Design and modeling of continuum robot based on virtual-center of motion mechanism

Abstract

Continuum robot has attracted extensive attention since its emergence. It has multi-degree of freedom and high compliance, which give it significant advantages when traveling and operating in narrow spaces. The flexural virtual-center of motion (VCM) mechanism can be machined integrally, and this way eliminates the assembly between joints. Thus, it is well suited for use as a continuum robot joint. Therefore, a design method for continuum robots based on the VCM mechanism is proposed in this study. First, a novel VCM mechanism is formed using a double leaf-type isosceles-trapezoidal flexural pivot (D-LITFP), which is composed of a series of superimposed LITFPs, to enlarge its stroke. Then, the pseudo-rigid body (PRB) model of the leaf is extended to the VCM mechanism, and the stiffness and stroke of the D-LITFP are modeled. Second, the VCM mechanism is combined to form a flexural joint suitable for the continuum robot. Finally, experiments and simulations are used to validate the accuracy and validity of the PRB model by analyzing the performance (stiffness and stroke) of the VCM mechanism. Furthermore, the motion performance of the designed continuum robot is evaluated. Results show that the maximum stroke of the VCM mechanism is approximately 14.2°, the axial compressive strength is approximately 1915 N/mm, and the repeatable positioning accuracies of the continuum robot is approximately ±1.47° (bending angle) and ±2.46° (bending direction).

Graphical abstract

Keywords

VCM mechanism / continuum robot / flexural joint / pseudo-rigid body model / cable-driven

References

[1] Qi F, Chen B, Gao S Y, She S G. Dynamic model and control for a cable-driven continuum manipulator used for minimally invasive surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2021, 17(3): e2234

[2] Omisore O M, Han S P, Xiong J, Li H, Li Z, Wang L. A review on flexible robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(1): 631–644

[3] Thomas T L, Kalpathy Venkiteswaran V, Ananthasuresh G K, Misra S. Surgical applications of compliant mechanisms: a review. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2021, 13(2): 020801

[4] Axinte D, Dong X, Palmer D, Rushworth A, Guzman S C, Olarra A, Arizaga I, Gomez-Acedo E, Txoperena K, Pfeiffer K, Messmer F, Gruhler M, Kell J. MiRoR-miniaturized robotic systems for holistic in-situ repair and maintenance works in restrained and hazardous environments. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2018, 23(2): 978–981

[5] Dong X, Axinte D, Palmer D, Cobos S, Raffles M, Rabani A, Kell J. Development of a slender continuum robotic system for on-wing inspection/repair of gas turbine engines. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 44: 218–229

[6] Buckingham R, Graham A. Nuclear snake-arm robots. Industrial Robot, 2012, 39(1): 6–11

[7] Buckingham R, Graham A. Snaking around in a nuclear jungle. Industrial Robot, 2005, 32(2): 120–127

[8] NaharD, Yanik P M, WalkerI D. Robot tendrils: long, thin continuum robots for inspection in space operations. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky: IEEE, 2017, 1–8

[9] LiljebäckP, MillsR. Eelume: a flexible and subsea resident IMR vehicle. In: Proceedings of Oceans 2017-Aberdeen Conference. Aberdeen: IEEE, 2017, 1–4

[10] Yamauchi Y, Ambe Y, Nagano H, Konyo M, Bando Y, Ito E, Arnold S, Yamazaki K, Itoyama K, Okatani T, Okuno H G, Tadokoro S. Development of a continuum robot enhanced with distributed sensors for search and rescue. Robomech Journal, 2022, 9(1): 8

[11] Russo M, Sriratanasak N, Ba W M, Dong X, Mohammad A, Axinte D. Cooperative continuum robots: enhancing individual continuum arms by reconfiguring into a parallel manipulator. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(2): 1558–1565

[12] Wang M F, Dong X, Ba W M, Mohammad A, Axinte D, Norton A. Design, modelling and validation of a novel extra slender continuum robot for in-situ inspection and repair in aeroengine. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2021, 67: 102054

[13] DeashapriyaK P, SampathP A G, Wijekoon W M S B, JayaweeraN D, KulasekeraA L. Biomimetic flexible robot arm design and kinematic analysis of a novel flexible robot arm. In: Proceedings of 2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon). Moratuwa: IEEE, 2016, 385–390

[14] Li Z, Du R X. Design and analysis of a bio-inspired wire-driven multi-section flexible robot. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2013, 10(4): 209

[15] BuckinghamR, Chitrakaran V, ConkieR, FergusonG, GrahamA, LazellA, Lichon M, ParryN, PollardF, KayaniA, RedmanM, Summers M, GreenB. Snake-Arm Robots: A New Approach to Aircraft Assembly. SAE International 2007-01-3870, 2007,

[16] Guardiani P, Ludovico D, Pistone A, Abidi H, Zaplana I, Lee J, Caldwell D G, Canali C. Design and analysis of a fully actuated cable-driven joint for hyper-redundant robots with optimal cable routing. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2022, 14(2): 021006

[17] BamoriyaS, Kumar C S. Kinematics of three segment continuum robot for surgical application. In: Kumar R, Chauhan V S, Talha M, Pathak H, eds. Machines, Mechanism and Robotics. Singapore: Springer, 2022, 1011–1021

[18] Kim Y, Cheng S S, Diakite M, Gullapalli R P, Simard J M, Desai J P. Toward the development of a flexible mesoscale MRI-compatible neurosurgical continuum robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2017, 33(6): 1386–1397

[19] De Volder M, Moers A J M, Reynaerts D. Fabrication and control of miniature McKibben actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2011, 166(1): 111–116

[20] Böttcher G, Lilge S, Burgner-Kahrs J. Design of a reconfigurable parallel continuum robot with tendon-actuated kinematic chains. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(2): 1272–1279

[21] Yang C H, Geng S N, Walker I, Branson D T, Liu J G, Dai J S, Kang R J. Geometric constraint-based modeling and analysis of a novel continuum robot with shape memory alloy initiated variable stiffness. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2020, 39(14): 1620–1634

[22] Chitalia Y, Jeong S, Yamamoto K K, Chern J J, Desai J P. Modeling and control of a 2-DoF meso-scale continuum robotic tool for pediatric neurosurgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2021, 37(2): 520–531

[23] Park S, Kim J, Kim C, Cho K J, Noh G. Design optimization of asymmetric patterns for variable stiffness of continuum tubular robots. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(8): 8190–8200

[24] Oliver-Butler K, Childs J A, Daniel A, Rucker D C. Concentric push-pull robots: planar modeling and design. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2022, 38(2): 1186–1200

[25] Girerd C, Morimoto T K. Design and control of a hand-held concentric tube robot for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2021, 37(4): 1022–1038

[26] Rucker C, Childs J, Molaei P, Gilbert H B. Transverse anisotropy stabilizes concentric tube robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, 7(2): 2407–2414

[27] Lee K, Wang Y Z, Zheng C Q. Twister hand: underactuated robotic gripper inspired by origami twisted tower. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2020, 36(2): 488–500

[28] Santoso J, Onal C D. An origami continuum robot capable of precise motion through torsionally stiff body and smooth inverse kinematics. Soft Robotics, 2021, 8(4): 371–386

[29] Wu S, Ze Q J, Dai J Z, Udipi N, Paulino G H, Zhao R K. Stretchable origami robotic arm with omnidirectional bending and twisting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(36): e2110023118

[30] Kang B, Kojcev R, Sinibaldi E. The first interlaced continuum robot, devised to intrinsically follow the leader. PLoS One, 2016, 11(2): e0150278

[31] Hawkes E W, Blumenschein L H, Greer J D, Okamura A M. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Science Robotics, 2017, 2(8): eaan3028

[32] Sadeghi A, Del Dottore E, Mondini A, Mazzolai B. Passive morphological adaptation for obstacle avoidance in a self-growing robot produced by additive manufacturing. Soft Robotics, 2020, 7(1): 85–94

[33] Awtar S, Slocum A H. Constraint-based design of parallel kinematic XY flexure mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2007, 129(8): 816–830

[34] Howell L L, Midha A. A method for the design of compliant mechanisms with small-length flexural pivots. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1994, 116(1): 280–290

[35] Ping Z Y, Zhang T C, Gong L, Zhang C, Zuo S Y. Miniature flexible instrument with fibre bragg grating-based triaxial force sensing for intraoperative gastric endomicroscopy. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 49(9): 2323–2336

[36] Wei X Y, Zhang Y X, Ju F, Guo H, Chen B, Wu H T. Design and analysis of a continuum robot for transnasal skull base surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2021, 17(6): e2328

[37] Wang H D, Wang X L, Yang W L, Du Z J. Design and kinematic modeling of a notch continuum manipulator for laryngeal surgery. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2020, 18(11): 2966–2973

[38] Kato T, Okumura I, Kose H, Takagi K, Hata N. Tendon-driven continuum robot for neuroendoscopy: validation of extended kinematic mapping for hysteresis operation. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2016, 11(4): 589–602

[39] Tian J W, Wang T M, Fang X, Shi Z Y. Design, fabrication and modeling analysis of a spiral support structure with superelastic Ni-Ti shape memory alloy for continuum robot. Smart Materials and Structures, 2020, 29(4): 045007

[40] Pei X, Yu J J, Zong G H, Bi S S. An effective pseudo-rigid-body method for beam-based compliant mechanisms. Precision Engineering, 2010, 34(3): 634–639

Nomenclature

Abbreviations
Al alloy	Aluminum alloy
CLITFP	Compressed leaf-type isosceles-trapezoidal flexural pivot
D-LITFP	Double leaf-type isosceles-trapezoidal flexural pivot
FEA	Finite element analysis
ICR	Instantaneous center of rotation
IE	Intermediate element
LITFP	Leaf-type isosceles-trapezoidal flexural pivot
ME	Movement element
PLA	Polylactic acid
PRB	Pseudo-rigid body
S	Stand
TLITFP	Tensioned leaf-type isosceles-trapezoidal flexural pivot
VCM	Virtual-center of motion
Variables
a1, a2	X-coordinate of the end points B and C of link BC
b	Width of the leaf
\overline{C{C}^{\prime }},\overline{D{D}^{\prime }}	Displacements of points C and D, respectively
E	Elastic modulus
I, Ii	Moments of inertia of the leaf and LITFP i, respectively
F	Force
F_{Cx}, F_{Cy}	Component forces at point C on the X- and Y-axis, respectively
F_{Dx}, F_{Dy}	Component forces at point D on the X- and Y-axis, respectively
F_{\mathrm{N}C}, F_{\mathrm{N}D}	Axial forces applied to link DC on points C and D, respectively
FRC, FRD	Radial forces exerted by link BC and AD on points C and D of link DC, respectively
hf	Height of the lower plane of LITFP from the ICR
hfi	Height of the lower plane of LITFP i from the ICR, i = 1, 2
H	Height of the upper plane of LITFP from the ICR
Hi	Height of the upper plane of LITFP i from the ICR, i = 1, 2
K	Bending stiffness of LITFP
KBC, KAD	Bending stiffness of links BC and AD, respectively
Kd	Bending stiffness of the D-LITFP
Ki	Bending stiffness of the LITFP i, i = 1, 2
KV	Bending stiffness of the VCM mechanism
l_{\mathrm{j}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\left(i\right)	Driving cable length in single joint
lr	Length of the rigid links A^{\prime }D and B^{\prime }C
l_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\left(i\right)	Driving cable length in a single segment
l_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}}\left(i\right)	Driving cable length in half joint
l_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}}\left(i\right)	Driving cable length of the whole continuum robot
M	A pure bending moment
M_{max}	Maximum bending moment which LITFP can bear
n	Position coefficient of ICR
ni	Position coefficient of the ICR of the LITFP i
r	Radius of the circle where the driving cable is located
r_{\mathrm{f}}	Result of FEA
r_{\mathrm{p}}	Calculation result of the PRB model
R	Bending radius
R_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}}	Bending radius of the segment
{\mathit{R}}_Y	Rotation matrix around the Y-axis
{\mathit{R}}_Z	Rotation matrix around the Z-axis
{}_0^4\mathit{R}, {}_0^4\mathit{P}	Rotation matrix and displacement vector from \left\{O_4\right\} to \left\{O_0\right\}, respectively
Sy	Tensile yield strength
t	Thickness of the leaf
ti	Thickness of the leaf of LITFP i
{\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}	Pose transformation matrix of the single segment
{\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}}	End pose transformation matrix of the whole continuum robot
{}_0^1\mathit{T}	Coordinate transformation matrix from \left\{O_1\right\} to \left\{O_0\right\}
{}_0^2\mathit{T}	Coordinate transformation matrix from \left\{O_2\right\} to \left\{O_0\right\}
{}_1^2\mathit{T}	Coordinate transformation matrix from \left\{O_2\right\} to \left\{O_1\right\}
{\alpha }_1, {\alpha }_2	Bending angles of link BC and AD under the action of bending moment M
{\sigma }_{1max}, {\sigma }_{2max}	Maximum stress values corresponding to rotation angles of LITFPs 1 and 2, respectively
σdmax, σmax	Maximum stress of the D-LITFP and LITFP, respectively
\phi	Bending angle of the half joint
φi	Half of the angle between the two leaves of the LITFP i, i = 1, 2
{\phi }_X, {\phi }_Y	X- and Y-axis tilt angles, respectively
θ	Rotation angle (stroke) of the VCM mechanism
{\theta }_{\mathrm{d}}	Rotation angle of the whole D-LITFP
{\theta }_{\mathrm{d}max}	Maximum bending angle of the whole D-LITFP
θi, θimax	(Maximum) Bending angle of the LITFP i, i = 1, 2
{\theta }_{\mathrm{j}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}, {\theta }_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}	Bending angles of the single joint and single segment, respectively
θmax	Maximum bending angle of the LITFP
\eta	Bending direction
{\eta }_{\mathrm{j}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}, {\eta }_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}	Bending directions of the single joint and single segment, respectively
\epsilon	Relative error of PRB model with respect to FEA
\mathrm{\Delta }l	Displacement of the force sensor
\mathrm{\Delta }l\left(i\right)	Cable length difference
\mathrm{\Delta }{l}_{\mathrm{j}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\left(i\right)	Difference in driving cable length in a single joint
\mathrm{\Delta }{l}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}}\left(i\right)	Difference in driving cable length in a single segment
\mathrm{\Delta }{l}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}}\left(i\right)	Difference in driving cable length in half joint
\mathrm{\Delta }{l}_{\mathrm{t}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}}\left(i\right)	Difference in driving cable length of the whole continuum robot

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1813221) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFB1311200).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press