Macroscopic frost heave model based on segregation potential theory

Abstract

A macroscopic frost heave model with more clear parameters was established. Based on a porosity rate frost heave model and segregation potential theory, a porosity rate function was deduced and introduced into the stress-strain relationship. Numerical simulation was conducted and verified by frost heave tests. Results show that the porosity rate within the frozen fringe is proportional to the square of temperature gradient and current porosity, and is also proportional to the exponential function of applied pressure. The relative errors between the calculated and measured results of frost depth and frost heave are within 3% and 15% respectively, demonstrating that the temperature gradient, applied pressure and current porosity are the main influencing factors, while temperature is just the constraint of frozen fringe. The improved model have meaningful and accessible parameters, which can be used in engineering with good accuracy.

Keywords

frost heave model / porosity rate / segregation potential / frost heave test / temperature gradient

References

[1] Miller R. D. Freezing and heaving of saturated and unsaturated soils[J]. Highway Research Record, 1972, 393 1-11.

[2] Kim K., Zhou W., Huang S. L. Frost heave predictions of buried chilled gas pipelines with the effect of permafrost[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2008, 53(3): 382-396.

[3] Lai Y., Jin L., Chang Xiaoxiao. Yield criterion and elasto-plastic damage constitutive model for frozen sandy soil[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2009, 25(6): 1117-1205.

[4] Chen Xiangsheng. Theory and Practice of Ground Freezing[M]. 2007, Beijing: China Coal Industry Publishing House.

[5] Malekzadeh H., Edwards D. J., Harris F. C. Simulating the ground freezing process: A decision support model[J]. Journal of Construction Research, 2005, 6(1): 107-121.

[6] He P., Cheng G., Zhu Yuanlin. The progress of study on heat and mass transfer in freezing soils[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2001, 23(1): 92-97.

[7] Chen F., Li N., Cheng Guodong. The theoretical frame of multi-phase porous medium for the freezing soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(2): 213-217.

[8] Konrad J. M., Shen M. 2-D frost action modeling using the segregation potential of soils[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 1996, 24(3): 263-278.

[9] Blanchard D, Frémond M. Soil frost heaving and thaw settlement[C]. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Ground Freezing. Sapporo, Japan, 1985. 209–216.

[10] Michalowski R. L. A constitutive model of saturated soils for frost heave simulations[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 1993, 22(1): 47-63.

[11] Michalowski R. L., Zhu M. Frost heave modeling using porosity rate function[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2006, 30(8): 703-722.

[12] Konrad J. M. Frost Heave Mechanics[D]. 1980, Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.

[13] Konrad J. M., Morgenstern N. R. Mechanistic theory of ice lens formation in fine-grained soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1980, 17(4): 473-486.

[14] Konrad J. M., Morgenstem N. R. Effects of applied pressure on freezing soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1982, 19(4): 494-505.

[15] Tice A. R., Anderson D. M., Sterrett K. F. Unfrozen water contents of submarine permafrost determined by nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Engineering Geology, 1981, 18(1–4): 135-146.

[16] Tice A. R., Black P. B., Berg R. L. Unfrozen water contents of undisturbed and remolded Alaskan silt[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 1989, 17 103-111.

[17] Stahli M., Stadler D. Measurement of water and solute dynamics in freezing soil columns with time domain reflectometry[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1997, 195(1–4): 352-369.

[18] Konrad J. M. Estimation of the segregation potential of fine-grained soils using the frost heave response of reference soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(1): 38-50.