PRESS-based EFOR algorithm for the dynamic parametrical modeling of nonlinear MDOF systems

Haopeng LIU, Yunpeng ZHU, Zhong LUO, Qingkai HAN

PDF(403 KB)
PDF(403 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 390-400. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-017-0459-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE

PRESS-based EFOR algorithm for the dynamic parametrical modeling of nonlinear MDOF systems

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In response to the identification problem concerning multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) nonlinear systems, this study presents the extended forward orthogonal regression (EFOR) based on predicted residual sums of squares (PRESS) to construct a nonlinear dynamic parametrical model. The proposed parametrical model is based on the non-linear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (NARX) model and aims to explicitly reveal the physical design parameters of the system. The PRESS-based EFOR algorithm is proposed to identify such a model for MDOF systems. By using the algorithm, we built a common-structured model based on the fundamental concept of evaluating its generalization capability through cross-validation. The resulting model aims to prevent over-fitting with poor generalization performance caused by the average error reduction ratio (AERR)-based EFOR algorithm. Then, a functional relationship is established between the coefficients of the terms and the design parameters of the unified model. Moreover, a 5-DOF nonlinear system is taken as a case to illustrate the modeling of the proposed algorithm. Finally, a dynamic parametrical model of a cantilever beam is constructed from experimental data. Results indicate that the dynamic parametrical model of nonlinear systems, which depends on the PRESS-based EFOR, can accurately predict the output response, thus providing a theoretical basis for the optimal design of modeling methods for MDOF nonlinear systems.

Keywords

MDOF / dynamic parametrical model / NARX model / PRESS-based EFOR / cantilever beam

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haopeng LIU, Yunpeng ZHU, Zhong LUO, Qingkai HAN. PRESS-based EFOR algorithm for the dynamic parametrical modeling of nonlinear MDOF systems. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(3): 390‒400 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-017-0459-5

References

[1]
Billings S A. Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency, and Spatio-Temporal Domains. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013
[2]
Xia X, Zhou J, Xiao J, A novel identification method of Volterra series in rotor-bearing system for fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 66–67: 557–567
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Li S, Li Y. Model predictive control of an intensified continuous reactor using a neural network Wiener model. Neurocomputing, 2016, 185: 93–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Gotmare A, Patidar R, George N V. Nonlinear system identification using a cuckoo search optimized adaptive Hammerstein model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(5): 2538–2546
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Guo Y, Guo L Z, Billings S A, An iterative orthogonal forward regression algorithm. International Journal of Systems Science, 2015, 46(5): 776–789
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
De Hoff R L, Rock S M. Development of simplified nonlinear models from multiple linearizations. In: Proceedings of 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes. San Diego: IEEE, 1979, 316–318
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Wei H L, Lang Z Q, Billings S A. Constructing an overall dynamical model for a system with changing design parameter properties. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2008, 5(2): 93–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Chen S, Wu Y, Luk B L. Combined genetic algorithm optimization and regularized orthogonal least squares learning for radial basis function networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999, 10(5): 1239–1243
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Orr M J L. Regularization in the selection of radial basis function centers. Neural Computation, 1995, 7(3): 606–623
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Montreal: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995, 14(2): 1137–1145
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Piroddi L. Simulation error minimisation methods for NARX model identification. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2008, 3(4): 392–403
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Worden K, Manson G, Tomlinson G R. A harmonic probing algorithm for the multi-input Volterra series. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 201(1): 67–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Worden K, Tomlinson G R. Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000
[14]
Li P, Wei H L, Billings S A, Nonlinear model identification from multiple data sets using an orthogonal forward search algorithm. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 8(4): 041001
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Palmqvist S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Accuracy of brain amyloid detection in clinical practice using cerebrospinal fluid b-amyloid 42: A cross-validation study against amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurology, 2014, 71(10): 1282–1289
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Myers R H. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. Boston: PWS and Kent Publishing Company, 1990
[17]
Hong X, Sharkey P M, Warwick K. A robust nonlinear identification algorithm using PRESS statistic and forward regression. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2003, 14(2): 454–458
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Wang L, Cluett W R. Use of PRESS residuals in dynamic system identification. Automatica, 1996, 32(5): 781–784
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Hong X, Sharkey P M, Warwick K. Automatic nonlinear predictive model-construction algorithm using forward regression and the PRESS statistic. IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications, 2003, 150(3): 245–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zhang Y, Yang Y. Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure. Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 187(1): 95–112
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Savaresi S M, Bittanti S, Montiglio M. Identification of semi-physical and black-box non-linear models: The case of MR-dampers for vehicles control. Automatica, 2005, 41(1): 113–127
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11572082), the Excellent Talents Support Program in Institutions of Higher Learning in Liaoning Province, China (Grant No. LJQ2015038), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant Nos. N150304004 and N140301001), and the Key Laboratory for Precision and Non-traditional Machining of the Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology (Grant No. JMTZ201602).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(403 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/