Search-and-replace editing of genetic information

References

[1] Cong L, Ran F A, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu P D, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini L A, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819–823

[2] Komor A C, Badran A H, Liu D R. CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes. Cell, 2017, 168(1–2): 20–36

[3] Ceccaldi R, Rondinelli B, D’Andrea A D. Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends in Cell Biology, 2016, 26(1): 52–64

[4] Komor A C, Kim Y B, Packer M S, Zuris J A, Liu D R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature, 2016, 533(7603): 420–424

[5] Gaudelli N M, Komor A C, Rees H A, Packer M S, Badran A H, Bryson D I, Liu D R. Programmable base editing of A·T to G·C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature, 2017, 551(7681): 464–471

[6] Gehrke J M, Cervantes O, Clement M K, Wu Y, Zeng J, Bauer D E, Pinello L, Joung J K. An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36(10): 977–982

[7] Kim Y B, Komor A C, Levy J M, Packer M S, Zhao K T, Liu D R. Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions. Nature Biotechnology, 2017, 35(4): 371–376

[8] Koblan L W, Doman J L, Wilson C, Levy J M, Tay T, Newby G A, Maianti J P, Raguram A, Liu D R. Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36(9): 843–846

[9] Komor A C, Zhao K T, Packer M S, Gaudelli N M, Waterbury A L, Koblan L W, Kim Y B, Badran A H, Liu D R. Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity. Science Advances, 2017, 3(8): eaao4774

[10] Li J, Liu Z, Huang S, Wang X, Li G, Xu Y, Yu W, Chen S, Zhang Y, Ma H, Ke Z, Chen J, Sun Q, Huang X. Efficient base editing in G/C-rich regions to model androgen insensitivity syndrome. Cell Research, 2019, 29(2): 174–176

[11] Anzalone A V, Randolph P B, Davis J R, Sousa A A, Koblan L W, Levy J M, Chen P J, Wilson C, Newby G A, Raguram A, Liu D R. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature, 2019, 576(7785): 149–157

[12] Shen B, Zhang W, Zhang J, Zhou J, Wang J, Chen L, Wang L, Hodgkins A, Iyer V, Huang X, Skarnes W C. Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects. Nature Methods, 2014, 11(4): 399–402

[13] Young A I, Benonisdottir S, Przeworski M, Kong A. Deconstructing the sources of genotype-phenotype associations in humans. Science, 2019, 365(6460): 1396–1400

[14] Jenko J, Gorjanc G, Cleveland M A, Varshney R K, Whitelaw C B, Woolliams J A, Hickey J M. Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs. Genetics, Selection, Evolution., 2015, 47(1): 55

[15] Li G, Zhou S, Li C, Cai B, Yu H, Ma B, Huang Y, Ding Y, Liu Y, Ding Q, He C, Zhou J, Wang Y, Zhou G, Li Y, Yan Y, Hua J, Petersen B, Jiang Y, Sonstegard T, Huang X, Chen Y, Wang X. Base pair editing in goat: nonsense codon introgression into FGF5 results in longer hair. FEBS Journal, 2019, 286(23): 4675–4692

[16] Yin K, Gao C, Qiu J L. Progress and prospects in plant genome editing. Nature Plants, 2017, 3(8): 17107

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s) 2020. Published by Higher Education Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)