RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison between four piezoelectric energy harvesting circuits

  • Jinhao Qiu ,
  • Hao Jiang ,
  • Hongli Ji ,
  • Kongjun ZHU
Expand
  • The Aeronautic Key Laboratory for Smart Materials and Structures, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 18 Nov 2008

Accepted date: 30 Dec 2008

Published date: 05 Jun 2009

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

This paper investigates and compares the efficiencies of four different interfaces for vibration-based energy harvesting systems. Among those four circuits, two circuits adopt the synchronous switching technique, in which the circuit is switched synchronously with the vibration. In this study, a simple source-less trigger circuit used to control the synchronized switch is proposed and two interface circuits of energy harvesting systems are designed based on the trigger circuit. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed circuits, an experimental system was established and the power harvested by those circuits from a vibration beam was measured. Experimental results show that the two new circuits can increase the harvested power by factors 2.6 and 7, respectively, without consuming extra power in the circuits.

Cite this article

Jinhao Qiu , Hao Jiang , Hongli Ji , Kongjun ZHU . Comparison between four piezoelectric energy harvesting circuits[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2009 , 4(2) : 153 -159 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-009-0031-z

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50775110).
1
Chandrakasan A, Amirtharajah R, Cho S H. Design considerations for distributed microsensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Annual Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, May16–19, San Diego, 1999: 279-286

2
Davis C, Lssieuter G. An actively tuned solid-state vibration absorber using capacitive shunting of piezoelectric stiffness. Journal of Sound Vibration, 2000, 232: 601-617

DOI

3
Rabaey J M, Ammer M J, Julio L. da Silva. PicoRadio supports ad hoc ultra-low power wireless networking. Computer, 2000, 33: 42-48

DOI

4
Ottman G K, Bhattt A C, Hofmann H. Adaptive piezoelectric energy harvesting circuit for wireless, remote power supply. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2002, 17(5): 669-676

DOI

5
Hofmann H, Ottman G K, Lesieutre G A. Optimized piezoelectric energy circuit using step-down converter in discontinuous conduction mode. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2002, 18(2): 696-703

6
Lesieutre G A, Hofmann H, Ottman G K. Damping as a result of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 269: 991-1001

DOI

7
Guyomar D, Badel A, Lefeuvre E. Toward energy harvesting using active materials and conversion improvement by nonlinear processing. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2005, 52(4): 584-595

DOI

8
Badel A, Benayad A, Lefeuvre E. Single Crystals and nonlinear process for outstanding vibration-powered electrical generators. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2006, 53 (4): 673-684

9
Lefeuvre E, Adrien B, Claude R. A comparison between several vibration-powered piezoelectric generators for standalone systems. Sensors and Actuators A, 2006, 126: 405-4

DOI

10
Yabu T, Onoda J. Non-power-supply semi-active vibration suppression with piezoelectric actuator. In: Proceedings of the 47th Symposium on Structural Strength, Japan Society of Astronautics, Kanazawa, Japan, July 20-22, 2005: 48-50

Outlines

/