Numerical Investigation and Optimization of a Flat Plate Solar Collector Operating with Cu/CuO/Al₂O₃–Water Nanofluids

Abstract

Nanofluids are a potential alternative to significantly improving the performance of heat transfer applications. In this work, a numerical analysis to examine the effect of dispersing copper (Cu), copper oxide (CuO), and aluminum (Al₂O₃) nanoparticles in pure water on the performance of a flat plate solar collector (FPSC) and a numerical model was proposed. The influence of the nanofluid type on the thermal efficiency was critically investigated and discussed. The effect of the mass flow rate on the performance was also analyzed and discussed. Based on correlations of the thermophysical properties of nanofluids, a sensitivity analysis was used to analyze the impact of the nanoparticles on the base fluid. The results indicate that the performance of the FPSC with Cu/water nanofluid was better than that of FPSCs using CuO/water or Al₂O₃/water nanofluids. When the mass flow rate of the nanofluids was 8.0 L/min, the efficiency of the FPSC was much greater than those at the flow rates of 5.0 L/min and 2.0 L/min. Mean enhancements in thermal efficiency of 4.44%, 4.27%, and 4.21% were observed when 2.0 L/min was applied using Cu/water, CuO/water, and Al₂O₃/water nanofluids, respectively. Improvements in thermal efficiency of 2.76%, 2.53%, and 2.47% occurred when 8.0 L/min was applied.

Keywords

Flat plate solar collector / Solar energy / Thermal efficiency / Nanofluids / Al₂O₃/water / Cu/water / CuO/water

References

[1] Tata O, Feddaoui M, Belkassmi Y Numerical study on energy performance of sheet and tube type photovoltaic thermal solar system Ouarzazate, Morocco. AIP Conf Proc, 2018, 2056: 020021.

[2] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C, Antonopoulos KA Exergetic and energetic comparison of LiCl–H₂O and LiBr–H₂O working pairs in a solar absorption cooling system. Energy Convers Manag, 2016, 123: 453-461.

[3] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C, Antonopoulos KA Performance of evacuated at solar thermal collectors. Therm Sci Eng Progress, 2018, 8: 296-306.

[4] Choi DASS, Wang HP Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles in development and applications of non-Newtonian flows, 1995 New York ASME

[5] Mahian O, Kianifar A, Sahin AZ, et al. Performance analysis of a minichannel-based solar collector using different nanofluids. Energy Convers Manag, 2014, 88: 129-138.

[6] Tong YJ, Lee H, Kang W, et al. Energy and exergy comparison of a flat-plate solar collector using water, Al₂O₃ nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid. Appl Therm Eng, 2019, 159: 113959.

[7] Moghadam AJ, Farzane-Gord M, Sajadi M, et al. Effects of CuO/water nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2014, 58: 9-14.

[8] He QB, Zeng SQ, Wang SF Experimental investigation on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors with nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng, 2015, 88: 165-171.

[9] Verma SK, Tiwari AK, Chauhan DS Experimental evaluation of flat plate solar collector using nanofluids. Energy Convers Manag, 2017, 134: 103-115.

[10] Loni R, Asli-ardeh AE, Ghobadian B, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a solar dish receiver using different nanofluids. Energy, 2017, 133: 749-760.

[11] Michael JJ, Iniyan S Performance of copper oxide/water nanofluid in a flat plate solar water heater under natural and forced circulations. Energy Convers Manag, 2015, 95: 160-169.

[12] Al-Waeli AHA, Chaichan MT, Kazem HA, et al. Comparative study to use nano-(Al₂O₃, CuO, and SiC) with water to enhance photovoltaic thermal PV/T collectors. Energy Convers Manag, 2017, 148: 963-973.

[13] Verma SK, Tiwari AK, Chauhan DS Performance augmentation in flat plate solar collector using MgO/water nanofluid. Energy Convers Manag, 2016, 124: 607-617.

[14] Said Z, Saidur R, Rahim NA Energy and exergy analysis of a flat plate solar collector using different sizes of aluminium oxide based nanofluid. J Clean Prod, 2016, 133: 518-530.

[15] Sharafeldin MA, Gróf G Experimental investigation of flat plate solar collector using CeO₂–water nanofluid. Energy Convers Manag, 2018, 155: 32-41.

[16] Yousefi T, Veysi F, Shojaeizadeh E, et al. An experimental investigation on the effect of Al₂O₃–H₂O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renew Energy, 2012, 39(1): 293-298.

[17] Mirzaei M, Hosseini SMS, Moradi Kashkooli AM Assessment of Al₂O₃ nanoparticles for the optimal operation of the flat plate solar collector. Appl Therm Eng, 2018, 134: 68-77.

[18] Genc AM, Ezan MA, Turgut A Thermal performance of a nanofluid-based flat plate solar collector: a transient numerical study. Appl Therm Eng, 2018, 130: 395-407.

[19] Okonkwo EC, Wole-Osho I, Kavaz D, et al. Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of a flat plate collector operating with alumina and iron mono and hybrid nanofluids. Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 2020, 37: 100636.

[20] Choudhary S, Sachdeva A, Kumar P Investigation of the stability of MgO nanofluid and its effect on the thermal performance of flat plate solar collector. Renew Energy, 2020, 147: 1801-1814.

[21] DuffieJA BeckmanWA Solar engineering of thermal processes, 2013 New York Wiley

[22] Brinkman HC The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J Chem Phys, 1952, 20(4): 571.

[23] Maxwell JC A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 1873 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

[24] Leinhard IVJ, Leinhard VJ A heat tranfer textbook, 2012 4 Cambridge Philogiston Press

[25] LiQ XuanY Convective heat transfer and flow characteristics of Cu-water. Sci China Ser E: Technol Sci, 2002, 45: 408-416.

[26] Sudarmadji Soeparman S, Wahyudi S, et al. Effects of cooling process of Al₂O₃–water nanofluid on convective heat transfer. FME Trans, 2014, 42(2): 155-160.

[27] Yazdanifard F, Ameri M, Ebrahimnia-Bajestan E Performance of nanofluid-based photovoltaic/thermal systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 76: 323-352.

[28] Pak BC, Cho YI Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf, 1998, 11(2): 151-170.

[29] Kalogirou S Thermal performance, economic and environmental life cycle analysis of thermosiphon solar water heaters. Sol Energy, 2009, 83(1): 39-48.

[30] Hollands KGT, Unny TE, Raithby GD, et al. Free convective heat transfer across inclined air layers. J Heat Transf, 1976, 98(2): 189-193.

[31] Bellos E, Tzivanidis C Performance analysis and optimization of an absorption chiller driven by nanofluid based solar flat plate collector. J Clean Prod, 2018, 174: 256-272.

[32] Farajzadeh E, Movahed S, Hosseini R Experimental and numerical investigations on the effect of Al₂O₃/TiO₂H₂O nanofluids on thermal efficiency of the flat plate solar collector. Renew Energy, 2018, 118: 122-130.

[33] Rangababu JA, Kiran KK, Srinivasa RS Numerical analysis and validation of heat transfer mechanism of flat plate collectors. Procedia Eng, 2015, 127: 63-70.

[34] Ansarpour M, Danesh E, Mofarahi M Investigation the effect of various factors in a convective heat transfer performance by ionic liquid, ethylene glycol, and water as the base fluids for Al₂O₃ nanofluid in a horizontal tube: a numerical study. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf, 2020, 113: 104556.

[35] Zamzamian A, KeyanpourRad M, KianiNeyestani M, et al. An experimental study on the effect of Cu-synthesized/EG nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renew Energy, 2014, 71: 658-664.