The road to sustainable use and waste management of plastics in Portugal
Joana C. Prata, Ana L. Patrício Silva, Armando C. Duarte, Teresa Rocha-Santos
The road to sustainable use and waste management of plastics in Portugal
• Portugal recycles 34% of the 40 kg/hab year of plastic packaging waste.
• Recycling of plastics in Portugal produces a final revenue of 167 €/t.
• Recycling and recovery must be the priority for imported wastes.
• Beach litter must be reduced from 330 to 20 items/100 m (94%) under EU goals.
• Consumption, use, and waste management of plastics need to improve.
As a European Union (EU) member, Portugal must comply with reductions in plastic waste. In Portugal, the 330 items/100 m of beach litter, comprising up to 3.9 million pieces and of which 88% is plastic, is higher than the EU median (149 items/100 m) and must be reduced to 20 items/100 m (94%). Integrative measures are needed to reduce littering and improve plastics’ use and disposal under the circular economy. Of this 414 kt of plastic packaging waste, 163 kt were declared plastic packaging, 140 kt subjected to recycling, and 94 kt to energy recovery. The current recycling rate of plastic packaging (34%) should be improved to reach EU recycling averages (42%) and goals and to provide widespread benefits, considering revenues of 167 €/t. As a net importer of waste, Portugal could benefit from the valorization of imported waste. Besides increased recycling, pyrolysis and gasification could provide short-term alternatives for producing value-added substances from plastic waste, such as hydrogen, consistent with the National Plan of Hydrogen and improving ongoing regulations on single-use plastics. This manuscript provides an integrative view of plastics in Portugal, from use to disposal, providing specific recommendations under the circular economy.
Single-use plastics / Plastic packaging / Plastic waste / Waste management / Waste shipment / Lightweight plastic bags
[1] |
Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente (2019a). Transfrontier Movement of Wastes: Reports. Lisbon: Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente
|
[2] |
Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente (2019b). Urban Waste Management: Production. Lisbon: Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente
|
[3] |
Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente (2020). Packaging and Packaging Waste. Lisbon: Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente
|
[4] |
Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente (2021a). Value of TGR. Lisbon: Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente
|
[5] |
Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente (2021b). Beach Litter Monitoring Program. Lisbon: Agencia Portuguesa do Ambiente
|
[6] |
Andrady A L (2017). The plastic in microplastics: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 119(1): 12–22
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Andrady A L, Neal M A (2009). Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1526): 1977–1984
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Assembleia da Republica (2014). Law n. 82-D/2014. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[9] |
Assembleia da Republica (2017). Decree-Law n. 152-D/2017. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[10] |
Assembleia da Republica (2018). Lei n. 69/2018. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[11] |
Assembleia da Republica (2019a). Law n. 76/2019. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[12] |
Assembleia da Republica (2019b). Law n. 77/2019. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[13] |
Assembleia da Republica (2019c). Law n. 88/2019. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[14] |
Assembleia da Republica (2020). Minister Coucil Resolution n. 63/2020. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[15] |
Assembleia da Republica (2021a). Decree-Law n. 22-A/2021. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[16] |
Assembleia da Republica (2021b). Proposed Law n. 61/XIV/2- State Budget for 2021. Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica
|
[17] |
Associação da Hotelaria, Restauração e Similares de Portugal (2019). Less Plastic, More Environment. Lisbon: Associação da Hotelaria, Restauração e Similares de Portugal
|
[18] |
Baytekin B, Baytekin H T, Grzybowski B A (2013). Retrieving and converting energy from polymers: deployable technologies and emerging concepts. Energy & Environmental Science, 6(12): 3467–3482
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Boz Z, Korhonen V, Koelsch Sand C (2020). Consumer considerations for the implementation of sustainable packaging: A review. Sustainability, 12(6): 2192
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Chang M (2015). Reducing microplastics from facial exfoliating cleansers in wastewater through treatment versus consumer product decisions. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 101(1): 330–333
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Cimpan C, Maul A, Jansen M, Pretz T, Wenzel H (2015). Central sorting and recovery of MSW recyclable materials: A review of technological state-of-the-art, cases, practice and implications for materials recycling. Journal of Environmental Management, 156: 181–199
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Comtrade U N (2021). UN Comtrade Database. New York: UN Comtrade
|
[23] |
Consumers International (2021). “Can I Recycle This?” A Global Mapping and Assessment of Standards, Labels and Claims on Plastic Packaging. London: Consumers International
|
[24] |
Continente (2021). What Continente did in 2020? Lisbon: Continente
|
[25] |
da Cruz N F, Simões P, Marques R C (2012). Economic cost recovery in the recycling of packaging waste: the case of Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37: 8–18
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Eriksen M, Thiel M, Prindiville M, Kiessling T (2018). Microplastics: What are the Solutions? In: Wagner M, Lambert S, ed. Freshwater Microplastics. Cham: Springer, 273–298
|
[27] |
Euroactiv (2020). Portugal Suspends Foreign Trash Imports to Cope With Own Waste Surge. Brussels: Euractiv
|
[28] |
European Chemical Agency (2018). Plastic Additives Initiative. Helsinki: European Chemical Agency
|
[29] |
European Commission (2015). Packaging Waste. Brussels: European Commission
|
[30] |
European Commission (2018). Waste Framework Directive. Brussels: European Commission
|
[31] |
European Commission (2020a). A European Threshold Value and Assessment Method for Macro Litter on Coastlines. Brussels: European Commission
|
[32] |
European Commission (2020b). Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 14 December 2020 on the System of Own Resources of the European Union and Repealing Decision 2014/335/EU. Brussels: European Commission
|
[33] |
European Commission (2020c). The Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Brussels: European Commission
|
[34] |
European Commission (2021). Plastic Waste Shipments. Brussels: European Commission
|
[35] |
European Environmental Agency (2019). Resource Efficiency and the Circular Economy in Europe 2019–Even More From Less. København: European Environmental Agency
|
[36] |
European Parliament (1994). Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on Packaging and Packaging Waste. Brussels: European Parliament
|
[37] |
European Parliament (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on Shipments of Waste Brussels, European Commission. Brussels: European Parliament
|
[38] |
European Parliament (2015). Directive (EU) 2015/720 of The European Parliament of the Council of 29 April 2015 amending Directive 94/62/EC as Regards Reducing the Consumption of Lightweight Plastic Carrier Bags. Brussels: European Parliament
|
[39] |
European Parliament (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. Brussels: European Parliament
|
[40] |
Eurostat (2021a). European Statistics Database: Waste Generation and Waste Treatment. Luxembourg: Eurostat
|
[41] |
Eurostat (2021b). Eurostat Database: GNI. Luxembourg: Eurostat
|
[42] |
EY (2020). Belgium implements EU plastics tax measures. Machelen: EY
|
[43] |
Fernández-Braña Á, Feijoo-Costa G, Dias-Ferreira C (2019). Looking beyond the banning of lightweight bags: analysing the role of plastic (and fuel) impacts in waste collection at a Portuguese city. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(35): 35629–35647
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Ferrão P, Ribeiro P, Rodrigues J, Marques A, Preto M, Amaral M, Domingos T, Lopes A, Costa I (2014). Environmental, economic and social costs and benefits of a packaging waste management system: A Portuguese case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 85: 67–78
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Ferreira S, Cabral M, da Cruz N F, Marques R C (2014). Economic and environmental impacts of the recycling system in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79: 219–230
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Ferreira S, Cabral M, da Cruz N F, Simões P, Marques R C (2017). The costs and benefits of packaging waste management systems in Europe: the perspective of local authorities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(5): 773–791
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Finisterra do Paço A M, Raposo M L B (2010). Green consumer market segmentation: empirical findings from Portugal. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4): 429–436
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Gaspar M C, Mendes C V T, Pinela S R, Moreira R, Carvalho M G V S, Quina M J, Braga M E M, Portugal T (2019). Assessment of agroforestry residues: their potential within the biorefinery context. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 7(20): 17154–17165
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Gellynck X, Jacobsen R, Verhelst P (2011). Identifying the key factors in increasing recycling and reducing residual household waste: a case study of the Flemish region of Belgium. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10): 2683–2690
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Gundupalli S P, Hait S, Thakur A (2017). A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 60: 56–74
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Herva M, Neto B, Roca E (2014). Environmental assessment of the integrated municipal solid waste management system in Porto (Portugal). Journal of Cleaner Production, 70: 183–193
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Instituto Nacional de Estatistica (2018). Demographic Statistics 2017. Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Estatistica
|
[53] |
Jambeck J R, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler T R, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law K L (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223): 768–771
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Jornal de Noticias (2021). Brands Advance on Mandatory Reduction of Plastics. Lisbon: Jornal de Noticias
|
[55] |
Kasidoni M, Moustakas K, Malamis D (2015). The existing situation and challenges regarding the use of plastic carrier bags in Europe. Waste Management & Research, 33(5): 419–428
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Krelling A P, Williams A T, Turra A (2017). Differences in perception and reaction of tourist groups to beach marine debris that can influence a loss of tourism revenue in coastal areas. Marine Policy, 85: 87–99
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Litterati (2021). Litterati Open Data. Madrid: Litterati
|
[58] |
Lopez G, Artetxe M, Amutio M, Alvarez J, Bilbao J, Olazar M (2018). Recent advances in the gasification of waste plastics. A critical overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82: 576–596
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Luís S, Roseta-Palma C, Matos M, Lima M L, Sousa C (2020). Psychosocial and economic impacts of a charge in lightweight plastic carrier bags in Portugal: Keep calm and carry on? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161: 104962
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Lusagua (2021). SMART+ Waste is the New Sustainable Project of Lusagua. Lisbon: Lusagua
|
[61] |
Magrinho A, Didelet F, Semiao V (2006). Municipal solid waste disposal in Portugal. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 26(12): 1477–1489
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[62] |
Marques R C, da Cruz N F, Carvalho P (2012). Assessing and exploring (in)efficiency in Portuguese recycling systems using non-parametric methods. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 67: 34–43
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
Martinez G, Costas S, Ferreira Ó (2020). The role of culture for coastal disaster risk reduction measures: Empirical evidence from northern and southern Europe. Advances in Climate Change Research, 11(4): 297–309
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
Martins J, Sobral P (2011). Plastic marine debris on the Portuguese coastline: a matter of size? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(12): 2649–2653
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[65] |
Minelgaitė A, Liobikienė G (2019). The problem of not waste sorting behaviour, comparison of waste sorters and non-sorters in European Union: Cross-cultural analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 672: 174–182
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[66] |
Oosterhuis F, Papyrakis E, Boteler B (2014). Economic instruments and marine litter control. Ocean and Coastal Management, 102: 47–54
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[67] |
OSPAR (2007). Monitoring of marine litter in the OSPAR region. London, UK: OSPAR
|
[68] |
Pacto Portugues para os Plasticos (2021). Portuguese Pact for Plastics. Lisbon: Pacto Portugues para os Plasticos
|
[69] |
Patrício Silva A L (2021). Future-proofing plastic waste management for a circular Bio-economy. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 22: 100263
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[70] |
Plastics Europe (2019). Plastics- the Facts 2019. Brussels: Plastics Europe
|
[71] |
Pires A, Sargedas J, Miguel M, Pina J, Martinho G (2017). A case study of packaging waste collection systems in Portugal- Part II: Environmental and economic analysis. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 61: 108–116
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[72] |
