RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nonlinear dynamic analysis for elastic robotic arms

  • M. H. KORAYEM 1 ,
  • H. N. RAHIMI , 2
Expand
  • 1. Robotic Research Lab, College of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
  • 2. Mechanical Engineering department, Islamic Azad University, Damavand Branch, Damavand, Iran

Received date: 07 Aug 2010

Accepted date: 22 Nov 2010

Published date: 05 Jun 2011

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyze the nonlinear dynamics of robotic arms with elastic links and joints. The main contribution of the paper is the comparative assessment of assumed modes and finite element methods as more convenient approaches for computing the nonlinear dynamic of robotic systems. Numerical simulations comprising both methods are carried out and results are discussed. Hence, advantages and disadvantages of each method are illustrated. Then, adding the joint flexibility to the system is dealt with and the obtained model is demonstrated. Finally, a brief description of the optimal motion generation is presented and the simulation is carried out to investigate the role of robot dynamic modeling in the control of robots.

Cite this article

M. H. KORAYEM , H. N. RAHIMI . Nonlinear dynamic analysis for elastic robotic arms[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 0 , 6(2) : 219 -228 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-011-0218-y

1
Zhu G, Ge S S, Lee T H. Simulation studies of tip tracking control of a single-link flexible robot based on a lumped model. Robotica, 1999, 17(1): 71-78

DOI

2
Kim J S, Uchiyama M. Vibration mechanism of constrained spatial flexible manipulators. JSME, Series C, 2003, 46(1): 123-128

DOI

3
Green A, Sasiadek J Z. Dynamics and trajectory tracking control of a two-link robot manipulator. J. of Vib. and Cont, 2004, 10(10): 1415-1440

DOI

4
Green A, Sasiadek J Z. Robot manipulator control for rigid and assumed mode flexible dynamics models, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2003

5
Subudhi B, Morris A S. Dynamic modelling, simulation and control of a manipulator with flexible links and joints. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2002, 41(4): 257-270

DOI

6
Korayem M H, Rahimi Nohooji H. Trajectory optimization of flexible mobile manipulators using open-loop optimal control method. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, LNAI, 2008, 5314(1): 54-63

7
Usoro P B, Nadira R, Mahil S S. A finite element/Lagrange approach to modeling lightweight flexible manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1986, 108(3): 198-205

DOI

8
Korayem M H, Haghpanahi M, Rahimi H N, Nikoobin A. Finite element method and optimal control theory for path planning of elastic manipulators, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. New Advanced in Intelligent Decision Technology, SCI, 2009, 199: 107-116

DOI

9
Zhang C X, Yu Y Q. Dynamic analysis of planar cooperative manipulators with link flexibility, ASME. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2004, 126: 442-448

10
Mohamed Z, Tokhi M O. Command shaping techniques for vibration control of a flexible robot manipulator. Mechatronics, 2004, 14(1): 69-90

DOI

11
Yue S, Tso S K, Xu W L. Maximum dynamic payload trajectory for flexible robot manipulators with kinematic redundancy. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2001, 36(6): 785-800

DOI

12
Korayem M H, Rahimi H N, Nikoobin A. Analysis of four wheeled flexible joint robotic arms with application on optimal motion design, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New Advan. in Intel. Decision Technology, 2009, 199: 117-126

13
Chen W. Dynamic modeling of multi-link flexible robotic manipulators. Computers & Structures, 2001, 79(2): 183-195

DOI

14
Fraser A R, Daniel R W. Perturbation techniques for flexible manipulators. Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, 1991, 138

15
Kirk D E. Optimal control theory, an introduction. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970

16
Koivo A J, Arnautovic S H. Dynamic optimum control of redundant manipulators. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1991, 466-471

17
Mohri A, Furuno S, Iwamura M, Yamamoto M. Sub-optimal trajectory planning of mobile manipulator. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2001, 1271-1276

18
Kelly A, Nagy B. Reactive nonholonomic trajectory generation via parametric optimal control. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2003, 22(8): 583-601

DOI

19
Furuno S, Yamamoto M, Mohri A. Trajectory planning of mobile manipulator with stability considerations. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003, 3403-3408

20
Wilson D G, Robinett R D, Eisler G R. Discrete dynamic programming for optimized path planning of flexible robots. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on lntelligent Robots and Systems, Japan, 2004

21
Hull D G. Conversion of optimal control problems into parameter optimization problems. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1997, 20(1): 57-60

DOI

22
Wang L T, Ravani B. Dynamic load carrying capacity of mechanical manipulators- Part 2, J. of Dynamic Sys. Measurement and Control, 1988, 110: 53-61

DOI

23
Wang C Y E, Timoszyk W K, Bobrow J E. Payload maximization for open chained manipulator: Finding motions for a Puma 762 robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2001, 17(2): 218-224

DOI

24
Ge X S, Chen L Q. Optimal motion planning for nonholonomic systems using genetic algorithm with wavelet approximation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 180(1): 76-85

DOI

25
Haddad M, Chettibi T, Hanchi S, Lehtihet H E. Optimal motion planner of mobile manipulators in generalized point-to-point task. 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006, 300-306

26
Park K J. Flexible robot manipulator path design to reduce the endpoint residual vibration under torque constraints. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 275(3-5): 1051-1068

DOI

27
Shiller Z, Dubowsky S. Robot path planning with obstacles, actuators, gripper and payload constraints. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1986, 8(6): 3-18

DOI

28
Shiller Z. Time-energy optimal control of articulated systems with geometric path constraints. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994, 4: 2680-2685

29
Fotouhi R, Szyszkowski W. An algorithm for time-optimal control problems, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Transactions of the ASME, 1998, 120(3): 414-418

30
Agrawal O P, Xu Y.On the global optimum path planning for redundant space manipulators. IEEE T sys Man Cyb, 1994, 24(9): 1306-1316

31
Bessonnet G, Chessé S. Optimal dynamics of actuated kinematic chains, Part 2: Problem statements and computational aspects. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2005, 24(3): 472-490

DOI

32
Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M. Symbolic–numeric indirect method for solving optimal control problems for large multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics, 2005, 13(2): 233-252

DOI

33
Sentinella M R, Casalino L. Genetic algorithm and indirect method coupling for low-thrust trajectory optimization. 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, California, 2006

34
Bryson A E, Ho Y. Applied optimal control: Optimization, estimation, and control, Ginn and company, 1969

35
Shampine L F, Reichelt M W, Kierzenka J. Solving boundary value problems for ordinary differential equations in MATLAB with bvp4c. Available at http://www.mathworks.com/bvp tutorial

Outlines

/