Design method and verification of a hybrid prosthetic mechanism with energy-damper clutchable device for transfemoral amputees

Abstract

Transfemoral amputees (TAs) have difficulty in mobility during walking, such as restricted movement of lower extremity and body instability, yet few transfemoral prostheses have explored human-like multiple motion characteristics by simple structures to fit the kinesiology, biomechanics, and stability of human lower extremity. In this work, the configurations of transfemoral prosthetic mechanism are synthesized in terms of human lower-extremity kinesiology. A hybrid transfemoral prosthetic (HTP) mechanism with multigait functions is proposed to recover the gait functions of TAs. The kinematic and mechanical performances of the designed parallel mechanism are analyzed to verify their feasibility in transfemoral prosthetic mechanism. Inspired by motion–energy coupling relationship of the knee, a wearable energy-damper clutched device that can provide energy in knee stance flexion to facilitate the leg off from the ground and can impede the leg’s swing velocity for the next stance phase is proposed. Its co-operation with the springs in the prismatic pairs enables the prosthetic mechanism to have the energy recycling ability under the gait rhythm of the knee joint. Results demonstrate that the designed HTP mechanism can replace the motion functions of the knee and ankle to realize its multimode gait and effectively decrease the peak power of actuators from 94.74 to 137.05 W while maintaining a good mechanical adaptive stability.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

hybrid transfemoral prosthetic mechanism / energy recycling / wearable mechanical clutched device / mechanical adaptive stability

References

[1] Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie E J, Ephraim P L. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2008, 89( 3): 422– 429

[2] Ngan C C, Andrysek J. Modeling and design of the automatic stance phase lock (ASPL) knee joint control mechanism for paediatric users with transfemoral amputations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2020, 28( 1): 203– 210

[3] Sup F, Bohara A, Goldfarb M. Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2008, 27( 2): 263– 273

[4] Yang U J, Kim J Y. Mechanical design of powered prosthetic leg and walking pattern generation based on motion capture data. Advanced Robotics, 2015, 29( 16): 1061– 1079

[5] Lenzi T, Cempini M, Hargrove L. Design, development and testing of a lightweight hybrid robotic knee prosthesis. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2018, 37( 8): 953– 976

[6] Lawson B E, Varol H A, Goldfarb M. Standing stability enhancement with an intelligent powered transfemoral prosthesis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2011, 58( 9): 2617– 2624

[7] Wang Y, Yu J J, Pei X. Fast forward kinematics algorithm for real-time and high-precision control of the 3-RPS parallel mechanism. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 13( 3): 368– 375

[8] Russo M, Herrero S, Altuzarra O. Kinematic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a 3-UPR parallel mechanism for a robotic leg. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2018, 120 : 192– 202

[9] Moosavian A, Xi F F. Holonomic under-actuation of parallel robots with topological reconfiguration. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2016, 96 : 290– 307

[10] Song M J, Guo S, Qu H B, et al. China Patent, ZL201910438441.2, 2020-10-09

[11] Hisano G, Hashizume S, Kobayashi Y. Factors associated with a risk of prosthetic knee buckling during walking in unilateral transfemoral amputees. Gait & Posture, 2020, 77 : 69– 74

[12] Yu J J, Liu X J, Ding X L. Mathematical Foundation of Mechanisms and Robotics. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016, 11– 78

[13] Chhabra R, Emami M R. A generalized exponential formula for forward and differential kinematics of open-chain multi-body systems. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2014, 73 : 61– 75

[14] Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004, 1–68

[15] Xie X D, Wang S T, Ye M. Isogeometric topology optimization based on energy penalization for symmetric structure. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 15( 1): 100– 122

[16] Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches: a comparative review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48( 6): 1031– 1055

[17] Zhu B L, Zhang X M, Zhang H C. Design of compliant mechanisms using continuum topology optimization: a review. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2020, 143 : 103622–

[18] Stolpe M, Svanberg K. An alternative interpolation scheme for minimum compliance topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 22( 2): 116– 124

[19] Huang Z, Zhao Y S, Zhao T S. Advanced Spatial Mechanism. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006, 19– 39

[20] Laus L P, Simas H, Martins D. Machine efficiency determined using graph and screw theories with application in robotics. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2020, 148 : 103748–

[21] Tasi L W. Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators. New York: Wiley, 1999, 116–259

[22] Tsai L W, Joshi S. Kinematic analysis of 3-DOF position mechanisms for use in hybrid kinematic machines. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2002, 124( 2): 245– 253

[23] Wang L P, Xu H Y, Guan L W. A novel 3-PUU parallel mechanism and its kinematic issues. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2016, 42 : 86– 102

[24] Rezaei A, Akbarzadeh A, Nia P M. Position, Jacobian and workspace analysis of a 3-PSP spatial parallel manipulator. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29( 4): 158– 173

[25] Sun T, Lian B B, Yang S F. Kinematic calibration of serial and parallel robots based on finite and instantaneous screw theory. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2020, 36( 3): 816– 834

[26] Joshi S, Tsai L W. Jacobian analysis of limited-DOF parallel manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2002, 124( 2): 254– 258

[27] Choi H B, Ryu J. Singularity analysis of a four degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator based on an expanded 6×6 Jacobian matrix. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, 57 : 51– 61

[28] Song M J, Guo S, Wang X Y. Dynamic analysis and performance verification of a novel hip prosthetic mechanism. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 33( 1): 17–

[29] Herrero S, Pinto C, Altuzarra O. Analysis of the 2 PRU-1 PRS 3DOF parallel manipulator: kinematics, singularities and dynamics. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2018, 51 : 63– 72

[30] Arsenault M, Boudreau R. Synthesis of planar parallel mechanisms while considering workspace, dexterity, stiffness and singularity avoidance. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2006, 128( 1): 69– 78

[31] Farrokh M, Afzali M, Carrera E. Mechanical and thermal buckling loads of rectangular FG plates by using higher-order unified formulation. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2021, 28( 6): 608– 617

[32] Kulkarni K, Singh B N, Maiti D K. Analytical solution for bending and buckling analysis of functionally graded plates using inverse trigonometric shear deformation theory. Composite Structures, 2015, 134 : 147– 157

[33] Shen J J, Wadee M A, Sadowski A J. Interactive buckling in long thin-walled rectangular hollow section struts. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 2017, 89 : 43– 58

[34] Radau L, Gerzen N, Barthold F J. Sensitivity of structural response in context of linear and non-linear buckling analysis with solid shell finite elements. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55( 6): 2259– 2283

[35] Dijkstra E J, Gutierrez-Farewik E M. Computation of ground reaction force using zero moment point. Journal of Biomechanics, 2015, 48( 14): 3776– 3781

[36] Oh S E, Choi A, Mun J H. Prediction of ground reaction forces during gait based on kinematics and a neural network model. Journal of Biomechanics, 2013, 46( 14): 2372– 2380

[37] Seroussi R E, Gitter A, Czerniecki J M. Mechanical work adaptations of above-knee amputee ambulation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1996, 77( 11): 1209– 1214

[38] Winter D A. Energy generation and absorption at the ankle and knee during fast, natural, and slow cadences. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1983, 175 : 147– 154

[39] Winter D A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 2nd ed. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press, 1990

[40] Millard M, Emonds A L, Harant M. A reduced muscle model and planar musculoskeletal model fit for the simulation of whole-body movements. Journal of Biomechanics, 2019, 89( 24): 11– 20

[41] Winter D A. Overall principle of lower-limb support during stance phase of gait. Journal of Biomechanics, 1980, 13( 11): 923– 927

[42] Donelan J M, Kram R, Kuo A D. Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002, 35( 1): 117– 124

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875033).

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the Creative Commons license is provided, and the changes made are indicated.

The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 The Author(s) 2021. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn.