An application of game theory in distributed collaborative decision making

Abstract

In a distributed product realization environment, new paradigms and accompanying software systems are necessary to support the collaborative work of geographically dispersed engineering teams from different disciplines who have different knowledge, experience, tools and resources. To verify the concept of collaboration by separation, we propose a generic information communication medium to enable knowledge representation and exchange between engineering teams, a digital interface. Across digital interfaces, each engineering team maintains its own perspective towards the product realization problem, and each controls a subset of design variables and seeks to maximize its own payoff function subject to individual constraints. Hence, we postulate the use of principles from game theory to model the relationships between engineering teams and facilitate collaborative decision making without causing unnecessary information exchange or iteration across digital interfaces. A product design and manufacturing scenario is introduced to demonstrate the efficacy of using game theory to maintain a clean interface between design and manufacturing teams.

Keywords

collaboration / distributed product realization / game theory / digital interface

References

[1] Li W D, Lu W F, Fuh J Y H, Collaborative computer-aided design—Research and development status. Computer Aided Design, 2005, 37(9): 931–940

[2] Wang L, Shen W, Xie H, Collaborative conceptual design—State of the art and future trends. Computer Aided Design, 2002, 34(13): 981–996

[3] Rosen D, Chen Y, Gerhard J, Design decision templates and their implementation for distributed design and solid freeform fabrication. In: Proceedings of ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Baltimore: ASME, 2000

[4] Chao P, Wang Y. A data exchange framework for networked CAD/CAM. Computers in Industry, 2001, 44(2): 131–140

[5] Wu D, Rosen D W, Wang L, Cloud-based design and manufacturing: A new paradigm in digital manufacturing and design innovation. Computer Aided Design, 2015, 59: 1–14

[6] Whitfield R I, Duffy A H B, Gatchell S, A collaborative platform for integrating and optimizing computational fluid dynamics analysis requests. Computer Aided Design, 2012, 44(3): 224–240

[7] Eynard B, Liénard S, Charles S, Web-based collaborative engineering support system: Applications in mechanical design and structural analysis. Concurrent Engineering, Research and Applications, 2005, 13(2): 145–153

[8] Kleiner S, Anderl R, Gräb R. A collaborative design system for product data integration. Journal of Engineering Design, 2003, 14(4): 421–428

[9] Schlenoff C, Gruninger M, Creek T, The essence of the process specification language. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation, 1999, 16(4): 204–216

[10] Whitfield R, Duffy A H, Coates G, Distributed design coordination. Research in Engineering Design, 2002, 13(4): 243–252

[11] Whitfield R I, Duffy A H B, Boyle I, An integrated environment for organisational decision support. Computers in Industry, 2011, 62(8–9): 842–853

[12] Whitfield R I, Duffy A H B, York P, Managing the exchange of engineering product data to support through life ship design. Computer Aided Design, 2011, 43(5): 516–532

[13] Hoffmann C M, Joan-Arinyo R. Distributed maintenance of multiple product views. Computer Aided Design, 2000, 32(7): 421–431

[14] Hoffman C M, Joan-Arinyo R. CAD and the product master model. Computer Aided Design, 1998, 30(11): 905–918

[15] Badin J, Monticolo D, Chamoret D, Using the knowledge configuration model to manage knowledge in configuration for upstream phases of the design process. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 2011, 5: 171

[16] Belkadi F, Dremont N, Notin A, A meta-modelling framework for knowledge consistency in collaborative design. Annual Reviews in Control, 2012, 36(2): 346–358

[17] Bracewell R, Wallace K, Moss M, Capturing design rationale. Computer Aided Design, 2009, 41(3): 173–186

[18] Peng G, Wang H, Zhang H, A collaborative system for capturing and reusing in-context design knowledge with an integrated representation model. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2017, 33: 314–329

[19] Chandrasegaran S K, Ramani K, Sriram R D, The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer Aided Design, 2013, 45(2): 204–228

[20] Mistree F, Smith W F, Bras B, Decision-based design: A contemporary paradigm for ship design. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1990, 98: 565–597

[21] McMahon C, Liu Y, McAdams D, Ontology-based executable design decision template representation and reuse. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 2016, 30(4): 390–405

[22] Nellippallil A B, Song K N, Goh C H, A goal-oriented, sequential, inverse design method for the horizontal integration of a multistage hot rod rolling system. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2017, 139(3): 031403

[23] Vadde S, Allen J K, Mistree F. Compromise decision support problems for hierarchical design involving uncertainty. Computers & Structures, 1994, 52(4): 645–658

[24] Hu Y, Rao S S. Game-theory approach for multi-objective optimal design of stationary flat-plate solar collectors. Engineering Optimization, 2009, 41(11): 1017–1035

[25] Dhingra A K, Rao S S. A cooperative fuzzy game theoretic approach to multiple objective design optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 1995, 83(3): 547–567

[26] Sunar M, Rao S S. Simultaneous passive and active control design of structures using multiobjective optimization strategies. Computers & Structures, 1993, 48(5): 913–924

[27] Rao S S. Game theory approach for multiobjective structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1987, 25(1): 119–127

[28] Badhrinath K, Jagannatha Rao J R. Modeling for concurrent design using game theory formulations. Concurrent Engineering, 1996, 4(4): 389–399

[29] Takai S. A game-theoretic model of collaboration in engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010, 132(5): 051005

[30] Xiao M, Shao X, Gao L, A new methodology for multi-objective multidisciplinary design optimization problems based on game theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(3): 1602–1612

[31] Chen L, Li S. A computerized team approach for concurrent product and process design optimization. Computer Aided Design, 2002, 34(1): 57–69

[32] Ge Z, Hu Q. Collaboration in R&D activities: Firm-specific decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(2): 864–883

[33] Lewis K, Mistree F. Collaborative, sequential and isolated decisions in design. ASME journal of Mechanical Engineering, 1998, 120(4): 643–652

[34] Lewis K, Mistree F. Modeling interactions in multidisciplinary design: A game theoretic approach. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(8): 1387–1392

[35] Montgomery D C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 8th ed. Wiley, 2012

[36] Sambu S. A design for manufacture method for rapid prototyping and rapid tooling. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2001

[37] Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Computer Aided Design, 2015, 69: 65–89

Acknowledgments

The research was performed at the Systems Realization Laboratory at Georgia Institute of Technology, and Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology and Industrial Design at New York City College of Technology.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature