, H. V. Peiris, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, C. L. Bennett, M. Halpern, G. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer, L. Page, G. S. Tucker, J. L. Weiland, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright, First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)Observations: Determination of cosmological parameters,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148(1), 175 (2003)

[3] P. A. R. Ade, (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2013 results. XXIII. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB,A&A 571, A23 (2014)

[4] F. Melia, The Edge of Infinity: Supermassive Black Holes in the Universe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972, p. 119

[5] F. Melia, The cosmic horizon, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382(4), 1917 (2007)

[6] F. Melia and M. Abdelqader, The cosmological spacetime, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18(12), 1889 (2009)

[7] F. Melia and A. S. H. Shevchuk, The Rh= ct universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419(3), 2579 (2012)

[8] F. Melia, Physical basis for the symmetries in the Friedmann–Robertson–Walker metric, Front. Phys. 11(4), 119801 (2016)

[9] D. Y. Kim, A. N. Lasenby, and M. P. Hobson, Friedmann–Robertson–Walker models do not require zero active mass, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460(1), L119 (2016), arXiv: 1601.07890

[10] S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, New York: Wiley, 1972

[11] A. Harvey, The principle of equivalence, Ann. Phys. 29(3), 383 (1964)

[12] M. Carrera and D. Giulini, Influence of global cosmological expansion on local dynamics and kinematics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 169 (2010), arXiv: 0810.2712v2

[13] H. Liu, Nonlinear resonance for quasilinear hyperbolic equation, J. Math. Phys. 28(11), 1920 (1987)

[14] H. Liu, Nonlinear resonance for quasilinear hyperbolic equation, J. Math. Phys. 28(11), 1924 (1987)

[15] S. M. Kopeikin, Local gravitational physics of the Hubble expansion, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130(1), 11 (2015)

[16] D. Y. Kim, A. N. Lasenby, and M. P. Hobson, Spherically-symmetric solutions in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D (2016) (submitted), arXiv: 1604.06365

[17] B. O. J. Tupper, Tetrad field equations and a generalized Friedmann equation, Astrophys. Space Sci. 28(1), 225 (1974)

[18] P. van Oirschot, J. Kwan, and G. F. Lewis, Through the looking glass: Why the “Cosmic Horizon” is not a horizon, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 404, 1633 (2010), arXiv: 1001.4795

[19] G. F. Lewis and P. van Oirschot, How does the Hubble sphere limit our view of the Universe? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 423(1), L26 (2012)

[20] O. Bikwa, F. Melia, and A. S. H. Shevchuk, Photon geodesics in Friedmann–Robertson–Walker cosmologies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421(4), 3356 (2012)

[21] F. Melia, The cosmic horizon for a universe with Phantom energy, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09, 029 (2012)

[22] F. Melia, Proper size of the visible Universe in FRW metrics with a constant space-time curvature, Class. Quantum Gravity 30(15), 155007 (2013)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg