Robust topology optimization of hinge-free compliant mechanisms with material uncertainties based on a non-probabilistic field model

Junjie ZHAN, Yangjun LUO

PDF(3553 KB)
PDF(3553 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2) : 201-212. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-019-0529-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Robust topology optimization of hinge-free compliant mechanisms with material uncertainties based on a non-probabilistic field model

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper presents a new robust topology optimization framework for hinge-free compliant mecha- nisms with spatially varying material uncertainties, which are described using a non-probabilistic bounded field model. Bounded field uncertainties are efficiently represented by a reduced set of uncertain-but-bounded coefficients on the basis of the series expansion method. Robust topology optimization of compliant mechanisms is then defined to minimize the variation in output displacement under constraints of the mean displacement and predefined material volume. The nest optimization problem is solved using a gradient-based optimization algorithm. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method for circumventing hinges in topology optimization of compliant mechanisms.

Keywords

compliant mechanisms / robust topology optimization / hinges / uncertainty / bounded field

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Junjie ZHAN, Yangjun LUO. Robust topology optimization of hinge-free compliant mechanisms with material uncertainties based on a non-probabilistic field model. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 201‒212 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0529-y

References

[1]
Shi F, Ramesh P, Mukherjee S. Simulation methods for micro-electro-mechanical structures (MEMS) with application to a microtweezer. Computers & Structures, 1995, 56(5): 769–783
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Kota S, Joo J, Li Z, Design of compliant mechanisms: Applications to MEMS. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 2001, 29(1‒2): 7–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Sigmund O, Maute K. Topology optimization approaches. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48(6): 1031–1055
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Deaton J D, Grandhi R V. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: Post 2000. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(1): 1–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Pedersen C B W, Buhl T, Sigmund O. Topology synthesis of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(12): 2683–2705
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Lee E, Gea H C. A strain based topology optimization method for compliant mechanism design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(2): 199–207
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Ansola R, Veguería E, Canales J, A simple evolutionary topology optimization procedure for compliant mechanism design. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2007, 44(1–2): 53–62
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Huang X, Li Y, Zhou S W, et al. Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms with desired structural stiffness. Engineering Structures, 2014, 79: 13–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Luo Z, Tong L. A level set method for shape and topology optimization of large-displacement compliant mechanisms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 76(6): 862–892
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Zhu B, Zhang X. A new level set method for topology optimization of distributed compliant mechanism. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 91(8): 843–871
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Luo Z, Zhang N, Ji J, A meshfree level-set method for topological shape optimization of compliant multiphysics actuators. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 223–224: 133–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Saxena A, Ananthasuresh G K. On an optimal property of compliant topologies. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2000, 19(1): 36–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Hetrick J A, Kota S. An energy formulation for parametric size and shape optimization of compliant mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1999, 121(2): 229–234
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Sigmund O. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 1997, 25(4): 493–524
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Deepak S R, Dinesh M, Sahu D K, A comparative study of the formulations and benchmark problems for the topology optimization of compliant mechanisms. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2009, 1(1): 011003
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Poulsen T A. A simple scheme to prevent checkerboard patterns and one-node connected hinges in topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 24(5): 396–399
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wang N, Zhang X. Compliant mechanisms design based on pairs of curves. Science China. Technological Sciences, 2012, 55(8): 2099–2106
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Luo Z, Chen L, Yang J, Compliant mechanisms design using multi-objective topology optimization scheme of continuum structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005, 30(2): 142–154
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Zhu B, Zhang X, Wang N. Topology optimization of hinge-free compliant mechanisms with multiple outputs using level set method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 47(5): 659–672
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zhu B, Zhang X, Fatikow S. A multi-objective method of hinge-free compliant mechanism optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(3): 431–440
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lopes C G, Novotny A A. Topology design of compliant mechanisms with stress constraints based on the topological derivative concept. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(4): 737–746
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
de Assis Pereira A, Cardoso E L. On the influence of local and global stress constraint and filtering radius on the design of hinge-free compliant mechanisms. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(2): 641–655
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Luo Y, Kang Z, Luo Z, Continuum topology optimization with non-probabilistic reliability constraints based on multi-ellipsoid convex model. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2009, 39(3): 297–310
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Chen S, Chen W, Lee S. Level set based robust shape and topology optimization under random field uncertainties. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(4): 507–524
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Luo Y, Zhou M, Wang M Y, Reliability based topology optimization for continuum structures with local failure constraints. Computers & Structures, 2014, 143: 73–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Maute K, Frangopol D M. Reliability-based design of MEMS mechanisms by topology optimization. Computers & Structures, 2003, 81(8–11): 813–824
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Lazarov B S, Schevenels M, Sigmund O. Topology optimization considering material and geometric uncertainties using stochastic collocation methods. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2012, 46(4): 597–612
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Doltsinis I, Kang Z. Robust design of structures using optimization methods. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193(23–26): 2221–2237
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Sandgren E, Cameron T M. Robust design optimization of structures through consideration of variation. Computers & Structures, 2002, 80(20–21): 1605–1613
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Asadpoure A, Tootkaboni M, Guest J K. Robust topology optimization of structures with uncertainties in stiffness—Application to truss structures. Computers & Structures, 2011, 89(11–12): 1131–1141
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Vanmarcke E. Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2010
[32]
Jiang C, Li W, Han X, Structural reliability analysis based on random distributions with interval parameters. Computers & Structures, 2011, 89(23–24): 2292–2302
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Do D M, Gao W, Song C, Interval spectral stochastic finite element analysis of structures with aggregation of random field and bounded parameters. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2016, 108(10): 1198–1229
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Ying X, Lee S, Chen W, Efficient random field uncertainty propagation in design using multiscale analysis. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2009, 131(2): 021006
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Luo Y, Zhan J, Xing J, Non-probabilistic uncertainty quantification and response analysis of structures with a bounded field model. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019 (in press)
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes—A new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(2): 359–373
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Sigmund O. Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4–5): 401–424
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Wang F, Lazarov B S, Sigmund O. On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43: 767– 784
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB0203604) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11472215).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3553 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/