Level set-based isogeometric topology optimization for maximizing fundamental eigenfrequency

Manman XU, Shuting WANG, Xianda XIE

PDF(1397 KB)
PDF(1397 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2) : 222-234. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-019-0534-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Level set-based isogeometric topology optimization for maximizing fundamental eigenfrequency

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Maximizing the fundamental eigenfrequency is an efficient means for vibrating structures to avoid resonance and noises. In this study, we develop an isogeometric analysis (IGA)-based level set model for the formulation and solution of topology optimization in cases with maximum eigenfrequency. The proposed method is based on a combination of level set method and IGA technique, which uses the non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS), description of geometry, to perform analysis. The same NURBS is used for geometry representation, but also for IGA-based dynamic analysis and parameterization of the level set surface, that is, the level set function. The method is applied to topology optimization problems of maximizing the fundamental eigenfrequency for a given amount of material. A modal track method, that monitors a single target eigenmode is employed to prevent the exchange of eigenmode order number in eigenfrequency optimization. The validity and efficiency of the proposed method are illustrated by benchmark examples.

Keywords

topology optimization / level set method / isogeometric analysis / eigenfrequency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Manman XU, Shuting WANG, Xianda XIE. Level set-based isogeometric topology optimization for maximizing fundamental eigenfrequency. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 222‒234 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0534-1

References

[1]
Suzuki K, Kikuchi N. A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1991, 93(3): 291–318
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Sigmund O. A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(2): 120–127
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Pedersen N L. Maximization of eigenvalues using topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2000, 20(1): 2–11 doi:10.1007/s001580050130
[4]
Du J, Olhoff N. Minimization of sound radiation from vibrating bi-material structures using topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4‒5): 305–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Iga A, Nishiwaki S, Izui K, Topology optimization for thermal conductors considering design-dependent effects, including heat conduction and convection. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009, 52(11‒12): 2721–2732
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Yamada T, Izui K, Nishiwaki S. A level set-based topology optimization method for maximizing thermal diffusivity in problems including design-dependent effects. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2011, 133(3): 031011
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bendsøe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Bendsøe M P. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural Optimization, 1989, 1(4): 193–202
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Rozvany G I N, Zhou M, Birker T. Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Structural Optimization, 1992, 4(3–4): 250–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Bourdin B, Chambolle A. Design-dependent loads in topology optimization. ESAIM. Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 2003, 9: 19–48
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Wang M Y, Zhou S. Phase field: A variational method for structural topology optimization. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2004, 6(6): 547–566
[12]
Xie Y M, Steven G P. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Querin O M, Steven G P, Xie Y M. Evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) using a bidirectional algorithm. Engineering Computations, 1998, 15(8): 1031–1048
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Díaz A, Sigmund O. Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization. Structural Optimization, 1995, 10(1): 40–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Jog C S, Haber R B. Stability of finite element models for distributed-parameter optimization and topology design. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 130(3‒4): 203–226
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Sigmund O. Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: An inverse homogenization problem. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1994, 31(17): 2313–2329
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Petersson J, Sigmund O. Slope constrained topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1998, 41(8): 1417–1434
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Sethian J A, Wiegmann A. Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 163(2): 489–528
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Osher S J, Santosa F. Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints: I. Frequencies of a two-density inhomogeneous drum. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 171(1): 272–288
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. A level-set method for shape optimization. Mathematical Rendering, 2002, 334(12): 1125–1130 (in French)
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Wang M Y, Wang X, Guo D. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 192(1‒2): 227–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2004, 194(1): 363–393
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Dijk N P, Langelaar M, Keulen F. Explicit level-set-based topology optimization using an exact Heaviside function and consistent sensitivity analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 91(1): 67–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Wang S, Wang M Y. Radial basis functions and level set method for structural topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 65(12): 2060–2090
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Luo Z, Tong L, Wang M Y, et al. Shape and topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using a parameterization level set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 227(1): 680–705
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Gomes A A, Suleman A. Application of spectral level set methodology in topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006, 31(6): 430–443
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Hughes T J R, Cottrell J A, Bazilevs Y. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(39–41): 4135–4195
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Grebennikov A I. Isogeometric approximation of functions of one variable. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 1982, 22(6): 42–50 doi:10.1016/0041-5553(82)90095-7
[29]
Nguyen T, Jüttler B. Parameterization of contractible domains using sequences of harmonic maps. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Curves and Surfaces. Berlin: Springer, 2010, 501–514
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Constructing analysis-suitable parameterization of computational domain from CAD boundary by variational harmonic method. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2013, 252: 275–289
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Optimal analysis-aware parameterization of computational domain in isogeometric analysis. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Geometric Modeling and Processing. Berlin: Springer, 2010, 236–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Analysis-suitable volume parameterization of multi-block computational domain in isogeometric applications. Computer-Aided Design, 2013, 45(2): 395–404
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Bazilevs Y, Calo V M, Cottrell J A, Isogeometric analysis using T-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(5‒8): 229–263
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wu Z, Huang Z, Liu Q, A local solution approach for adaptive hierarchical refinement in isogeometric analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 283: 1467–1492
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Nguyen-Thanh N, Kiendl J, Nguyen-Xuan H, Rotation free isogeometric thin shell analysis using PHT-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(47‒48): 3410–3424
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Nguyen-Thanh N, Nguyen-Xuan H, Bordas S P A, Isogeometric analysis using polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes for two-dimensional elastic solids. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(21–22): 1892–1908
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Atroshchenko E, Tomar S, Xu G, Weakening the tight coupling between geometry and simulation in isogeometric analysis: From sub- and super-geometric analysis to geometry-independent field approximation (GIFT). International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2018, 114(10): 1131–1159
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Speleers H, Manni C, Pelosi F, Isogeometric analysis with Powell-Sabin splines for advection-diffusion-reaction problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 221 ‒ 222: 132–148
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Auricchio F, Da Veiga L B, Hughes T J R, Isogeometric collocation methods. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2010, 20(11): 2075–2107
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Xu G, Li M, Mourrain B, Constructing IGA-suitable planar parameterization from complex CAD boundary by domain partition and global/local optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 328: 175–200
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Simpson R N, Bordas S P, Trevelyan J, A two-dimensional isogeometric boundary element method for elastostatic analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 209–212: 87–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Lian H, Simpson R N, Bordas S. Stress analysis without meshing: Isogeometric boundary-element method. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering and Computational Mechanics, 2013, 166(2): 88–99
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Peng X, Atroshchenko E, Kerfriden P, Isogeometric boundary element methods for three dimensional static fracture and fatigue crack growth. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 316: 151–185
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Peng X, Atroshchenko E, Kerfriden P, Linear elastic fracture simulation directly from CAD: 2D NURBS-based implementation and role of tip enrichment. International Journal of Fracture, 2017, 204(1): 55–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Simpson R N, Scott M A, Taus M, Acoustic isogeometric boundary element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 269: 265–290
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Lian H, Kerfriden P, Bordas S P A. Shape optimization directly from CAD: An isogeometric boundary element approach using T-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 317: 1–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Lian H, Kerfriden P, Bordas S P. Implementation of regularized isogeometric boundary element methods for gradient-based shape optimization in two-dimensional linear elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 106(12): 972–1017
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Hughes T J R, Reali A, Sangalli G. Efficient quadrature for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(5‒8): 301–313
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Reali A.An isogeometric analysis approach for the study of structural vibrations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 10(spec01): 1–30
[50]
Bazilevs Y, Calo V M, Zhang Y, Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Computational Mechanics, 2006, 38(4‒5): 310–322
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Bazilevs Y, Calo V M, Hughes T J R, Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: Theory, algorithms, and computations. Computational Mechanics, 2008, 43(1): 3–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Xu G, Mourrain B, Duvigneau R, Parameterization of computational domain in isogeometric analysis: Methods and comparison. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(23‒24): 2021–2031
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Wall W A, Frenzel M A, Cyron C. Isogeometric structural shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(33–40): 2976–2988
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Cho S, Ha S H. Isogeometric shape design optimization: Exact geometry and enhanced sensitivity. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 38(1): 53–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Kiendl J, Bletzinger K U, Linhard J, Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff-Love elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 198(49‒52): 3902–3914
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Wang Y, Benson D J. Isogeometric analysis for parameterized LSM-based structural topology optimization. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(1): 19–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Buffa A, Sangalli G, Vázquez R. Isogeometric analysis in electromagnetics: B-splines approximation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(17–20): 1143–1152
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Lee S, Kwak B M, Kim I Y. Smooth boundary topology optimization using B-spline and hole generation. International Journal of CAD/CAM, 2007, 7(1): 11–20
[59]
Seo Y D, Kim H J, Youn S K. Isogeometric topology optimization using trimmed spline surfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(49–52): 3270–3296
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Hassani B, Khanzadi M, Tavakkoli S M. An isogeometrical approach to structural topology optimization by optimality criteria. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2012, 45(2): 223–233
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Tavakkoli S M, Hassani B, Ghasemnejad H. Isogeometric topology optimization of structures by using MMA. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 2013, 3(2): 313–326
[62]
Dedè L, Borden M J, Hughes T J R. Isogeometric analysis for topology optimization with a phase field model. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2012, 19(3): 427–465
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Díaaz A R, Kikuchi N. Solutions to shape and topology eigenvalue optimization problems using a homogenization method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1992, 35(7): 1487–1502
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Tenek L H, Hagiwara I. Static and vibrational shape and topology optimization using homogenization and mathematical programming. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1993, 109(1–2): 143–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Xie Y M, Steven G P. Evolutionary structural optimization for dynamic problems. Computers & Structures, 1996, 58(6): 1067–1073
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Ma Z D, Kikuchi N, Hagiwara I. Structural topology and shape optimization for a frequency response problem. Computational Mechanics, 1993, 13(3): 157–174
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Ma Z D, Cheng H C, Kikuchi N. Structural design for obtaining desired eigenfrequencies by using the topology and shape optimization method. Computing Systems in Engineering, 1994, 5(1): 77–89
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Kim T S, Kim Y. Mac-based mode-tracking in structural topology optimization. Computers & Structures, 2000, 74(3): 375–383
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Sigmund O, Jensen J S. Systematic design of phononic band-gap materials and structures by topology optimization. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2003, 361(1806): 1001–1019
[70]
Kosaka I, Swan C C. A symmetry reduction method for continuum structural topology optimization. Computers & Structures, 1999, 70(1): 47–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Neves M M, Rodrigues H, Guedes J M. Generalized topology design of structures with a buckling load criterion. Structural Optimization, 1995, 10(2): 71–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Allaire G, Jouve F. A level-set method for vibration and multiple loads structural optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(30–33): 3269–3290
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Shu L, Wang M Y, Fang Z, Level set based structural topology optimization for minimizing frequency response. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2011, 330(24): 5820–5834
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Xia Q, Shi T, Wang M Y. A level set based shape and topology optimization method for maximizing the simple or repeated first eigenvalue of structure vibration. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(4): 473–485
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Liu T, Li B, Wang S, Eigenvalue topology optimization of structures using a parameterized level set method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 50(4): 573–591
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Hassani B, Hinton E. A review of homogenization and topology optimization III—Topology optimization using optimality criteria. Computers & Structures, 1998, 69(6): 739–756
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Nguyen V P, Anitescu C, Bordas S P A, Isogeometric analysis: An overview and computer implementation aspects. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2015, 117: 89–116
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51675197).

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1397 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/