RESEARCH ARTICLE

Robust cooperation of connected vehicle systems with eigenvalue-bounded interaction topologies in the presence of uncertain dynamics

  • Keqiang LI 1 ,
  • Feng GAO , 2 ,
  • Shengbo Eben LI , 1 ,
  • Yang ZHENG 3 ,
  • Hongbo GAO 1
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Department of Automotive Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2. School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • 3. Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13PJ, UK

Received date: 07 May 2017

Accepted date: 28 Aug 2017

Published date: 11 Jun 2018

Copyright

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

Abstract

This study presents a distributed H-infinity control method for uncertain platoons with dimensionally and structurally unknown interaction topologies provided that the associated topological eigenvalues are bounded by a predesigned range. With an inverse model to compensate for nonlinear powertrain dynamics, vehicles in a platoon are modeled by third-order uncertain systems with bounded disturbances. On the basis of the eigenvalue decomposition of topological matrices, we convert the platoon system to a norm-bounded uncertain part and a diagonally structured certain part by applying linear transformation. We then use a common Lyapunov method to design a distributed H-infinity controller. Numerically, two linear matrix inequalities corresponding to the minimum and maximum eigenvalues should be solved. The resulting controller can tolerate interaction topologies with eigenvalues located in a certain range. The proposed method can also ensure robustness performance and disturbance attenuation ability for the closed-loop platoon system. Hardware-in-the-loop tests are performed to validate the effectiveness of our method.

Cite this article

Keqiang LI , Feng GAO , Shengbo Eben LI , Yang ZHENG , Hongbo GAO . Robust cooperation of connected vehicle systems with eigenvalue-bounded interaction topologies in the presence of uncertain dynamics[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2018 , 13(3) : 354 -367 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-018-0486-x

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the NSF China (Grant Nos. 51575293 and 51622504), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0100906), International Sci&Tech Cooperation Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0102200), and the Open Fund of State Key Lab of Automotive Safety and Energy (Grant No. KF16192). Special gratitude is extended to Prof. R. Rajamani of the University of Minnesota and Prof. G. Orosz of the University of Michigan for their invaluable comments and suggestions.
1
Zhang J, Wang F, Wang K, . Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(4): 1624–1639

DOI

2
Luettel T, Himmelsbach M, Wuensche J. Autonomous ground vehicles—Concepts and a path to the future. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(Special Centennial Issue): 1831–1839

DOI

3
Caveney D. Cooperative vehicular safety applications. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2010, 30(4): 38–53

DOI

4
Shladover S, Desoer C, Hedrick J, . Automated vehicle control developments in the PATH program. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 1991, 40(1): 114–130

DOI

5
Rajamani R, Tan H, Law B, . Demonstration of integrated lateral and longitudinal control for the operation of automated vehicles in platoons. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2000, 8(4): 695–708

DOI

6
Swaroop D, Hedrick J K, Chien C C, . A comparison of spacing and headway control laws for automatically controlled vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1994, 23(8): 597–625

DOI

7
Zhou J, Peng H. Range policy of adaptive cruise control vehicle for improved flow stability and string stability. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, 6(2): 229–237

DOI

8
Swaroop D, Hedrick J. Constant spacing strategies for platooning in automated highway systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 1999, 121(3): 462–470

DOI

9
Fax A, Murray R. Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2004, 49: 1465–1476

DOI

10
Yadlapalli S K, Darbha S, Rajagopal K R. Information flow and its relation to stability of the motion of vehicles in a rigid formation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference. Portland: IEEE, 2006, 1315–1319

DOI

11
Zheng Y, Li S, Wang J, . Influence of information flow topology on closed-loop stability of vehicle platoon with rigid formation. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation System. Qingdao: IEEE, 2014, 2094–2100

DOI

12
Xiao L, Cao F. Practical string stability of platoon of adaptive cruise control vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2011, 12(4): 1184–1194

DOI

13
Teo R, Stipanovic D, Tomlin C. Decentralized spacing control of a string of multiple vehicles over lossy data links. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2010, 18(2): 469–473

DOI

14
Shaw E, Hedrick J. String stability analysis for heterogeneous vehicle strings. In: Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference. New York: IEEE, 2007, 3118–3125

DOI

15
Zheng Y, Li S E, Li K, Distributed model predictive control for heterogeneous vehicle platoons under unidirectional topologies. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2017, 25(3): 899–910

DOI

16
Liang C, Peng H. Optimal adaptive cruise control with guaranteed string stability. Vehicle System Dynamics, 1999, 32(4–5): 313–330

17
Stankovic S, Stanojevic M, Siljak D. Decentralized overlapping control of a platoon of vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2000, 8(5): 816–831

DOI

18
Dunbar W, Caveney D. Distributed receding horizon control of vehicle platoons: Stability and string stability. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(3): 620–633

DOI

19
Zheng Y, Li S E, Li K, . Stability margin improvement of vehicular platoon considering undirected topology and asymmetric control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2016, 24(4): 1253–1265

DOI

20
Kianfar R, Augusto B, Ebadighajari A, . Design and experimental validation of a cooperative driving system in the grand cooperative driving challenge. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(3): 994–1007

DOI

21
Chan E, Gilhead P, Jelinek P, . Cooperative control of SARTRE automated platoon vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress. Vienna, 2012, 1–9

22
Tsugawa S, Kato S, Aoki K. An automated truck platoon for energy saving. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Francisco: IEEE, 2011, 32(14): 4109–4114

DOI

23
Zheng Y, Li S, Wang J, . Stability and scalability of homogeneous vehicular platoon: Study on the influence of information flow topologies. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(1): 14–26

DOI

24
Willke T, Tientrakool P, Maxemchuk N F. A survey of inter-vehicle communication protocols and their applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2009, 11(2): 3–20

DOI

25
Ploeg J, Serrarens A, Heijenk G. Connect & drive: Design and evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control for congestion reduction. Journal of Modern Transportation, 2011, 19(3): 207–213

26
Guo G, Yue W. Autonomous platoon control allowing range-limited sensors. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2012, 61(7): 2901–2912

DOI

27
Herman I, Martinec D, Hurak Z, . Nonzero bound on Fiedler eigenvalue causes exponential growth of H-infinity norm of vehicular platoon. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2015, 60(8): 2248–2253

DOI

28
Naus G J L, Vugts R P A, Ploeg J, . String-stable CACC design and experimental validation: A frequency-domain approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2010, 59(9): 4268–4279

DOI

29
Gao F, Li K. Hierarchical switching control of longitudinal acceleration with large uncertainties. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2007, 8(3): 351–359

30
Li S, Gao F, Cao D, Multiple model switching control of vehicle longitudinal dynamics for platoon level automation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016, 65(6): 4480–4492

DOI

31
Hu G. Robust consensus tracking of a class of second-order multi-agent dynamic systems. Systems & Control Letters, 2012, 61(1): 134–142

DOI

32
Han D, Chesi G, Hung Y. Robust consensus for a class of uncertain multi-agent dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2013, 9(1): 306–312

DOI

33
Huang W, Zeng J, Sun H. Robust consensus for linear multi-agent systems with mixed uncertainties. Systems & Control Letters, 2015, 76: 56–65

DOI

34
Gao F, Li S, Zheng Y, Robust control of heterogeneous vehicular platoon with uncertain dynamics and communication delay. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2016, 10(7): 503–513

DOI

35
Gao F, Dang D, Huang S, Li S. Decoupled robust control of vehicular platoon with identical controller and rigid information flow. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2017, 18(1): 157–164

36
Ren W, Beard R. Consensus seeking in multi-agent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005, 50(5): 655–661

DOI

37
Godsil C, Royle G F. Algebraic Graph Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

38
Zheng Y, Li S E, Li K, Platooning of connected vehicles with undirected topologies: robustness analysis and distributed H-infinity controller synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, PP(99): 1–12

39
Zhang L, Orosz G. Motif-based design for connected vehicle systems in presence of heterogeneous connectivity structures and time delays. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(6): 1638–1651

DOI

40
Gao F, Li S, Kum D, Synthesis of multiple model switching controllers using H-inf theory for systems with large uncertainties. Neurocomputing, 2015, 157: 118–124

DOI

41
Gao F, Dang D, Li S, Control of large model mismatch system using multiple models. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, 2017, 15(4): 1494–1506

DOI

Outlines

/