Effects of boundary conditions on the design of anti-ram bollards

Abstract

Anti-ram bollards used in perimeter protection are tested to meet performance requirements of established standards such as the US Department of State Specification SD-STD-02.01. Under these standards, tests are conducted in prescribed conditions that should be representative of the service installation. In actual project, conditions encountered on site may vary from the test environment and it would be expensive and time consuming to validate each deviation with a physical test. High-fidelity physics-based (HFPB) finite element modeling can provide precise simulations of the behavior of anti-ram bollards. This paper presents the use of HFPB finite element modeling, using LS-DYNA, in an actual project to evaluate the performance of an anti-ram bollard design subjected to various boundary conditions representing the physical conditions encountered on site. The study shows that boundary conditions can have a significant influence on the performance of the anti-ram bollards. This suggests that anti-ram bollards must be designed and engineered according to actual conditions that are found on site. It also shows that HFPB modeling can be an effective tool that supplements physical testing of anti-ram bollards.

Keywords

anti-ram bollards / perimeter protection / high-fidelity physics-based modeling / LS-DYNA / boundary conditions

References

[1] Crawford J E, Bogo Sian D D. Design Procedures, Data and Concepts for Airblast Barriers [R]. Karagozian & Case, Glendale, CA, TR-98-21.1, September 1998.

[2] Crawford J E, Magallanes J M, Lan S. Study of the Application of Corrugated Metal Products for Mitigating Blast Effects and Providing Anti-Ram and Ballistic Protection [R]. Karagozian & Case, Burbank, CA, TR-04-37.1, October 2004.

[3] ASTM F 2656-07. Standard Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers [S]. August 2007.

[4] US Department of State. Test Method for Vehicle Crash Testing of Perimeter Barriers and Gates [S]. SD-STD-02.01, Revision A, January 2003.

[5] BSI. Guidance for the Selection, Installation and Use of Vehicle Security Barriers [S]. PAS 69: 2006, December 2006.

[6] BSI. Specification for Vehicle Security Barriers [S]. PAS 68:2007, January 2007.

[7] LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Version 970 [M]. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, April 2003.