Comprehensive analysis of the influence of structural and dynamic parameters on the accuracy of nano-precision positioning stages

Chengyuan LIANG , Fang YUAN , Xuedong CHEN , Wei JIANG , Lizhan ZENG , Xin LUO

Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3) : 255 -272.

PDF (3887KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3) : 255 -272. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-019-0538-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comprehensive analysis of the influence of structural and dynamic parameters on the accuracy of nano-precision positioning stages

Author information +
History +
PDF (3887KB)

Abstract

Nano-precision positioning stages are characterized by rigid-flexible coupling systems. The complex dynamic characteristics of mechanical structure of a stage, which are determined by structural and dynamic parameters, exert a serious influence on the accuracy of its motion and measurement. Systematic evaluation of such influence is essential for the design and improvement of stages. A systematic approach to modeling the dynamic accuracy of a nano-precision positioning stage is developed in this work by integrating a multi-rigid-body dynamic model of the mechanical system and measurement system models. The influence of structural and dynamic parameters, including aerostatic bearing configurations, motion plane errors, foundation vibrations, and positions of the acting points of driving forces, on dynamic accuracy is investigated by adopting the H-type configured stage as an example. The approach is programmed and integrated into a software framework that supports the dynamic design of nano-precision positioning stages. The software framework is then applied to the design of a nano-precision positioning stage used in a packaging lithography machine.

Keywords

nano-precision positioning stage / analysis and design / structural and dynamic parameters / dynamic accuracy / systematic modeling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chengyuan LIANG, Fang YUAN, Xuedong CHEN, Wei JIANG, Lizhan ZENG, Xin LUO. Comprehensive analysis of the influence of structural and dynamic parameters on the accuracy of nano-precision positioning stages. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(3): 255-272 DOI:10.1007/s11465-019-0538-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

ITRS. 2013 Edition, IRC Overview, International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors

[2]

Torralba M, Valenzuela M, Yagüe-Fabra J A, Large range nanopositioning stage design: A three-layer and two-stage platform. Measurement, 2016, 89: 55–71

[3]

Gao W, Kim S W, Bosse H, Measurement technologies for precision positioning. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 64(2): 773–796

[4]

Smith S T, Chetwynd D G. Foundations of Ultraprecision Mechanism Design. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005

[5]

Schmidt R M, Schitter G, Eijk J V. The Design of High Performance Mechatronics: High-Tech Functionality by Multidisciplinary System Integration. Amsterdam: Delft University Press, 2011

[6]

Huo D, Cheng K, Wardle F. Design of Precision Machines in Machining Dynamics: Fundamentals, Applications and Practices. London: Springer, 2009

[7]

Huo D, Cheng K. A dynamics-driven approach to the design of precision machine tools for micro-manufacturing and its implementation perspectives. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2008, 222(1): 1–13

[8]

Huo D, Cheng K, Wardle F. A holistic integrated dynamic design and modelling approach applied to the development of ultraprecision micro-milling machines. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2010, 50(4): 335–343

[9]

Srivatsan V, Katz R, Dutta D, Dynamic error characterization for non-contact dimensional inspection systems. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2008, 130(5): 051003

[10]

Chen D, Han J, Huo C, Effect of gas slip on the behavior of the aerostatic guideway. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, 2017, 69(4): 447–454

[11]

Li Y, Wu Y, Gong H, Air bearing center cross gap of neutron stress spectrometer sample table support system. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 11(4): 403–411

[12]

He X, Chen X. The dynamic analysis of the gas lubricated stage in optical lithography. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2007, 32(9–10): 978–984

[13]

Chen X, Li Z. Model reduction techniques for dynamics analysis of ultra-precision linear stage. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 4(1): 64–70

[14]

Bao X, Mao J. Dynamic modeling method for air bearings in ultra-precision positioning stages. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8(8): 1‒9

[15]

Denkena B, Dahlmann D, Sassi N. Analysis of an ultra-precision positioning system and parametrization of its structural model for error compensation. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 62: 335–339

[16]

Li W, Li B, Yang J. Design and dynamic optimization of an ultra-precision micro grinding machine tool for flexible joint blade machining. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 93(9–12): 3135–3147

[17]

Kim K, Ahn D, Gweon D. Optimal design of a 1-rotational DOF flexure joint for a 3-DOF H-type stage. Mechatronics, 2012, 22(1): 24–32

[18]

Erkorkmaz K, Gorniak J M, Gordon D J. Precision machine tool X-Y stage utilizing a planar air bearing arrangement. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 59(1): 425–428

[19]

Chen R, Yan L, Jiao Z, Dynamic modeling and analysis of flexible H-type gantry stage. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2019, 439: 144–155

[20]

Kilikevičius A, Kasparaitis A. Dynamic research of multi-body mechanical systems of angle measurement. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2017, 18(8): 1065–1073

[21]

Zhou B, Wang S, Fang C, Geometric error modeling and compensation for five-axis CNC gear profile grinding machine tools. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technolo-gy, 2017, 92(5–8): 2639–2652

[22]

Guo S, Jiang G, Mei X. Investigation of sensitivity analysis and compensation parameter optimization of geometric error for five-axis machine tool. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 93(9–12): 3229–3243

[23]

Chen J X, Lin S W, Zhou X L. A comprehensive error analysis method for the geometric error of multi-axis machine tool. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2016, 106: 56–66

[24]

Tian W, Gao W, Zhang D, A general approach for error modeling of machine tools. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2014, 79: 17–23

[25]

Zhang Z, Liu Z, Cheng Q, An approach of comprehensive error modeling and accuracy allocation for the improvement of reliability and optimization of cost of a multi-axis NC machine tool. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 89(1–4): 561–579

[26]

Cheng Q, Zhang Z, Zhang G, Geometric accuracy allocation for multi-axis CNC machine tools based on sensitivity analysis and reliability theory. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2015, 229(6): 1134–1149

[27]

Liu Y, Yuan M, Cao J, Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in H-drive stage during high acceleration based on Monte Carlo method. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2015, 93: 1–9

[28]

Gao Z, Hu J, Zhu Y, The research on geometric error’s tolerance design of X-Y stage’s measurement system accuracy. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2013, 35(5): 672–682

[29]

Gao Z, Hu J, Zhu Y, A new 6-degree-of-freedom measurement method of X-Y stages based on additional information. Precision Engineering, 2013, 37(3): 606–620

[30]

Du S, Hu J, Zhu Y, Analysis and compensation of synchronous measurement error for multi-channel laser interferometer. Measurement Science and Technology, 2017, 28(5): 055201

[31]

Teng W, Zhou Y F, Mu H H, An algorithm on laser measurement model of ultra-precision motion stage and error compensation. China Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 20(12): 1492–1497 (in Chinese)

[32]

Wen X, Zhou Y F, Mu H H, An algorithm for the compensation of geometrical error in laser interferometer measurement. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2011, (9): 46–48 (in Chinese)

[33]

Liu C, Pu Y, Chen Y, Design of a measurement system for simultaneously measuring six-degree-of-freedom geometric errors of a long linear stage. Sensors, 2018, 18(11): 3875

[34]

Liang C Y, Luo X, Chen X D. Generating equivalent models of aerostatic bearings for precise positioning stage design in a knowledge-based framework. In: Proceedings of 2015 Advanced Design Concepts and Practice. Lancaster: Destech Publications, 2016, 138–148

[35]

Chen X D, Zhu J C, Chen H. Dynamic characteristics of ultra-precision aerostatic bearings. Advances in Manufacturing, 2013, 1(1): 82–86

[36]

Agilent Technologies. Agilent Laser and Optics User’s Manual, Volume II. 2007

[37]

Fan K C, Chen M J A. 6-degree-of-freedom measurement system for the accuracy of X-Y stages. Precision Engineering, 2000, 24(1): 15–23

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3887KB)

5722

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/