Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering >
A systematic review of current and emergent manipulator control approaches
Received date: 29 Jan 2015
Accepted date: 26 Feb 2015
Published date: 14 Jul 2015
Copyright
Pressing demands of productivity and accuracy in today’s robotic applications have highlighted an urge to replace classical control strategies with their modern control counterparts. This recent trend is further justified by the fact that the robotic manipulators have complex nonlinear dynamic structure with uncertain parameters. Highlighting the authors’ research achievements in the domain of manipulator design and control, this paper presents a systematic and comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art control techniques that find enormous potential in controlling manipulators to execute cutting-edge applications. In particular, three kinds of strategies, i.e., intelligent proportional-integral-derivative (PID) scheme, robust control and adaptation based approaches, are reviewed. Future trend in the subject area is commented. Open-source simulators to facilitate controller design are also tabulated. With a comprehensive list of references, it is anticipated that the review will act as a first-hand reference for researchers, engineers and industrial-interns to realize the control laws for multi-degree of freedom (DOF) manipulators.
Syed Ali AJWAD , Jamshed IQBAL , Muhammad Imran ULLAH , Adeel MEHMOOD . A systematic review of current and emergent manipulator control approaches[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2015 , 10(2) : 198 -210 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-015-0335-0
1 |
Khan H, Iqbal J, Baizid K,
|
2 |
Spong M W, Vidyasagar M. Robot Dynamics and Control. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008
|
3 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Fiorilla A E,
|
4 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N, Caldwell D. Design optimization of a hand exoskeleton rehabilitation device. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Understanding the Human Hand for Advancing Robotic Manipulation, Robotics Science and Systems (RSS). Seattle, 2009, 44–45
|
5 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Caldwell D G. A human hand compatible optimised exoskeleton system. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Tianjin: IEEE, 2010, 685–690
|
6 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Caldwell D G. A multi-DOF robotic exoskeleton interface for hand motion assistance. In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Boston: IEEE, 2011, 1575–1578
|
7 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N, Fiorilla A E,
|
8 |
Khan A A, un Nabi S R, Iqbal J. Surface estimation of a pedestrian walk for outdoor use of power wheelchair based robot. Life Science Journal, 2013, 10(3): 1697–1704
|
9 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N, Caldwell D. Design of a wearable direct-driven optimized hand exoskeleton device. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI). Gosier: IARIA, 2011, 142–146
|
10 |
Azeem M M, Iqbal J, Toivanen P,
|
11 |
Naveed K, Iqbal J, ur Rahman H. Brain controlled human robot interface. In: 2012 International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (ICRAI). Rawalpindi: IEEE, 2012, 55–60
|
12 |
Iqbal J, Pasha S M, Baizid K,
|
13 |
Iqbal J, Pasha M, Riaz-un-Nabi,
|
14 |
Iqbal J, Heikkila S, Halme A. Tether tracking and control of ROSA robotic rover. In: 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV). Hanoi: IEEE, 2008, 689–693
|
15 |
Iqbal J, Saad M R, Tahir A M,
|
16 |
Iqbal J, Tahir A, Islam R U,
|
17 |
Baizid K, Chellali R, Yousnadj A,
|
18 |
Meddahi A, Baizid K, Yousnadj A,
|
19 |
Groover M P, Weiss M, Nagel R N,
|
20 |
Fu K S, Gonzalez R C, Lee C S G. Robotics: Control Sensing Vision and Intelligence. McGraw-Hill Education, 2008
|
21 |
Bamdad M. Analytical dynamic solution of a flexible cable-suspended manipulator. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 8(4): 350–359
