1 Introduction
2 HSDM of difficult-to-machine metal materials
2.1 HSDM of titanium alloy
Fig.3 Influence of cutting parameters on tool wear, cutting force and temperature: (a) effect of vc and fz on tool wear [105], (b) cutting force under different vc [106], and (c) cutting temperature under different vc [106]. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [105,106] from Elsevier and Springer Nature. |
Fig.4 Influence of cutting parameters on microstructure and chip morphology: (a) workpiece microstructure and deformation zone under different vc [107], (b) effect of vc on chip morphology [108], and (c) major section of chips at different vc [108]. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [107,108] from Trans Tech Publications Ltd. and Springer Nature. |
2.2 HSDM of high-strength steel
Fig.6 Microhardness and residual stress under different cutting parameters: (a) microhardness of depth from the machined surface under different cutting parameters and (b) variation of machining surface residual stress with cutting parameters [117]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [117] from Elsevier. |
2.3 HSDM of nickel-based alloy
2.4 Summary of HSDM of difficult-to-machine metal materials
3 LAM of difficult-to-machine metal materials
3.1 LAM of high-strength steel
Fig.12 Cutting forces and grain deformation distribution: (a) tool wear under different cutting conditions [134] and (b) surface roughness at different vc [135]. CM: conventional milling; LAM: laser-assisted milling; H.F: high-feed milling; L.F: low-feed milling. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [134,135] from Elsevier. |
3.2 LAM of titanium alloy
Fig.18 Surface quality, unit cost and annual cost: (a) microstructure, (b) residual stress, (c) cost of the unit under different vc [144], and (d) annual costs of produced parts [145]. CM: conventional milling; LAM: laser-assisted milling. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [144,145] from Springer Nature and Elsevier. |
3.3 LAM of nickel-based alloys
Fig.19 Flank face wear at different milling conditions: (a) scanning electron microscope of coated tool at 10s with laser-assisted milling, (b) scanning electron microscope of coated tool at 16.6 min with laser-assisted milling [148], and (c) scanning electron microscope of the coated tool at 20 mm with laser-assisted milling under different PL [149]. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [148,149] from Springer Nature and ASME. |
Fig.20 The influence of workpiece inclination angles on cutting force and tool damage: (a) workpiece inclination and cutting force and (b) workpiece inclination and tool damage [151]. CM: conventional milling; LAM: laser-assisted milling. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [151] from Springer Nature. |
Fig.22 Cutting forces and grain deformation distribution: (a) cutting forces of path-optimized laser-assisted milling (LAM) [155] and (b) grain deformation distribution in different machining processes [156]. CM: conventional milling; LS: single laser scanning. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [155,156] from Elsevier. |
3.4 Summary of LAM of difficult-to-machine metal materials
4 Ultrasonic energy field-assisted milling of difficult-to-machine metal materials
4.1 Ultrasonic energy field-assisted milling of nickel-based alloy
Fig.25 Changes in surface morphology, burr size and surface roughness under different fz: (a) bottom surface morphology and (b) burr width and surface roughness [164]. UVAM: ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling; CM: conventional milling. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [164] from Springer Nature. |
Fig.26 Microstructure and surface roughness of conventional milling (CM) and ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling (UVAM): (a) microstructure of processed surface [166] and (b) three-dimensional surface roughness [167]. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [166,167] from Springer Nature and Elsevier. |
4.2 Ultrasonic energy field-assisted milling of titanium alloy
Fig.29 Optimization of resonant block and analysis of tool tip trajectory: (a) finite element method (FEM) structure optimization of ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling (UVAM) system and resonant block and (b) tool-tip motion trajectory in UVAM and conventional milling (CM) process [174]. Unit: mm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [174] from Elsevier. |
Fig.31 Three-dimensional morphology of ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling (UVAM) and conventional milling (CM) machined surfaces: (a) CM at vc = 125.6 m/min, (b) UVAM at vc = 125.6 m/min, (c) CM at vc = 157 m/min, and (d) UVAM at vc = 157 m/min [178]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [178] from Springer Nature. |
4.3 Ultrasonic energy field-assisted milling of high-strength steel
Fig.33 Ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling (UVAM) and conventional milling (CM) surface quality: (a) influence of f and helix angle on the processed surface [180] and (b) effect of fz and f on surface roughness and residual stress [181]. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [180,181] from MDPI and Elsevier. |
4.4 Summary of ultrasonic energy field-assisted milling of difficult-to-machine metal materials
5 CMQLAM of difficult-to-machine metal materials
Fig.36 Cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication energy field-assisted milling system (CMQLAM), lubrication mechanism and logic: (a) CMQLAM system, (b) workpiece surface boundary lubrication [189], and (c) logical structure of laser-assisted milling difficult-to-machine metal materials. CA: cold air; MQL: minimum quantity lubrication. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [189] from Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering. |
5.1 CMQLAM of nickel-based alloy
Fig.37 Different nozzle diameters, cutting temperatures, and specific cutting energies: (a) experimental results of different nozzle diameter outlets [190], and (b) effects of green lubrication and cutting parameters on cutting temperature and specific cutting energy [191]. MQL: minimum quantity lubrication. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [190,191] from Springer Nature and Elsevier. |
Fig.38 Grain size distribution and scanning electron microscope: (a) effect of green lubrication on grain size distribution [191] and (b) scanning electron microscope images of different green lubricants [193]. CM: conventional milling; MQL: minimum quantity lubrication. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [191,193] from Elsevier. |
Fig.39 Different green cooling lubrication and tool machining surfaces: (a) uncoated tool liquid nitrogen, (b) uncoated tool minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), (c) uncoated tool cryogenic MQL (CMQL), (d) low-temperature treatment tool LN2, (e) low-temperature treatment tool MQL, (f) low-temperature treatment tool CMQL, (g) TiAlN-coated tool LN2, (h) TiAlN-coated tool MQL, and (i) TiAlN-coated tool CMQL [197]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [197] from Elsevier. |
5.2 CMQLAM of titanium alloy
5.3 CMQLAM of high-strength steel
Fig.44 Average residual stresses corresponding to different fz and vc: (a) conventional milling 0° residual stresses, (b) conventional milling 90° residual stresses, (c) cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication 0° residual stresses, and (d) cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication 90° residual stresses [209]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [209] from Elsevier. |
Fig.45 Chip morphology, cutting force, and cutting temperature: (a) chip morphology under different lubrication environments [210] and (b) influence of cutting parameters on cutting force and cutting temperature [211]. CM: conventional milling; CMQL: cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [210,211] from ASTM and Springer Nature. |