Modelling and analysis of FMS productivity variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach
Vineet JAIN, Tilak RAJ
Modelling and analysis of FMS productivity variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach
Productivity has often been cited as a key factor in a flexible manufacturing system (FMS) performance, and actions to increase it are said to improve profitability and the wage earning capacity of employees. Improving productivity is seen as a key issue for survival and success in the long term of a manufacturing system. The purpose of this paper is to make a model and analysis of the productivity variables of FMS. This study was performed by different approaches viz. interpretive structural modelling (ISM), structural equation modelling (SEM), graph theory and matrix approach (GTMA) and a cross-sectional survey within manufacturing firms in India. ISM has been used to develop a model of productivity variables, and then it has been analyzed. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are powerful statistical techniques. CFA is carried by SEM. EFA is applied to extract the factors in FMS by the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 20) software and confirming these factors by CFA through analysis of moment structures (AMOS 20) software. The twenty productivity variables are identified through literature and four factors extracted, which involves the productivity of FMS. The four factors are people, quality, machine and flexibility. SEM using AMOS 20 was used to perform the first order four-factor structures. GTMA is a multiple attribute decision making (MADM) methodology used to find intensity/quantification of productivity variables in an organization. The FMS productivity index has purposed to intensify the factors which affect FMS.
[1] |
Cosmetatos G P, Eilon S. Effects of productivity definition and measurement on performance evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 1983, 14(1): 31–35
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Russell R S, Taylor-Iii B W. Operations Management along the Supply Chain. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009
|
[3] |
Kilic H, Okumus F. Factors influencing productivity in small island hotels: Evidence from Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2005, 17(4): 315–331
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Tangen S. Understanding the concept of productivity. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference. Taipei, 2002
|
[5] |
Jahromi M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. A novel 0–1 linear integer programming model for dynamic machine-tool selection and operation allocation in a flexible manufacturing system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2012, 31(2): 224–231
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Cordero R. Changing human resources to make flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) successful. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1997, 8(2): 263–275
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Dai J B, Lee N K. Economic feasibility analysis of flexible material handling systems: A case study in the apparel industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 136(1): 28–36
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Li J F, Long Y, Liu Q P. Advanced manufacturing technology, quality of product and level of performance: Empirical evidence from Chongqing. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management. IEEE, 2005, 486– 490
|
[9] |
Black S E, Lynch L M. Human-capital investments and productivity. American Economic Review, 1996, 86(2): 263–267
|
[10] |
Hoffman J M, Mehra S. Management leadership and productivity improvement programs. International Journal of Applied Quality Management, 1999, 2(2): 221–232
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Millea M, Fuess S M Jr. Does pay affect productivity or react to it?: Examination of U.S. manufacturing. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2005, 45(4–5): 796–807
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Kazerooni A, Chan F, Abhary K. A fuzzy integrated decision-making support system for scheduling of FMS using simulation. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 1997, 10(1): 27–34
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Oke A. A framework for analysing manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2005, 25(10): 973–996
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Buyurgan N, Saygin C, Kilic S E. Tool allocation in flexible manufacturing systems with tool alternatives. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2004, 20(4): 341–349
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Özbayrak M, Bell R. A knowledge-based decision support system for the management of parts and tools in FMS. Decision Support Systems, 2003, 35(4): 487–515
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Anderson E W, Fornell C, Rust R T. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Science, 1997, 16(2): 129–145
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Löthgren M, Tambour M. Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 115(3): 449–458
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Sharma R K, Kumar D, Kumar P. Manufacturing excellence through TPM implementation: A practical analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2006, 106(2): 256–280
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Youssef M A, Al-Ahmady B. Quality management practices in a Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS) environment. Total Quality Management, 2002, 13(6): 877–890
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Singh B, Narain R, Yadav R C. Identifying critical barriers in the growth of Indian Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). International Journal of Business Competition and Growth, 2012, 2(1): 84–105
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Swamidass P M, Waller M A. A classification of approaches to planning and justifying new manufacturing technologies. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 1990, 9(3): 181–193
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Banaszak Z, Tang X Q, Wang S C, Zaremba M B. Logistics models in flexible manufacturing. Computers in Industry, 2000, 43(3): 237–248
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Kashyap A S, Khator S K. Analysis of tool sharing in an FMS: A simulation study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1996, 30(1): 137–145
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Conti G. Training, productivity and wages in Italy. Labour Economics, 2005, 12(4): 557–576
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Barron J M, Berger M C, Black D A. Do workers pay for on-the-job training? Journal of Human Resources, 1999, 34(2): 235–252
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Yellen J L. Efficiency wage models of unemployment. Information and Macroeconomics, 1984, 74(2): 200–205
|
[27] |
Mehrabi M G, Ulsoy A G, Koren Y. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2000, 11(4): 403–419
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Öztürk A, Kayalıgil S, Özdemirel N E. Manufacturing lead time estimation using data mining. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 173(2): 683–700
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
D'Souza D E, Williams F P. Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Journal of Operations Management, 2000, 18(5): 577–593
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Gupta Y P, Somers T M. The measurement of manufacturing flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 60(2): 166–182