|
22 |
Baizid K, Yousnadj A, Meddahi A,
|
23 |
Asfahl C. Robots and Manufacturing Automation. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992
|
24 |
Visioli A. Research trends for PID controllers. Acta Polytechnica, 2012, 52(5): 144–150
|
25 |
Blevins T. PID advances in industrial control. In: Preprints IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control. Brescia, 2012
|
26 |
McMillan G K. Industrial applications of PID control. In: Vilanova R, Visioli A, eds. PID Control in the Third Millennium. London: Springer, 2012, 415–461
|
27 |
Brogårdh T. Present and future robot control development—An industrial perspective. Annual Reviews in Control, 2007, 31(1): 69–79
|
28 |
Brogårdh T. Robot control overview: An industrial perspective. Modeling, Identification and Control, 2009, 30(3): 167–180
|
29 |
Khan M F, Iqbal J, Islam R U. Control strategies for robotic manipulators. In: 2012 International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (ICRAI). Rawalpindi: IEEE, 2012, 26–33
|
30 |
Craig J J. Introduction to Robotics. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 2006
|
31 |
Liang C, Ceccarelli M. Feasible workspace regions for general two-revolute manipulator. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 6(4): 397–408
|
32 |
Islam R U, Iqbal J, Manzoor S,
|
33 |
Manzoor S, Islam R U, Khalid A,
|
34 |
Álvarez Chavarría J S, Jiménez Builes J A, Ramírez Patiño J F. Design cycle of a robot for learning and the development of creativity in engineering. DYNA, 2011, 78(170): 51–58
|
35 |
Ajwad S A, Ullah M I, Islam R U,
|
36 |
Yime-Rodríguez E, Peña-Cortés C A, Rojas-Contreras W M. The dynamic model of a four control moment gyroscope system. DYNA, 2014, 81(185): 41–47
|
37 |
Márton L, Lantos B. Control of robotic systems with unknown friction and payload. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(6): 1534–1539
|
38 |
Iqbal J, Islam R U, Khan H. Modeling and analysis of a 6 DOF robotic arm manipulator. Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2012, 3(6): 300–306
|
39 |
Iqbal J, un Nabi S R, Khan A A,
|
40 |
Ajwad S A, Iqbal U, Iqbal J. Hardware realization and control of multi-degree of freedom articulated robotic arm. In: Emerging Trends and Applications in Information Communication Technologies, Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS). Berlin: Springer2015 (i<?Pub Caret?>n press)
|
41 |
Fei Y, Wu Q. Tracking control of robot manipulators via output feedback linearization. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering in China, 2006, 1(3): 329–335
|
42 |
Nagaraj B, Murugananth N. A comparative study of PID controller tuning using GA, EP, PSO and ACO. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICCCCT). Ramanathapuram: IEEE, 2010, 305–313
|
43 |
Tan W, Liu J, Chen T,
|
44 |
Foley M W, Julien R H, Copeland B R. A comparison of PID controller tuning methods. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2005, 83(4): 712–722
|
45 |
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Caldwell D G. Human hand compatible underactuated exoskeleton robotic system. Electronics Letters, 2014, 50(7): 494–496
|
46 |
Iqbal J, Khan H, Tsagarakis N G,
|
47 |
Iqbal U, Samad A, Nissa Z,
|
48 |
Ajwad S, Ullah M, Baizid K,
|
49 |
Ullah M I, Ajwad S A, Islam R U,
|
50 |
Piltan F, Sulaiman N, Jalali A,
|
51 |
Sharkawy A B, Othman M M, Khalil A M A. A robust fuzzy tracking control scheme for robotic manipulators with experimental verification. Intelligent Control and Automation, 2011, 2(2): 100–111
|
52 |
Chen Y, Ma G, Lin S,
|
53 |
Leines M T, Yang J S. LQR control of an under actuated planar biped robot. In: 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). Beijing: IEEE, 2011, 1684–1689
|
54 |
Simmons G, Demiris Y. Optimal robot arm control using the minimum variance model. Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, 22(11): 677–690
|
55 |
Islam R U, Iqbal J, Khan Q. Design and comparison of two control strategies for multi-DOF articulated robotic arm manipulator. Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, 2014, 16(2): 28–39
|
56 |
Wai R J, Muthusamy R. Fuzzy-neural-network inherited sliding-mode control for robot manipulator including actuator dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2013, 24(2): 274–287
|
57 |
Nabaee A R, Piltan F, Ebrahimi M M,
|
58 |
Hacioglu Y, Arslan Y Z, Yagiz N. MIMO fuzzy sliding mode controlled dual arm robot in load transportation. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2011, 348(8): 1886–1902
|
59 |
Corradini M L, Fossi V, Giantomassi A,
|
60 |
Laghrouche S, Mehmood A, Bagdouri M E. Study of the nonlinear control techniques for single acting VGT pneumatic actuator. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2012, 60(3/4): 264–285
|
61 |
Camacho E F, Alba C B. Model Predictive Control. Springer, 2013
|
62 |
Wang L. Model Predictive Control System Design and Implementation Using MATLAB®. London: Springer, 2009
|
63 |
Henmi T, Deng M, Inoue A. Adaptive control of a two-link planar manipulator using nonlinear model predictive control. In: 2010 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). Xi’an: IEEE, 2010, 1868–1873
|
64 |
Mazdarani H, Farrokhi M. Adaptive neuro-predictive control of robot manipulators in work space. In: 2012 17th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). Miedzyzdrojie: IEEE, 2012, 349–354
|
65 |
Rojas–Moreno A, Valdivia–Mallqui R. Embedded position control system of a manipulator using a robust nonlinear predictive control. In: 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). Montevideo: IEEE, 2013, 1–6
|
66 |
Copot C, Lazar C, Burlacu A. Predictive control of nonlinear visual servoing systems using image moments. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2012, 6(10): 1486–1496
|
67 |
Wang L, Chai S, Rogers E,
|
68 |
Gu D W. Robust Control Design with MATLAB®. London: Springer, 2005
|
69 |
Montano O E, Orlov Y. Discontinuous H. ∞-control of mechanical manipulators with frictional joints. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE). Mexico City: IEEE, 2012, 1–6
|
70 |
Chen C. Robust self-organizing neural-fuzzy control with uncertainty observer for MIMO nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2011, 19(4): 694–706
|
71 |
Siqueira A A G, Terra M H. Mixed model-based/neural network H∞ impedance control of constrained manipulators. In: IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA). Christchurch: IEEE, 2009, 1901–1906
|
72 |
Yang Z, Fukushima Y, Qin P. Decentralized adaptive robust control of robot manipulators using disturbance observers. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(5): 1357–1365
|
73 |
Kim Y, Seok J, Noh I,
|
74 |
He Z, Xie W. Improved disturbance observer based control structure. In: Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). Guilin: IEEE, 2009, 1015–1020
|
75 |
Parsa M, Farrokhi M. Robust nonlinear model predictive trajectory free control of biped robots based on nonlinear disturbance observer. In: 2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). Isfahan: IEEE, 2010, 617–622
|
76 |
Mohammadi A, Tavakoli M, Marquez H. Disturbance observer-based control of non-linear haptic teleoperation systems. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2011, 5(18): 2063–2074
|
77 |
Mohammadi A, Marquez H J, Tavakoli M. Disturbance observer-based trajectory following control of nonlinear robotic manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics. 2011
|
78 |
Mohammadi A, Tavakoli M, Marquez H,
|
79 |
Laghrouche S, Ahmed F S, Mehmood A. Pressure and friction observer-based backstepping control for a VGT pneumatic actuator. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2014, 22(2): 456–467
|
80 |
Arimoto S. Passivity-based control [robot dynamics]. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (Volume 1). San Francisco: IEEE, 2000, 227–232
|
81 |
Shibata T, Murakami T. A null space force control based on passivity in redundant manipulator. In: ICM2007 4th IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics. Kumamoto: IEEE, 2007, 1–6
