RESEARCH ARTICLE

Robust design approach to the minimization of functional performance variations of products and systems

  • J. ZHANG 1 ,
  • H. DU 1 ,
  • D. XUE 2 ,
  • P. GU , 3
Expand
  • 1. Intelligent Manufacturing Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education, Shantou University, Shantou 515063 China
  • 2. Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N1N4, Canada
  • 3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received date: 20 Apr 2020

Accepted date: 15 Aug 2020

Published date: 15 Jun 2021

Copyright

2021 Higher Education Press

Abstract

Functional performance variations of products and systems are often used to measure the qualities of products and systems considering the changes in the design parameter values caused by uncertainties. A robust design approach has been developed in this research to minimize the functional performance variations considering the design parameter uncertainties by identifying the boundaries of the functional performance variations through optimization. In this work, a mathematical model is developed to describe the relationships among functional performance, design configurations and parameters, and design parameter uncertainties. A multi-level optimization model is established to identify: (1) The optimal design configuration, (2) the optimal values of design parameters, and (3) the boundaries of functional performance variations. Sensitivity analysis considering the impact of parameter uncertainties on functional performance variation boundaries has also been conducted. A case study on the design of a truss system has been conducted. Case study results show that the sensitivities of functional performance variation boundaries to the design parameter uncertainties can be reduced significantly using the new robust design approach.

Cite this article

J. ZHANG , H. DU , D. XUE , P. GU . Robust design approach to the minimization of functional performance variations of products and systems[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2021 , 16(2) : 379 -392 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-020-0607-1

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1701701), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51505269), and the Sailing Talent Program of Guangdong Province, China for providing financial support for this research.
1
Pahl G, Beitz W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach.Berlin: Springer, 1988

2
Xue D, Cheing S Y, Gu P. Configuration design considering the impact of design changes on downstream processes based upon the axiomatic design approach. Journal of Engineering Design, 2006, 17(6): 487–508

DOI

3
Taguchi G. Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream. New York: ASME Press, 1993

4
Gu P, Lu B, Spiewak S. A new approach for robust design of mechanical systems. CIRP Annals, 2004, 53(1): 129–133

DOI

5
Zhan J, Luo Y. Robust topology optimization of hinge-free compliant mechanisms with material uncertainties based on a non-probabilistic field model. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 14(2): 201–212

DOI

6
Zang C, Friswell M I, Mottershead J E. A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(4–5): 315–326

DOI

7
Zhang Y. Principle of maximum entropy for reliability analysis in design of machine components. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 14(1): 21–32

DOI

8
Zhang J, Li S, Bao N, A robust design approach to determination of tolerance of mechanical products. CIRP Annals, 2010, 59(1):195–198

DOI

9
Jia X, Jiang C, Fu C, Uncertainty propagation analysis by an extended sparse grid technique. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 14(1): 33–46

DOI

10
Zhang J, Wu M, Peng Q, Design for interface stiffness of mechanical products using integrated simulation and optimization under uncertainty. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 6(2): 021006

DOI

11
Taguchi G. Performance analysis design. International Journal of Production Research, 1978, 16(6): 521–530

DOI

12
Murphy T, Tsui K, Allen J. A review of robust design methods for multiple response. Research in Engineering Design, 2005, 15(4): 201–215

DOI

13
Beyer H G, Sendhoff B. Robust optimization—A comprehensive survey. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(33–34): 3190–3218

DOI

14
Zhang Y. Reliability-based robust design optimization of vehicle components, Part I: Theory. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 10(2): 138–144

DOI

15
Hasenkamp T, Arvidsson M, Gremyr I. A review of practices for robust design methodology. Journal of Engineering Design, 2009, 20(6): 645–657

DOI

16
Zhou X, Ruan X, Gosling P. Robust design optimization of variable angle tow composite plates for maximum buckling load in the presence of uncertainties. Composite Structures, 2019, 223: 110985

DOI

17
Parkinson A, Sorensen C, Pourhassan N. A general approach for robust optimal design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1993, 115(1): 74–80

DOI

18
Huang B, Du X. Analytical robustness assessment for robust design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 34(2): 123–137

DOI

19
Fonseca J R, Friswell M I, Lees A W. Efficient robust design via Monte Carlo sample reweighting. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 69(11): 2279–2301

DOI

20
Wang H, Gong Z, Huang H Z, System reliability based design optimization with Monte Carlo simulation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering. Chengdu: IEEE, 2012, 1143–1147

DOI

21
Du X, Chen W. Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2000, 122(4): 385–394

DOI

22
Mayda M, Choi S K. A reliability-based design framework for early stages of design process. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 2105–2120

DOI

23
Mayda M. An efficient simulation-based search method for reliability-based robust design optimization of mechanical components. Mechanika, 2017, 23(5): 696–702

DOI

24
Zhang X, He D. A reliability-based robust design method for the sealing of slipper-swash plate friction pair in hydraulic piston pump. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2018, 67(2): 459–469

DOI

25
Wu J. A robust optimization for the frequency and decoupling ratio of a powertrain mounting system based on interval analysis. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2012, 13(3): 409–422

DOI

26
Do D, Gao W, Song C, Interval spectral stochastic finite element analysis of structures with aggregation of random field and bounded parameters. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(10): 1198–1229

DOI

27
Li W, Xiao M, Yi Y, Maximum variation analysis based analytical target cascading for multidisciplinary robust design optimization under interval uncertainty. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2019, 40: 81–92

DOI

28
Gao W. Interval finite element analysis using interval factor method. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 39(6): 709–717

DOI

29
Ouyang L, Ma Y, Byun J, An interval approach to robust design with parameter uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(11): 3201–3215

DOI

30
Sun W, Dong R, Xu H. A novel non-probabilistic approach using interval analysis for robust design optimization. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2009, 23(12): 3199–3208

DOI

31
Yoo D, Lee I. Sampling-based approach for design optimization in the presence of interval variables. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(2): 253–266

DOI

32
Wu J, Gao J, Luo Z, Robust topology optimization for structures under interval uncertainty. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 99: 36–48

DOI

33
Xia B, Lu H, Yu D, Reliability-based design optimization of structural systems under hybrid probabilistic and interval model. Computers & Structures, 2015, 160: 126–134

DOI

34
Jiang C, Zheng J, Han X. Probability-interval hybrid uncertainty analysis for structures with both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties: A review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57(6): 2485–2502

DOI

35
Xia T, Li M. A sequential approach for robust multidisciplinary design optimization under mixed interval and probabilistic uncertainties. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 5(2): 020905

DOI

36
Zhang J, Chen Y, Xue D, Robust design of configurations and parameters of adaptable products. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 9(1): 1–14

DOI

37
Zhang J, Xue D, Gu P. Adaptable design of open architecture products with robust performance. Journal of Engineering Design, 2015, 26(1–3): 1–23

DOI

38
Hong G, Hu L, Xue D, Identification of the optimal product configuration and parameters based on individual customer requirements on performance and costs in one-of-a-kind production. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(12): 3297–3326

DOI

39
Long Y, Bao S H, Yuan S. Structural Mechanics.Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012

Outlines

/