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Chan F T, Chan H. A comprehensive survey and future trend of simulation study on FMS scheduling. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2004, 15(1): 87–102
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Das S K. The measurement of flexibility in manufacturing systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 1996, 8(1): 67–93
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Gupta Y P. Organizational issues of flexible manufacturing systems. Technovation, 1988, 8(4): 255–269
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Martin T, Ulich E, Warnecke H J. Appropriate automation for flexible manufacturing. Automatica, 1990, 26(3): 611–616
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Beamon B M. Performance, reliability, and performability of material handling systems. International Journal of Production Research, 1998, 36(2): 377–393
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Kulak O. A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, 29(2): 310–319
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Jain V, Raj T. Evaluation of flexibility in FMS using SAW and WPM. Decision Science Letters, 2013, 2(4): 223–230
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Jain V, Raj T. Ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system by using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2013, 14(3): 125–141
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Co H C, Patuwo B E, Hu M Y. The human factor in advanced manufacturing technology adoption: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1998, 18(1): 87–106
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Stecke K E. Planning and scheduling approaches to operate a particular FMS. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 61(3): 273–291
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Bengtsson J, Olhager J. Valuation of product-mix flexibility using real options. International Journal of Production Economics, 2002, 78(1): 13–28
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Elkins D A, Huang N, Alden J M. Agile manufacturing systems in the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 91(3): 201–214
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Silveira G D. A framework for the management of product variety. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 1998, 18(3): 271–285
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
ElMaraghy H A. Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2005, 17(4): 261–276
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Azevedo S, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V. Using interpretive structural modelling to identify and rank performance measures: An application in the automotive supply chain. Baltic Journal of Management, 2013, 8(2): 208–230
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Govindan K, Palaniappan M, Zhu Q, Kannan D. Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 140(1): 204–211
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Raj T, Attri R, Jain V. Modelling the factors affecting flexibility in FMS. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, 11(4): 350–374
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Singh R K, Garg S K, Deshmukh S G, Kumar M. Modelling of critical success factors for implementation of AMTs. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2007, 2(3): 232–250
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Jain V, Raj T. Evaluating the variables affecting flexibility in FMS by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2013, 14(4): 181–193
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Ramanathan U, Muyldermans L. Identifying the underlying structure of demand during promotions: A structural equation modelling approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(5): 5544–5552
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Su Y, Yang C. A structural equation model for analyzing the impact of ERP on SCM. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(1): 456–469
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Lau A K, Yam R C, Tang E P. Supply chain integration and product modularity: An empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2010, 30(1): 20–56
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Vázquez-Bustelo D, Avella L, Fernández E. Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2007, 27(12): 1303–1332
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Rao R V, Padmanabhan K. Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods. Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, 2006, 22(4): 373–383
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Rao R V. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2006, 431(1–2): 248–255
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Grover S, Agrawal V, Khan I. Human resource performance index in TQM environment. International Journal of Management Practice, 2005, 1(2): 131–151
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Grover S, Agrawal V P, Khan I A. A digraph approach to TQM evaluation of an industry. International Journal of Production Research, 2004, 42(19): 4031–4053
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Wilcox J B, Bellenger D N, Rigdon E E. Assessing sample representativeness in industrial surveys. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 1994, 9(2): 51–61
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Haleem A, Sushil, Qadri M A, Kumar S. Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: An application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process. Production Planning and Control, 2012, 23(10–11): 722–734
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Shah R, Goldstein S M. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management, 2006, 24(2): 148–169
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
Rigdon E E. The equal correlation baseline model for comparative fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 1998, 5(1): 63–77
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Jöreskog K G, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
|
[63] |
Jöreskog K G, Sörbom D. PRELIS 2 User’s Reference Guide: A Program for Multivariate Data Screening and Data Summarization: A Preprocessor for LISREL. 3rd ed. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1996
|
[64] |
Rao R V. Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment: Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods: Volume 2. London: Springer,2013
|
[65] |
Jurkat W B, Ryser H J. Matrix factorizations of determinants and permanents. Journal of Algebra, 1966, 3(1): 1–27
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[66] |
Sage A. Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977, 91–164
|
[67] |
Warfield J N.Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 1974, SMC-4(1): 81–87
|
[68] |
Nunnally J C, Bernstein I H. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994
|
[69] |
Hair J F, Black W C, Babin B J, Anderson R E. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2009.
|
[70] |
Anderson J C, Gerbing D W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103(3): 411–423
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[71] |
Byrne B M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009
|
[72] |
Fornell C, Larcker D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18(1): 39–50
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[73] |
Carmines E G, Zeller R A. Reliability and validity assessment. London: Sage Publications, Inc., 1979
|
/
〈 | 〉 |