Prabha S P, Nagappan S, Rathna R, Viveka R, Nakkeeran E (2020). Blue biotechnology: a vision for future marine biorefineries. In: Kumar R P, Dnansounou E, Raman J K, Baskar G, eds. Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts. London, UK: Elsevier, 463–480
|
[73] |
Prata J C, da Costa J P, Lopes I, Andrady A L, Duarte A C, Rocha-Santos T (2021). A One Health perspective of the impacts of microplastics on animal, human and environmental health. Science of the Total Environment, 777: 146094
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[74] |
Prata J C, da Costa J P, Lopes I, Duarte A C, Rocha-Santos T (2020a). Environmental status of (micro)plastics contamination in Portugal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 200: 110753
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[75] |
Prata J C, Reis V, Paço A, Martins P, Cruz A, da Costa J P, Duarte A C, Rocha-Santos T (2020b). Effects of spatial and seasonal factors on the characteristics and carbonyl index of (micro)plastics in a sandy beach in Aveiro, Portugal. Science of the Total Environment, 709: 135892
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[76] |
Prata J C, Silva A L P, da Costa J P, Mouneyrac C, Walker T R, Duarte A C, Rocha-Santos T (2019). Solutions and Integrated Strategies for the Control and Mitigation of Plastic and Microplastic Pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13): 2411
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[77] |
Quaghebeur M, Laenen B, Geysen D, Nielsen P, Pontikes Y, Van Gerven T, Spooren J (2013). Characterization of landfilled materials: screening of the enhanced landfill mining potential. Journal of Cleaner Production, 55: 72–83
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[78] |
Ramos A, Afonso Teixeira C, Rouboa A (2018). Environmental analysis of waste-to-energy—a Portuguese case study. Energies, 11(3): 548
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[79] |
Rochman C M, Browne M A, Halpern B S, Hentschel B T, Hoh E, Karapanagioti H K, Rios-Mendoza L M, Takada H, Teh S, Thompson R C (2013). Policy: Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature, 494(7436): 169–171
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[80] |
Rodríguez Y, Ressurreição A, Pham C K (2020). Socio-economic impacts of marine litter for remote oceanic islands: The case of the Azores. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160: 111631
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[81] |
Sharuddin S D A, Abnisa F, Wan Daud W M A, Aroua M K (2016). A review on pyrolysis of plastic wastes. Energy Conversion and Management, 115: 308–326
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[82] |
Sociedade Ponto Verde (2012). Commercials which changed minds. Lisbon: Sociedade Ponto Verde
|
[83] |
Sociedade Ponto Verde (2019). Relatório de Atividades da Sociedade Ponto Verde 2019 [Green Dot Society Report 2019]. Lisbon: Sociedade Ponto Verde
|
[84] |
Statistica (2019). Top-15 countries of the European Union for imports of plastic waste from other EU members in 2018. Hamburg: Statistica
|
[85] |
Tallentire C W, Steubing B (2020). The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 103: 426–436
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[86] |
Villarrubia-Gómez P, Cornell S E, Fabres J (2018). Marine plastic pollution as a planetary boundary threat: The drifting piece in the sustainability puzzle. Marine Policy, 96: 213–220
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[87] |
Vora N, Christensen P R, Demarteau J, Baral N R, Keasling J D, Helms B A, Scown C D (2021). Leveling the cost and carbon footprint of circular polymers that are chemically recycled to monomer. Science Advances, 7(15): eabf0187
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[88] |
Willis K, Maureaud C, Wilcox C, Hardesty B D (2018). How successful are waste abatement campaigns and government policies at reducing plastic waste into the marine environment? Marine Policy, 96: 243–249
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[89] |
Xanthos D, Walker T R (2017). International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 118(1–2): 17–26
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[90] |
Xevgenos D, Papadaskalopoulou C, Panaretou V, Moustakas K, Malamis D (2015). Success stories for recycling of MSW at municipal level: A review. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 6(5): 657–684
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[91] |
Zhuo C, Levendis Y A (2014). Upcycling waste plastics into carbon nanomaterials: A review. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 131: 39931–39931
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[92] |
Zielinski S, Botero C M, Yanes A (2019). To clean or not to clean? A critical review of beach cleaning methods and impacts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 139: 390–401
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |