Determination of the feasible setup parameters of a workpiece to maximize the utilization of a five-axis milling machine
Aqeel AHMED, Muhammad WASIF, Anis FATIMA, Liming WANG, Syed Amir IQBAL
Determination of the feasible setup parameters of a workpiece to maximize the utilization of a five-axis milling machine
The machining industry must maximize the machine tool utilization for its efficient and effective usage. Determining a feasible workpiece location is one of the significant tasks performed in an iterative way via machining simulations. The maximum utilization of five-axis machine tools depends upon the cutting system’s geometry, the configuration of the machine tool, and the workpiece’s location. In this research, a mathematical model has been developed to determine the workpiece’s feasible location in the five-axis machine tool for avoiding the number of iterations, which are usually performed to eliminate the global collision and axis limit errors. In this research, a generic arrangement of the five-axis machine tool has been selected. The mathematical model of post-processor has been developed by using kinematic modeling methods. The machine tool envelopes have been determined using the post-processor and axial limit. The tooltip reachable workspace is determined by incorporating the post-processor, optimal cutting system length, and machining envelope, thereby further developing an algorithm to determine the feasible workpiece setup parameters accurately. The algorithm’s application has been demonstrated using an example. Finally, the algorithm is validated for feasible workpiece setup parameters in a virtual environment. This research is highly applicable in the industry to eliminate the number of iterations performed for the suitable workpiece setup parameters.
workpiece setup parameter / five-axis / space utilization / setup parameters / machine tool
[1] |
Altintas Y. Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Calibrations and CNC Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000
|
[2] |
Bohez E L J. Five axis milling machine tool kinematic chain design and analysis. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2002, 42(4): 505–520
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Stanislav S M, Weerachai A. Advance Numerical Method to Optimize Cutting Operations of Five-Axis Milling Machines. Berlin: Springer, 2007
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Lee Y S. Admissible tool orientation control of gouging avoidance for 5-axis complex surface machining. Computer-Aided Design, 1997, 29(7): 507–521
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Lo C. Efficient cutter-path planning for five axis surface machining with a flat-end cutter. Computer-Aided Design, 1999, 31(9): 557–566
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Gray P, Bedi S, Ismail F. Rolling ball method for 5-axis surface machining. Computer-Aided Design, 2003, 35(4): 347–357
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Gray P, Bedi S, Ismail F. Arc-intersection method for 5-axis tool positioning. Computer-Aided Design, 2005, 37(7): 663–674
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Choi B K, Park J W, Jun C S. Cutter location data optimization in 5-axis surface machining. Computer-Aided Design, 1993, 25(6): 377–386
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Jensen C G, Red W E, Pi J. Tool selection for five-axis curvature matched machining. Computer-Aided Design, 2002, 34(3): 251–266
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
She C, Chang C. Design of a generic five-axis postprocessor based on generalized kinematics model of machine tool. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2007, 47(3–4): 537–545
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Jung Y H, Lee D W, Kim J S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Chen L. Kinematics modelling and post processing method of five axis CNC machine. Proceedings of the 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science, 2009, 1: 300–303
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Affouard A, Duc E, Lartigue C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Munlin M, Makhanov S S, Bohez E L J. Optimization of rotations of a five-axis milling machine near stationary points. Computer-Aided Design, 2004, 36(12): 1117–1128
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Anotaipaiboon W, Makhanov S S, Bohez E L J. Optimal setup for five-axis machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2006, 46(9): 964–977
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Chen Z C, Ahmed A. A precise approach for the determination of the setup parameters to utilize maximum workspace of five-axis CNC machine tools. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85(9–12): 2297–2311
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Duong T, Rodriguez-Ayerbe P, Lavernhe S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Sepahi-Boroujeni S, Mayers J R R, Khameneifar F. Repeatability of on-machine probing by a five-axis machine tool. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 152: 103544
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Lin Z, Fu J, Shen H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Pessoles X, Landon Y, Segonds S,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Xu K, Tang K. Optimal workpiece setup for time-efficient and energysaving five-axis machining of freeform surfaces. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2017, 139(5): 051003
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Wasif M, Iqbal S A, Ahmed A,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Chen Z C, Wasif M. A generic and theoretical approach to programming and post-processing for hypoid gear machining on multi-axis cnc face-milling machines. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 81(1–4): 135–148
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Wasif M, Chen Z C. An accurate approach to determine the cutting system for the face milling of hypoid gears. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84(9–12): 1873–1888
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Wasif M, Chen Z C, Hasan S M. Determination of cutter-head geometry for the face-milling of hypoid gears. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 86(9): 3081–3090
|
[26] |
Rababah M, Wasif M, Omari M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Rababah M, Wasif M, Omari M,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Yan G, Chen H, Zhang X,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |