Machine learning of frustrated classical spin models (II): Kernel principal component analysis

Abstract

In this work, we apply a principal component analysis (PCA) method with a kernel trick to study the classification of phases and phase transitions in classical XY models of frustrated lattices. Compared to our previous work with the linear PCA method, the kernel PCA can capture nonlinear functions. In this case, the Z₂ chiral order of the classical spins in these lattices is indeed a nonlinear function of the input spin configurations. In addition to the principal component revealed by the linear PCA, the kernel PCA can find two more principal components using the data generated by Monte Carlo simulation for various temperatures as the input. One of them is related to the strength of the U(1) order parameter, and the other directly manifests the chiral order parameter that characterizes the Z₂ symmetry breaking. For a temperature-resolved study, the temperature dependence of the principal eigenvalue associated with the Z₂ symmetry breaking clearly shows second-order phase transition behavior.

Keywords

machine learning / classical XY model / kernel PCA / frustrated lattice

References

[1] C. Wang and H. Zhai, Machine learning of frustrated classical spin models (I): Principal component analysis, Phys. Rev. B 96(14), 144432 (2017)

[2] L. Wang, Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning, Phys. Rev. B 94(19), 195105 (2016)

[3] J. Carrasquilla and R. G. Melko, Machine learning phases of matter, Nat. Phys. 13(5), 431 (2017)

[4] E. P. L. van Nieuwenburg, Y. H. Liu, and S. D. Huber, Learning phase transitions by confusion, Nat. Phys. 13(5), 435 (2017)

[5] G. Torlai and R. G. Melko, Learning thermodyamics with Boltzmann machines, Phys. Rev. B 94(16), 165134 (2016)

[6] S. Wetzel, Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: From principal component analysis to variational autoencoders, Phys. Rev. E 96(2), 022140 (2017)

[7] P. Ponte and R. G. Melko, Kernel methods for interpretable machine learning of order parameters, Phys. Rev. B 96(20), 205146 (2017)

[8] W. J. Hu, R. Singh, and R. Scalettar, Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination, Phys. Rev. E 95(6), 062122 (2017)

[9] K. Ch’ng, N. Vazquez, and E. Khatami, Unsupervised machine learning account of magnetic transitions in the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. E 97(1), 013306 (2018)

[10] N. C. Costa, W. J. Hu, Z. J. Bai, R. Scalettar, and R. Singh, Principal component analysis for fermionic critical points, Phys. Rev. B 96(19), 195138 (2017)

[11] S. Wetzel and M. Scherzer, Machine learning of explicit order parameters: From the Ising model to SU(2) lattice gauge theory, Phys. Rev. B 96(18), 184410 (2017)

[12] K. Ch’ng, J. Carrasquilla, R. G. Melko, and E. Khatami, Machine learning phases of strongly correlated fermions, Phys. Rev. X 7(3), 031038 (2017)

[13] P. Broecker, J. Carrasquilla, R. G. Melko, and S. Trebst, Machine learning quantum phases of matter beyond the fermion sign problem, Sci. Rep. 7(1), 8823 (2017)

[14] P. Broecker, F. F. Assaad, and S. Trebst, Quantum phase recognition via unsupervised machine learning, arXiv: 1707.00663 (2017)

[15] M. Beach, A. Golubeva, and R. G. Melko, Machine learning vortices at the Kosterlitz–Thouless transition, Phys. Rev. B 97(4), 045207 (2018)

[16] Y. Zhang and E. Kim, Quantum loop topography for machine learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(21), 216401 (2017)

[17] Y. Zhang, R. G. Melko, and E. Kim, Machine learning Z₂ quantum spin liquids with quasiparticle statistics, Phys. Rev. B 96(24), 245119 (2017)

[18] P. Zhang, H. Shen, and H. Zhai, Machine learning topological invariants with neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(6), 066401 (2018)

[19] J. Villain, Spin glass with non-random interactions, J. Phys. Chem. 10, 1717 (1977)

[20] J. Villain, Two-level systems in spin-glass model (I): General formalism and two-dimensional model, J. Phys. Chem. 10, 4793 (1977)

[21] D. H. Lee, J. D. Joannopoulos, J. W. Negele, and D. P. Landau, Discrete-symmetry breaking and novel critical phenomena in an antiferromagnetic planar (XY) model in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52(6), 433 (1984)

[22] S. Miyashita and H. Shiba, Nature of phase transition of the two-dimensional antiferromagnetic plane rotator model on the triangular lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53(3), 1145 (1984)

[23] S. Lee and K. C. Lee, Phase transitions in the fully frustrated XY model studied with use of the microcanonical Monte Carlo technique, Phys. Rev. B 49(21), 15184 (1994)

[24] S. Korshunov, Kink pairs unbinding on domain walls and the sequence of phase transitions in fully frustrated XYmodels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(16), 167007 (2002)

[25] M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Transitions and crossover phenomena in fully frustrated XYsystems, Phys. Rev. B 72(18), 184502 (2005)

[26] T. Obuchi and H. Kawamura, Spin and chiral orderings of the antiferromagnetic XYmodel on the triangular lattice and their critical properties, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81(5), 054003 (2012)

[27] J. P. Lv, T. M. Garoni, and Y. J. Deng, Phase transitions in XYantiferromagnets on plane triangulations, Phys. Rev. B 87(2), 024108 (2013)

[28] P. Olsson, Monte Carlo analysis of the two-dimensional XYmodel (II): Comparison with the Kosterlitz renormalization-group equations, Phys. Rev. B 52(6), 4526 (1995)

[29] T. Ohta and D. Jasnow, XYmodel and the superfluid density in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 20(1), 139 (1979)

[30] H. Weber and P. Minnhagen, Monte Carlo determination of the critical temperature for the two-dimensional XYmodel, Phys. Rev. B 37(10), 5986 (1988)

[31] C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, 2007

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature