Challenges in characterization of nanoplastics in the environment

Abstract

Plastic pollution has been a legacy environment problems and more recently, the plastic particles, especially those ultrafine or small plastics particles, are widely recognized with increasing environmental and ecological impacts. Among small plastics, microplastics are intensively studied, whereas the physicochemical properties, environmental abundance, chemical states, bioavailability and toxicity toward organisms of nanoplastics are inadequately investigated. There are substantial difficulties in separation, visualization and chemical identification of nanoplastics due to their small sizes, relatively low concentrations and interferences from co-existing substances (e.g., dyes or natural organic matters). Moreover, detection of polymers at nanoscale is largely hampered by the detection limit or sensitivity for existing spectral techniques such as Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) or Raman Spectroscopy. This article critically examined the current state of art techniques that are exclusively reported for nanoplastic characterization in environmental samples. Based on their operation principles, potential applications and limitations of these analytical techniques are carefully analyzed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Nanoplastics / Microplastics / Plastic characterization / Particle separation

References

[1] Bianco A, Passananti M (2020). Atmospheric micro and nanoplastics: An enormous microscopic problem. Sustainability, 12(18): 7327

[2] Correia M, Loeschner K (2018). Detection of nanoplastics in food by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering: possibilities, challenges and analytical limitations. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 410(22): 5603–5615

[3] Fu W, Zhang W (2017). Hybrid AFM for nanoscale physicochemical characterization: Recent development and emerging applications. Small, 13(11): 1603525

[4] Hurley R R, Lusher A L, Olsen M, Nizzetto L (2018). Validation of a method for extracting microplastics from complex, organic-rich, environmental matrices. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(13): 7409–7417

[5] Jiménez-Lamana J, Marigliano L, Allouche J, Grassl B, Szpunar J, Reynaud S (2020). A novel strategy for the detection and quantification of nanoplastics by single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Analytical Chemistry, 92(17): 11664–11672

[6] Lambert S, Wagner M (2016). Characterisation of nanoplastics during the degradation of polystyrene. Chemosphere, 145: 265–268

[7] Materić D, Ludewig E, Brunner D, Röckmann T, Holzinger R (2021). Nanoplastics transport to the remote, high-altitude Alps. Environmental Pollution, 288: 117697

[8] Materić D A, Kasper-Giebl A, Kau D, Anten M, Greilinger M, Ludewig E, Van Sebille E, Röckmann T, Holzinger R (2020). Micro-and nanoplastics in Alpine Snow: A new method for chemical identification and (semi) quantification in the nanogram range. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(4): 2353–2359

[9] Merzel R L, Purser L, Soucy T L, Olszewski M, Colón‐Bernal I, Duhaime M, Elgin A K, Banaszak Holl M M (2020). Uptake and retention of nanoplastics in quagga mussels. Global Challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 4(6): 1800104

[10] Nigamatzyanova L, Fakhrullin R (2021). Dark-field hyperspectral microscopy for label-free microplastics and nanoplastics detection and identification in vivo: A Caenorhabditis elegans study. Environmental Pollution, 271: 116337

[11] Pirok B W J, Abdulhussain N, Aalbers T, Wouters B, Peters R A H, Schoenmakers P J (2017). Nanoparticle analysis by online comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography combining hydrodynamic chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography with intermediate sample transformation. Analytical Chemistry, 89(17): 9167–9174

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press