Method for solving the nonlinear inverse problem in gas face seal diagnosis based on surrogate models
Yuan YIN, Weifeng HUANG, Decai LI, Qiang HE, Xiangfeng LIU, Ying LIU
Method for solving the nonlinear inverse problem in gas face seal diagnosis based on surrogate models
Physical models carry quantitative and explainable expert knowledge. However, they have not been introduced into gas face seal diagnosis tasks because of the unacceptable computational cost of inferring the input fault parameters for the observed output or solving the inverse problem of the physical model. The presented work develops a surrogate-model-assisted method for solving the nonlinear inverse problem in limited physical model evaluations. The method prepares a small initial database on sites generated with a Latin hypercube design and then performs an iterative routine that benefits from the rapidity of the surrogate models and the reliability of the physical model. The method is validated on simulated and experimental cases. Results demonstrate that the method can effectively identify the parameters that induce the abnormal signal output with limited physical model evaluations. The presented work provides a quantitative, explainable, and feasible approach for identifying the cause of gas face seal contact. It is also applicable to mechanical devices that face similar difficulties.
surrogate model / gas face seal / fault diagnosis / nonlinear dynamics / tribology
[1] |
Fan Y E, Gu F S, Ball A. A review of the condition monitoring of mechanical seals. In: Proceedings of ASME the 7th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design & Analysis. Manchester, 2004, 3: 179–184
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Phillips R L, Jacobs L E, Merati P. Experimental determination of the thermal characteristics of a mechanical seal and its operating environment. Tribology Transactions, 1997, 40(4): 559–568
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
DiRussoE. Film Thickness Measurement for Spiral Groove and Rayleigh Step Lift Pad Self-Acting Face Seals. NASA TP-2058, 1982
|
[4] |
Huang W F, Lin Y B, Liu Y, Liu X F, Gao Z, Wang Y M. Face rub-impact monitoring of a dry gas seal using acoustic emission. Tribology Letters, 2013, 52(2): 253–259
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Towsyfyan H, Gu F S, Ball A D, Liang B. Tribological behaviour diagnostic and fault detection of mechanical seals based on acoustic emission measurements. Friction, 2019, 7(6): 572–586
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Daraz A, Alabied S, Zhen D, Gu F S, Ball A D. Detection and diagnosis of mechanical seal faults in centrifugal pumps based on acoustic measurement. In: Ball A, Gelman L, Rao B K N, eds. Advances in Asset Management and Condition Monitoring. Cham: Springer, 2020,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Medina-Arenas M, Sopp F, Stolle J, Schley M, Kamieth R, Wassermann F. Measurement and analysis of inadequate friction mechanisms in liquid-buffered mechanical seals utilizing acoustic emission technique. Vibration, 2021, 4(1): 263–283
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Feldman Y, Kligerman Y, Etsion I. Stiffness and efficiency optimization of a hydrostatic laser surface textured gas seal. Journal of Tribology, 2007, 129(2): 407–410
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Blasiak S, Zahorulko A V. A parametric and dynamic analysis of non-contacting gas face seals with modified surfaces. Tribology International, 2016, 94: 126–137
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Jiang J B, Zhao W J, Peng X D, Li J Y. A novel design for discrete surface texture on gas face seals based on a superposed groove model. Tribology International, 2020, 147: 106269
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Zhang Z, Li X H. Acoustic emission monitoring for film thickness of mechanical seals based on feature dimension reduction and cascaded decision. In: Proceedings of 2014 the 6th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation. Zhangjiajie: IEEE, 2014,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
YinY, LiuX F, HuangW F, Liu Y, HuS T. Gas face seal status estimation based on acoustic emission monitoring and support vector machine regression. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 12(5): 168781402092132
|
[13] |
ZhangZ H, Min F, ChenG S, ShenS P, WenZ C, ZhouX B. Tri-partition state alphabet-based sequential pattern for multivariate time series. Cognitive Computation, 2021 (in press)
|
[14] |
Li T Y, Qian Z J, Deng W, Zhang D Z, Lu H H, Wang S H. Forecasting crude oil prices based on variational mode decomposition and random sparse Bayesian learning. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 113: 108032
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Ran X J, Zhou X B, Lei M, Tepsan W, Deng W. A novel k-means clustering algorithm with a noise algorithm for capturing urban hotspots. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(23): 11202
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Miller B A, Green I. Numerical formulation for the dynamic analysis of spiral-grooved gas face seal. Journal of Tribology, 2001, 123(2): 395–403
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Green I. A transient dynamic analysis of mechanical seals including asperity contact and face deformation. Tribology Transactions, 2002, 45(3): 284–293
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Zirkelback N, San Andre’s L. Effect of frequency excitation on force coefficients of spiral groove gas seals. Journal of Tribology, 1999, 121(4): 853–861
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Miller B, Green I. Constitutive equations and the correspondence principle for the dynamics of gas lubricated triboelements. Journal of Tribology, 1998, 120(2): 345–352
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Simpson T W, Peplinski J D, Koch P H, Allen J K. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Engineering with Computers, 2001, 17(2): 129–150
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Bhosekar A, Ierapetritou M. Advances in surrogate based modeling, feasibility analysis, and optimization: a review. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2018, 108: 250–267
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Han Z H. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization: a review of recent progress. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11): 3197–3225
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Kontogiannis S G, Savill M A. A generalized methodology for multidisciplinary design optimization using surrogate modelling and multifidelity analysis. Optimization and Engineering, 2020, 21(3): 723–759
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Garg A, Liu C, Jishnu A K, Gao L, Le Phung M L, Tran V M. A Thompson sampling efficient multi-objective optimization algorithm (TSEMO) for lithium-ion battery liquid-cooled thermal management system: study of hydrodynamic, thermodynamic, and structural performance. Journal of Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage, 2021, 18(2): 021009
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Tang H S, Ren Y, Kumar A. Optimization tool based on multi-objective adaptive surrogate modeling for surface texture design of slipper bearing in axial piston pump. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2021, 60(5): 4483–4503
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Liu Y, Liu Q X, Yin M, Yin G F. Dynamic analysis and structure optimization of a floating ring system in dry gas seal. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing, 2018, 12(7): JAMDSM0128
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Patir N, Cheng H S. An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. Journal of Tribology, 1978, 100(1): 12–17
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
FanY B, Gu F S, BallA. Modeling acoustic emissions generated by sliding friction. Wear, 2010, 268(5–6): 811–815
|
[29] |
Greenwood J A, Williamson J B P. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1966, 295(1442): 300–319
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Yin Y, Hu S T, Huang W F, Liu X F, Liu Y, Wang Z X. A bi-Gaussian acoustic emission model for sliding friction. IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering, 2019, 686(1): 012026
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Mckay M D, Beckman R J, Conover W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 1979, 21: 239–245
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Morris M D, Mitchell T J. Exploratory designs for computational experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1995, 43(3): 381–402
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Lee B W, Peterson J J, Yin K H, Stockdale G S, Liu Y C, O’Brien A. System model development and computer experiments for continuous API manufacturing. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2020, 156: 495–506
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Sacks J, Welch W J, Mitchell T J, Wynn H P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science, 1989, 4(4): 409–423
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Yin J, Ng S H, Ng K M. Kriging metamodel with modified nugget-effect: the heteroscedastic variance case. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2011, 61(3): 760–777
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Toal D J J, Bressloff N W, Keane A J. Kriging hyperparameter tuning strategies. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(5): 1240–1252
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Byrd R H, Gilbert J C, Nocedal J. A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Mathematical Programming, 2000, 89(1): 149–185
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Herrera F, Lozano M, Verdegay J L. Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: operators and tools for behavioural analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1998, 12(4): 265–319
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Deng W, Zhang X X, Zhou Y Q, Liu Y, Zhou X B, Chen H L, Zhao H M. An enhanced fast non-dominated solution sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective problems. Information Sciences, 2022, 585: 441–453
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Jones D R, Schonlau M, Welch W J. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 1998, 13(4): 455–492
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Hu S T, Huang W F, Liu X F, Wang Y M. Influence analysis of secondary O-ring seals in dynamic behavior of spiral groove gas face seals. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(3): 507–514
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |