Dimensional synthesis of a novel 5-DOF reconfigurable hybrid perfusion manipulator for large-scale spherical honeycomb perfusion

Abstract

A novel hybrid perfusion manipulator (HPM) with five degrees of freedom (DOFs) is introduced by combining the 5PUS-PRPU (P, R, U, and S represent prismatic, revolute, universal, and spherical joint, respectively) parallel mechanism with the 5PRR reconfigurable base to enhance the perfusion efficiency of the large-scale spherical honeycomb thermal protection layer. This study mainly presents the dimensional synthesis of the proposed HPM. First, the inverse kinematics, including the analytic expression of the rotation angles of the U joint in the PUS limb, is obtained, and mobility analysis is conducted based on screw theory. The Jacobian matrix of 5PUS-PRPU is also determined with screw theory and used for the establishment of the objective function. Second, a global and comprehensive objective function (GCOF) is proposed to represent the Jacobian matrix’s condition number. With the genetic algorithm, dimensional synthesis is conducted by minimizing GCOF subject to the given variable constraints. The values of the designed variables corresponding to different configurations of the reconfigurable base are then obtained. Lastly, the optimal structure parameters of the proposed 5-DOF HPM are determined. Results show that the HPM with the optimized parameters has an enlarged orientation workspace, and the maximum angle of the reconfigurable base is decreased, which is conducive to improving the overall stiffness of HPM.

Keywords

5-DOF hybrid manipulator / reconfigurable base / large workspace / dimensional synthesis / optimal design

References

[1] Ackerman P k, Baker, A L, Newquist C W. US Patent 5322725, 1994-6-21

[2] Gogu C, Bapanapalli S K, Haftka R T, Comparison of materials for an integrated thermal protection system for spacecraft reentry. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2009, 46(3): 501–513

[3] Erb R B, Greenshields D H,Chauvin L T, Apollo thermal-protection system development. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2015, 7(1): 839–869

[4] Wu D, Zhou A, Zheng L, Study on the thermal protection performance of superalloy honeycomb panels in high-speed thermal shock environments. Theoretical & Applied Mechanics Letters, 2014, 4(2): 19–26

[5] Merlet J P. Parallel Robots. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000

[6] Liu Y, Wang L, Wu J, A comprehensive analysis of a 3-P(Pa)S spatial parallel manipulator. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 10(1): 7–19

[7] Chaker A, Mlika A, Laribi M A, Synthesis of spherical parallel manipulator for dexterous medical task. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 7(2): 150–162

[8] Dong W, Du Z, Xiao Y, Development of a parallel kinematic motion simulator platform. Mechatronics, 2013, 23(1): 154–161

[9] Guo S, Li D, Chen H, . Design and kinematic analysis of a novel flight simulator mechanism. In: Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications (ICIRA). Guangzhou: Springer, 2014, 23–34

[10] Wu G, Bai S, Hjørnet P. Architecture optimization of a parallel Schönflies-motion robot for pick-and-place applications in a predefined workspace. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2016, 106: 148–165

[11] Mo J, Shao Z, Guan L, Dynamic performance analysis of the X4 high-speed pick-and-place parallel robot. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 46: 48–57

[12] Wu J, Gao Y, Zhang B, Workspace and dynamic performance evaluation of the parallel manipulators in a spray-painting equipment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 44: 199–207

[13] Zhang B, Wu J, Wang L, Accurate dynamic modeling and control parameters design of an industrial hybrid spray-painting robot. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2020, 63: 101923

[14] Xie F, Liu X, Wang J A. 3-DOF parallel manufacturing module and its kinematic optimization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2012, 28(3): 334–343

[15] Sun T, Song Y, Dong G, Optimal design of a parallel mechanism with three rotational degrees of freedom. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2012, 28(4): 500–508

[16] Yang H, Fang H, Ge Q J, . On the kinematic performance of a novel 5-DOF reconfigurable hybrid manipulator with ultra large workspace for automatic perfusion of a large-scale spherical honeycomb structure. In: Proceedings of 2019 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC). Anaheim: ASME, 2019, 1–9

[17] Liu X. Optimal kinematic design of a three translational DoFs parallel manipulator. Robotica, 2006, 24(2): 239–250

[18] Liu X, Li J, Zhou Y. Kinematic optimal design of a 2-degree-of-freedom 3-parallelogram planar parallel manipulator. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2015, 87: 1–17

[19] Liu X, Chen X, Li Z. Modular design of typical rigid links in parallel kinematic machines: Classification and topology optimization. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 7(2): 199–209

[20] Shin H, Lee S, Jeong J I, Antagonistic stiffness optimization of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators in a predefined workspace. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2013, 18(3): 1161–1169

[21] Liu X, Wang J. A new methodology for optimal kinematic design of parallel mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2007, 42(9): 1210–1224

[22] Wang L, Xu H, Guan L. Optimal design of a 3-PUU parallel mechanism with 2R1T DOFs. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2017, 114: 190–203

[23] Kelaiaia R, Company O, Zaatri A. Multiobjective optimization of a linear Delta parallel robot. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, 50: 159–178

[24] Wan X, Li Q, Wang K. Dimensional synthesis of a robotized cell of support fixture. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2017, 48: 80–92

[25] Altuzarra O, Pinto C, Sandru B, Optimal dimensioning for parallel manipulators: Workspace, dexterity, and energy. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011, 133(4): 041007

[26] Wu J, Chen X, Li T, Optimal design of a 2-DOF parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy considering kinematics and natural frequency. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29(1): 80–85

[27] Qi Y, Sun T, Song Y. Multi-objective optimization of parallel tracking mechanism considering parameter uncertainty. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2018, 10(4): 041006

[28] Klein J, Spencer S, Allington J, Optimization of a parallel shoulder mechanism to achieve a high-force, low-mass, robotic-arm exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2010, 26(4): 710–715

[29] Song Y, Lian B, Sun T, A novel five-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator and its kinematic optimization. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2014, 6(4): 041008

[30] Cheng Y, Yu D. Optimal design of a parallel bionic eye mechanism. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2019, 33(2): 879–887

[31] Daneshmand M, Saadatzi M H, Kaloorazi M H F, Optimal design of a spherical parallel manipulator based on kinetostatic performance using evolutionary techniques. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(3): 1323–1331

[32] Gosselin C, Angeles J. A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1991, 113(3): 220–226

[33] Huang T, Li M, Zhao X, Conceptual design and dimensional synthesis for a 3-DOF module of the TriVariant−A novel 5-DOF reconfigurable hybrid robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2005, 21(3): 449–456

[34] Liu H, Huang T, Mei J, Kinematic design of a 5-DOF hybrid robot with large workspace/limb–stroke ratio. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2007, 129(5): 530–537

[35] Sun T, Song Y, Li Y, et al. Workspace decomposition based dimensional synthesis of a novel hybrid reconfigurable robot. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2010, 2(3): 031009

[36] Fang Y, Tsai L W. Structure synthesis of a class of 4-DoF and 5-DoF parallel manipulators with identical limb structures. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2002, 21(9): 799–810

[37] Joshi S A, Tsai L W. Jacobian analysis of limited-DOF parallel manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2002, 124(2): 254–258

[38] Angeles J. The design of isotropic manipulator architectures in the presence of redundancies. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1992, 11(3): 196–201

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press