Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering >

2016 , Vol. 11 >Issue 3: 275 - 288

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-016-0372-3

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Standard model of knowledge representation

  • Wensheng YIN
Expand
  • School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received date: 14 Sep 2015

Accepted date: 04 Nov 2015

Published date: 31 Aug 2016

Copyright

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
Fold

Abstract

Knowledge representation is the core of artificial intelligence research. Knowledge representation methods include predicate logic, semantic network, computer programming language, database, mathematical model, graphics language, natural language, etc. To establish the intrinsic link between various knowledge representation methods, a unified knowledge representation model is necessary. According to ontology, system theory, and control theory, a standard model of knowledge representation that reflects the change of the objective world is proposed. The model is composed of input, processing, and output. This knowledge representation method is not a contradiction to the traditional knowledge representation method. It can express knowledge in terms of multivariate and multidimensional. It can also express process knowledge, and at the same time, it has a strong ability to solve problems. In addition, the standard model of knowledge representation provides a way to solve problems of non-precision and inconsistent knowledge.

Key words： knowledge representation; standard model; ontology; system theory; control theory; multidimensional representation

Cite this article

Wensheng YIN . Standard model of knowledge representation[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2016 , 11(3) : 275 -288 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-016-0372-3

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51175200).

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
1
Feigenbaum E A, Feldman J. Computers and Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963

2
Simon H A. The Sciences of Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969

3
Newell A, Simon H A. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972

4
Minsky M L. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986

5
Hartati R S, El-Hawary M E. A summary of application of Hopfield neural network to economic load dispatch. In: Proceedings of 2000 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. Halifax: IEEE, 2000, 2: 707–711

DOI

6
Brooks R A. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 47(1–3): 139–159

DOI

7
Gödel K. Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalküls. Monatisheftc für Mathematik und Physik, 1930, 37(1): 349–360 (in Germany)

8
Xiao K, Li D. Ontology. In: Encyclopedia and philosophy of China I. 1987

9
Cao S. Neural network system based on semantic network. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2011, 37(11): 96–97, 118 (in Chinese)

10
Wang W. Artificial Intelligence Principle and Its Application. Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2000: 27–38 (in Chinese)

11
Lu R. Artificial Intelligence. Beijing: Science Press, 2000: 43–48 (in Chinese)

12
Yang B. Research on the representation and processing of knowledge information in the library. Journal of Chengdu Teachers College, 2004 (in Chinese)

13
Thiagarajan P S. Elementary net systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1987, 254(1): 26–59

14
Reisig W. Place/transition systems. In: Brauer W, Reisig W, Rozenberg G, eds. Petri Nets: Central Models and Their Properties. Berlin: Springer, 1987, 117–141

15
Genrich H J. Predicate/transition nets. In: Brauer W, Reisig W, Rozenberg G, eds. Petri Nets: Central Models and Their Properties. Berlin: Springer, 1987, 207–247

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