A systematic graph-based method for the kinematic synthesis of non-anthropomorphic wearable robots for the lower limbs

Abstract

The choice of non-anthropomorphic kinematic solutions for wearable robots is motivated both by the necessity of improving the ergonomics of physical Human-Robot Interaction and by the chance of exploiting the intrinsic dynamical properties of the robotic structure so to improve its performances. Under these aspects, this new class of robotic solutions is potentially advantageous over the one of anthropomorphic robotic orthoses. However, the process of kinematic synthesis of non-anthropomorphic wearable robots can be too complex to be solved uniquely by relying on conventional synthesis methods, due to the large number of open design parameters. A systematic approach can be useful for this purpose, since it allows to obtain the complete list of independent kinematic solutions with desired properties. In this perspective, this paper presents a method, which allows to generalize the problem of kinematic synthesis of a non-anthropomorphic wearable robot for the assistance of a specified set of contiguous body segments. The methodology also includes two novel tests, specifically devised to solve the problem of enumeration of kinematic structures of wearable robots: the HR-isomorphism and the HR-degeneracy tests. This method has been implemented to derive the atlas of independent kinematic solutions suitable to be used for the kinematic design of a planar wearable robot for the lower limbs.

Key words： assistive robotics; non-anthropomorphic wearable robots; topology; kinematic synthesis; HR-isomorphism test; HR-degeneracy test

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the FP7 FET Proactive Initiative “Embodied Intelligence” of the European Commission, project No. ICT-2007.8.5-231451-EVRYON (EVolving morphologies for human-Robot sYmbiotic interactiON).

References

1 Pons J L. Wearable Robots: Biomechatronic Exoskeletons. Wiley, 2008, 1–2

2 Kawamoto H, Sankai Y. Power assist system HAL-3 for gait disorder person, Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2002, 2398: 196–203.

3 Walsh C J, Endo K, Herr H. Quasi-passive leg exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2007, 4(3): 487–506

4 Veneman J F, Kruidhof R, Hekman E E G, Ekkelenkamp R, Van Asseldonk E H F, van der Kooij H. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2007, 15(3): 379–386

PMID

5 Dollar A M, Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: Challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24(1): 144–158

6 Guglielmelli E, Johson M J, Shibata T. Guest editorial, special issue on rehabilitation robotics. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2009, 25(3): 477–480

7 Kubow T, Full R. The role of the mechanical system in control: A hypothesis of selfstabilization in hexapedal runners. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 1999, 354(1385): 849–861

8 Cham J G, Karpick J K, Cutkosky M R. Stride period adaptation for a biomimetic running hexapod. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2004, 23(2): 141–153

9 Collins S, Ruina A, Tedrake R, Wisse M. Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science, 2005, 307(5712): 1082–1085

PMID

10 Pfeifer R, Lungarella M, Iida F. Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science, 2007, 318(5853): 1088–1093

PMID

11 Bongard J C, Paul C. Making evolution an offer It can’t refuse: Morphology and the extradimensional bypass. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2001, 2159: 401–412

12 Schiele A, van der Helm F C T. Kinematic design to improve ergonomics in human machine interaction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2006, 14(4): 456–469

PMID

13 Colombo G, Joerg M, Diez V. Driven gait orthosis to do locomotor training of paraplegic patients, 22nd Annual Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL, 2000

14 Hidler J M, Wall A E. Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2005, 20(2): 184–193

PMID

15 Lipson H, Pollack J B. Automatic design and manufacture of robotic lifeforms. Nature, 2000, 406(6799): 974–978

PMID

16 Mruthyunjaya T S. Kinematic structure of mechanisms revisited. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2003, 38(4): 279–320

17 Dobrjanskyj L, Freudenstein F. Some applications of graph theory to structural analysis of mechanisms. Journal of Engineering for Industry-Transactions of the ASME, Series B, 1967, 89: 153–158

18 Kutzbach K. Mechanische Leitungsverzweigung. Maschinenbau, der Betrieb, 1929, 8, 710–716

19 Ding H F, Huang Z. A unique representation of the kinematic chain and the atlas database. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2007, 42(6): 637–651

20 Sergi F, Accoto D, Tagliamonte N L, Carpino G, Pathiyil L, Guglielmelli E. A systematic graph-based method for the kinematic synthesis of non-anthropomorphic wearable robots, IEEE Conference on Robotics Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), 2010, 100–105

21 McKay B D. Isomorph-f`ree exhaustive generation. Journal of Algorithms, 1998, 26(2): 306–324

22 Sunkari R P. Structural synthesis and analysis of planar and spatial mechanisms satisfying Gruebler’s degrees of freedom equation, Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, Univ. of Maryland MD, 2006