Simulation and analysis of grinding wheel based on Gaussian mixture model
Yulun CHI, Haolin LI
Simulation and analysis of grinding wheel based on Gaussian mixture model
This article presents an application of numerical simulation technique for the generation and analysis of the grinding wheel surface topographies. The ZETA 20 imaging and metrology microscope is employed to measure the surface topographies. The Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is used to transform the measured non-Gaussian field to Gaussian fields, and the simulated topographies are generated. Some numerical examples are used to illustrate the viability of the method. It shows that the simulated grinding wheel topographies are similar with the measured and can be effective used to study the abrasive grains and grinding mechanism.
grinding wheel / 3D topographies measurement / Gaussian mixture model / simulation
[1] |
Hegeman J B J W. Fundamentals of grinding: Surface conditions of ground materials. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Netherlands: University of Groningen, 2000
|
[2] |
Fu Y C, Xu H J, Xu J H. Optimization design of grinding wheel topography for high efficency grinding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002, 129(1-3): 118-122
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Xie J, Wei F, Zheng J H, Tamaki J, Kubo A. 3D laser investigation on micron-scale grain protrusion topography of truncated diamond grinding wheel for precision grinding performance. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2011, 51(5): 411-419
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Cai R, Rowe W B. Assessment of vitrified CBN wheels for precision grinding. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2004, 44(12,13): 1391-1402
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Nguyen T A, Butler D L. Simulation of precision grinding process,part 1:generation of the grinding wheel surface. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2005, 45(11): 1321-1328
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Xiong G, Feng C, Ji L, Chao F, Liang J. Dynamical Gaussian mixture model for tracking elliptical living objects. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2006, 27(7): 838-842
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Yan L, Rong Y M, Jiang F, Zhou Z X. Three-dimension surface characterization of grinding wheel using white light interferometer. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 55(1-4): 133-141
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Huo F W. Measurement and evaluation of the surface topography of fine diamond grinding wheel. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2007, 43(10): 108-113
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Shinozuka M, Deodatis G. Simulation of multi-dimensional Gaussian stochastic fields by spectral representation. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 1996, 49(1): 29-53
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Chakrabarti S, Paul S. Numetical modelling of surface topography in superabrasive grinding. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 39(1,2): 29-38
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Balasz B, Szatkiewicz T, Krolikowski T. Grinding Wheel Topography Modeling with Application of an Elastic Neural Network. Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications. With Aspects of Artificial Intelligence. 2007, 4682: 83-90
|
[12] |
Blunt L, Ebdon S. The application of three-dimensional surface measurement techniques to characterizing grinding wheel topography. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 1996, 36(11): 1207-1226
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
This set includes four 3D height parameters [ | |
The RMS value of the departures within the sampling area | |
The absolute height of the five highest peaks and the depths of the deepest valleys within the sampling area | |
Asymmetry of surface deviations about the mean plane | |
Peakness or sharpness of the surface height distribution | |
This set includes four 3D spatial parameters [ | |
Number of summits of a unit sampling area | |
Long crestness or uniform texture aspect | |
Pronounced direction of the surface texture | |
Shortest autocorrelation length that the areal autocorrelation function decays to 0.2 | |
This set includes three 3D hybrid parameters [ | |
RMS value of the surface slope within the sampling area | |
Average of the principle curvatures of the summits within the sampling area | |
Ratio of the increment of the interfacial area of a surface over the sampling area | |
This set includes six 3D functional parameters [ | |
Ratio of the RMS deviation over the surface height at 5% bearing area | |
Ratio of the void volume of the unit sampling area at the core zone over the RMS deviation | |
Ratio of the void volume of the unit sampling area at the valley zone over the RMS deviation |
/
〈 | 〉 |