Analysis and comparison of laser cutting performance of solar float glass with different scanning modes

Wenyuan LI, Yu HUANG, Youmin RONG, Long CHEN, Guojun ZHANG, Zhangrui GAO

PDF(6858 KB)
PDF(6858 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1) : 97-110. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-020-0600-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Analysis and comparison of laser cutting performance of solar float glass with different scanning modes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Cutting quality and efficiency have always been important indicators of glass laser cutting. Laser scanning modes have two kinds, namely, the spiral and concentric circle scanning modes. These modes can achieve high-performance hole cutting of thick solar float glass using a 532-nm nanosecond laser. The mechanism of the glass laser cutting under these two different scanning modes has been described. Several experiments are conducted to explore the effect of machining parameters on cutting efficiency and quality under these two scanning modes. Results indicate that compared with the spiral scanning mode, the minimum area of edge chipping (218340 µm2) and the minimum Ra (3.01 µm) in the concentric circle scanning mode are reduced by 9.4% and 16.4% respectively. Moreover, the best cutting efficiency scanning mode is 14.2% faster than that in the spiral scanning mode. The best parameter combination for the concentric circle scanning mode is as follows: Scanning speed: 2200 mm/s, number of inner circles: 6, and circle spacing: 0.05 mm. This parameter combination reduces the chipping area and sidewall surface roughness by 8.8% and 9.6% respectively at the same cutting efficiency compared with the best spiral processing parameters. The range of glass processing that can be achieved in the concentric circle scanning mode is wider than that in the spiral counterpart. The analyses of surface topography, white spots, microstructures, and sidewall surface element composition are also performed. The study concluded that the concentric circle scanning mode shows evident advantages in the performance of solar float glass hole cutting.

Keywords

laser cutting / solar float glass / scanning mode / surface quality / cutting efficiency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wenyuan LI, Yu HUANG, Youmin RONG, Long CHEN, Guojun ZHANG, Zhangrui GAO. Analysis and comparison of laser cutting performance of solar float glass with different scanning modes. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(1): 97‒110 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0600-8

References

[1]
Yang L J, Wang Y, Tian Z G, YAG laser cutting soda-lime glass with controlled fracture and volumetric heat absorption. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2010, 50(10): 849–859
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Kühnapfel S, Severin S, Kersten N, Multi crystalline silicon thin films grown directly on low cost soda-lime glass substrates. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2019, 203: 110168
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Kondrashov V I, Shitova L A, Litvinov V A, Characteristics of cutting parameters and their effect on the glass edge quality. Glass and Ceramics, 2001, 58(9–10): 303–305
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Matsumura T, Hiramatsu T, Shirakashi T, A study on cutting force in the milling process of glass. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2005, 7(2): 102–108
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Zhimalov A B, Solinov V F, Kondratenko V S, Laser cutting of float glass during production. Glass and Ceramics, 2006, 63(9–10): 319–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Sharma A, Jain V, Gupta D. Characterization of chipping and tool wear during drilling of float glass using rotary ultrasonic machining. Measurement, 2018, 128: 254–263
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Azmir M A, Ahsan A K. A study of abrasive water jet machining process on glass/epoxy composite laminate. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2009, 209(20): 6168–6173
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Yu X, Wang P, Li X, et al. Thin Czochralski silicon solar cells based on diamond wire sawing technology. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2012, 98: 337–342
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Lumley R M. Controlled separation of brittle materials using a laser. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 1969, 48(9): 850–854
[10]
Nisar S, Li L, Sheikh M A. Laser glass cutting techniques—A review. Journal of Laser Applications, 2013, 25(4): 042010
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Tsai C H, Liou C S. Fracture mechanism of laser cutting with controlled fracture. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2003, 125(3): 519–528
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Udrea M V, Alacakir A, Esendemir A, Small-power-pulsed and continuous longitudinal CO2 laser for material processing. Proceedings Volume 4068, SIOEL’99: Sixth Symposium on Optoelectronics, 2000, 4068: 657–662
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zhao C, Zhang H, Wang Y. Semiconductor laser asymmetry cutting glass with laser induced thermal-crack propagation. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2014, 63: 43–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Deng L, Yang H, Zeng X, Study on mechanics and key technologies of laser nondestructive mirror-separation for KDP crystal. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2015, 94: 26–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kuo Y L, Lin J. Laser cleaving on glass sheets with multiple laser beams. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2008, 46(5): 388–395
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Jiao J, Wang X. Cutting glass substrates with dual-laser beams. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2009, 47(7–8): 860–864
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Zhao C, Zhang H, Yang L, Dual laser beam revising the separation path technology of laser induced thermal-crack propagation for asymmetric linear cutting glass. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2016, 106: 43–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Wang H, Wang M, Zhang H, Use of inner-heated circular microwave spot to cut glass sheets based on thermal-controlled fracture method. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2020, 276: 116309
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Gattass R R, Mazur E. Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials. Nature Photonics, 2008, 2(4): 219–225
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Shin H, Kim D. Cutting thin glass by femtosecond laser ablation. Optics & Laser Technology, 2018, 102: 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Couairon A, Mysyrowicz A. Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media. Physics Reports, 2007, 441(2–4): 47–189
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Chuang C F, Chen K S, Chiu T C, Crafting interior holes on chemically strengthened thin glass based on ultrafast laser ablation and thermo-shock crack propagations. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2020, 301: 111723
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Mačernytė L, Skruibis J, Vaičaitis V, Femtosecond laser micromachining of soda-lime glass in ambient air and under various aqueous solutions. Micromachines, 2019, 10(6): 354
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Collins A R, O’Connor G M. Mechanically inspired laser scribing of thin flexible glass. Optics Letters, 2015, 40(20): 4811–4814
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Liu P, Duan J, Wu B, A flexible multi-focus laser separation technology for thick glass. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2018, 135: 12–23
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Liu P, Deng L, Zhang F, Study on high-efficiency separation of laminated glass by skillfully combining laser-induced thermal-crack propagation and laser thermal melting. Applied Physics A, 2020, 126(4): 286
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Feucht F, Ketelaer J, Wolff A, Latest machining technologies of hard-to-cut materials by ultrasonic machine tool. Procedia CIRP, 2014, 14(1): 148–152
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51905191), the Major Project of Science and Technology Innovation Special Project for Hubei Province (Grant No. 2018AAA027), and Wuhan Science and Technology Planning Project (Grant No. 201903070311520).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6858 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/