New biomimetic approach for multi-objective optimization decision-making of collaborative gear hobbing and grinding

Hengxin NI, Jianpeng ZHAO, Ximing ZHU, Yang YANG, Yifan LIU, Qing LI

PDF(4567 KB)
PDF(4567 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6) : 40. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-024-0811-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE

New biomimetic approach for multi-objective optimization decision-making of collaborative gear hobbing and grinding

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Multiple process variable parameters such as cutting parameters, tool parameters, and machine tool parameters in gear hobbing and subsequent gear grinding processes directly affect gear machining accuracy and efficiency, as confirmed through historical processing experience or manual decision-making. To determine effective parameters quickly, this study proposes a new biomimetic approach for optimization and decision-making based on the improved multi-objective grasshopper optimization algorithm (MOGOA) and the information entropy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (information entropy-TOPSIS) for gear hobbing and gear grinding collaborative machining. Specifically, the parameter optimization problem under collaborative machining of gear hobbing and gear grinding is presented. Then, a multi-objective model oriented to the optimization of gear accuracy and processing efficiency is constructed through optimization variables, i.e., hobbing and grinding process parameters. Furthermore, the improved MOGOA and information entropy-TOPSIS are used for optimal decision-making on the process parameter sets. Eventually, the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed multi-objective optimization decision-making method are verified via small module gear precision machining. Results and comparison demonstrate that the optimization and decision of multiple parameters for the collaborative machining of gear hobbing and gear grinding can be solved by the proposed method, whose efficiency and superiority are confirmed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

gear hobbing / gear grinding / multi-objective grasshopper optimization / decision-makin / information entropy-TOPSIS

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hengxin NI, Jianpeng ZHAO, Ximing ZHU, Yang YANG, Yifan LIU, Qing LI. New biomimetic approach for multi-objective optimization decision-making of collaborative gear hobbing and grinding. Front. Mech. Eng., 2024, 19(6): 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-024-0811-5

References

[1]
Chaubey S K, Jain N K. State-of-art review of past research on manufacturing of meso and micro cylindrical gears. Precision Engineering, 2018, 51: 702–728
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bagaiskov Yu. Effect of gear honing by tools with various elasticity on vehicle gear quality. Transportation Research Procedia, 2022, 63: 703–711
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Zhang W Q, Guo X D, Wang Y W, Wen Y K, Lin C C, Lim T C. A CNC tooth grinding method for formate face hobbed hypoid Gears. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2020, 144: 103628
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Ding H, Wan Z G, Zhou Y S, Tang J Y. A data-driven programming of the human-computer interactions for modeling a collaborative manufacturing system of hypoid gears by considering both geometric and physical performances. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2018, 51: 121–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
de Melo S A, Pereira R B D, da Silva Reis A F, Lauro C H, Brandão L C. Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of unsupervised latent variables of turning process. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 120: 108713
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Pantoja H C, García A C, Rodríguez R P, Alfonso R D R, Acuña J A Y, Rondón R L Á. Datasets describing optimization of the cutting regime in the turning of AISI 316L steel for biomedical purposes based on the NSGA-II and NSGA-III multi-criteria algorithms. Data in Brief, 2023, 50: 109475
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Amorim L F, de Paiva A P, Balestrassi P P, Ferreira J R. Multi-objective optimization algorithm for analysis of hardened steel turning manufacturing process. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 106: 822–843
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
de Toledo J V R, Pires T F, Pereira R B D, Ferreira J R. A multi-objective robust evolutionary optimization approach applied to the multivariate helical milling process of super duplex steel. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 147: 110811
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Yang S C, Guo C Y, Ren W. Research on optimization of milling performance of V-groove micro-texture ball-end milling cutter. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2022, 36(6): 2849–2860
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Li W Y, Li B, He S P, Mao X Y, Qiu C C, Qiu Y, Tan X. A novel milling parameter optimization method based on improved deep reinforcement learning considering machining cost. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022, 84: 1362–1375
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Singh S, Doddamani M, Powar S. Multi-objective optimization of machining parameter in laser drilling of glass microballoon/epoxy syntactic foams. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 23: 3869–3879
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Delavar M R, Ramezanzadeh A, Gholami R, Sanei M. Optimization of drilling parameters using combined multi-objective method and presenting a practical factor. Computers & Geosciences, 2023, 175: 105359
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Saatçi E, Yapan Y F, Uslu Uysal M, Uysal A. Orthogonal turning of AISI 310S austenitic stainless steel under hybrid nanofluid-assisted MQL and a sustainability optimization using NSGA-II and TOPSIS. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2023, 36(6): e00628
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Sur G, Motorcu A R, Nohutçu S. Single and multi-objective optimization for cutting force and surface roughness in peripheral milling of Ti6Al4V using fixed and variable helix angle tools. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2022, 80: 529–545
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Cao W D, Chen X Z, Ni J J. Fuzzy decision-making approach of hobbing tool and cutting parameters. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 125: 106655
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Cao W D, Ni J J, Jiang B Y, Ye C Q. A three-stage parameter prediction approach for low-carbon gear hobbing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 289: 125777
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Dixit Y, Kulkarni M S. Multi-objective optimization with solution ranking for design of spur gear pair considering multiple failure modes. Tribology International, 2023, 180: 108284
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Lv Y, Li C B, He J X, Li W, Li X Y, Li J. Energy saving design of the machining unit of hobbing machine tool with integrated optimization. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 17(3): 38
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Yang Y C, Wu Y R, Tsai T M. An analytical method to control and predict grinding textures on modified gear tooth flanks in CNC generating gear grinding. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 177: 105023
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Wang L, Tian X L, Liu Q, Tang X J, Yang L J, Long H. Surface integrity analysis of 20CrMnTi steel gears machined using the WD-201 microcrystal corundum grinding wheel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 93(5–8): 2903–2912
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Zhang S Y, Zhang G B, Ran Y, Wang Z C, Wang W. Multi-objective optimization for grinding parameters of 20CrMnTiH gear with ceramic microcrystalline corundum. Materials, 2019, 12(8): 1352
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Ni H X, Yan C P, Cao W D, Liu Y F. A novel parameter decision approach in hobbing process for minimizing carbon footprint and processing time. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 111(11–12): 3405–3419
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ni H X, Yan C P, Ni S F, Shu H, Zhang Y. Multi-verse optimizer based parameters decision with considering tool life in dry hobbing process. Advances in Manufacturing, 2021, 9(2): 216–234
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Cao B, Li G L, Fortunato A, Ni H X. Continuous generating grinding method for beveloid gears and analysis of grinding characteristics. Advances in Manufacturing, 2022, 10(3): 459–478
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Klocke F, Löpenhaus C, Sari D. Process concepts for gear finish hobbing. Procedia CIRP, 2016, 41: 875–880
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Kumar Parida A, Maity K. Modeling of machining parameters affecting flank wear and surface roughness in hot turning of Monel-400 using response surface methodology (RSM). Measurement, 2019, 137: 375–381
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Ahmadi B, Ceylan O, Ozdemir A. Distributed energy resource allocation using multi-objective grasshopper optimization algorithm. Electric Power Systems Research, 2021, 201(3): 107564
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhou X J, Tan W, Sun Y, Huang T W, Yang C H. Multi-objective optimization and decision making for integrated energy system using STA and fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 240: 122539
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
AiX, XiaoS G. Concise Handbook of Cutting Parameters (3rd ed). Beijing: China Machine Press, 1994 (in Chinese)
[30]
WangL T, Zhao X X, LiJ. Optimization of gear grinding parameters with worm grinding wheel. China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32(17): 2136–2141 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Educational Committee, China (Grant No. 2023AH050999); the Anhui Agricultural University Talent Research Funding Project, China (Grant No. rc412302); and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52205079).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4567 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/