One DOF mechanism for the mechanical harvest of vines in an arbor structure and the validation of the acceleration of grape berry harvesting

Abstract

In the mechanized harvest of vines, grape berries are detached through the vibration to the structure supporting the clusters. According to the kind of guide selected, the clusters require one or two vibration directions in the structure. For guiding in parral structures, vibration is necessary in two directions or planes: One perpendicular to the other. The guide branches producing the clusters develop in these planes, and the guiding is called H-guiding. Mechanism theory indicates that a mechanism has as many degrees of freedom as its actuators, and an actuator is needed to achieve a certain vibration. Having the smallest number of possible actuators is beneficial in reducing moving parts and achieving more compact and easily controllable mecha-nisms. In this case, a single degree-of-freedom mechanism is proposed. It is capable of generating vibrations on two planes: One perpendicular to the other. This mechanism is the sum of two link mechanisms on perpendicular planes with a common outlet located at the output rod of the mechanism where the actuator is found. As the distance between the soil and the elements containing the clusters is not constant, a system has been designed to measure the accelerations at the bars and the rocker to validate the acceleration values that detach the grape berries in a prototype in a lab experiment, to ensure that the acceleration needed for pulling the grape berries are produced at any contact point of the bar.

Keywords

harvest / mechanisms / one DOF / vibration

References

[1] Sethuramasamyraja B, Sachidhanantham S, Wample R. Geospatial modeling of wine grape quality indicators (anthocyanin) for development of differential wine grape harvesting technology. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2010, 1(3): 372–385

[2] Morris J R. Effects of mechanical harvesting on the quality of small fruits and grapes. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1983, 5–84: 332–348

[3] Morris J R. The wine and juice industry in Arkansas. American Wine Society, 1997, 29(3): 94–96

[4] Johnson S S. Mechanical Harvesting of Wine Grapes. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 385. 1977

[5] Morris J R. Commercialization of the Morris-Oldridge Vineyard Mechanization System. In: Striegler R K, Allen A, Bergmeier E, , eds. Proceedings of the Justin R. Morris Vineyard Mechanization Symposium. Columbia, 2008

[6] Huffman W E. The Status of Labor-saving Mechanization in U.S. Fruit and Vegetable Harvesting: A Further Update. Working Paper No. 12009. 2012

[7] Battistella M, Aguilar H. Development of a Mechanical Harvesting Machine for Guided Systems in a Two Plane-canopy. Technical Report: INTA. 2011 (in Spanish)

[8] Aguilar H, Galdeano H, Rodriguez C J,  Proposal of a harvesting machine for vines in parral structures. In: Proceedings of 2nd Argentine Congress of Mechanical Engineering. San Juan, 2010 (in Spanish)

[9] Aguilar H, Galdeano H, Rodriguez C,  Dynamic analysis of a vibrating mechanism for vine harvesting. In: Proceedings of 10th Iberoamerican Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Oporto, 2011 (in Spanish)

[10] Miranda  O,  Battitsella  M.  Impact  of  Aided  Harvesting  Methods on  Labor  Productivity  in  Wine and  Must  Grape  Harvest. Technical  Report: INTA  San  Juan  Experimental  Station.  2003 (in Spanish)

[11] Troncoso  C J, Riquelme  J, Laurie  F,  Evaluation of the relative advantages of the mechanized vine harvesting in central Chile. In: Proceedings of 52nd Agronomic Congress. Quillota, 2001 (in Spanish)

[12] Miranda O, Battitsella M. Training and updating course on vitiviniculture, mechanical harvesting. Lecture for a Degree Course. Mendoza, 2006 (in Spanish)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg