Concurrent optimization of structural topology and infill properties with a CBF-based level set method

Abstract

In this paper, a parametric level-set-based topology optimization framework is proposed to concurrently optimize the structural topology at the macroscale and the effective infill properties at the micro/meso scale. The concurrent optimization is achieved by a computational framework combining a new parametric level set approach with mathematical programming. Within the proposed framework, both the structural boundary evolution and the effective infill property optimization can be driven by mathematical programming, which is more advantageous compared with the conventional partial differential equation-driven level set approach. Moreover, the proposed approach will be more efficient in handling nonlinear problems with multiple constraints. Instead of using radial basis functions (RBF), in this paper, we propose to construct a new type of cardinal basis functions (CBF) for the level set function parameterization. The proposed CBF parameterization ensures an explicit impose of the lower and upper bounds of the design variables. This overcomes the intrinsic disadvantage of the conventional RBF-based parametric level set method, where the lower and upper bounds of the design variables oftentimes have to be set by trial and error. A variational distance regularization method is utilized in this research to regularize the level set function to be a desired distance-regularized shape. With the distance information embedded in the level set model, the wrapping boundary layer and the interior infill region can be naturally defined. The isotropic infill achieved via the mesoscale topology optimization is conformally fit into the wrapping boundary layer using the shape-preserving conformal mapping method, which leads to a hierarchical physical structure with optimized overall topology and effective infill properties. The proposed method is expected to provide a timely solution to the increasing demand for multiscale and multifunctional structure design.

Keywords

concurrent topology optimization / parametric level set method / cardinal basis function / shell-infill structure design / conformal mapping

References

[1] Gibson L J, Ashby M F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999

[2] Christensen R M. Mechanics of cellular and other low-density materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2000, 37(1–2): 93–104

[3] Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber T H, Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science, 2014, 344(6190): 1373–1377

[4] Valdevit L, Jacobsen A J, Greer J R, Protocols for the optimal design of multi-functional cellular structures: From hypersonics to micro-architected materials. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2011, 94(s1): s15–s34

[5] Clausen A, Wang F, Jensen J S, Topology optimized architectures with programmable Poisson’s ratio over large deformations. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(37): 5523–5527

[6] Schwerdtfeger J, Wein F, Leugering G, Design of auxetic structures via mathematical optimization. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(22–23): 2650–2654

[7] Murr L E, Gaytan S M, Ramirez D A, Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2012, 28(1): 1–14

[8] Han S C, Lee J W, Kang K. A new type of low density material: Shellular. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(37): 5506–5511

[9] Xia Q, Wang M Y. Simultaneous optimization of the material properties and the topology of functionally graded structures. Computer Aided Design, 2008, 40(6): 660–675

[10] Xia L, Breitkopf P. Concurrent topology optimization design of material and structure within FE² nonlinear multiscale analysis framework. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 278: 524–542

[11] Sigmund O. Design of material structures using topology optimization. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark, 1994

[12] Bendsøe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224

[13] Fujii D, Chen B, Kikuchi N. Composite material design of two-dimensional structures using the homogenization design method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(9): 2031–2051

[14] Neves M M, Sigmund O, Bendsøe M P. Topology optimization of periodic microstructures with a penalization of highly localized buckling modes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2002, 54(6): 809–834

[15] Bendsøe M P. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural Optimization, 1989, 1(4): 193–202

[16] Rozvany G I, Zhou M, Birker T. Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Structural Optimization, 1992, 4(3–4): 250–252

[17] Sethian J A, Wiegmann A. Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 163(2): 489–528

[18] Wang M Y, Wang X, Guo D. A level set method for structural topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 192(1–2): 227–246

[19] Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2004, 194(1): 363–393

[20] Xie Y M, Steven G P. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896

[21] Sigmund O. Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: An inverse homogenization problem. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1994, 31(17): 2313–2329

[22] Sigmund O. Tailoring materials with prescribed elastic properties. Mechanics of Materials, 1995, 20(4): 351–368

[23] Sigmund O, Torquato S. Design of materials with extreme thermal expansion using a three-phase topology optimization method. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1997, 45(6): 1037–1067

[24] Mei Y, Wang X. A level set method for structural topology optimization and its applications. Advances in Engineering Software, 2004, 35(7): 415–441

[25] Vogiatzis P, Chen S, Wang X, Topology optimization of multi-material negative Poisson’s ratio metamaterials using a reconciled level set method. Computer Aided Design, 2017, 83: 15–32

[26] Wang Y, Luo Z, Zhang N, Topological shape optimization of microstructural metamaterials using a level set method. Computational Materials Science, 2014, 87: 178–186

[27] Huang X, Radman A, Xie Y. Topological design of microstructures of cellular materials for maximum bulk or shear modulus. Computational Materials Science, 2011, 50(6): 1861–1870

[28] Huang X, Xie Y M, Jia B, Evolutionary topology optimization of periodic composites for extremal magnetic permeability and electrical permittivity. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2012, 46(3): 385–398

[29] Huang X, Zhou S, Xie Y, Topology optimization of microstructures of cellular materials and composites for macrostructures. Computational Materials Science, 2013, 67: 397–407

[30] Xia L, Xia Q, Huang X, Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: A comprehensive review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2018, 25(2): 437–478

[31] Xia L, Breitkopf P. Recent advances on topology optimization of multiscale nonlinear structures. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2017, 24(2): 227–249

[32] Rodrigues H, Guedes J M, Bendsøe MP. Hierarchical optimization of material and structure. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 24(1): 1–10

[33] Coelho P, Fernandes P, Guedes J, A hierarchical model for concurrent material and topology optimisation of three-dimensional structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2008, 35(2): 107–115

[34] Liu L, Yan J, Cheng G. Optimum structure with homogeneous optimum truss-like material. Computers & Structures, 2008, 86(13–14): 1417–1425

[35] Deng J, Chen W. Concurrent topology optimization of multiscale structures with multiple porous materials under random field loading uncertainty. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 56(1): 1–19

[36] Wu J, Clausen A, Sigmund O. Minimum compliance topology optimization of shell-infill composites for additive manufacturing. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 326: 358–375

[37] Wu J, Aage N, Westermann R, Infill optimization for additive manufacturing approaching bone-like porous structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, 24(2): 1127–1140

[38] Deng J, Yan J, Cheng G. Multi-objective concurrent topology optimization of thermoelastic structures composed of homogeneous porous material. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 47(4): 583–597

[39] Sivapuram R, Dunning P D, Kim H A. Simultaneous material and structural optimization by multiscale topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(5): 1267–1281

[40] Wang Y, Chen F, Wang M Y. Concurrent design with connectable graded microstructures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 317: 84–101

[41] Li H, Luo Z, Zhang N, Integrated design of cellular composites using a level-set topology optimization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 309: 453–475

[42] Li H, Luo Z, Gao L, Topology optimization for concurrent design of structures with multi-patch microstructures by level sets. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 331: 536–561

[43] Yan X, Huang X, Zha Y, Concurrent topology optimization of structures and their composite microstructures. Computers & Structures, 2014, 133: 103–110

[44] Yan X, Huang X, Sun G, Two-scale optimal design of structures with thermal insulation materials. Composite Structures, 2015, 120: 358–365

[45] Da D, Cui X, Long K, Concurrent topological design of composite structures and the underlying multi-phase materials. Computers & Structures, 2017, 179: 1–14

[46] Vicente W, Zuo Z, Pavanello R, Concurrent topology optimization for minimizing frequency responses of two-level hierarchical structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 301: 116–136

[47] Osher S, Sethian J A. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 1988, 79(1): 12–49

[48] Osher S J, Santosa F. Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints: I. Frequencies of a two-density inhomogeneous drum. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, (1): 272–288

[49] Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A M. A level-set method for shape optimization. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 2002, 334(12): 1125–1130

[50] Luo Z, Tong L, Wang M Y, Shape and topology optimization of compliant mechanisms using a parameterization level set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 227(1): 680–705

[51] Luo Z, Wang M Y, Wang S, A level set-based parameterization method for structural shape and topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 76(1): 1–26

[52] Jiang L, Chen S. Parametric structural shape & topology optimization with a variational distance-regularized level set method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 321: 316–336

[53] Wang S, Wang M Y. Radial basis functions and level set method for structural topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 65(12): 2060–2090

[54] Buhmann M D. Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations. Vol. 12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003

[55] Svanberg K. MMA and GCMMA-two methods for nonlinear optimization. 2007. Retrieved from https://people.kth.se/~krille/mmagcmma.pdf.

[56] Chen J, Shapiro V, Suresh K, Shape optimization with topological changes and parametric control. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 71(3): 313–346

[57] Qian X. Full analytical sensitivities in NURBS based isogeometric shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(29–32): 2059–2071

[58] Wang Y, Benson D J. Isogeometric analysis for parameterized LSM-based structural topology optimization. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(1): 19–35

[59] Safdari-Vaighani A, Heryudono A, Larsson E. A radial basis function partition of unity collocation method for convection-diffusion equations arising in financial applications. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2015, 64(2): 341–367

[60] Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19(12): 3243–3254

[61] Zhu B, Wang R, Li H, A level set method with a bounded diffusion for structural topology optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2018, 140(7): 071402

[62] Jiang L, Chen S, Jiao X. Parametric shape and topology optimization: A new level set approach based on cardinal basis functions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2018, 114(1): 66–87

[63] Jiang L, Ye H, Zhou C, Parametric topology optimization toward rational design and efficient prefabrication for additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of ASME 2017 12th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Collocated with the JSME/ASME 2017 6th International Conference on Materials and Processing. Los Angeles: ASME, 2017, V004T05A006

[64] Wang Y, Kang Z. A level set method for shape and topology optimization of coated structures. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 329: 553–574

[65] Fu J, Li H, Xiao M, Topology optimization of shell-infill structures using a distance regularized parametric level-set method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59(1):249–262 (in press)

[66] Tushinsky L, Kovensky I, Plokhov A, Coated Metal: Structure and Properties of Metal-Coating Compositions. Berlin: Springer, 2013

[67] Challis V, Roberts A, Wilkins A. Design of three dimensional isotropic microstructures for maximized stiffness and conductivity. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2008, 45(14–15): 4130–4146

[68] Neves M, Rodrigues H, Guedes J M. Optimal design of periodic linear elastic microstructures. Computers & Structures, 2000, 76(1–3): 421–429

[69] Radman A, Huang X, Xie Y. Topological optimization for the design of microstructures of isotropic cellular materials. Engineering Optimization, 2013, 45(11): 1331–1348

[70] Guth D, Luersen M, Muñoz-Rojas P. Optimization of three-dimensional truss-like periodic materials considering isotropy constraints. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 52(5): 889–901

[71] Vogiatzis P, Ma M, Chen S, Computational design and additive manufacturing of periodic conformal metasurfaces by synthesizing topology optimization with conformal mapping. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 328: 477–497

[72] Sethian J A. Theory, algorithms, and applications of level set methods for propagating interfaces. Acta Numerica, 1996, 5: 309–395

[73] Tumbleston J R, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science, 2015, 347(6228): 1349–1352

[74] Thomsen C R, Wang F, Sigmund O.Buckling strength topology optimization of 2D periodic materials based on linearized bifurcation analysis, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 339: 115–136

[75] Ahlfors L V. Conformal Invariants: Topics in Geometric Function Theory. Vol. 371. Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2010

[76] Jin M, Kim J, Luo F, Discrete surface Ricci flow. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2008, 14(5): 1030–1043

[77] Chow B, Luo F. Combinatorial Ricci flows on surfaces. Journal of Differential Geometry, 2003, 63(1): 97–129

[78] Zeng W, Gu X D. Ricci Flow for Shape Analysis and Surface Registration: Theories, Algorithms and Applications. New York: Springer, 2013

[79] Gu X, He Y, Jin M, Manifold splines with a single extraordinary point. Computer Aided Design, 2008, 40(6): 676–690

[80] Jin M, Luo F, Gu X. Computing surface hyperbolic structure and real projective structure. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling. New York: ACM, 2006, 105–116

[81] Gu X D, Zeng W, Luo F, Numerical computation of surface conformal mappings. Computational Methods and Function Theory, 2012, 11(2): 747–787

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the support from the National Science Foundation of the United States (Grant Nos. CMMI1462270 and CMMI1762287), Ford University Research Program (URP), and the start-up fund from the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn