Topology optimization based on reduction methods with applications to multiscale design and additive manufacturing

Emmanuel TROMME, Atsushi KAWAMOTO, James K. GUEST

PDF(2087 KB)
PDF(2087 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 151-165. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-019-0564-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Topology optimization based on reduction methods with applications to multiscale design and additive manufacturing

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Advanced manufacturing processes such as additive manufacturing offer now the capability to control material placement at unprecedented length scales and thereby dramatically open up the design space. This includes the considerations of new component topologies as well as the architecture of material within a topology offering new paths to creating lighter and more efficient structures. Topology optimization is an ideal tool for navigating this multiscale design problem and leveraging the capabilities of advanced manufacturing technologies. However, the resulting design problem is computationally challenging as very fine discretizations are needed to capture all micro-structural details. In this paper, a method based on reduction techniques is proposed to perform efficiently topology optimization at multiple scales. This method solves the design problem without length scale separation, i.e., without iterating between the two scales. Ergo, connectivity between space-varying micro-structures is naturally ensured. Several design problems for various types of micro-structural periodicity are performed to illustrate the method, including applications to infill patterns in additive manufacturing.

Keywords

multiscale topology optimization / micro-structure / additive manufacturing / reduction techniques / substructuring / static condensation / super-element

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Emmanuel TROMME, Atsushi KAWAMOTO, James K. GUEST. Topology optimization based on reduction methods with applications to multiscale design and additive manufacturing. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 151‒165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0564-8

References

[1]
Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer Aided Design, 2015, 69: 65–89
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Mumtaz K A, Vora P, Hopkinson N. A method to eliminate anchors/supports from directly laser melted metal powder bed processes. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Austin, 2011, 55–64
[3]
Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2013, 213(7): 1019–1026
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Optimal topology for additive manufacture: A method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Materials & Design, 2014, 63: 678–690
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Gaynor A T, Meisel N A, Williams C B, Topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Considering maximum overhang constraint. In: Proceedings of the 15th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Atlanta: AIAA, 2014, 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Gaynor A T, Guest J K. Topology optimization considering overhang constraints: Eliminating sacrificial support material in additive manufacturing through design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(5): 1157–1172
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bendsøe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Bendsøe M P. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural Optimization, 1989, 1(4): 193–202
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Rozvany G I N, Zhou M, Birker T. Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Structural Optimization, 1992, 4(3‒4): 250–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Bendsøe M P, Sigmund O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 1999, 69(9‒10): 635–654
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Gaynor A T, Meisel N A, Williams C B, Multiple-material topology optimization of compliant mechanisms created via PolyJet three-dimensional printing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2014, 136(6): 061015
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Cadman J E, Zhou S, Chen Y, On design of multi-functional microstructural materials. Journal of Materials Science, 2013, 48(1): 51–66
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Osanov M, Guest J K. Topology optimization for architected materials design. Annual Review of Materials Research, 2016, 46(1): 211–233
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Sigmund O. Tailoring materials with prescribed elastic properties. Mechanics of Materials, 1995, 20(4): 351–368
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Andreassen E, Lazarov B S, Sigmund O. Design of manufacturable 3D extremal elastic microstructure. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 69(1): 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Sigmund O, Torquato S. Composites with extremal thermal expansion coefficients. Applied Physics Letters, 1996, 69(21): 3203–3205
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Guest J K, Prévost J H. Optimizing multifunctional materials: Design of microstructures for maximized stiffness and fluid permeability. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(22‒23): 7028–7047
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Challis V J, Guest J K, Grotowski J F, Computationally generated cross-property bounds for stiffness and fluid permeability using topology optimization. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(23‒24): 3397–3408
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Silva N E C, Fonseca O J S, Kikuchi N. Optimal design of piezoelectric microstructures. Computational Mechanics, 1997, 19(5): 397–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Sigmund O, Søndergaard Jensen J. Systematic design of phononic band-gap materials and structures by topology optimization. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 2003, 361(1806): 1001–1019
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Rupp C J, Evgrafov A, Maute K, Design of phononic materials/structures for surface wave devices using topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 34(2): 111–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Sigmund O. Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: An inverse homogenization problem. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1994, 31(17): 2313–2329
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Lotfi R, Ha S, Carstensen J V, Topology optimization for cellular material design. MRS Proceedings, 2014, 1662: mrsf13-1662-vv03-08
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Carstensen J V, Guest J K. Topology optimization of nonlinear cellular materials. In: Proceedings of the 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Washington, D.C.: AIAA, 2016
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Rodrigues H C, Guedes J M, Bendsøe M P. Hierarchical optimization of material and structure. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 24(1): 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Sanchez-Palencia E. Non-Homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory. Berlin: Springer, 1980
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Guedes J M, Kikuchi N. Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite element methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1990, 83(2): 143–198
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Coelho P G, Cardoso J B, Fernandes P R, Parallel computing techniques applied to the simultaneous design of structure and material. Advances in Engineering Software, 2011, 42(5): 219–227
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Nakshatrala P B, Tortorelli D A, Nakshatrala K B. Nonlinear structural design using multiscale topology optimization. Part I: Static formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 261 ‒ 262: 167–176
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Xia L, Breitkopf P. Concurrent topology optimization design of material and structure within FE2 nonlinear multiscale analysis framework. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 278: 524–542
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Sivapuram R, Dunning P D, Kim H A. Simultaneous material and structural optimization by multiscale topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(5): 1267–1281
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Xie Y M, Zuo Z H, Huang X, Convergence of topological patterns of optimal periodic structures under multiple scales. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2012, 46(1): 41–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zuo Z H, Huang X, Yang X, Comparing optimal material microstructures with optimal periodic structures. Computational Materials Science, 2013, 69: 137–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zhang W, Sun S. Scale-related topology optimization of cellular materials and structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 68(9): 993–1011
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Schury F, Stingl M, Wein F. Efficient two-scale optimization of manufacturable graded structures. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2012, 34(6): B711–B733
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Radman A, Huang X, Xie Y M. Topology optimization of functionally graded cellular materials. Journal of Materials Science, 2013, 48(4): 1503–1510
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Alexandersen J, Lazarov B S. Topology optimization of manufacturable microstructural details without length scale separation using a spectral coarse basis preconditioner. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 290: 156–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Lazarov B S. Topology optimization using multiscale finite element method for high-contrast media. In: Lirkov I, Margenov S, WaŚniewski J, eds. Large-Scale Scientific Computing. LSSC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8353. Berlin: Springer, 2014, 339–346
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Osanov M, Carstensen J V, Tromme E, Topology optimization for additive manufacturing: New projection-based design algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Washington, D.C.: AIAA, 2016
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Turner M J, Clough R W, Martin H C, Stiffness and deflection analysis of complex structures. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1956, 23(9): 805–823
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Wang S, de Sturler E, Paulino G H. Large-scale topology optimization using preconditioned Krylov subspace methods with recycling. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 69(12): 2441–2468
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Amir O. Revisiting approximate reanalysis in topology optimization: On the advantages of recycled preconditioning in a minimum weight procedure. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(1): 41–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Amir O, Stolpe M, Sigmund O. Efficient use of iterative solvers in nested topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 42(1): 55–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Aage N, Andreassen E, Lazarov B S. Topology optimization using PETSc: An easy-to-use, fully parallel, open source topology optimization framework. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(3): 565–572
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Sigmund O, Petersson J. Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Structural Optimization, 1998, 16(1): 68–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Sigmund O. Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4‒5): 401–424
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Guest J K, Prévost J H, Belytschko T. Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(2): 238–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Guest J K, Smith Genut L C. Reducing dimensionality in topology optimization using adaptive design variable fields. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 81(8): 1019–1045
[49]
Bruns T E, Tortorelli D A. Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 190(26‒27): 3443–3459
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Guest J K, Asadpoure A, Ha S H. Eliminating beta-continuation from heaviside projection and density filter algorithms. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 44(4): 443–453
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes—A new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(2): 359–373
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Sigmund O. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mechanics of Structures and Machines, 1997, 25(4): 493–524
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Sigmund O, Aage N, Andreassen E. On the non-optimality of Michell structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(2): 361–373
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Guest J K. Topology optimization with multiple phase projection. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 199(1‒4): 123–135
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Clausen A, Aage N, Sigmund O. Exploiting additive manufacturing infill in topology optimization for improved buckling load. Engineering, 2016, 2(2): 250–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Hashin Z. The elastic moduli of heterogeneous materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1962, 29(1): 143–150
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Hashin Z, Shtrikman S. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behavior of multiphase materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1963, 11(2): 127–140
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Wu J, Aage N, Westermann R, Infill optimization for additive manufacturing—Approaching bone-like porous structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, 24(2): 1127–1140
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant Number 1462453, and in part by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) under Grant Number 80NSSC18K0428. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or NASA.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2087 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/