|
82 |
Ott C, Albu-Schaffer A, Kugi A,
|
83 |
Kawai H, Murao T, Sato R,
|
84 |
Foudil A, Hadia S. Passivity based control of a 3-DOF robot manipulator. In: International Conference on Communication, Computer & Power (ICCCP). Muscat, 2007, 56–59
|
85 |
Bouakrif F, Boukhetala D, Boudjema F. Passivity-based controller-observer for robot manipulators. In: 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications. Damascus: IEEE, 2008, 1–5
|
86 |
Landau I D, Lozano R, M’Saad M,
|
87 |
Sun T, Pei H, Pan Y,
|
88 |
Aseltine J, Mancini A, Sarture C. A survey of adaptive control systems. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1958, 6(1): 102–108
|
89 |
Åström K J, Wittenmark B. On self tuning regulators. Automatica, 1973, 9(2): 185–199
|
90 |
Slotine J J E, Li W. On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1987, 6(3): 49–59
|
91 |
Lozano R, Brogliato B. Adaptive control of robot manipulators with flexible joints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1992, 37(2): 174–181
|
92 |
Huang S, Tan K K, Lee T H. Adaptive friction compensation using neural network approximations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 2000, 30(4): 551–557
|
93 |
Purwar S, Kar I N, Jha A N. Adaptive control of robot manipulators using fuzzy logic systems under actuator constraints. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (Volume 3). IEEE, 2004, 1449–1454
|
94 |
Schindele D, Aschemann H. Adaptive friction compensation based on the LuGre model for a pneumatic rodless cylinder. In: Industrial Electronics, 2009. IECON’09 35th Annual Conference of IEEE. Porto: IEEE, 2009, 1432–1437
|
95 |
Garpinger O, Hägglund T, Cederqvist L. Software for PID design: Benefits and pitfalls. In: 2nd IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control. Brescia, 2012, 2(1): 140–145
|
96 |
Jara C A, Candelas F A, Gil P,
|
97 |
Corke P I. A robotics toolbox for MATLAB. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 1996, 3(1): 24–32
|
98 |
Corke P. Robotics, Vision and Control: Fundamental Algorithms in MATLAB. Berlin: Springer, 2011
|
99 |
Falconi R, Melchiorri C. Roboticad: An educational tool for robotics. In: Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress. Korea, 2008, 9111–9116
|
100 |
Žlajpah L. Integrated environment for modelling, simulation and control design for robotic manipulators. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2001, 32(2): 219–234
|
101 |
Maza J I, Ollero A. HEMERO: A MATLAB-Simulink toolbox for robotics. In: 1st Workshop on Robotics Education and Training. Germany, 2001, 43–50
|
102 |
Alsina P J. ROBOTLAB: A software for robot graphic simulation. Simpósio Brasileiro de Automação Inteligente, 1997, 465–470
|
103 |
Nethery J F, Spong M W. Robotica: A mathematica package for robot analysis. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 1994, 1(1): 13–20
|
104 |
Dean-Leon E, Nair S, Knoll A. User friendly Matlab-toolbox for symbolic robot dynamic modeling used for control design. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Guangzhou: IEEE, 2012, 2181–2188
|
105 |
Rohmer E, Singh S P, Freese M. V-REP: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Tokyo: IEEE, 2013, 1321–1326
|
106 |
Breijs A, Klaassens B, Babuska R. Matlab design environment for robotic manipulators. In: 16th IFAC World Congress. Prague, 2005, 1331–1336
|
107 |
Shah S V, Nandihal P V, Saha S K. Recursive dynamics simulator (ReDySim): A multibody dynamics solver. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2012, 2: 063011
|
108 |
Ferreira N F, Machado J T. RobLib: An educational program for robotics. In: Symposium on Robot Control (SYROCO). Vienna, 2000, 563–568
|
109 |
Arm6x Manual. Concurrent Dynamics International, 2014
|
110 |
Fueanggan S, Chokchaitam S. Dynamics and kinematics simulation for robots. In: International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology—Spring Conference. Singapore: IEEE, 2009, 136–140
|
/
〈 | 〉 |