Analysis of suitable geometrical parameters for designing a tendon-driven under-actuated mechanical finger

Abstract

This study aims to optimize the geometrical parameters of an under-actuated mechanical finger by conducting a theoretical analysis of these parameters. The finger is actuated by a flexion tendon and an extension tendon. The considered parameters are the tendon guide positions with respect to the hinges. By applying such an optimization, the correct kinematical and dynamical behavior of the closing cycle of the finger can be obtained. The results of this study are useful for avoiding the snap-through and the single joint hyperflexion, which are the two breakdowns most frequently observed during experimentation on prototypes. Diagrams are established to identify the optimum values for the tendon guides position of a finger with specified dimensions. The findings of this study can serve as guide for future finger design.

Keywords

tendon-driven fingers / mechanical finger design / under-actuated mechanical systems

References

[1] Bicchi A. Hands for dexterous manipulation and robust grasping: A difficult road toward simplicity. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2000, 16(6): 652–662

[2] Biagiotti L, Lotti F, Melchiorri C, . Design aspects for advanced robot hands. In: Proceedings of 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Lausanne: IEEE, 2002

[3] Brown C Y, Asada H H. Inter-finger coordination and postural synergies in robot hands via mechanical implementation of principal components analysis. In: Proceedings of 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Diego: IEEE, 2007, 2877–2882

[4] Dechev N, Cleghorn W L, Naumann S. Multiple finger, passive adaptive grasp prosthetic hand. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2001, 36(10): 1157–1173

[5] Gosselin C, Pelletier F, Laliberté T. An anthropomorphic underactuated robotic hand with 15 dofs and a single actuator. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Pasadena: IEEE, 2008, 749–754

[6] Baril M, Laliberté T, Gosselin C, . On the design of a mechanically programmable underactuated anthropomorphic prosthetic gripper. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2013, 135(12): 121008

[7] Catalano M G, Grioli G, Serio A, . Adaptive synergies for a humanoid robot hand. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Osaka: IEEE, 2012, 7–14

[8] Penta F, Rossi C, Savino S. An underactuated finger for a robotic hand. International Journal of Mechanics and Control, 2014, 15(2): 63–68

[9] Penta P, Rossi C, Savino S. Gripping analysis of an underactuated finger. In: Borangiu T, ed. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Volume 371). Springer International Publishing, 2015, 71–78

[10] Niola V, Penta F, Rossi C, . An underactuated mechanical hand: Theoretical studies and prototyping. International Journal of Mechanics and Control, 2015, 16(1): 11–19

[11] Rossi C, Savino S. An underactuated multi-finger grasping device. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2014, 11(1): 201

[12] Rossi C, Savino S, Niola V, . A study of a robotic hand with tendon driven fingers. Robotica, 2015, 33(5): 1034–1048

[13] Carbone G, Rossi C, Savino S. Performance comparison between FEDERICA Hand and LARM Hand. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2015, 12: 1–11

[14] Niola V, Rossi C, Savino S, . An underactuated mechanical hand prosthesys by IFToMM Italy. In: Proceedings of the 14th IFToMM World Congress. Taipei, 2015, 415–420

[15] Hirose S, Umetani Y. The development of soft gripper for versatile robot hand. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1978, 13(3): 351–359

[16] Townsend W. The BarretHand grasper—Programmably flexible part handling and assembly. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2000, 27(3): 181–188

[17] Birglen L, Kragten G A, Herder J L. Underactuated Grasping—Special Issue in the Journal of Mechanical Sciences. Göttingen: Copernicus Publications, 2010

[18] Kaneko M, Higashimori M, Takenaka R, . The 100 G capturing robot—Too fast to see. IEEE/ASME Transaction on Mechatronics, 2003, 8(1): 37–44

[19] Laliberté T, Birglen L, Gosselin C M. Underactuation in robotic grasping hands. Japanese Journal of Machine Intelligence & Robotic Control, 2002, 4(3): 77–87

[20] Doria M, Birglen L. Design of an underactuated compliant gripper for surgery using nitinol. Journal of Medical Devices, 2009, 3(1): 011007

[21] Zottola M, Ceccarelli M. Underactuated finger mechanism for LARM Hand. In: Ceccarelli M, Glazunov V A. eds. Advances on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators. Springer International Publishing, 2014, 283–291

[22] Nelson C A, Dessauw E, Saiter J M, . Design of a compliant underactuated robotic finger with coordinated stiffness. In: Proceedings of ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013, V06BT07A017–V06BT07A017

[23] Groenewegen M W, Aguirre M E, Herder J L. Design of a partially compliant, three-phalanx underactuated prosthetic finger. In: Proceedings of ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015, V05AT08A040–V05AT08A040

[24] Niola V, Rossi C, Savino S, . Robot trajectory planning by points and tangents. In: Proceedings of 10th WSEAS International Conference on Robotics, Control and Manufacturing Technology. Hangzhou, 2010, 91–96

[25] Rossi C, Savino S. Robot trajectory planning by assigning positions and tangential velocities. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 29(1): 139–156

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg