FRP retrofitted RC slabs using finite difference model

Chengqing Wu , Deric John Oehlers , Andrew Whittaker

Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2008, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 344 -347.

PDF
Transactions of Tianjin University ›› 2008, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 344 -347. DOI: 10.1007/s12209-008-0058-y
Article

FRP retrofitted RC slabs using finite difference model

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Current guidelines recommend using single-degree-of-freedom(SDOF) method for dynamic analysis of reinforced concretec (RC) structures against blast loads, which is not suitable for retrofitted members. Thus, a finite difference procedure developed in another study was used to accurately and efficiently analyze the dynamic response of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) plated members under blast loads. It can accommodate changes in the mechanical properties of a member’s cross section along its length and through its depth in each time step, making it possible to directly incorporate both strain rate effects (which will vary along the length and depth of a member) and non-uniform member loading to solve the partial differential equation of motion. The accuracy of the proposed method was validated in part using data from field blast testing. The finite difference procedure is implemented easily and enables accurate predictions of FRP-platedmember response.

Keywords

finite difference analysis / blast loads / retrofit / slab

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chengqing Wu, Deric John Oehlers, Andrew Whittaker. FRP retrofitted RC slabs using finite difference model. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2008, 14(5): 344-347 DOI:10.1007/s12209-008-0058-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Davidson J. S., Fisher J. W., Hammons M. I., et al. Failure mechanisms of polymer-reinforced concrete masonry walls subjected to blast[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 2005, 131(8): 1194-1205.

[2]

Department of Defence Structures to Resist the Effect of Accidental Explosions[M]. 1990, Washington DC: US Department of the Army, Navy and Air Force Technical Manual(TM-5-1300).

[3]

American Society of Civil Engineers Blast Standard[M]. 2007, Washington DC: Ballot Version 1.

[4]

Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). LS-DYNA, Version 970 Manual [M]. Livermore, CA, USA, 2003.

[5]

Century Dynamics. AUTODYN. Theory Manual [M]. 2003.

[6]

Krauthammer T., Assadi-Lamouki A., Shanaa Analysis of impulsively loaded reinforced concrete structural elements(I): Theory[J]. Computers and Structures, 1993, 48(5): 851-860.

[7]

Krauthammer T., Assadi-Lamouki A., Shanaa Analysis of impulsively loaded reinforced concrete structural elements (II): Implementation[J]. Computers and Structures, 1993, 48(5): 861-871.

[8]

Jones J, Wu C, Oehlers D J et al. Finite difference analysis of RC panels for blast effects [J]. Submitted to Engineering Structures.

[9]

Weaver W., Timoshenko S. P.. Vibration Problems in Engineering[M]. 1990 5 New York: Wiley.

[10]

Malvar L J, Crawford J E. Dynamic Increase Factors for Concrete [C]. In: 28th DDESB Seminar. Orlando, USA, 1998.

[11]

Malvar L J, Crawford J E. Dynamic increase factors for steel reinforcing bars [C]. In: 28th DDESB Seminar. Orlando, USA, 1998.

[12]

Wu C, Oehlers D J, Rebentrost M et al. Blast testing of ultra-high performance fibre and FRP-retrofitted concrete slabs [J]. Submitted to Engineering Structures.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

106

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/