Quantification of the Atmospheric Corrosion of 304 and 2205 Stainless Steels Using Electrochemical Probes Based on Thevenin Electrochemical Equivalent Circuit Model

Yu Zhu , Yang Song , Likun Xu , Zhenbo Qin , Shizhe Song , Wenbin Hu , Da-Hai Xia

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 218 -227.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3) : 218 -227. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-020-00242-y
Research Article

Quantification of the Atmospheric Corrosion of 304 and 2205 Stainless Steels Using Electrochemical Probes Based on Thevenin Electrochemical Equivalent Circuit Model

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Stainless steel (SS) is one of the most widely used engineering materials in marine engineering. However, its corrosion in the marine atmospheric environment due to the high concentration of Cl is a problem. The SS corrosion is a threat to the development and security of marine industry; therefore, evaluating the corrosion resistance of SSs is necessary. In this work, atmospheric corrosion detection probes based on a symmetrical electrode system were used to study the corrosion behaviors of 304 SS and 2205 duplex stainless steel (DSS) in a simulated marine atmosphere. A theoretical model for electrochemical noise (EN) data analysis based on the Thevenin electrochemical equivalent circuit (EEC) model was established. The relationship between the EN characteristic parameters and the corrosion rate was obtained. The Thevenin EEC model analysis showed that the relationship between the noise resistance (R n), the noise impedance [R sn(f)], and the impedance modulus (|Z(f)|) was $R_{{\text{n}}} \approx R_{{{\text{sn}}}} = {}^{\sqrt 3 }\left| {Z(f)} \right|$. Thus, R n and R sn can be used as indicators for quantitative corrosion evaluation. The results of EN detection for the 304 SS and 2205 DSS showed that in a simulated marine atmospheric environment, the passive films on the two SSs were relatively intact at the initial exposure stage, and their dissolution rates were slow. The corrosion resistance of the 2205 DSS was higher than that of the 304 SS. With the deposition of Cl on the SS surface, pitting was initiated and the dissolution rate increased. The pitting initiation process on the SS surface was random, and part of the active pores could be repassivated.

Keywords

Atmospheric corrosion / Stainless steel / Electrochemical noise / Thevenin electrochemical equivalent circuit / Passive film

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yu Zhu, Yang Song, Likun Xu, Zhenbo Qin, Shizhe Song, Wenbin Hu, Da-Hai Xia. Quantification of the Atmospheric Corrosion of 304 and 2205 Stainless Steels Using Electrochemical Probes Based on Thevenin Electrochemical Equivalent Circuit Model. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2020, 26(3): 218-227 DOI:10.1007/s12209-020-00242-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Pan C, Song Y, Jin W, et al. Enhancing the stability of passive film on 304 SS by chemical modification in alkaline phosphate-molybdate solutions. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2020

[2]

Xia DH, Sun YF, Fan HQ. Characterization of passive film formed on 304 SS in simulated alkaline water chemistries containing sulphur at 300 °C. Trans Tianjin Univ, 2015, 21(6): 554-561.

[3]

Xia DH, Ma C, Song SZ, et al. Assessing atmospheric corrosion of metals by a novel electrochemical sensor combining with a thin insulating net using electrochemical noise technique. Sens Actuators B Chem, 2017, 252: 353-358.

[4]

Xia DH, Song SZ, Behnamian Y. Detection of corrosion degradation using electrochemical noise (EN): review of signal processing methods for identifying corrosion forms. Corros Eng Sci Technol, 2016, 51(7): 527-544.

[5]

Zhang T, Yang YG, Shao YW, et al. Advances of the analysis methodology for electrochemical noise. J Chin Soc Corros Prot, 2014, 34: 1-18 (in Chinese)

[6]

Monrrabal G, Huet F, Bautista A. Electrochemical noise measurements on stainless steel using a gelled electrolyte. Corros Sci, 2019, 148: 48-56.

