1 Introduction
In a recent review paper [
1], by performing integration within an ordered product (IWOP) of operators, we explored a quantum optical version of classical optical transformations. In this way, we developed some topics in classical optics theory using research results in quantum optics and vice-versa, i.e., not only have we found new quantum mechanical unitary operators that correspond to known optical transformations, but we also proposed some new classical optical transformations. For example, we found a Fresnel operator (GFO) corresponding to the famous Fresnel transform (GFT) in classical optics. In this paper, using the same technique, we shall reveal that a core operator is involved in the quantum-mechanical treatment of fractional Fourier transforms (FrFT). Then, we shall demonstrate the role of this core operator in composing complex fractional Fourier transformations (CFrFTs). In this manner, we shall also reveal the fractional property of Fresnel transformation caused by a type of Fresnel operators.
The FrFT is a very useful tool in Fourier optics and information optics, especially in optical communication, image manipulations, and signal analysis [
1–
10]. The concept of the FrFT was originally used for signal processing in 1980 by Namias [
2] as a Fourier transform of fractional order. However, FrFT did not have a significant impact on optics until the FrFT was physically defined based on propagation in quadratic graded-index media (GRIN media) [
6] by Mendlovic, Ozaktas, and Lohmann.
Other than its Fourier-transform nature, the essence of FrFT, denoted as is its additive rule (or the compositional rule), i.e.,
which gives rise to the name “fractional” transformation. In this work by virtue of quantum mechanical representation theory and the IWOP technique we shall reveal the essence of the “fractional” transformation by finding its core operator, which is shown to be the position–momentum mutual-transformation operator. Based on this observation, and using the two mutually conjugate entangled-state representations, we shall derive a core operator that allows for complex, fractional Fourier transformations (CFrFT) [
11], and which also obeys the additive rule. Then, we shall also reveal the fractional nature of the Fresnel operator [
12].
The work is arranged as follows: In Section 2, using the known integration kernel of FrFT, we use Dirac’s representation to derive the FrFT operator. Then, in Section 3 we emphasize that the position-momentum mutual-transformation operator is the core of FrFT, and then derive its concrete form using the IWOP technique [
13–
15]. In Sections 4 and 5, based on the two mutually conjugate entangled-state representations, we also derive the core operator for constructing CFrFT, which manifestly exhibits the additive rule. In Section 6, we demonstrate the fractional nature of the Fresnel operator.
2 Obtaining the FrFT operator by virtue of the IWOP method
The one-dimensional FrFT of the
α-th (the real
α-angle) is defined in Refs. [
5,
6]
where
noting that . The conventional Fourier transform is simply .
We hope to derive the FrFT operator such that
In the context of quantum mechanics, a function f becomes the quantum state , and the value becomes the matrix element . The typical Fourier transform is simply the change of basis between the coordinate representation and the momentum representation
In Fock space, and are respectively expressed as
where and is the vacuum state annihilated by . Multiplying by from the left and by from the right, and then integrating over and , using the IWOP method and , while also using the identity we have
On the other hand, from the completeness relation
we know
so
which is the FrFT operator. It then follows that
Now, we analyze the appearance of in more detail. As will be soon demonstrated, it is the core for FrFT.
3 The position–momentum mutual-transformation operator as the core of FrFT
The key feature of FrFT is composite ability and additivity. Let be another β-th FrFT
When and are to be combined as a single FrFT , i.e., to perform a fractional Fourier transform repeatedly on they must be connected smoothly as the following two-fold integral
In terms of the Dirac symbolism, this is expressed as
in which we examine
Using , we have
Then, using and Eqs. (6) and (7), we see that
Thus, is the position–momentum mutual-transformation operator. Using Eq. (18), we can express Eq. (17) as
Then, according to the definition of in Eq. (11), we see that
noting that
Therefore, the appearance of in the center of is inevitable for the additivity of FrFT. We now have a better understanding of why the kernel should be defined in the seemingly unnatural terms instead of naively using
The position–momentum mutual-transformation operator can be expressed as . In fact, using IWOP, we perform the integration
which confirms that
4 Two mutually conjugate entangled-state representations for finding the core of a complex fractional Fourier transformation
In Refs. [
15–
18] we introduced two mutually conjugate entangled-state representations
and
Here, is the common eigenvector of two-particles’ relative coordinates and total momentum
It was Einstein
et al. [
19] who first noted that the commutativity of
would lead to the concept of quantum entanglement. Here,
is the common eigenvector of
and
where and both possess completeness and the orthogonality:
The overlap
is a Fourier transformation kernel in complex form. The core for constructing the complex fractional Fourier transformation (CFrFT) transiting from to can be found by examining the additivity, i.e., when performing complex fractional Fourier transforms and repeatedly on the following two-fold integral
must be smoothly connected as a single CFrFT with -order. Using Dirac notation, Eq. (30) is expressed as
in which we examine
Using Eq. (28), we have
If we can find an operator W that can play the role of transforming
then
Comparing (24) with (25), we see that
Thus, W is the core operator for constructing the CFrFT:
so that is the mutual-transformation operator.
5 The kernel of CFrFT (improved)
We now know that the operator for enabling the use of a CFrFT can be chosen as
since
We then calculate the kernel of the CFrFT, using the two-mode coherent-state representation with the over-completeness
and the overlap
Thus, we have
At this point, we should mention that in Ref. [
11], Fan
et al. calculated
, but the additive rule of CFrFT was not examined. The present paper offers a supplement.
In particular, when using
and Eq. (29), we can verify that
which is also a Fourier transformation.
6 The fractional transformation property for a type of Fresnel operator
In this section, drawing from the core-operator concept, we demonstrate that the Fresnel operator also involves the fractional transformation property (but not the fractional Fourier transformation).
As we demonstrated in Ref. [
1], the Fresnel operator in the coherent state representation is
where s and r are complex numbers, obeying and where is the coherent state
After performing the integration in (46), using the IWOP technique, we see that
By introducing a real and D obeying , through the following relation:
or conversely
we obtain the matrix element of in coordinate representation
which is simply the kernel of the optical Fresnel transform in classical optics. This is the reason we call the Fresnel operator. Now we let and so that that is
which is a squeezing operator [
20], since
In this case,
Since
for , using Eqs. (50) and (52), we can re-express Eq. (49) as
Comparing Eq. (12) with Eq. (54) we see that they have a similar form, with the exception that Thus, we see that the core operator also plays a role in the Fresnel transformation. It remains to be determined if obeys the additive rule (fractional transformation property).
7 The additivity of fractional squeezing transformations
By recalling that the Fresnel operator defined in Eq. (46) possesses the group multiplication property [
1],
where
or
We let and Then, from Eq. (56) we see that
Correspondingly, using Eq. (48) we have
It then follows from Eq. (54) and Eq. (59) that the fractional transformation property of the Fresnel operator can be demonstrated by
By combining Eq. (54) and Eq. (60), we have exposed the additive property of the Fresnel transformations caused by a type of Fresnel operator .
In summary, by quantum–mechanical analysis of the additive rule which the fractional Fourier transformation should satisfy, we have revealed that the position–momentum mutual-transformation operator is the core for constructing the integration kernel of a FrFT. Based on this observation, we have found the core operator for CFrFT, which is the mutual transform operator between the two conjugate entangled states and We also identified as the operator for enabling a CFrFT. This observation also helps to reveal the fractional-transformation property for a type of Fresnel operator.
© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015