A novel approach for remanufacturing process planning considering uncertain and fuzzy information

Yan LV, Congbo LI, Xikun ZHAO, Lingling LI, Juan LI

PDF(4358 KB)
PDF(4358 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 546-558. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-021-0639-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A novel approach for remanufacturing process planning considering uncertain and fuzzy information

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Remanufacturing, as one of the optimal disposals of end-of-life products, can bring tremendous economic and ecological benefits. Remanufacturing process planning is facing an immense challenge due to uncertainties and fuzziness of recoverable products in damage conditions and remanufacturing quality requirements. Although researchers have studied the influence of uncertainties on remanufacturing process planning, very few of them comprehensively studied the interactions among damage conditions and quality requirements that involve uncertain, fuzzy information. Hence, this challenge in the context of uncertain, fuzzy information is undertaken in this paper, and a method for remanufacturing process planning is presented to maximize remanufacturing efficiency and minimize cost. In particular, the characteristics of uncertainties and fuzziness involved in the remanufacturing processes are explicitly analyzed. An optimization model is then developed to minimize remanufacturing time and cost. The solution is provided through an improved Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy neural network (T-S FNN) method. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is exemplified and elucidated by a case study. Results show that the training speed and accuracy of the improved T-S FNN method are 23.5% and 82.5% higher on average than those of the original method, respectively.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

remanufacturing / uncertain and fuzzy information / process planning / T-S FNN

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan LV, Congbo LI, Xikun ZHAO, Lingling LI, Juan LI. A novel approach for remanufacturing process planning considering uncertain and fuzzy information. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(3): 546‒558 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0639-1

References

[1]
Kurilova-Palisaitiene J, Sundin E, Poksinska B. Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 172 : 3225– 3236
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Jena S K. Remanufacturing for the circular economy: Study and evaluation of critical factors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 156( 1): 104681–
[3]
Ismail H N, Zwolinski P, Mandil G. Decision-making system for designing products and production systems for remanufacturing activities. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 61 : 212– 217
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Subramoniam R, Huisingh D, Chinnam R B. Remanufacturing for the automotive aftermarket-strategic factors: Literature review and future research needs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17( 13): 1163– 1174
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Du Y, Zheng Y, Wu G. Decision-making method of heavy-duty machine tool remanufacturing based on AHP-entropy weight and extension theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 252 : 119607–
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Tighazoui A, Turki S, Sauvey C. Optimal design of a manufacturing-remanufacturing-transport system within a reverse logistics chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing, 2019, 101( 5‒8): 1773– 1791
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Le V T, Paris H, Mandil G. Process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies in a remanufacturing context. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 44( 1): 243– 254
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Tian G, Zhang H, Feng Y. Operation patterns analysis of automotive components remanufacturing industry development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164 : 1363– 1375
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Ijomah W L, Mcmahon C A, Hammond G P. Development of design for remanufacturing guidelines to support sustainable manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2007, 23( 6): 712– 719
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Goodall P, Rosamond E, Harding J. A review of the state of the art in tools and techniques used to evaluate remanufacturing feasibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 81( 7): 1– 15
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Zhang R, Ong S, Nee A Y C. A simulation-based genetic algorithm approach for remanufacturing process planning and scheduling. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 37 : 521– 532
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Tian G, Zhou M, Li P. Disassembly sequence planning considering fuzzy component quality and varying operational cost. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2018, 15( 2): 748– 760
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Yanıkoğlu İ, Denizel M. The value of quality grading in remanufacturing under quality level uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59( 3): 839– 859
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Cui L, Wu K J, Tseng M L. Selecting a remanufacturing quality strategy based on consumer preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161 : 1308– 1316
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Um J, Rauch M, Hascoët J Y. STEP-NC compliant process planning of additive manufacturing: Remanufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 88( 5‒8): 1215– 1230
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Aksoy H K, Gupta S M. Optimal management of remanufacturing systems with server vacations. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 54( 9‒12): 1199– 1218
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Jiang Z, Zhou T, Zhang H. Reliability and cost optimization for remanufacturing process planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135 : 1602– 1610
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Denizel M, Ferguson M, Souza G G C. Multiperiod remanufacturing planning with uncertain quality of inputs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2010, 57( 3): 394– 404
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Teunter R H, Flapper S D P. Optimal core acquisition and remanufacturing policies under uncertain core quality fractions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 210( 2): 241– 248
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Shakourloo A. A multi-objective stochastic goal programming model for more efficient remanufacturing process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 91( 1‒4): 1007– 1021
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Le V T, Paris H, Mandil G. Process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies in a remanufacturing context. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 44( 1): 243– 254
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
He Y, Hao C, Wang Y. An ontology-based method of knowledge modelling for remanufacturing process planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 258 : 120952–
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Jiang Z, Zhou T, Zhang H. Reliability and cost optimization for remanufacturing process planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135 : 1602– 1610
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Li S, Zhang H, Yan W, et al. A hybrid method of blockchain and case-based reasoning for remanufacturing process planning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2021, 32(5): 1389−1399
[25]
Chen D, Jiang Z, Zhu S. A knowledge-based method for eco-efficiency upgrading of remanufacturing process planning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 108( 4): 1153– 1162
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Zhao B, Ren Y, Gao D. Prediction of service life of large centrifugal compressor remanufactured impeller based on clustering rough set and fuzzy Bandelet neural network. Applied Soft Computing, 2019, 78 : 132– 140
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hou S, Fei J, Chen C. Finite-time adaptive fuzzy-neural-network control of active power filter. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2019, 34( 10): 10298– 10313
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Tian G, Hao N, Zhou M. Fuzzy grey Choquet integral for evaluation of multicriteria decision making problems with interactive and qualitative indices. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Systems, 2021, 51( 3): 1855– 1868
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Yazdani-Chamzini A, Razani M, Yakhchali S H. Developing a fuzzy model based on subtractive clustering for road header performance prediction. Automation in Construction, 2013, 35 : 111– 120
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Bu F. An efficient fuzzy c-means approach based on canonical polyadic decomposition for clustering big data in IoT. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 88 : 675– 682
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Javadi S, Rameez M, Dahl M. Vehicle classification based on multiple fuzzy c-means clustering using dimensions and speed features. Procedia Computer Science, 2018, 126 : 1344– 1350
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Nguyen N N, Zhou W J, Quek C. GSETSK: A generic self-evolving TSK fuzzy neural network with a novel Hebbian-based rule reduction approach. Applied Soft Computing, 2015, 35 : 29– 42
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zeng S, Tong X, Sang N. Study on multi-center fuzzy C-means algorithm based on transitive closure and spectral clustering. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 16 : 89– 101
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975075), the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project, China (Grant No. 2019ZX04005-001), and the Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Program, China (Grant No. cstc2020jscx-msxmX0221).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press 2021.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4358 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/