[7]

Xia D, Song S, Li J, et al. On-line monitoring atmospheric corrosion of metal materials by using a novel corrosion electrochemical sensor. Corros Sci Prot Technol, 2017, 29: 581-585 (in Chinese)

[8]

Ritter S, Huet F, Cottis RA. Guideline for an assessment of electrochemical noise measurement devices. Mater Corros, 2012, 63(4): 297-302.

[9]

Homborg AM, Tinga T, van Westing EPM, et al. A critical appraisal of the interpretation of electrochemical noise for corrosion studies. Corrosion, 2014, 70(10): 971-987.

[10]

Cottis RA, Homborg AM, Mol JMC. The relationship between spectral and wavelet techniques for noise analysis. Electrochim Acta, 2016, 202: 277-287.

[11]

Sarmiento E, Uruchurtu J, González-Rodriguez JG, et al. Electrochemical noise analysis of type 316L stainless steel in a LiBr  + ethylene glycol + H2O solution. Corrosion, 2011, 67(10): 105004

[12]

Xia DH, Ma C, Behnamian Y, et al. Reliability of the estimation of uniform corrosion rate of Q235B steel under simulated marine atmospheric conditions by electrochemical noise (EN) analyses. Measurement, 2019, 148: 106946

[13]

Pujar MG, Parvathavarthini N, Dayal RK, et al. Assessment of intergranular corrosion (IGC) in 316(N) stainless steel using electrochemical noise (EN) technique. Corros Sci, 2009, 51(8): 1707-1713.

[14]

Tang YW, Dai NW, Wu J, et al. Effect of surface roughness on pitting corrosion of 2205 duplex stainless steel investigated by electrochemical noise measurements. Materials, 2019, 12(5): 738

[15]

Bahrami MJ, Shahidi M, Hosseini SMA. Comparison of electrochemical current noise signals arising from symmetrical and asymmetrical electrodes made of Al alloys at different pH values using statistical and wavelet analysis. Part I: neutral and acidic solutions. Electrochim Acta, 2014, 148: 127-144.

[16]

Cottis RA. The significance of electrochemical noise measurements on asymmetric electrodes. Electrochim Acta, 2007, 52(27): 7585-7589.

[17]

Bosch RW, Cottis RA, Csecs K, et al. Reliability of electrochemical noise measurements: results of round-robin testing on electrochemical noise. Electrochim Acta, 2014, 120: 379-389.

[18]

Xia DH, Song SZ. Development of theoretical models regarding with electrochemical noise applied in corrosion rate measurement. CIESC J, 2019, 70: 3880-3891 (in Chinese)

[19]

Xia DH, Song SZ, Qin ZB, et al. Review: electrochemical probes and sensors designed for time-dependent atmospheric corrosion monitoring: fundamentals, progress, and challenges. J Electrochem Soc, 2020, 167(3): 037513

[20]

Huet F, Ngo K. Electrochemical noise: guidance for improving measurements and data analysis. Corrosion, 2019, 75(9): 1065-1073.

[21]

Bertocci U, Huet F, Nogueira RP, et al. Drift removal procedures in the analysis of electrochemical noise. Corrosion, 2002, 58(4): 337-347.

[22]

Xia DH, Behnamian Y. Electrochemical noise: a review of experimental setup, instrumentation and DC removal. Russ J Electrochem, 2015, 51(7): 593-601.

[23]

Cottis RA. Interpretation of electrochemical noise data. Corrosion, 2001, 57(3): 265-285.

[24]

Bertocci U, Gabrielli C, Huet F, et al. Noise resistance applied to corrosion measurements: I. Theoretical analysis. J Electrochem Soc, 1997, 144: 31-37.

[25]

Xia DH, Ma C, Song SZ, et al. Detection of atmospheric corrosion of aluminium alloys by electrochemical probes: theoretical analysis and experimental tests. J Electrochem Soc, 2019, 166(12): B1000-B1009.

[26]

Meng FD, Liu YS, Liu L, et al. Effect of asymmetric epoxy coating/metal electrodes on the electrochemical noise measurements under marine alternating hydrostatic pressure. Coatings, 2019, 9(12): 852

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

138

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/