PRESS-based EFOR algorithm for the dynamic parametrical modeling of nonlinear MDOF systems

Abstract

In response to the identification problem concerning multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) nonlinear systems, this study presents the extended forward orthogonal regression (EFOR) based on predicted residual sums of squares (PRESS) to construct a nonlinear dynamic parametrical model. The proposed parametrical model is based on the non-linear autoregressive with exogenous inputs (NARX) model and aims to explicitly reveal the physical design parameters of the system. The PRESS-based EFOR algorithm is proposed to identify such a model for MDOF systems. By using the algorithm, we built a common-structured model based on the fundamental concept of evaluating its generalization capability through cross-validation. The resulting model aims to prevent over-fitting with poor generalization performance caused by the average error reduction ratio (AERR)-based EFOR algorithm. Then, a functional relationship is established between the coefficients of the terms and the design parameters of the unified model. Moreover, a 5-DOF nonlinear system is taken as a case to illustrate the modeling of the proposed algorithm. Finally, a dynamic parametrical model of a cantilever beam is constructed from experimental data. Results indicate that the dynamic parametrical model of nonlinear systems, which depends on the PRESS-based EFOR, can accurately predict the output response, thus providing a theoretical basis for the optimal design of modeling methods for MDOF nonlinear systems.

Keywords

MDOF / dynamic parametrical model / NARX model / PRESS-based EFOR / cantilever beam

References

[1] Billings S A. Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency, and Spatio-Temporal Domains. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2013

[2] Xia X, Zhou J, Xiao J, A novel identification method of Volterra series in rotor-bearing system for fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016, 66–67: 557–567

[3] Li S, Li Y. Model predictive control of an intensified continuous reactor using a neural network Wiener model. Neurocomputing, 2016, 185: 93–104

[4] Gotmare A, Patidar R, George N V. Nonlinear system identification using a cuckoo search optimized adaptive Hammerstein model. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(5): 2538–2546

[5] Guo Y, Guo L Z, Billings S A, An iterative orthogonal forward regression algorithm. International Journal of Systems Science, 2015, 46(5): 776–789

[6] De Hoff R L, Rock S M. Development of simplified nonlinear models from multiple linearizations. In: Proceedings of 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes. San Diego: IEEE, 1979, 316–318

[7] Wei H L, Lang Z Q, Billings S A. Constructing an overall dynamical model for a system with changing design parameter properties. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2008, 5(2): 93–104

[8] Chen S, Wu Y, Luk B L. Combined genetic algorithm optimization and regularized orthogonal least squares learning for radial basis function networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999, 10(5): 1239–1243

[9] Orr M J L. Regularization in the selection of radial basis function centers. Neural Computation, 1995, 7(3): 606–623

[10] Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Montreal: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995, 14(2): 1137–1145

[11] Piroddi L. Simulation error minimisation methods for NARX model identification. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2008, 3(4): 392–403

[12] Worden K, Manson G, Tomlinson G R. A harmonic probing algorithm for the multi-input Volterra series. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 201(1): 67–84

[13] Worden K, Tomlinson G R. Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

[14] Li P, Wei H L, Billings S A, Nonlinear model identification from multiple data sets using an orthogonal forward search algorithm. Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 2013, 8(4): 041001

[15] Palmqvist S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Accuracy of brain amyloid detection in clinical practice using cerebrospinal fluid b-amyloid 42: A cross-validation study against amyloid positron emission tomography. JAMA Neurology, 2014, 71(10): 1282–1289

[16] Myers R H. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. Boston: PWS and Kent Publishing Company, 1990

[17] Hong X, Sharkey P M, Warwick K. A robust nonlinear identification algorithm using PRESS statistic and forward regression. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2003, 14(2): 454–458

[18] Wang L, Cluett W R. Use of PRESS residuals in dynamic system identification. Automatica, 1996, 32(5): 781–784

[19] Hong X, Sharkey P M, Warwick K. Automatic nonlinear predictive model-construction algorithm using forward regression and the PRESS statistic. IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications, 2003, 150(3): 245–254

[20] Zhang Y, Yang Y. Cross-validation for selecting a model selection procedure. Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 187(1): 95–112

[21] Savaresi S M, Bittanti S, Montiglio M. Identification of semi-physical and black-box non-linear models: The case of MR-dampers for vehicles control. Automatica, 2005, 41(1): 113–127

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany