Stiffness of a 3-degree of freedom translational parallel kinematic machine

Abstract

In this paper, a typical 3-degree of freedom (3-DOF) translational parallel kinematic machine (PKM) is studied and analyzed whose tool platform has only translations along X-, Y- and Z-axes. It consists of three limbs, each of which have arm and forearm with prismatic-revolute-revolute-revolute (PRRR) joints. Inverse kinematics analysis is carried out to find the slider coordinates and joint angles for a given position of tool platform. Stiffness modeling is done based on the compliance matrices of arm and forearm of each limb. Using the stiffness modeling the variations of minimum and maximum translational stiffness in the workspace are analyzed. For various architectural parameters of the 3-DOF PKM the tendency of variations on the minimum and maximum stiffness over the entire workspace is studied; and also the deflections of the tool platform along X, Y, and Z directions with respect to various forces are presented.

Keywords

3-DOF translational PKM / inverse kinematics / stiffness modeling / translational stiffness

References

[1] Merlet J P. Parallel Robots. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000

[2] Lee K, Shah D K. Kinematics analysis of a three degrees of freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 1988, 4(3): 361–367

[3] Yang P H, Waldron K J, Orin D E. Kinematics of a Three Degrees-of-Freedom Motion Platform for a Low-Cost Driving Simulator. In: Lenarcic J, Parenti-Castelli V, eds. Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996: 89–98

[4] Ceccarelli M. A new 3 D.O.F. spatial parallel mechanism. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1997, 32(8): 895–902

[5] Gosselin C, Angeles J. The optimum kinematic design of a spherical 3-DOF parallel manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Automation Desigh, 1989, 111(2): 202–207

[6] Karouia M, Herve J M. A 3-DOF tripod for generating spherical rotation. In: Lenarcic J, Stanisic M M, eds. Advances in Robot Kinematics. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, 395–402

[7] Vischer P, Clavel R. Argos: A novel 3-DOF parallel wrist mechanism. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2000, 19(1): 5–11

[8] Di Gregorio R. A new parallel wrist using only revolute pairs: The 3-RUU wrist. Robotica, 2001, 19(3): 305–309

[9] Zlatanov D, Bonev I, Gosselin C M. Constraint singularities of parallel mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. Washington D C, 2002: 496–502

[10] Fang Y F, Tsai L W. Structure synthesis of 3-DOF rotational parallel manipulators. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 2004, 20(1): 117–121

[11] Clavel R. DELTA, a fast robot with parallel geometry. In: Proceedings of 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988, 91–100

[12] Pierrot F, Reynaud C, Fournier A. DELTA: A simple and efficient parallel robot. Robotica, 1990, 8(02): 105–109

[13] Tsai L W, Walsh G C, Stamper R. Kinematics of a novel three DOF translational platform. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Minneapolis MN: IEEE, 1996, 3446–3451

[14] Tsai L W. US Patent, 5656905, 1997-08-12

[15] Tsai L W. Kinematics of a three-DOF platform with three extensible limbs. In: Lenarcic J, Parenti-Castelli V, eds. Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics. Berlin: Springer Netherlands, 1996 ,401–410

[16] Wang J S, Tang X Q. Analysis and dimensional design of a novel hybrid machine tool. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2003, 43(7): 647–655

[17] Gosselin C M. Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1990, 6(3): 377–382

[18] Gosselin C, Angeles J. A global performance index for kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1991, 113(3): 220–226

[19] Svinin M M, Hosoe S, Uchiyana M. On the stiffness and stability of Gough-Stewart platforms. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2001, 3268–3273

[20] El-Khasawneh B S, Ferreira P M. Computation of stiffness and stiffness bounds for parallel link manipulators. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 1999, 39(2): 321–342

[21] Huang T, Zhao X Y, Whitehouse D J. Stiffness estimation of a tripod-based parallel kinematic machine. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2002, 18(1): 50–58

[22] Ceccarelli M, Carbone G. A stiffness analysis for CaPaman (Cassino Parallel Manipulator). Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2002, 37(5): 427–439

[23] Li Y, Xu Q. Stiffness analysis for a 3-PUU Parallel Kinematic Machine. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2008, 43(2): 186–200

[24] Kim W K, Lee J Y, Yi B J. Analysis for a planar 3 degree-of-freedom parallel mechanism with actively adjustable stiffness characteristics. In: Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 1997, 2663–2670

[25] Kock S, Schumacher W. A parallel x–y manipulator with actuation redundancy for high-speed and active-stiffness applications. In: Proceedings of 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 1998, 2295–2300

[26] Chakarov D. Study of the antagonistic stiffness of parallel manipulators with actuation redundancy. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2004, 39(6): 583–601

[27] Ganesh S S, Koteswara Rao A B. Error analysis and optimization of 3-DOF translational parallel kinematic machine. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 9(2): 120–129

[28] Ganesh S S, Koteswara Rao A B, Darvekar S. Multi-objective optimization of 3-DOF translational parallel kinematic machine. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2013, 27(12): 3797–3804

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg