REVIEW ARTICLE

A systematic review of current and emergent manipulator control approaches

  • Syed Ali AJWAD ,
  • Jamshed IQBAL ,
  • Muhammad Imran ULLAH ,
  • Adeel MEHMOOD
Expand
  • Department of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Received date: 29 Jan 2015

Accepted date: 26 Feb 2015

Published date: 14 Jul 2015

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Pressing demands of productivity and accuracy in today’s robotic applications have highlighted an urge to replace classical control strategies with their modern control counterparts. This recent trend is further justified by the fact that the robotic manipulators have complex nonlinear dynamic structure with uncertain parameters. Highlighting the authors’ research achievements in the domain of manipulator design and control, this paper presents a systematic and comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art control techniques that find enormous potential in controlling manipulators to execute cutting-edge applications. In particular, three kinds of strategies, i.e., intelligent proportional-integral-derivative (PID) scheme, robust control and adaptation based approaches, are reviewed. Future trend in the subject area is commented. Open-source simulators to facilitate controller design are also tabulated. With a comprehensive list of references, it is anticipated that the review will act as a first-hand reference for researchers, engineers and industrial-interns to realize the control laws for multi-degree of freedom (DOF) manipulators.

Cite this article

Syed Ali AJWAD , Jamshed IQBAL , Muhammad Imran ULLAH , Adeel MEHMOOD . A systematic review of current and emergent manipulator control approaches[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2015 , 10(2) : 198 -210 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-015-0335-0

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Raza Ul Islam, Research Associate, CAST, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan for his kind help in implementation of various control strategies.
1
Khan H, Iqbal J, Baizid K, . Longitudinal and lateral slip control of autonomous wheeled mobile robot for trajectory tracking. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2015, 16(2): 166–172

DOI

2
Spong M W, Vidyasagar M. Robot Dynamics and Control. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008

3
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Fiorilla A E, . A portable rehabilitation device for the hand. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Buenos Aires: IEEE, 2010, 3694–3697 doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627448

4
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N, Caldwell D. Design optimization of a hand exoskeleton rehabilitation device. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Understanding the Human Hand for Advancing Robotic Manipulation, Robotics Science and Systems (RSS). Seattle, 2009, 44–45

5
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Caldwell D G. A human hand compatible optimised exoskeleton system. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Tianjin: IEEE, 2010, 685–690

DOI

6
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Caldwell D G. A multi-DOF robotic exoskeleton interface for hand motion assistance. In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Boston: IEEE, 2011, 1575–1578

DOI

7
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N, Fiorilla A E, . Design requirements of a hand exoskeleton robotic device. In: 14th IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications (RA). Massachusetts, 2009, 44–51

8
Khan A A, un Nabi S R, Iqbal J. Surface estimation of a pedestrian walk for outdoor use of power wheelchair based robot. Life Science Journal, 2013, 10(3): 1697–1704

9
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N, Caldwell D. Design of a wearable direct-driven optimized hand exoskeleton device. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI). Gosier: IARIA, 2011, 142–146

10
Azeem M M, Iqbal J, Toivanen P, . Emotions in robots. In: Chowdhry B S, Shaikh F K, Akbar Hussain D M, , eds. Emerging Trends and Applications in Information Communication Technologies. Berlin: Springer, 2012, 144–153

11
Naveed K, Iqbal J, ur Rahman H. Brain controlled human robot interface. In: 2012 International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (ICRAI). Rawalpindi: IEEE, 2012, 55–60

12
Iqbal J, Pasha S M, Baizid K, . Computer vision inspired real-time autonomous moving target detection, tracking and locking. Life Science Journal, 2013, 10(4): 3338–3345

13
Iqbal J, Pasha M, Riaz-un-Nabi, . Real-time target detection and tracking: A comparative in-depth review of strategies. Life Science Journal, 2013, 10(3): 804–813

14
Iqbal J, Heikkila S, Halme A. Tether tracking and control of ROSA robotic rover. In: 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV). Hanoi: IEEE, 2008, 689–693

DOI

15
Iqbal J, Saad M R, Tahir A M, . State estimation technique for a planetary robotic rover. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 2014, 73: 58–68

16
Iqbal J, Tahir A, Islam R U, . Robotics for nuclear power plants—Challenges and future perspectives. In: 2012 2nd International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI). Zurich: IEEE, 2012, 151–156 doi:10.1109/CARPI.2012.6473373

17
Baizid K, Chellali R, Yousnadj A, . Modelling of robotized site and simulation of robot’s optimum placement and orientation zone. In: 21st IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation (MS). Canada, 2010, 9–16

18
Meddahi A, Baizid K, Yousnadj A, . API based graphical simulation of robotized sites. In: IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications. Cambridge, 2009, 485–492

19
Groover M P, Weiss M, Nagel R N, . Industrial Robotics: Technology, Programming and Applications. McGraw-Hill Education, 2008

20
Fu K S, Gonzalez R C, Lee C S G. Robotics: Control Sensing Vision and Intelligence. McGraw-Hill Education, 2008

21
Bamdad M. Analytical dynamic solution of a flexible cable-suspended manipulator. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 8(4): 350–359

DOI

22
Baizid K, Yousnadj A, Meddahi A, . Time scheduling and optimization of industrial robotized tasks based on genetic algorithms. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2015, 34: 140–150

DOI

23
Asfahl C. Robots and Manufacturing Automation. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992

24
Visioli A. Research trends for PID controllers. Acta Polytechnica, 2012, 52(5): 144–150

25
Blevins T. PID advances in industrial control. In: Preprints IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control. Brescia, 2012

26
McMillan G K. Industrial applications of PID control. In: Vilanova R, Visioli A, eds. PID Control in the Third Millennium. London: Springer, 2012, 415–461

DOI

27
Brogårdh T. Present and future robot control development—An industrial perspective. Annual Reviews in Control, 2007, 31(1): 69–79

DOI

28
Brogårdh T. Robot control overview: An industrial perspective. Modeling, Identification and Control, 2009, 30(3): 167–180

DOI

29
Khan M F, Iqbal J, Islam R U. Control strategies for robotic manipulators. In: 2012 International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (ICRAI). Rawalpindi: IEEE, 2012, 26–33

DOI

30
Craig J J. Introduction to Robotics. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 2006

31
Liang C, Ceccarelli M. Feasible workspace regions for general two-revolute manipulator. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 6(4): 397–408

32
Islam R U, Iqbal J, Manzoor S, . An autonomous image—Guided robotic system simulating industrial applications. In: 2012 7th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE). Genoa: IEEE, 2012, 344–349

DOI

33
Manzoor S, Islam R U, Khalid A, . An open-source multi-DOF articulated robotic educational platform for autonomous object manipulation. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2014, 30(3): 351–362

DOI

34
Álvarez Chavarría J S, Jiménez Builes J A, Ramírez Patiño J F. Design cycle of a robot for learning and the development of creativity in engineering. DYNA, 2011, 78(170): 51–58

35
Ajwad S A, Ullah M I, Islam R U, . Modeling robotic arms-A review and derivation of screw theory based kinematics. In: International Conference on Engineering & Emerging Technologies. Lahore, 2014, 66–69

36
Yime-Rodríguez E, Peña-Cortés C A, Rojas-Contreras W M. The dynamic model of a four control moment gyroscope system. DYNA, 2014, 81(185): 41–47

DOI

37
Márton L, Lantos B. Control of robotic systems with unknown friction and payload. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(6): 1534–1539

DOI

38
Iqbal J, Islam R U, Khan H. Modeling and analysis of a 6 DOF robotic arm manipulator. Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2012, 3(6): 300–306

39
Iqbal J, un Nabi S R, Khan A A, . A novel track-drive mobile robotic framework for conducting projects on robotics and control systems. Journal of Life Science, 2013, 10(3): 130–137

40
Ajwad S A, Iqbal U, Iqbal J. Hardware realization and control of multi-degree of freedom articulated robotic arm. In: Emerging Trends and Applications in Information Communication Technologies, Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS). Berlin: Springer2015 (i<?Pub Caret?>n press)

41
Fei Y, Wu Q. Tracking control of robot manipulators via output feedback linearization. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering in China, 2006, 1(3): 329–335

DOI

42
Nagaraj B, Murugananth N. A comparative study of PID controller tuning using GA, EP, PSO and ACO. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Control and Computing Technologies (ICCCCT). Ramanathapuram: IEEE, 2010, 305–313

DOI

43
Tan W, Liu J, Chen T, . Comparison of some well-known PID tuning formulas. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2006, 30(9): 1416–1423

DOI

44
Foley M W, Julien R H, Copeland B R. A comparison of PID controller tuning methods. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2005, 83(4): 712–722

DOI

45
Iqbal J, Tsagarakis N G, Caldwell D G. Human hand compatible underactuated exoskeleton robotic system. Electronics Letters, 2014, 50(7): 494–496

DOI

46
Iqbal J, Khan H, Tsagarakis N G, . A novel exoskeleton robotic system for hand rehabilitation—Conceptualization to prototyping. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 34(2): 79–89

DOI

47
Iqbal U, Samad A, Nissa Z, . Embedded control system for AUTAREP—A novel AUTonomous articulated robotic educational platform. Technical Gazette, 2014, 21(6): 1255–1261

48
Ajwad S, Ullah M, Baizid K, . A comprehensive state-of-the-art on control of industrial articulated robots. Journal of the Balkan Tribological Association, 2014, 20(4): 499–521

49
Ullah M I, Ajwad S A, Islam R U, . Modeling and computed torque control of a 6 degree of freedom robotic arm. In: 2014 International Conference on Robotics & Emerging Allied Technologies in Engineering (iCREATE). Islamabad: IEEE, 2014, 133–138

DOI

50
Piltan F, Sulaiman N, Jalali A, . Design of model free adaptive fuzzy computed torque controller: Applied to nonlinear second order system. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2011, 2(4): 232–244

51
Sharkawy A B, Othman M M, Khalil A M A. A robust fuzzy tracking control scheme for robotic manipulators with experimental verification. Intelligent Control and Automation, 2011, 2(2): 100–111

DOI

52
Chen Y, Ma G, Lin S, . Adaptive fuzzy computed-torque control for robot manipulator with uncertain dynamics. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2012, 9: 237–245

DOI

53
Leines M T, Yang J S. LQR control of an under actuated planar biped robot. In: 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). Beijing: IEEE, 2011, 1684–1689

DOI

54
Simmons G, Demiris Y. Optimal robot arm control using the minimum variance model. Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, 22(11): 677–690

DOI

55
Islam R U, Iqbal J, Khan Q. Design and comparison of two control strategies for multi-DOF articulated robotic arm manipulator. Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, 2014, 16(2): 28–39

56
Wai R J, Muthusamy R. Fuzzy-neural-network inherited sliding-mode control for robot manipulator including actuator dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2013, 24(2): 274–287

DOI

57
Nabaee A R, Piltan F, Ebrahimi M M, . Design intelligent robust partly linear term SMC for robot manipulator systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2014, 6: 58–71

DOI

58
Hacioglu Y, Arslan Y Z, Yagiz N. MIMO fuzzy sliding mode controlled dual arm robot in load transportation. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2011, 348(8): 1886–1902

DOI

59
Corradini M L, Fossi V, Giantomassi A, . Discrete time sliding mode control of robotic manipulators: Development and experimental validation. Control Engineering Practice, 2012, 20(8): 816–822

DOI

60
Laghrouche S, Mehmood A, Bagdouri M E. Study of the nonlinear control techniques for single acting VGT pneumatic actuator. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 2012, 60(3/4): 264–285

DOI

61
Camacho E F, Alba C B. Model Predictive Control. Springer, 2013

62
Wang L. Model Predictive Control System Design and Implementation Using MATLAB®. London: Springer, 2009

DOI

63
Henmi T, Deng M, Inoue A. Adaptive control of a two-link planar manipulator using nonlinear model predictive control. In: 2010 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). Xi’an: IEEE, 2010, 1868–1873

DOI

64
Mazdarani H, Farrokhi M. Adaptive neuro-predictive control of robot manipulators in work space. In: 2012 17th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). Miedzyzdrojie: IEEE, 2012, 349–354

DOI

65
Rojas–Moreno A, Valdivia–Mallqui R. Embedded position control system of a manipulator using a robust nonlinear predictive control. In: 2013 16th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). Montevideo: IEEE, 2013, 1–6

DOI

66
Copot C, Lazar C, Burlacu A. Predictive control of nonlinear visual servoing systems using image moments. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2012, 6(10): 1486–1496

DOI

67
Wang L, Chai S, Rogers E, . Multivariable repetitive-predictive controllers using frequency decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(6): 1597–1604

DOI

68
Gu D W. Robust Control Design with MATLAB®. London: Springer, 2005

DOI

69
Montano O E, Orlov Y. Discontinuous H. ∞-control of mechanical manipulators with frictional joints. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE). Mexico City: IEEE, 2012, 1–6

DOI

70
Chen C. Robust self-organizing neural-fuzzy control with uncertainty observer for MIMO nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2011, 19(4): 694–706

DOI

71
Siqueira A A G, Terra M H. Mixed model-based/neural network H∞ impedance control of constrained manipulators. In: IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA). Christchurch: IEEE, 2009, 1901–1906

DOI

72
Yang Z, Fukushima Y, Qin P. Decentralized adaptive robust control of robot manipulators using disturbance observers. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(5): 1357–1365

DOI

73
Kim Y, Seok J, Noh I, . An adaptive disturbance observer for a two-link robot manipulator. In: International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). Seoul: IEEE, 2008, 141–145

DOI

74
He Z, Xie W. Improved disturbance observer based control structure. In: Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). Guilin: IEEE, 2009, 1015–1020

DOI

75
Parsa M, Farrokhi M. Robust nonlinear model predictive trajectory free control of biped robots based on nonlinear disturbance observer. In: 2010 18th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). Isfahan: IEEE, 2010, 617–622

DOI

76
Mohammadi A, Tavakoli M, Marquez H. Disturbance observer-based control of non-linear haptic teleoperation systems. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2011, 5(18): 2063–2074

DOI

77
Mohammadi A, Marquez H J, Tavakoli M. Disturbance observer-based trajectory following control of nonlinear robotic manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics. 2011

78
Mohammadi A, Tavakoli M, Marquez H, . Nonlinear disturbance observer design for robotic manipulators. Control Engineering Practice, 2013, 21(3): 253–267

DOI

79
Laghrouche S, Ahmed F S, Mehmood A. Pressure and friction observer-based backstepping control for a VGT pneumatic actuator. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2014, 22(2): 456–467

DOI

80
Arimoto S. Passivity-based control [robot dynamics]. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (Volume 1). San Francisco: IEEE, 2000, 227–232

DOI

81
Shibata T, Murakami T. A null space force control based on passivity in redundant manipulator. In: ICM2007 4th IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics. Kumamoto: IEEE, 2007, 1–6

DOI

82
Ott C, Albu-Schaffer A, Kugi A, . On the passivity-based impedance control of flexible joint robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, 24(2): 416–429

DOI

83
Kawai H, Murao T, Sato R, . Passivity-based control for 2DOF robot manipulators with antagonistic bi-articular muscles. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA). Denver: IEEE, 2011, 1451–1456

DOI

84
Foudil A, Hadia S. Passivity based control of a 3-DOF robot manipulator. In: International Conference on Communication, Computer & Power (ICCCP). Muscat, 2007, 56–59

85
Bouakrif F, Boukhetala D, Boudjema F. Passivity-based controller-observer for robot manipulators. In: 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications. Damascus: IEEE, 2008, 1–5

DOI

86
Landau I D, Lozano R, M’Saad M, . Adaptive Control: Algorithms, Analysis and Applications. London: Springer, 2011

DOI

87
Sun T, Pei H, Pan Y, . Neural network-based sliding mode adaptive control for robot manipulators. Neurocomputing, 2011, 74(14-15): 2377–2384

DOI

88
Aseltine J, Mancini A, Sarture C. A survey of adaptive control systems. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1958, 6(1): 102–108

DOI

89
Åström K J, Wittenmark B. On self tuning regulators. Automatica, 1973, 9(2): 185–199

DOI

90
Slotine J J E, Li W. On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1987, 6(3): 49–59

DOI

91
Lozano R, Brogliato B. Adaptive control of robot manipulators with flexible joints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1992, 37(2): 174–181

DOI

92
Huang S, Tan K K, Lee T H. Adaptive friction compensation using neural network approximations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 2000, 30(4): 551–557

DOI

93
Purwar S, Kar I N, Jha A N. Adaptive control of robot manipulators using fuzzy logic systems under actuator constraints. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (Volume 3). IEEE, 2004, 1449–1454

DOI

94
Schindele D, Aschemann H. Adaptive friction compensation based on the LuGre model for a pneumatic rodless cylinder. In: Industrial Electronics, 2009. IECON’09 35th Annual Conference of IEEE. Porto: IEEE, 2009, 1432–1437

DOI

95
Garpinger O, Hägglund T, Cederqvist L. Software for PID design: Benefits and pitfalls. In: 2nd IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control. Brescia, 2012, 2(1): 140–145

DOI

96
Jara C A, Candelas F A, Gil P, . Ejs+EjsRL: An interactive tool for industrial robots simulation, computer vision and remote operation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2011, 59(6): 389–401

DOI

97
Corke P I. A robotics toolbox for MATLAB. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 1996, 3(1): 24–32

DOI

98
Corke P. Robotics, Vision and Control: Fundamental Algorithms in MATLAB. Berlin: Springer, 2011

99
Falconi R, Melchiorri C. Roboticad: An educational tool for robotics. In: Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress. Korea, 2008, 9111–9116

DOI

100
Žlajpah L. Integrated environment for modelling, simulation and control design for robotic manipulators. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2001, 32(2): 219–234

DOI

101
Maza J I, Ollero A. HEMERO: A MATLAB-Simulink toolbox for robotics. In: 1st Workshop on Robotics Education and Training. Germany, 2001, 43–50

102
Alsina P J. ROBOTLAB: A software for robot graphic simulation. Simpósio Brasileiro de Automação Inteligente, 1997, 465–470

103
Nethery J F, Spong M W. Robotica: A mathematica package for robot analysis. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 1994, 1(1): 13–20

DOI

104
Dean-Leon E, Nair S, Knoll A. User friendly Matlab-toolbox for symbolic robot dynamic modeling used for control design. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). Guangzhou: IEEE, 2012, 2181–2188

DOI

105
Rohmer E, Singh S P, Freese M. V-REP: A versatile and scalable robot simulation framework. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Tokyo: IEEE, 2013, 1321–1326

DOI

106
Breijs A, Klaassens B, Babuska R. Matlab design environment for robotic manipulators. In: 16th IFAC World Congress. Prague, 2005, 1331–1336

107
Shah S V, Nandihal P V, Saha S K. Recursive dynamics simulator (ReDySim): A multibody dynamics solver. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2012, 2: 063011

DOI

108
Ferreira N F, Machado J T. RobLib: An educational program for robotics. In: Symposium on Robot Control (SYROCO). Vienna, 2000, 563–568

109
Arm6x Manual. Concurrent Dynamics International, 2014

110
Fueanggan S, Chokchaitam S. Dynamics and kinematics simulation for robots. In: International Association of Computer Science and Information Technology—Spring Conference. Singapore: IEEE, 2009, 136–140

DOI

Outlines

/