Dynamic motion of quadrupedal robots on challenging terrain: a kinodynamic optimization approach

Abstract

The dynamic motion of quadrupedal robots on challenging terrain generally requires elaborate spatial–temporal kinodynamic motion planning and accurate control at higher refresh rate in comparison with regular terrain. However, conventional quadrupedal robots usually generate relatively coarse planning and employ motion replanning or reactive strategies to handle terrain irregularities. The resultant complex and computation-intensive controller may lead to nonoptimal motions or the breaking of locomotion rhythm. In this paper, a kinodynamic optimization approach is presented. To generate long-horizon optimal predictions of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the quadruped robot on challenging terrain, we formulate motion planning as an optimization problem; jointly treat the foot’s locations, contact forces, and torso motions as decision variables; combine smooth motion and minimal energy consumption as the objective function; and explicitly represent feasible foothold region and friction constraints based on terrain information. To track the generated motions accurately and stably, we employ a whole-body controller to compute reference position and velocity commands, which are fed forward to joint controllers of the robot’s legs. We verify the effectiveness of the developed approach through simulation and on a physical quadruped robot testbed. Results show that the quadruped robot can successfully traverse a 30° slope and 43% of nominal leg length high step while maintaining the rhythm of dynamic trot gait.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

quadrupedal robot / kinodynamic planning / nonlinear optimization / challenging terrain / whole-body control

References

[1] Wilshin S, Reeve M A, Spence A J. Dog galloping on rough terrain exhibits similar limb coordination patterns and gait variability to that on flat terrain. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2021, 16(1): 015001

[2] Liu Q Y, Chen X D, Han B, Luo Z W, Luo X. Learning control of quadruped robot galloping. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15(2): 329–340

[3] Zhang G T, Li Y B, Ma S G. Trotting and pacing locomotion of a position-controlled quadruped robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Prague: IEEE, 2021, 7456–7463

[4] Spröwitz A, Tuleu A, Vespignani M, Ajallooeian M, Badri E, Ijspeert A J. Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: design, control, and experiments with Cheetah-cub, a compliant quadruped robot. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2013, 32(8): 932–950

[5] Koo I M, Trong T D, Lee Y H, Moon H, Koo J, Park S, Choi H R. Biologically inspired gait transition control for a quadruped walking robot. Autonomous Robots, 2015, 39(2): 169–182

[6] Mercy T, Van Parys R, Pipeleers G. Spline-based motion planning for autonomous guided vehicles in a dynamic environment. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2018, 26(6): 2182–2189

[7] Fukui T, Fujisawa H, Otaka K, Fukuoka Y. Autonomous gait transition and galloping over unperceived obstacles of a quadruped robot with CPG modulated by vestibular feedback. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2019, 111: 1–19

[8] Roennau A, Heppner G, Nowicki M, Zoellner J M, Dillmann R. Reactive posture behaviors for stable legged locomotion over steep inclines and large obstacles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Chicago: IEEE, 2014, 4888–4894

[9] Barasuol V, Buchli J, Semini C, Frigerio M, De Pieri E R, Caldwell D G. A reactive controller framework for quadrupedal locomotion on challenging terrain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Karlsruhe: IEEE, 2013, 2554–2561

[10] Xin G Y, Lin H C, Smith J, Cebe O, Mistry M. A model-based hierarchical controller for legged systems subject to external disturbances. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Brisbane: IEEE, 2018, 4375–4382

[11] Li Q, Sun P, Zhao C L, Luo X. Adaptive strategies for quadruped robot to climb high-slope terrain without priori information. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. Jinghong: IEEE, 2022, 1396–1401

[12] Zico Kolter J, Ng A Y. The Stanford littledog: a learning and rapid replanning approach to quadruped locomotion. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(2): 150–174

[13] Zucker M, Ratliff N, Stolle M, Chestnutt J, Bagnell J A, Atkeson C G, Kuffner J. Optimization and learning for rough terrain legged locomotion. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(2): 175–191

[14] Kalakrishnan M, Buchli J, Pastor P, Mistry M, Schaal S. Learning, planning, and control for quadruped locomotion over challenging terrain. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(2): 236–258

[15] Jenelten F, Miki T, Vijayan A E, Bjelonic M, Hutter M. Perceptive locomotion in rough terrain––online foothold optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(4): 5370–5376

[16] Chen L, Ye S S, Sun C M, Zhang A D, Deng G Y, Liao T J. Optimized foothold planning and posture searching for energy-efficient quadruped locomotion over challenging terrains. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Paris: IEEE, 2020, 399–405

[17] Bellicoso C D, Jenelten F, Gehring C, Hutter M. Dynamic locomotion through online nonlinear motion optimization for quadrupedal robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 2261–2268

[18] Fankhauser P, Bjelonic M, Bellicoso C D, Miki T, Hutter M. Robust rough-terrain locomotion with a quadrupedal robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Brisbane: IEEE, 2018, 5761–5768

[19] Aceituno-Cabezas B, Mastalli C, Dai H K, Focchi M, Radulescu A, Caldwell D G, Cappelletto J, Grieco J C, Fernández-López G, Semini C. Simultaneous contact, gait, and motion planning for robust multilegged locomotion via mixed-integer convex optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 2531–2538

[20] Bjelonic M, Sankar P K, Bellicoso C D, Vallery H, Hutter M. Rolling in the deep––hybrid locomotion for wheeled-legged robots using online trajectory optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 3626–3633

[21] Di Carlo J, Wensing P M, Katz B, Bledt G, Kim S. Dynamic locomotion in the MIT cheetah 3 through convex model-predictive control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Madrid: IEEE, 2018, 1–9

[22] Bledt G, Kim S. Implementing regularized predictive control for simultaneous real-time footstep and ground reaction force optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Macau: IEEE, 2019, 6316–6323

[23] Grandia R, Farshidian F, Ranftl R, Hutter M. Feedback MPC for torque-controlled legged robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Macau: IEEE, 2019, 4730–4737

[24] Neunert M, Stäuble M, Giftthaler M, Bellicoso C D, Carius J, Gehring C, Hutter M, Buchli J. Whole-body nonlinear model predictive control through contacts for quadrupeds. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 1458–1465

[25] Jenelten F, Grandia R, Farshidian F, Hutter M. TAMOLS: terrain-aware motion optimization for legged systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2022, 38(6): 3395–3413

[26] Winkler A W, Bellicoso C D, Hutter M, Buchli J. Gait and trajectory optimization for legged systems through phase-based end-effector parameterization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 1560–1567

[27] Bjelonic M, Grandia R, Geilinger M, Harley O, Medeiros V S, Pajovic V, Jelavic E, Coros S, Hutter M. Offline motion libraries and online MPC for advanced mobility skills. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2022, 41(9–10): 903–924

[28] Li Q, Qian L T, Sun P, Luo X. Energy-efficient dynamic motion planning of quadruped robots via whole-body nonlinear trajectory optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. Guilin: IEEE, 2022, 1610–1615

[29] Li Q, Qian L T, Wang S H, Sun P, Luo X. Towards generation and transition of diverse gaits for quadrupedal robots based on trajectory optimization and whole-body impedance control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023, 8(4): 2389–2396

[30] Siciliano B, Khatib O. Springer Handbook of Robotics. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer, 2016, 11–36

[31] Andersson J A E, Gillis J, Horn G, Rawlings J B, Diehl M. CasADi: a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control. Mathematical Programming Computation, 2019, 11(1): 1–36

[32] Wächter A, Biegler L T. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 2006, 106(1): 25–57

[33] Felis M L. RBDL: an efficient rigid-body dynamics library using recursive algorithms. Autonomous Robots, 2017, 41(2): 495–511

[34] DiehlMBock H GDiedamHWieberP B. Fast direct multiple shooting algorithms for optimal robot control. In: Diehl M, Mombaur K, eds. Fast Motions in Biomechanics and Robotics: Optimization and Feedback Control. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006, 65–93

[35] Norby J, Yang Y, Tajbakhsh A, Ren J, Yim J K, Stutt A, Yu Q, Flowers N, Johnson A M. Quad-SDK: full stack software framework for agile quadrupedal locomotion. In ICRA Workshop on Legged Robots, 2022

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Foundation of Engineering Research Center of Hubei Province for Clothing Information, China (Grant No. 2023HBCI05), the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation General Program, China (Grant No. 2022CFB563), and the Hubei Key Laboratory for New Textile Materials and Applications, Wuhan Textile University, China (Grant No. FZXCL202311).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press