Terrain classification and adaptive locomotion for a hexapod robot Qingzhui

Abstract

Legged robots have potential advantages in mobility compared with wheeled robots in outdoor environments. The knowledge of various ground properties and adaptive locomotion based on different surface materials plays an important role in improving the stability of legged robots. A terrain classification and adaptive locomotion method for a hexapod robot named Qingzhui is proposed in this paper. First, a force-based terrain classification method is suggested. Ground contact force is calculated by collecting joint torques and inertial measurement unit information. Ground substrates are classified with the feature vector extracted from the collected data using the support vector machine algorithm. Then, an adaptive locomotion on different ground properties is proposed. The dynamic alternating tripod trotting gait is developed to control the robot, and the parameters of active compliance control change with the terrain. Finally, the method is integrated on a hexapod robot and tested by real experiments. Our method is shown effective for the hexapod robot to walk on concrete, wood, grass, and foam. The strategies and experimental results can be a valuable reference for other legged robots applied in outdoor environments.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

terrain classification / hexapod robot / legged robot / adaptive locomotion / gait control

References

[1] Krotkov E, Hackett D, Jackel L, . The DARPA robotics challenge finals: Results and perspectives. Journal of Field Robotics, 2017, 34(2): 229–240

[2] Fankhauser P, Diethelm R, Bachmann S, . ANYmal at the ARGOS challenge—Tools and experiences from the autonomous inspection of oil & gas sites with a legged robot. In: Preceedings of ROSCon. Seoul, 2016

[3] Raibert M, Blankespoor K, Nelson G, . BigDog, the rough-terrain quadruped robot. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2008, 41(2): 10822–10825

[4] Ackerman E. Boston Dynamics’ SpotMini is all electric, agile, and has a capable face-arm. Available at IEEE Spectrum website, 2016

[5] Hutter M, Gehring C, Bloesch M, . StarlETH: A compliant quadrupedal robot for fast, efficient, and versatile locomotion. Adaptive Mobile Robotics, 2012, 483–490

[6] Gehring C, Coros S, Hutter M, . Control of dynamic gaits for a quadrupedal robot. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Karlsruhe: IEEE, 2013, 3287–3292

[7] Hutter M, Gehring C, Jud D, . ANYmal—A highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Daejeon: IEEE, 2016, 38–44

[8] Hutter M, Gehring C, Lauber A, . ANYmal—Toward legged robots for harsh environments. Advanced Robotics, 2017, 31(17): 918–931

[9] Fankhauser P, Hutter M. ANYmal: A unique quadruped robot conquering harsh environments. Research Features, 2018, 126: 54–57

[10] Bledt G, Powell M J, Katz B, . MIT Cheetah 3: Design and control of a robust, dynamic quadruped robot. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Madrid: IEEE, 2018, 18372454

[11] Di Carlo J, Wensing P M, Katz B, . Dynamic locomotion in the MIT Cheetah 3 through convex model-predictive control. In: Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Madrid: IEEE, 2018, 18372957

[12] Nguyen Q, Powell M J, Katz B, . Optimized jumping on the MIT Cheetah 3 robot. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal: IEEE, 2019, 18903916

[13] Katz B, Di Carlo J, Kim S. Mini Cheetah: A platform for pushing the limits of dynamic quadruped control. In: Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Montreal: IEEE, 2019, 18903830

[14] Semini C, Buchli J, Frigerio M, . HyQ—A dynamic locomotion research platform. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Bio-Inspired Robots. Nantes, 2011

[15] Belter D, Skrzypczyński P. Rough terrain mapping and classification for foothold selection in a walking robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 2011, 28(4): 497–528

[16] Belter D, Skrzypczyński P. Integrated motion planning for a hexapod robot walking on rough terrain. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2011, 44(1): 6918–6923

[17] Ding X, Wang Z, Rovetta A, . Locomotion analysis of hexapod robot. In: Miripour B, ed. Climbing and Walking Robots. IntechOpen, 2010, 291–310

[18] Wang Z, Ding X, Rovetta A, . Mobility analysis of the typical gait of a radial symmetrical six-legged robot. Mechatronics, 2011, 21(7): 1133–1146

[19] Peng S, Ding X, Yang F, . Motion planning and implementation for the self-recovery of an overturned multi-legged robot. Robotica, 2017, 35(5): 1107–1120

[20] Chen Z, Gao F. Time-optimal trajectory planning method for six-legged robots under actuator constraints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2019, 233(14): 4990–5002

[21] Chen Z, Gao F, Sun Q, . Ball-on-plate motion planning for six-parallel-legged robots walking on irregular terrains using pure haptic information. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 141: 136–150

[22] Tian Y, Gao F. Efficient motion generation for a six-legged robot walking on irregular terrain via integrated foothold selection and optimization-based whole-body planning. Robotica, 2018, 36(3): 333–352

[23] Tian Y, Gao F, Liu J, . Step rolling planning of a six-legged robot with 1-DOF waist for slope climbing. Science China. Technological Sciences, 2019, 62(4): 597–607

[24] Sun Q, Gao F, Chen X. Towards dynamic alternating tripod trotting of a pony-sized hexapod robot for disaster rescuing based on multi-modal impedance control. Robotica, 2018, 36(7): 1048–1076

[25] Filitchkin P, Byl K. Feature-based terrain classification for LittleDog. In: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Vilamoura: IEEE, 2012, 13195379

[26] Milella A, Reina G, Underwood J. A self-learning framework for statistical ground classification using radar and monocular vision. Journal of Field Robotics, 2015, 32(1): 20–41

[27] Christie J, Kottege N. Acoustics based terrain classification for legged robots. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Stockholm: IEEE, 2016, 16055317

[28] Brooks C A, Iagnemma K. Vibration-based terrain classification for planetary exploration rovers. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2005, 21(6): 1185–1191

[29] Hoepflinger M A, Remy C D, Hutter M, . Haptic terrain classification for legged robots. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Anchorage: IEEE, 2010, 11431433

[30] Giguere P, Dudek G, Saunderson S, . Environment identification for a running robot using inertial and actuator cues. Robotics Science and Systems, 2006, 2: 271–278

[31] Shill J J, Collins E G, Coyle E, . Terrain identification on a one-legged hopping robot using high-resolution pressure images. In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Hong Kong: IEEE, 2014, 14616345

[32] Wu X A, Huh T M, Mukherjee R, . Integrated ground reaction force sensing and terrain classification for small legged robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2016, 1(2): 1125–1132

[33] Best G, Moghadam P, Kottege N, . Terrain classification using a hexapod robot. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation. Sydney, 2013

[34] Hoffmann M, Štěpánová K, Reinstein M. The effect of motor action and different sensory modalities on terrain classification in a quadruped robot running with multiple gaits. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2014, 62(12): 1790–1798

[35] Walas K. Terrain classification and negotiation with a walking robot. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2015, 78(3–4): 401–423

[36] Li X, Wang W, Yi J. Ground substrate classification for adaptive quadruped locomotion. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Singapore: IEEE, 2017, 17057799

[37] Shao X, Yang Y, Wang W. Ground substrates classification and adaptive walking through interaction dynamics for legged robots. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012, 19(3): 100–108

[38] Dutta A, Dasgupta P. Ensemble learning with weak classifiers for fast and reliable unknown terrain classification using mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Systems, 2017, 47(11): 2933–2944

[39] Ordonez C, Shill J, Johnson A, . Terrain identification for RHex-type robots. In: Proceedings of Unmanned Systems Technology XV. Baltimore, 2013, 87410Q

[40] Valada A, Burgard W. Deep spatiotemporal models for robust proprioceptive terrain classification. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2017, 36(13–14): 1521–1539

[41] Kottege N, Parkinson C, Moghadam P, . Energetics-informed hexapod gait transitions across terrains. In: Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Seattle: IEEE, 2015, 15285932

[42] Bosworth W, Whitney J, Kim S, . Robot locomotion on hard and soft ground: Measuring stability and ground properties in-situ. In: Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Stockholm: IEEE, 2016, 16055370

[43] Duch W, Jankowski N, Maszczyk T. Make it cheap: Learning with O(nd) complexity. In: Proceedings of 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Brisbane: IEEE, 2012, 12906474

[44] Chang C C, Lin C J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011, 2(3): 27

[45] Hsu C W, Chang C C, Lin C J. A practical guide to support vector classification, 2003

[46] Farley C T, Glasheen J, Mcmahon T A. Running springs: Speed and animal size. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1993, 185(1): 71–86